Questions tagged [fake-proofs]

Seemingly flawless arguments are often presented to prove obvious fallacies (such as 0=1). This is the appropriate tag to use when asking "Where is the proof wrong?" about proofs of such obvious fallacies.

An example of a fake proof is $$1=\sqrt{-1\cdot-1}=\sqrt{-1}\sqrt{-1}=i^2=-1$$ which fails because $\sqrt{xy}=\sqrt x\sqrt y$ does not hold if $x$ or $y$ is negative. Sometimes the proof may be presented as a puzzle, the challenge being to identify the flaw.

For asking about identifying flaws in general proofs ("spot the mistake"); the tag should instead be used.

1112 questions
842
votes
23 answers

The staircase paradox, or why $\pi\ne4$

What is wrong with this proof? Is $\pi=4?$
Pratik Deoghare
  • 12,837
  • 6
  • 29
  • 44
293
votes
28 answers

In the history of mathematics, has there ever been a mistake?

I was just wondering whether or not there have been mistakes in mathematics. Not a conjecture that ended up being false, but a theorem which had a proof that was accepted for a nontrivial amount of time before someone found a hole in the argument.…
Steven-Owen
  • 5,296
  • 7
  • 26
  • 55
237
votes
27 answers

Best Fake Proofs? (A M.SE April Fools Day collection)

In honor of April Fools Day $2013$, I'd like this question to collect the best, most convincing fake proofs of impossibilities you have seen. I've posted one as an answer below. I'm also thinking of a geometric one where the "trick" is that it's…
Potato
  • 37,797
  • 15
  • 117
  • 251
181
votes
14 answers

Why $\sqrt{-1 \cdot {-1}} \neq \sqrt{-1}^2$?

I know there must be something unmathematical in the following but I don't know where it is: \begin{align} \sqrt{-1} &= i \\\\\ \frac1{\sqrt{-1}} &= \frac1i \\\\ \frac{\sqrt1}{\sqrt{-1}} &= \frac1i \\\\ \sqrt{\frac1{-1}} &= \frac1i \\\\…
Wilhelm
  • 2,013
  • 2
  • 14
  • 8
135
votes
25 answers

Visually deceptive "proofs" which are mathematically wrong

Related: Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain Beside the wonderful examples above, there should also be counterexamples, where visually intuitive demonstrations are actually wrong. (e.g. missing square puzzle) Do you know the…
puzzlet
  • 703
  • 2
  • 8
  • 12
95
votes
15 answers

math fallacy problem: $-1= (-1)^3 = (-1)^{6/2} = \sqrt{(-1)^6}= 1$?

I know there is something wrong with this but I don't know where. It's some kind of a math fallacy and it is driving me crazy. Here it is: $$-1= (-1)^3 = (-1)^{6/2} = \sqrt{(-1)^6}= 1?$$
89
votes
7 answers

$1=2$ | Continued fraction fallacy

It's easy to check that for any natural $n$ $$\frac{n+1}{n}=\cfrac{1}{2-\cfrac{n+2}{n+1}}.$$ Now,…
Mher
  • 4,911
  • 1
  • 18
  • 35
77
votes
11 answers

Fake induction proofs

Question: Can you provide an example of a claim where the base case holds but there is a subtle flaw in the inductive step that leads to a fake proof of a clearly erroneous result? [Note: Please do not answer with the very common all horses are the…
73
votes
6 answers

$\infty = -1 $ paradox

I puzzled two high school Pre-calc math teachers today with a little proof (maybe not) I found a couple years ago that infinity is equal to -1: Let x equal the geometric series: $1 + 2 + 4 + 8 + 16 \ldots$ $x = 1 + 2 + 4 + 8 + 16 \ldots$ Multiply…
73
votes
8 answers

How come $32.5 = 31.5$? (The "Missing Square" puzzle.)

Below is a visual proof (!) that $32.5 = 31.5$. How could that be? (As noted in a comment and answer, this is known as the "Missing Square" puzzle.)
Mehper C. Palavuzlar
  • 2,026
  • 4
  • 23
  • 21
68
votes
15 answers

How to convince a layperson that the $\pi = 4$ proof is wrong?

The infamous "$\pi = 4$" proof was already discussed here: Is value of $\pi = 4$? And I have read all the answers, yet I think that they will not be of much help to me if I try to explain this thing to a non mathematician. The main missing point, in…
Gadi A
  • 18,225
  • 6
  • 73
  • 116
68
votes
10 answers

Where is the flaw in this "proof" that 1=2? (Derivative of repeated addition)

Consider the following: $1 = 1^2$ $2 + 2 = 2^2$ $3 + 3 + 3 = 3^2$ Therefore, $\underbrace{x + x + x + \ldots + x}_{x \textrm{ times}}= x^2$ Take the derivative of lhs and rhs and we get: $\underbrace{1 + 1 + 1 + \ldots + 1}_{x \textrm{ times}}…
user116
61
votes
9 answers

What's wrong with this reasoning that $\frac{\infty}{\infty}=0$?

$$\frac{n}{\infty} + \frac{n}{\infty} +\dots = \frac{\infty}{\infty}$$ You can always break up $\infty/\infty$ into the left hand side, where n is an arbitrary number. However, on the left hand side $\frac{n}{\infty}$ is always equal to $0$. Thus…
JobHunter69
  • 3,114
  • 20
  • 57
56
votes
5 answers

Doesn't the unprovability of the continuum hypothesis prove the continuum hypothesis?

The Continuum Hypothesis say that there is no set with cardinality between that of the reals and the natural numbers. Apparently, the Continuum Hypothesis can't be proved or disproved using the standard axioms of set theory. In order to disprove…
RothX
  • 1,593
  • 12
  • 20
56
votes
12 answers

What are the Laws of Rational Exponents?

On Math SE, I've seen several questions which relate to the following. By abusing the laws of exponents for rational exponents, one can come up with any number of apparent paradoxes, in which a number seems to be shown as equal to its opposite…
1
2 3
74 75