Commonwealth realm

A Commonwealth realm is a sovereign state in the Commonwealth of Nations whose monarch and head of state is shared among the other realms. Each realm functions as an independent state, equal with the other realms and nations of the Commonwealth. King Charles III succeeded his mother, Queen Elizabeth II, as monarch of each Commonwealth realm following her death on 8 September 2022. He simultaneously became Head of the Commonwealth.

  Current Commonwealth realms
  Territories and dependencies of current realms
  Former realms and dominions that are now republics

As of 2023 there are 15 Commonwealth realms: Antigua and Barbuda, Australia, The Bahamas, Belize, Canada, Grenada, Jamaica, New Zealand, Papua New Guinea, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Solomon Islands, Tuvalu, and the United Kingdom. All are members of the Commonwealth, an intergovernmental organisation of 56 independent member states, 52 of which were formerly part of the British Empire. All Commonwealth members are independent sovereign states, regardless of whether they are Commonwealth realms.

At her accession in 1952, Queen Elizabeth II was the monarch and head of state of seven independent states: the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, South Africa, Pakistan, and Ceylon (now Sri Lanka). Since then, new realms have been created through the independence of former colonies and dependencies, and some realms have become republics. As of 2023 Barbados was the most recent realm to become a republic; it did so on 30 November 2021.[1]

Current realms

There are currently 15 Commonwealth realms scattered across three continents (9 in North America, 5 in Oceania and 1 in Europe), with a combined area (excluding the Antarctic claims) of 18.7 million km2 (7.2 million mi2)[note 1] and a population of more than 150 million,[2] of which all but about 2.5 million live in the six most populous: the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, Papua New Guinea, New Zealand, and Jamaica.

Country Population (2021)[3][4] Date[note 2] Governor general Prime minister
Antigua and Barbuda (monarchy) 93,219 1981 Rodney Williams Gaston Browne
Australia (monarchy) 25,921,089 1901 David Hurley Anthony Albanese
Bahamas (monarchy) 407,906 1973 Cornelius A. Smith Philip Davis
Belize (monarchy) 400,031 1981 Froyla Tzalam Johnny Briceño
Canada (monarchy) 38,155,012 1867 Mary Simon Justin Trudeau
Grenada (monarchy) 124,610 1974 Cécile La Grenade Dickon Mitchell
Jamaica (monarchy) 2,827,695 1962 Patrick Allen Andrew Holness
New Zealand[note 3] (monarchy) 5,129,727 1907 Cindy Kiro Chris Hipkins
Papua New Guinea (monarchy) 9,949,437 1975 Bob Dadae James Marape
Saint Kitts and Nevis (monarchy) 47,606 1983 Tapley Seaton Terrance Drew
Saint Lucia (monarchy) 179,651 1979 Errol Charles Philip J. Pierre
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines (monarchy) 104,332 1979 Susan Dougan Ralph Gonsalves
Solomon Islands (monarchy) 707,851 1978 David Vunagi Manasseh Sogavare
Tuvalu (monarchy) 11,204 1978 Tofiga Vaevalu Falani Kausea Natano
United Kingdom[note 4] (monarchy) 67,281,039 1801 N/A[5] Rishi Sunak

Relationship of the realms

Elizabeth II was the reigning sovereign of each of the Commonwealth realms from 1952 to 2022.

The Commonwealth realms are sovereign states. They are united only in their voluntary connection with the institution of the monarchy,[6] the succession, and the King himself; the person of the sovereign and the Crown were said in 1936 to be "the most important and vital link" between the dominions.[7] Political scientist Peter Boyce called this grouping of countries associated in this manner "an achievement without parallel in the history of international relations or constitutional law."[8] Terms such as personal union,[9][10][11][12][13][14] a form of personal union,[note 5][16] and shared monarchy,[17] among others,[note 6][20] have all been advanced as definitions since the beginning of the Commonwealth itself, though there has been no agreement on which term is most accurate.[19][20][21]

Under the Balfour Declaration of 1926, dominions were proclaimed as considered "equal in status, in no way subordinate one to another in any aspect of their domestic or external affairs, though united by a common allegiance to the Crown"[22][6][23][24][25][26] and the monarch is "equally, officially, and explicitly [monarch] of separate, autonomous realms".[6][23][27][25] Andrew Michie wrote in 1952 that "Elizabeth II embodies in her own person many monarchies: she is Queen of Great Britain, but she is equally Queen of Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Pakistan, South Africa, and Ceylon... it is now possible for Elizabeth II to be, in practice as well as theory, equally Queen in all her realms."[28] Still, Boyce holds the contrary opinion that the crowns of all the non-British realms are "derivative, if not subordinate" to the crown of the United Kingdom.[29]

Since each realm has the same person as its monarch, the diplomatic practice of exchanging ambassadors with letters of credence and recall from one head of state to another does not apply. Diplomatic relations between the Commonwealth realms are thus at a cabinet-level only, and high commissioners are exchanged between realms (though all other countries in the Commonwealth of Nations also follow this same practice, for traditional reasons). A high commissioner's full title will thus be High Commissioner for His Majesty's Government in [Country]. For certain ceremonies, the order of precedence for the realms' high commissioners or national flags is set according to the chronological order of, first, when the country became a dominion and then the date on which the country gained independence.[30]

High Commissioner of Belize to the UK meets with the British Minister of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs. High Commissioners act as liaisons between the governments of the Commonwealth realms.

Conflicts of interest have arisen from this relationship amongst independent states. Some have been minor diplomatic matters, such as the monarch expressing on the advice of one of his/her cabinets views that counter those of another of his/her cabinets.[note 7] More serious issues have arisen with respect to armed conflict, where the monarch, as head of state of two different realms, may be simultaneously at war and at peace with a third country, or even at war with himself/herself as head of two hostile nations.[note 8]

The Crown in the Commonwealth realms

Elizabeth II with the New Zealand cabinet, 1981

The evolution of dominions into realms has resulted in the Crown having both a shared and a separate character, with the one individual being equally monarch of each state and acting as such in right of a particular realm as a distinct legal person guided only by the advice of the cabinet of that jurisdiction.[6][23][33][34][35][36] This means that in different contexts, the term Crown may refer to the extra-national institution associating all 15 countries, or to the Crown in each realm considered separately.[note 9] The monarchy is therefore no longer an exclusively British institution.[33][36][24]

From a cultural standpoint, the sovereign's name, image, and other royal symbols unique to each nation are visible in the emblems and insignia of governmental institutions and militia. Elizabeth II's effigy, for example, appears on coins and banknotes in some countries, and an oath of allegiance to the King is usually required from politicians, judges, military members and new citizens. By 1959, it was being asserted by Buckingham Palace officials that the Queen was "equally at home in all her realms".[37]

Royal succession and regency

To guarantee the continuity of multiple states sharing the same person as monarch, the preamble of the Statute of Westminster 1931 laid out a convention that any alteration to the line of succession in any one country must be voluntarily approved by the parliaments of all the realms.[note 10][38] This convention was first applied in 1936 when the British government conferred with the dominion governments during the Edward VIII abdication crisis. Prime Minister of Canada William Lyon Mackenzie King pointed out that the Statute of Westminster required Canada's request and consent to any legislation passed by the British parliament before it could become part of Canada's laws and affect the line of succession in Canada.[39] Sir Maurice Gwyer, first parliamentary counsel in the UK, reflected this position, stating that the Act of Settlement was a part of the law in each dominion.[39] Though today the Statute of Westminster is law only in Canada, Australia, and the United Kingdom,[40] the convention of approval from the other realms was reasserted by the Perth Agreement of 2011, in which all 16 realms at the time agreed in principle to change the succession rule to absolute primogeniture, to remove the restriction on the monarch being married to a Catholic, and to reduce the number of members of the Royal Family who need the monarch's permission to marry. These changes came into effect on 26 March 2015. Alternatively, a Commonwealth realm may choose to cease being such by making its throne the inheritance of a different royal house or by becoming a republic, actions to which, though they alter the country's royal succession, the convention does not apply.[41]

Agreement among the realms does not, however, mean the succession laws cannot diverge. During the abdication crisis in 1936, the United Kingdom passed His Majesty's Declaration of Abdication Act with the approval of the parliament of Australia and the governments of the remaining dominions. (Canada, New Zealand, and South Africa gave parliamentary assent later.)[42] The act effected Edward's abdication in the United Kingdom on 11 December; as the Canadian government had requested and consented to the act becoming part of Canadian law, and Australia and New Zealand had then not yet adopted the Statute of Westminster, the abdication took place in those countries on the same day. The parliament of South Africa, however, passed its own legislation—His Majesty King Edward the Eighth's Abdication Act, 1937—which backdated the abdication there to 10 December. The Irish Free State recognised the king's abdication with the Executive Authority (External Relations) Act 1936 on 12 December.[42][43][44] According to Anne Twomey, this demonstrated "the divisibility of the Crown in the personal, as well as the political, sense."[42] For E. H. Coghill, writing as early as 1937, it proved that the convention of a common line of succession "is not of imperative force"[45] and Kenneth John Scott asserted in 1962 that it ended the "convention that statutory uniformity on these subjects would be maintained in the parts of the Commonwealth that continued to owe allegiance to the Crown".[46]

Today, some realms govern succession by their own domestic laws, while others, either by written clauses in their constitution or by convention, stipulate that whoever is monarch of the United Kingdom is automatically also monarch of that realm. It is generally agreed that any unilateral alteration of succession by the UK would not have effect in all the realms.[note 11]

Following the accession of George VI to the throne, the United Kingdom created legislation that provided for a regency if the monarch was not of age or incapacitated. Though input was sought from the dominions on this matter, all declined to make themselves bound by the British legislation, feeling instead that the governors-general could carry out royal functions in place of a debilitated or underage sovereign.[49] Tuvalu later incorporated this principle into its constitution.[50] New Zealand included in its Constitution Act 1986 a clause specifying that, should a regent be installed in the United Kingdom, that individual would carry out the functions of the monarch of New Zealand.[51]

Monarch's role in the realms

King George VI, with Queen Elizabeth, grants Royal Assent to bills in the Senate of Canada, 1939

The sovereign resides predominantly in his oldest realm, the United Kingdom. The King appoints viceroys to perform most of the constitutional and ceremonial duties on his behalf in the other realms: in each, a governor-general as his personal national representative, as well as a lieutenant governor as his representative in each of the Canadian provinces and governor as his representative in each of the Australian states. These appointments are made on the advice of the prime minister of the country or the premier of the province or state concerned, though this process may have additional requirements.[note 12] The extent to which specific additional powers are reserved exclusively for the monarch varies from realm to realm. On occasions of national importance, the King may be advised to perform in person his constitutional duties, such as granting Royal Assent or issuing a royal proclamation. Otherwise, all royal powers, including the Royal Prerogative, are carried out on behalf of the sovereign by the relevant viceroy. In the United Kingdom, the King appoints Counsellors of State to perform his constitutional duties in his absence.

Similarly, the monarch will perform ceremonial duties in the Commonwealth realms to mark historically significant events.[52] Citizens in Commonwealth realms may request birthday or wedding anniversary messages to be sent from the sovereign. This is available for 100th, 105th, and beyond for birthdays; and 60th ("Diamond"), 65th, 70th ("Platinum"), and beyond for wedding anniversaries.[53]

Religious role of the monarch

It is solely in England that the King plays a role in organised religion where he acts as the Supreme Governor of the Church of England and nominally appoints its bishops and archbishops. In Scotland, he swears an oath to uphold and protect the Church of Scotland and sends a Lord High Commissioner as his representative to meetings of the church's General Assembly, when he is not personally in attendance.[54]


The Royal Standard of Prince William, Prince of Wales, in the United Kingdom
The Royal Standard of Prince William, Prince of Wales, in Canada

Some members of the royal family have different heraldic standards for use in the appropriate realm.

Queen Elizabeth II employed various royal standards to mark her presence, the particular one used depending on which realm she was in or acting on behalf of at the time.[55] All are heraldic banners displaying the shield of the sovereign's coat of arms for that state and,[56] save for those of the UK, are defaced in the centre with the device from the Queen's Personal Flag.[56] The Queen would use that personal flag in realms where she did not have a royal standard.[56] Many other members of the royal family have their own personal standards; however, only the Prince of Wales, Princess Royal, Duke of York, and Earl of Wessex also have one each for Canada. Those without their own standard use a specific ermine-bordered banner of either the British, Scottish, or, when in or acting on behalf of Canada, Canadian royal arms.[57]

The governors-general throughout the Commonwealth realms also each use a personal flag, which, like that of the sovereign, passes to each successive occupant of the office. Most feature a lion passant atop a St. Edward's royal crown with the name of the country across a scroll underneath, all on a blue background.[58] The two exceptions are those of, since 1981, Canada (bearing on a blue background the crest of the Royal Coat of Arms of Canada) and, since 2008, New Zealand (a St. Edward's Crown above the shield of the Coat of arms of New Zealand). The lieutenant governors of the Canadian provinces each have their own personal standards, as do the governors of the Australian states.

Historical development

Dominions emerge

The possibility that a colony within the British Empire might become a new kingdom was first mooted in the 1860s, when it was proposed that the British North American territories of Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, and the Province of Canada unite as a confederation that might be known as the Kingdom of Canada.[59][60][61]

William Orpen's The Signing of Peace in the Hall of Mirrors: a compiled portrait of the main delegates to the signing of the Treaty of Versailles, including some of the dominion delegates[note 13]

Although the dominions were capable of governing themselves internally, they remained formallyand substantively in regard to foreign policy and defencesubject to British authority, wherein the governor-general of each dominion represented the British monarch-in-Council reigning over these territories as a single imperial domain. It was held in some circles that the Crown was a monolithic element throughout all the monarch's territories; A.H. Lefroy wrote in 1918 that "the Crown is to be considered as one and indivisible throughout the Empire; and cannot be severed into as many kingships as there are dominions, and self-governing colonies".[62] This unitary model began to erode, however, when the dominions gained more international prominence as a result of their participation and sacrifice in the First World War. In 1919, Canadian prime minister Sir Robert Borden and South African minister of defence Jan Smuts demanded that, at the Versailles Conference, the dominions be given full recognition as "autonomous nations of an Imperial Commonwealth". As a result, although the King signed as High Contracting Party for the Empire as a whole,[63] the dominions were also separate signatories to the Treaty of Versailles. They also became, together with India, founding members of the League of Nations. In 1921 the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, David Lloyd George, stated that the "British Dominions have now been accepted fully into the community of nations".[64][65]

Balfour Declaration

The pace of independence increased in the 1920s, led by Canada, which exchanged envoys with the United States in 1920 and concluded the Halibut Treaty in its own right in 1923.[63] In the Chanak crisis of 1922, the Canadian government insisted that its course of action would be determined by the Canadian parliament,[66] not the British government, and, by 1925, the dominions felt confident enough to refuse to be bound by Britain's adherence to the Treaty of Locarno.[67] The Viscount Haldane said in 1919 that in Australia the Crown "acts in self-governing States on the initiative and advice of its own ministers in these States."[68][63][69]

Another catalyst for change came in 1926, when Field Marshal the Lord Byng of Vimy, then Governor General of Canada, refused the advice of his prime minister (William Lyon Mackenzie King) in what came to be known colloquially as the King–Byng Affair.[70] Mackenzie King, after resigning and then being reappointed as prime minister some months later, pushed at the Imperial Conference of 1926 for a reorganisation of the way the dominions related to the British government, resulting in the Balfour Declaration, which declared formally that the dominions were fully autonomous and equal in status to the United Kingdom.[71] What this meant in practice was not at the time worked out; conflicting views existed, some in the United Kingdom not wishing to see a fracturing of the sacred unity of the Crown throughout the empire, and some in the dominions not wishing to see their jurisdiction have to take on the full brunt of diplomatic and military responsibilities.[24]

What did follow was that the dominion governments gained an equal status with the United Kingdom, a separate and direct relationship with the monarch, without the British Cabinet acting as an intermediary, and the governors-general now acted solely as a personal representative of the sovereign in right of that dominion.[note 15][73] Though no formal mechanism for tendering advice to the monarch had yet been established—former Prime Minister of Australia Billy Hughes theorised that the dominion cabinets would provide informal direction and the British Cabinet would offer formal advice[74]—the concepts were first put into legal practice with the passage in 1927 of the Royal and Parliamentary Titles Act, which implicitly recognised the Irish Free State as separate from the UK, and the King as king of each dominion uniquely, rather than as the British king in each dominion. At the same time, terminology in foreign relations was altered to demonstrate the independent status of the dominions, such as the dropping of the term "Britannic" from the King's style outside of the United Kingdom.[75] Then, in 1930 George V's Australian ministers employed a practice adopted by resolution at that year's Imperial Conference,[63] directly advising the King to appoint Sir Isaac Isaacs as the Australian governor-general.

Statute of Westminster

These new developments were explicitly codified in 1931 with the passage of the Statute of Westminster, through which Canada, the Union of South Africa, and the Irish Free State all immediately obtained formal legislative independence from the UK, while in the other dominions adoption of the statute was subject to ratification by the dominion's parliament. Australia and New Zealand did so in 1942 and 1947, respectively, with the former's ratification back-dated to 1939, while Newfoundland never ratified the bill and reverted to direct British rule in 1934. As a result, the parliament at Westminster was unable to legislate for any Dominion unless requested to do so,[63] although the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council was left available as the last court of appeal for some Dominions.[76] Specific attention was given in the statute's preamble to royal succession, outlining that no changes to that line could be made by the parliament of the United Kingdom or that of any dominion without the assent of all the other parliaments of the UK and dominions, an arrangement a justice of the Ontario Superior Court in 2003 likened to "a treaty among the Commonwealth countries to share the monarchy under the existing rules and not to change the rules without the agreement of all signatories."[77]

Edward VIII and Wallis Simpson in 1936. His proposal to marry her led to his abdication, an act that required the consent of the dominions.

This was all met with only minor trepidation, either before or at the time,[note 16] and the government of Ireland was confident that the relationship of these independent countries under the Crown would function as a personal union,[16] akin to that which had earlier existed between the United Kingdom and Hanover (1801 to 1837), or between England and Scotland (1603 to 1707). Its first test came, though, with the abdication of King Edward VIII in 1936,[63] for which it was necessary to gain the consent of the governments of all the dominions and the request and consent of the Canadian government, as well as separate legislation in South Africa and the Irish Free State, before the resignation could take place across the Commonwealth.[79]

The civil division of the Court of Appeal of England and Wales later found in 1982 that the British parliament could have legislated for a dominion simply by including in any new law a clause claiming the dominion cabinet had requested and approved of the act, whether that was true or not.[80] Further, the British parliament was not obliged to fulfil a dominion's request for legislative change. Regardless, in 1935 the British parliament refused to consider the result of the Western Australian secession referendum of 1933 without the approval of the Australian federal government or parliament. In 1937, the Appeal Division of the Supreme Court of South Africa ruled unanimously that a repeal of the Statute of Westminster in the United Kingdom would have no effect in South Africa, stating: "We cannot take this argument seriously. Freedom once conferred cannot be revoked."[81] Others in Canada upheld the same position.[63]

Fully sovereign dominions

At the 1932 British Empire Economic Conference, delegates from the United Kingdom, led by Stanley Baldwin (then Lord President of the Council),[82] hoped to establish a system of free trade within the British Commonwealth, to promote unity within the British Empire and to assure Britain's position as a world power. The idea was controversial, as it pitted proponents of imperial trade with those who sought a general policy of trade liberalisation with all nations. The dominions, particularly Canada, were also adamantly against dispensing with their import tariffs,[83] which "dispelled any romantic notions of a 'United Empire'."[82] The meeting, however, did produce a five-year trade agreement based upon a policy, first conceived in the 1900s,[84] of Imperial Preference: the countries retained their import tariffs, but lowered these for other Commonwealth countries.[83][85]

During his tenure as Governor General of Canada, Lord Tweedsmuir urged the organisation of a royal tour of the country by King George VI, so that he might not only appear in person before his people, but also personally perform constitutional duties and pay a state visit to the United States as king of Canada.[86] While the idea was embraced in Canada as a way to "translate the Statute of Westminster into the actualities of a tour," throughout the planning of the trip that took place in 1939, the British authorities resisted at numerous points the idea that the King be attended by his Canadian ministers instead of his British ones.[87] The Canadian prime minister (still Mackenzie King) was ultimately successful, however, in being the minister in attendance, and the King did in public throughout the trip ultimately act solely in his capacity as the Canadian monarch. The status of the Crown was bolstered by Canada's reception of George VI.[86]

The prime ministers of five Commonwealth countries at the 1944 Commonwealth Prime Ministers' Conference; from left to right: William Lyon Mackenzie King (Canada), Jan Smuts (South Africa), Winston Churchill (United Kingdom), Peter Fraser (New Zealand), and John Curtin (Australia)

When the Second World War began, there was some uncertainty in the dominions about the ramifications of Britain's declaration of war against Nazi Germany. Australia and New Zealand had not yet ratified the Statute of Westminster; the Australian prime minister, Robert Menzies, considered the government bound by the British declaration of war,[88][89][90] while New Zealand coordinated a declaration of war to be made simultaneously with Britain's.[91] As late as 1937, some scholars were still of the mind that, when it came to declarations of war, if the King signed, he did so as king of the empire as a whole; at that time, William Paul McClure Kennedy wrote: "in the final test of sovereignty—that of war—Canada is not a sovereign state... and it remains as true in 1937 as it was in 1914 that when the Crown is at war, Canada is legally at war,"[92] and, one year later, Arthur Berriedale Keith argued that "issues of war or neutrality still are decided on the final authority of the British Cabinet."[93] In 1939, however, Canada and South Africa made separate proclamations of war against Germany a few days after the UK's. Their example was followed more consistently by the other realms as further war was declared against Italy, Romania, Hungary, Finland, and Japan.[63] Ireland remained neutral.[90] At the war's end, it was said by F.R. Scott that "it is firmly established as a basic constitutional principle that, so far as relates to Canada, the King is regulated by Canadian law and must act only on the advice and responsibility of Canadian ministers."[94]

Post-war evolution

Within three years following the end of the Second World War, India, Pakistan, and Ceylon became independent dominions within the Commonwealth. India would soon move to a republican form of government. Unlike the Republic of Ireland and Burma, however, there was no desire on the part of India to leave the Commonwealth, prompting a Commonwealth Conference and the London Declaration in April 1949, which entrenched the idea that republics be allowed in the Commonwealth so long as they recognised King George VI as Head of the Commonwealth and the "symbol of the free association of its independent member nations".[95] Pakistan became a republic in 1956.

As these constitutional developments were taking place, the dominion and British governments became increasingly concerned with how to represent the more commonly accepted notion that there was no distinction between the sovereign's role in the United Kingdom and his or her position in any of the dominions. Thus, at the 1948 Prime Ministers' Conference the term dominion was avoided in favour of Commonwealth country, to avoid the subordination implied by the older designation.[96]

From the accession of Elizabeth II

Commonwealth realms shown in pink, the United Kingdom in light red and Britain's empire in dark red at the beginning of Queen Elizabeth II's reign
Elizabeth II in 2010. In 2010, she addressed the United Nations as queen of 16 Commonwealth realms.

The Commonwealth's prime ministers discussed the matter of the new monarch's title, with St. Laurent stating at the 1953 Commonwealth Prime Ministers' Conference that it was important to agree on a format that would "emphasise the fact that the Queen is Queen of Canada, regardless of her sovereignty over other Commonwealth countries."[34] The result was a new Royal Style and Titles Act being passed in each of the seven realms then existing (excluding Pakistan), which all identically gave formal recognition to the separateness and equality of the countries involved, and replaced the phrase "British Dominions Beyond the Seas" with "Her Other Realms and Territories", the latter using the word realm in place of dominion. Further, at her coronation, Elizabeth II's oath contained a provision requiring her to promise to govern according to the rules and customs of the realms, naming each one separately. The change in perspective was summed up by Patrick Gordon Walker's statement in the British House of Commons: "We in this country have to abandon... any sense of property in the Crown. The Queen, now, clearly, explicitly and according to title, belongs equally to all her realms and to the Commonwealth as a whole."[33] In the same period, Walker also suggested to the British parliament that the Queen should annually spend an equal amount of time in each of her realms. Lord Altrincham, who in 1957 criticised Queen Elizabeth II for having a court that encompassed mostly Britain and not the Commonwealth as a whole,[97] was in favour of the idea, but it did not attract wide support.[98] Another thought raised was that viceregal appointments should become trans-Commonwealth; the governor-general of Australia would be someone from South Africa, the governor-general of Ceylon would come from New Zealand, and so on. The prime ministers of Canada and Australia, John Diefenbaker and Robert Menzies, respectively, were sympathetic to the concept, but, again, it was never put into practice.[99]

On 6 July 2010, Elizabeth II addressed the United Nations in New York City as queen of 16 Commonwealth realms.[100] The following year, Portia Simpson-Miller, the Prime Minister of Jamaica, spoke of a desire to make that country a republic,[101][102] while Alex Salmond, the First Minister of Scotland and leader of the Scottish National Party (which favours Scottish independence), stated an independent Scotland "would still share a monarchy with ... the UK, just as ... 16 other [sic] Commonwealth countries do now."[103] Dennis Canavan, leader of Yes Scotland, disagreed and said a separate, post-independence referendum should be held on the matter.[104]

Following the Perth Agreement of 2011, the Commonwealth realms, in accordance with convention, together engaged in a process of amending the common line of succession according to each country's constitution, to ensure the order would continue to be identical in every realm. In legislative debates in the United Kingdom, the term Commonwealth realm was employed.[105][106]

Former realms and dominions

List of states

Country From To Initial post-transition system Method of transition
Barbados 30 November 1966 30 November 2021 Parliamentary republic Constitutional amendment
Ceylon[note 17] 4 February 1948 22 May 1972 Parliamentary republic New constitution
Fiji 10 October 1970 6 October 1987 Parliamentary republic Military coup
The Gambia 18 February 1965 24 April 1970 Parliamentary republic with an executive presidency Referendum and new constitution
Ghana 6 March 1957 1 July 1960 Assembly-independent republic Referendum and new constitution
Guyana 26 May 1966 23 February 1970 Parliamentary republic Resolution[107]
India 15 August 1947 26 January 1950 Parliamentary republic New constitution
Irish Free State / Ireland 6 December 1922 18 April 1949[note 18] Parliamentary republic Act of parliament
Kenya 12 December 1963 12 December 1964 Parliamentary republic with an executive presidency Constitutional amendment
Malawi 6 July 1964 6 July 1966 One-party presidential republic New constitution
Malta 21 September 1964 13 December 1974 Parliamentary republic Constitutional amendment
Mauritius 12 March 1968 12 March 1992 Parliamentary republic Constitutional amendment
Nigeria 1 October 1960 1 October 1963 Parliamentary republic Constitutional amendment
Pakistan[note 19] 14 August 1947 23 March 1956 Parliamentary republic New constitution
Rhodesia[note 20] 11 November 1965 2 March 1970 Parliamentary republic Referendum and new constitution
Sierra Leone 27 April 1961 19 April 1971 Parliamentary republic New constitution
South Africa 31 May 1910 31 May 1961 Parliamentary republic Referendum and new constitution
Tanganyika[note 21] 9 December 1961 9 December 1962 Assembly-independent republic New constitution
Trinidad and Tobago 31 August 1962 1 August 1976 Parliamentary republic New constitution
Uganda 9 October 1962 9 October 1963 Parliamentary republic Constitutional amendment

In addition to the states listed above, the Dominion of Newfoundland was a dominion when the Statute of Westminster 1931 was given royal assent but effectively lost that status in 1934, without ever having assented to the Statute of Westminster, and before the term Commonwealth realm ever came into use. Due to a domestic financial and political crisis, the Newfoundland legislature petitioned the UK to suspend dominion status, the UK parliament passed the Newfoundland Act 1933, and direct rule was implemented in 1934. Rather than reclaiming dominion status after the Second World War, it became a province of Canada in 1949.[108]

Republican referendums

Six Commonwealth realms and Dominions have held referendums to consider whether they should become republics. As of January 2020, of the eight referendums held, three have been successful: in Ghana, in South Africa and the second referendum in Gambia. Referendums that rejected the proposal were held in Australia, twice in Tuvalu, and in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. Interest in holding a second referendum was expressed in Australia in 2010.[109]

During the 2020 Jamaican general election, the People's National Party promised to hold a referendum on becoming a republic within 18 months if it won the election[110] and polls suggested that 55 per cent of Jamaicans desired the country become a republic.[111] However, the ruling Jamaica Labour Party, which had in 2016 promised a referendum but not carried one out, was re-elected.[112]

Barbados, which had been a Commonwealth realm for 55 years since it gained independence in 1966, became a republic by vote of Parliament in October 2021, effective on 30 November 2021. Some Barbadians criticised the government's decision not to hold a referendum on the issue as being undemocratic.[113][114]

In 2022, following the death of Elizabeth II and the accession of Charles III, the governments of Jamaica,[115] The Bahamas,[116] and Antigua and Barbuda[117] announced their intentions to hold referendums.

Year held Country Yes No Margin of victory (%) Republic
1960 Ghana 1,008,740 (88.49%) 131,145 (11.51%) 877,595 (77%)
1960 Union of South Africa 850,458 (52.29%) 775,878 (47.71%) 74,580 (5%)
1965 The Gambia 61,563 (65.85%) 31,921 (34.15%) [note 22]
1969 Rhodesia 61,130 (81.01%) 14,327 (18.99%) 46,803 (62%)
1970 The Gambia 84,968 (70.45%) 35,638 (29.55%) 49,330 (41%)
1986 Tuvalu 121 (5.34%) 2,144 (94.66%) 2,023 (89%)
1999 Australia 5,273,024 (45.13%) 6,410,787 (54.87%) 1,137,763 (10%)
2008 Tuvalu 679 (35.02%) 1,260 (64.98%) 581 (30%)
2009 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 22,646 (43.71%) 29,167 (55.29%) 6,521 (12%)

See also


  1. Figures totalled from member state profiles at the Commonwealth of Nations secretariat, rounded to the nearest 100,000.
  2. Dates indicate the year each country became a dominion or Commonwealth realm.
  3. The Cook Islands and Niue are under the sovereignty of the King of New Zealand as self-governing states in free association with New Zealand. New Zealand and its associated states, along with Tokelau and the Ross Dependency, compose the Realm of New Zealand.
  4. Guernsey, the Isle of Man, and Jersey—the Crown Dependencies—are self-governing possessions of the British Crown, under the sovereignty of the King of the United Kingdom. Together with the UK, these comprise the British Islands.
  5. F. R. Scott stated: "The common kinship within the British group today establishes a form of personal union, the members of which are legally capable of following different international policies even in time of war."[15]
  6. W. Y. Elliott stated: If a personal union be chosen, the Crown will be forced to act on the king's own discretion [and] since personal discretion in a modern monarch is unthinkable, the only alternative would be a league of states with a common but symbolic crown",[18] and Alexander N. Sack stated: "Whatever the future development of the British Commonwealth may be [it] can be described as a that of associations or unions of States, as distinguished from 'personal' unions, on the one hand, and federal States, on the other.[19]
  7. During a British state visit to Jordan in 1984, Queen Elizabeth II made a speech expressing opinions of her British Cabinet that countered the views of her Australian Cabinet,[31] though the Queen was evidently not representing Australia at that time. Similarly, Elizabeth II undertook a visit to Latin America to promote British goods at the same time that a Canadian ministerial trip was underway in the same region to promote Canadian products.[32]
  8. On 3 September 1939, the United Kingdom declared war on Nazi Germany, but it was only on 6 September that, under the articles of the Statute of Westminster, the Union of South Africa did same, followed by Canada on 10 September. Therefore, from 3 to 10 September, King George VI, as king of the United Kingdom, South Africa and Canada, was both at war and at peace with Germany.
    During the Indo-Pakistani War of 1947, George VI was head of state of both warring nations. In 1983, Elizabeth II was monarch of Grenada when her governor-general there requested the invasion of the country by a number of other Caribbean states, including some that were also realms of the Queen; an undertaking that was opposed by a number of Queen Elizabeth II's other governments, such as those of the United Kingdom, Canada, and Belize.
  9. One Canadian constitutional scholar, Dr. Richard Toporoski, stated on this: "I am perfectly prepared to concede, even happily affirm, that the British Crown no longer exists in Canada, but that is because legal reality indicates to me that in one sense, the British Crown no longer exists in Britain: the Crown transcends Britain just as much as it does Canada. One can therefore speak of 'the British Crown' or 'the Canadian Crown' or indeed the 'Barbadian' or 'Tuvaluan' Crown, but what one will mean by the term is the Crown acting or expressing itself within the context of that particular jurisdiction".[36]
  10. See Sue v Hill.
  11. Noel Cox stated: "Any alteration by the United Kingdom Parliament in the law touching the succession to the throne would, except perhaps in the case of Papua New Guinea, be ineffective to alter the succession to the throne in respect of, and in accordance with the law of, any other independent member of the Commonwealth which was within the Queen's realms at the time of such alteration. Therefore it is more than mere constitutional convention that requires that the assent of the Parliament of each member of the Commonwealth within the Queen's realms be obtained in respect of any such alteration in the law."[47] Richard Toporoski similarly stated: "[I]f, let us say, an alteration were to be made in the United Kingdom to the Act of Settlement 1701, providing for the succession of the Crown. It is my opinion that the domestic constitutional law of Australia or Papua New Guinea, for example, would provide for the succession in those countries of the same person who became Sovereign of the United Kingdom ... If the British law were to be changed and we [Canada] did not change our law ... the Crown would be divided. The person provided for in the new law would become king or queen in at least some realms of the Commonwealth; Canada would continue on with the person who would have become monarch under the previous law ...[48]
  12. In Solomon Islands and Tuvalu, the prime minister must consult the legislature in confidence; in Papua New Guinea, the governor-general is nominated to the Queen by a parliamentary vote.
  13. The Australian and South African prime ministers, Billy Hughes and Louis Botha, stand first and second from the right; the Canadian delegate, Sir George Foster, stands fourth from left. The representatives of New Zealand and Newfoundland are not shown.
  14. The figures in the photo are, back row, left to right: Walter Stanley Monroe, Prime Minister of Newfoundland; Gordon Coates, Prime Minister of New Zealand; Stanley Bruce, Prime Minister of Australia; James Hertzog, Prime Minister of South Africa, and W. T. Cosgrave, President of the Executive Council of the Irish Free State; front row, left to right: Stanley Baldwin, Prime Minister of the United Kingdom; the King; and William Lyon Mackenzie King, Prime Minister of Canada.
  15. The ministers in attendance at the Imperial Conference agreed that: "In our opinion it is an essential consequence of the equality of status existing among the members of the British Commonwealth of Nations that the Governor General of a Dominion is the representative of the Crown, holding in all essential respects the same position in relation to the administration of public affairs in the Dominion as is held by His Majesty the King in Great Britain, and that he is not the representative or agent of His Majesty's Government in Great Britain or of any Department of that Government".[72]
  16. P.E. Corbett in 1940 questioned whether there were any existing terms that could be used to describe any or all of the "possessions of the British Crown,"[20] while Scottish constitutional lawyer Arthur Berriedale Keith warned before 1930 that "the suggestion that the King can act directly on the advice of Dominion Ministers is a constitutional monstrosity, which would be fatal to the security of the position of the Crown."[78]
  17. Renamed Sri Lanka upon becoming a republic.
  18. See also: Irish head of state from 1922 to 1949.
  19. Also included modern-day Bangladesh (as East Bengal / East Pakistan).
  20. Rhodesia unilaterally declared independence in 1965, but this was not recognised internationally. Declared itself a republic in 1970.
  21. Now a part of Tanzania.
  22. In this referendum the "yes" votes failed to reach the required two-thirds (66%) total, therefore the proposal was rejected.



  1. Torrance, David (29 November 2021). "Insight: Barbados becomes a republic" [The Queen will no longer be head of state in Barbados but the country remains a member of the Commonwealth.]. British Parliament (published 29 November 2022). House of Commons Library. Retrieved 13 February 2022.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  2. "World Population Prospects – Population Division – United Nations".
  3. "World Population Prospects 2022". United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. Retrieved 17 July 2022.
  4. "World Population Prospects 2022: Demographic indicators by region, subregion and country, annually for 1950-2100" (XSLX). ("Total Population, as of 1 July (thousands)"). United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. Retrieved 17 July 2022.
  5. Commonwealth Network (2020). "Governor-General". Nexus Partnerships Limited. Retrieved 20 July 2021.
  6. Trepanier, Peter (2004). "Some Visual Aspects of the Monarchical Tradition" (PDF). Canadian Parliamentary Review. 27 (2): 28. Retrieved 2 May 2009.
  7. Berriedale, Keith (1936), "The King and the Imperial Crown: The Powers and Duties of His Majesty", in Coates, Colin MacMillan (ed.), Majesty in Canada: essays on the role of royalty, Toronto: Dundurn Press Ltd. (published 2006), p. 12, ISBN 978-1-55002-586-6, retrieved 16 January 2011
  8. Boyce, Peter (2008). The Queen's Other Realms. Annandale: Federation Press. p. 1. ISBN 978-1-86287-700-9.
  9. Oppenheim, Lassa (1952). Lauterpacht, Hersch (ed.). International law: a treatise. Vol. 1. London: Longmans. p. 163. ISBN 978-1-58477-609-3. Retrieved 29 January 2010.
  10. Clerk of the House of Commons (1947). Debates: official report. Vol. 1. Ottawa: King's Printer for Canada. p. 591. Retrieved 29 January 2010.
  11. Coolidge, Archibald Cary; Armstrong, Hamilton Fish (1927). Foreign affairs. Vol. 6. New York: Council on Foreign Relations. pp. 124–125, 127. Retrieved 7 November 2009.
  12. Library of Parliament (1947). Special war session, Volume 1. Ottawa, BC: Queen's Printer for Canada. p. 591. Retrieved 7 November 2009.
  13. "Personal Union". Crowned Republic. Archived from the original on 18 November 2009. Retrieved 29 January 2010.
  14. Hudson, Wayne (2004). Restructuring Australia: Regionalism, Republicanism and Reform of the Nation-State. Sydney, NSW: Federation Press. p. 86. ISBN 9781862874923.
  15. Scott, F. R. (January 1944), "The End of Dominion Status", The American Journal of International Law, 38 (1): 34–49, doi:10.2307/2192530, JSTOR 2192530, S2CID 147122057
  16. "Black v Chrétien: Suing a Minister of the Crown for Abuse of Power, Misfeasance in Public Office and Negligence". Murdoch University Electronic Journal of Law. 9 (3). September 2002. Retrieved 2 October 2008.
  17. Trepanier 2004, p. 27
  18. Elliott, W. Y. (November 1930). "The Sovereignty of the British Dominions: Law Overtakes Practice". The American Political Science Review. 24 (4): 971–989. doi:10.2307/1946754. JSTOR 1946754. S2CID 147362163.
  19. Sack, Alexander N.; Stewart, Robert B. (March 1940). "Treaty Relations of the British Commonwealth of Nations". University of Pennsylvania Law Review and American Law Register. 88 (5): 637–640. doi:10.2307/3308937. hdl:2027/mdp.39015062366508. JSTOR 3308937.
  20. Corbett, P. E. (1940). "The Status of the British Commonwealth in International Law". The University of Toronto Law Journal. 3 (2): 348–359. doi:10.2307/824318. JSTOR 824318.
  21. Keith, Arthur Berriedale (1929). The sovereignty of the British dominions. New York: Macmillan & Co. Ltd. p. xvii. ISBN 978-0-8371-8668-9. Retrieved 7 November 2009.
  22. Balfour, Arthur (November 1926). "Imperial Conference 1926" (PDF). Balfour Declaration. London: Inter-Imperial Relations Committee. p. 3. E (I.R./26) Series. Retrieved 6 May 2009.
  23. Cox, Noel (19 October 2003), The Development of a Separate Crown in New Zealand (PDF), Auckland University of Technology, p. 18, archived from the original (PDF) on 15 July 2011, retrieved 3 January 2011
  24. Mallory, J.R. (August 1956). "Seals and Symbols: From Substance to Form in Commonwealth Equality". The Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science. 22 (3): 281–291. ISSN 0008-4085. JSTOR 13843.
  25. Trepanier, Peter (2006), "A Not Unwilling Subject: Canada and Her Queen", in Coates, Colin MacMillan (ed.), Majesty in Canada: essays on the role of royalty, Toronto: Dundurn Press Ltd., p. 144, ISBN 978-1-55002-586-6, retrieved 11 June 2017
  26. Twomey, Anne (2006). The Chameleon Crown. Sydney, NSW: Federation Press. p. 81. ISBN 9781862876293.
  27. Michie, Allan Andrew (1952). The Crown and the People. London: Secker & Warburg. pp. 52, 369. Retrieved 11 June 2017.
  28. Michie 1952, p. 52
  29. Boyce 2008, p. 23
  30. "British Flag Protocol > Order for Commonwealth Events Held in the UK (but not the Commonwealth Games)". Flag Institute. Retrieved 1 October 2015.
  31. Cohen, Zelman (1995). "Further Reflections on an Australian Republic". Sir Robert Menzies Lecture Trust. Archived from the original (Lecture) on 28 September 2007. Retrieved 3 May 2009.
  32. Sharp, Mitchell (1994). Which Reminds Me..., A Memoir. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. p. 223. ISBN 978-0-8020-0545-8.
  33. Bogdanor, Vernon (1998), The Monarchy and the Constitution, New York: Oxford University Press, p. 288, ISBN 978-0-19-829334-7
  34. High Commissioner in United Kingdom (24 November 1952). "Royal Style and Titles". Documents on Canadian External Relations > Royal Style and Titles. 18 (2). DEA/50121-B-40. Archived from the original on 23 November 2011.
  35. Smy, William A. (2008). "Royal titles and styles". The Loyalist Gazette. XLVI (1). Archived from the original on 11 July 2012. Retrieved 3 January 2011.
  36. Toporoski, Richard. "The Invisible Crown". Monarchy Canada. Archived from the original on 9 February 2008. Retrieved 20 April 2008.
  37. Buckner, Phillip (2005). "The Last Great Royal Tour: Queen Elizabeth's 1959 Tour to Canada". In Buckner, Phillip (ed.). Canada and the End of Empire. Vancouver, BC: UBC Press. p. 66. ISBN 978-0-7748-0915-3. Retrieved 24 October 2009.
  38. Statute of Westminster, 1931. Westminster: Her Majesty's Stationery Office. 11 December 1931. c. 4 (U.K.). Retrieved 22 May 2015.
  39. Anne Twomey (18 September 2014). Professor Anne Twomey – Succession to the Crown: foiled by Canada? (Digital video). London: University College London.
  40. Twomey, Anne (October 2011), Changing the Rules of Succession to the Throne, Sydney Law School, pp. 10–11, SSRN 1943287
  41. Twomey 2011, p. 12
  42. Twomey 2011, p. 9
  43. "Executive Authority (External Relations) Act, 1936". Dublin: Office of the Attorney General. 12 December 1936. 3.2. Retrieved 6 May 2009.
  44. Morris, Jan (2010), "15", Farewell the Trumpets, London: Faber & Faber, ISBN 9780571265985, Note 13, retrieved 22 May 2015
  45. Coghill, E. H. (1937). "The King – Marriage and Abdication". Australian Law Journal. 10 (393): 398.
  46. Scott, Kenneth John (1962). The New Zealand Constitution. London: Clarendon Press. p. 68.
  47. Cox, Noel (23 August 2003) [1999], "The Dichotomy of Legal Theory and Political Reality: The Honours Prerogative and Imperial Unity", Australian Journal of Law and Society, 14, ISSN 0729-3356, SSRN 420752
  48. Toporoski, Richard (1988). "The Invisible Crown". Monarchy Canada (Summer 1998). Archived from the original on 17 June 1997. Retrieved 21 May 2015.
  49. Mallory, J. R. (1984). The Structure and Function of Canadian Government (2nd ed.). Toronto: Gage. pp. 36–37.
  50. "Section 58(1)", Constitution of Tuvalu, Funafuti: Pacific Islands Legal Information Institute, 1978, retrieved 25 May 2015
  51. Elizabeth II (13 December 1986), Constitution Act, 1986, 4.1, Wellington: New Zealand Government, retrieved 22 May 2015
  52. "The current Royal Family". Royal Household. Archived from the original on 10 July 2009. Retrieved 2 July 2009.
  53. "Queen and anniversary messages – Who is entitled?". Royal Household. Archived from the original on 4 December 2010. Retrieved 22 February 2011.
  54. "The Monarchy Today > Queen and State > Queen and Church > Queen and Church of Scotland". Royal Household. Archived from the original on 28 October 2008. Retrieved 25 October 2008.
  55. Panton, Kenneth J (2011), Historical Dictionary of the British Monarchy, Lanham: Scarecrow Press, p. 416, ISBN 978-0-8108-5779-7, retrieved 27 July 2022
  56. "Personal Flags". Royal Household. 15 January 2016. Retrieved 27 July 2022.
  57. Canadian Heraldic Authority. "Members of the Royal Family". Office of the Secretary of the Governor General of Canada. Retrieved 27 July 2022.
  58. Flags of the World, F. Warne, 1978, p. 48, ISBN 9780723220152
  59. Farthing, John (1985). Freedom Wears a Crown. Toronto: Veritas Paperback. ISBN 978-0-949667-03-8.
  60. Pope, Joseph (2009). Confederation: Being a Series of Hitherto Unpublished Documents Bearing on the British North America Act. Whitefish: Kessinger Publishing. p. 177. ISBN 978-1-104-08654-1.
  61. Hubbard, R.H. (1977). Rideau Hall. Montreal and London: McGill-Queen's University Press. p. 9. ISBN 978-0-7735-0310-6.
  62. Lefroy, A. H. (1918). A Short Treatise on Canadian Constitutional Law. Toronto: Carswell. p. 59. ISBN 978-0-665-85163-6.
  63. Heard, Andrew (1990), Canadian Independence, Vancouver: Simon Fraser University, retrieved 6 May 2009
  64. Dale, W. (1983). The Modern Commonwealth. London: Butterworths. p. 24. ISBN 978-0-406-17404-8.
  65. Twomey, Anne (2008). "Responsible Government and the Divisibility of the Crown". Public Law: 742.
  66. Phillip Alfred Buckner (2008). Canada and the British Empire. Oxford University Press. p. 98. ISBN 978-0-19-927164-1.
  67. John F. Hilliker (1990). Canada's Department of External Affairs: The Early Years, 1909–1946. McGill-Queen's Press – MQUP. p. 131. ISBN 978-0-7735-6233-2.
  68. Theodore v. Duncan, 696, p. 706 (Judicial Committee of the Privy Council 1919).
  69. Clement, W.H.P. (1916). The Law of the Canadian Constitution (3rd ed.). Toronto: Carswell. pp. 14–15. ISBN 978-0-665-00684-5.
  70. Williams, Jeffery (1983). Byng of Vimy: General and Governor General. Barnsley, S. Yorkshire: Leo Cooper in association with Secker & Warburg. pp. 314–317. ISBN 978-0-8020-6935-1.
  71. Marshall, Peter (September 2001). "The Balfour Formula and the Evolution of the Commonwealth". The Round Table. 90 (361): 541–553. doi:10.1080/00358530120082823. S2CID 143421201.
  72. Balfour 1926, p. 4
  73. Twomey 2006, p. 111
  74. Jenks, Edward (1927). "Imperial Conference and the Constitution". Cambridge Law Journal. 3 (13): 21. doi:10.1017/s0008197300103915. ISSN 0008-1973. S2CID 145241070.
  75. Walshe, Joseph P. (29 August 1927). Documents on Irish Foreign Policy > Despatch from Joseph P. Walshe (for Patrick McGilligan) to L.S. Amery (London) (D.5507) (Confidential) (Copy). Royal Irish Academy. Retrieved 24 October 2009.
  76. Baker, Philip Noel (1929). The Present Juridical Status of the British Dominions in International Law. London: Longmans. p. 231.
  77. O'Donohue v. Canada, J. Rouleau, 33 (Ontario Superior Court of Justice 17 April 2013).
  78. Keith, Arthur Berriedale (1928). Responsible Government in the Dominions. Vol. 1 (2 ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. xviii. ISBN 978-0-665-82054-0.
  79. Williams, Susan (2003). The People's King: The True Story of the Abdication. London: Penguin Books Ltd. p. 130. ISBN 978-0-7139-9573-2.
  80. Manuel et al. v. Attorney General, 822, p. 830 (Court of Appeal of England and Wales 1982).
  81. Ndlwana v. Hofmeyer, 229, p. 237 (Supreme Court of South Africa 1937).
  82. Kaufman, Will; Macpherson, Heidi Slettedahl (2005), Britain and the Americas: Culture, Politics, and History, ABC-CLIO, p. 976, ISBN 9781851094318, retrieved 5 November 2015
  83. The Cabinet Papers 1915–1986 > Policy, protectionism and imperial preference, National Archives, retrieved 4 November 2015
  84. National Archives 2015, Glossary
  85. "Imperial Preference", Encyclopædia Britannica, retrieved 4 November 2015
  86. Library and Archives Canada. "The Royal Tour of 1939". Queen's Printer for Canada. Archived from the original on 30 October 2009. Retrieved 6 May 2009.
  87. Galbraith, William (1989). "Fiftieth Anniversary of the 1939 Royal Visit". Canadian Parliamentary Review. 12 (3). Archived from the original on 5 December 2012. Retrieved 6 May 2009.
  88. Hasluck, Paul (1952). The Government and the People, 1939–1941. Canberra: Australian War Memorial. pp. 149–151. ISBN 9780642993670.
  89. "Menzies' announcement of the declaration of war". Department of Veterans Affairs. Archived from the original on 3 April 2008. Retrieved 26 June 2013.
  90. Boyce 2008, p. 27
  91. Monckton-Arundell, George (1949). "Documents Relating to New Zealand's Participation in the Second World War 1939–45 > 9 – The Governor-General of New Zealand to the Secretary of State for Dominion Affairs". In Historical Publications Branch (ed.). The Official History of New Zealand in the Second World War 1939–1945. Vol. 1. Wellington: Victoria University of Wellington (published 4 September 1939). Retrieved 6 May 2009.
  92. William Paul McClure Kennedy (1938). The Constitution of Canada, 1534–1937: An Introduction to Its Development, Law and Custom. Oxford University Press. pp. 540–541.
  93. Keith, A. Berriedale (1938). The Dominions as Sovereign States. London: Macmillan. p. 203.
  94. Scott 1944, p. 152
  95. de Smith, S. A. (July 1949). "The London Declaration of the Commonwealth Prime Ministers, April 28, 1949". The Modern Law Review. 12 (3): 351–354. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2230.1949.tb00131.x. JSTOR 1090506.
  96. Statistics New Zealand. New Zealand Official Yearbook 2000. Auckland: David Bateman. p. 55.
  97. Pimlott, Ben (2002). The Queen. New York: HarperCollins Publishers Ltd. p. 280. ISBN 978-0-00-711436-8.
  98. Boyce 2008, pp. 9–10
  99. Boyce 2008, p. 11
  100. "Address to the United Nations General Assembly". Royal Household. 6 July 2010. Archived from the original on 11 July 2010. Retrieved 6 July 2010.
  101. "Jamaica plans to become a republic". Sky News Australia. 31 December 2011. Archived from the original on 12 January 2012. Retrieved 31 December 2011.
  102. "Jamaica to break links with Queen, says Prime Minister Simpson Miller". BBC News. 6 January 2012. Retrieved 8 January 2012.
  103. Salmond, Alex. "Scottish independence "good" for England". Scottish National Party. Archived from the original on 16 February 2012. Retrieved 16 February 2012.
  104. Barnes, Eddie (29 July 2013). "Scottish independence: Call for vote on monarchy". The Scotsman. Retrieved 16 August 2013.
  105. Chloe Smith, Parliamentary Secretary, Cabinet Office (22 January 2013). "House of Commons Hansard Debates for 22 Jan 2013 (pt 0001)". Parliamentary Debates (Hansard). United Kingdom: House of Commons.
  106. Nick Clegg, Deputy Prime Minister (22 January 2013). "House of Commons Hansard Debates for 22 Jan 2013 (pt 0001)". Parliamentary Debates (Hansard). United Kingdom: House of Commons. col. 211.
  107. "Resolution No. 26 of 1969". Parliament of the Co-operative Republic of Guyana. 29 August 1969. Retrieved 1 October 2021.
  108. J. K. Hiller. (2002). The Newfoundland Royal Commission, 1933 (The Amulree Commission). Government and Politics Bibliography.
  109. "Australia's Gillard backs republic after Queen's death". BBC. 17 August 2010. Retrieved 17 July 2013.
  110. "PNP vows to hold referendum on whether to remove Queen, if elected". 8 August 2020.
  111. "Jamaica Observer Limited". Jamaica Observer.
  112. "Editorial | PM's governance agenda needs clarity". 8 September 2020.
  113. "Do it the democratic way". Barbados Today. 29 August 2021. Archived from the original on 28 September 2021. Retrieved 7 October 2021.
  114. "DLP President calls for a referendum". Barbados Advocate. 8 April 2021. Archived from the original on 28 September 2021. Retrieved 7 October 2021.
  115. "Jamaican Government Gives 2025 Timeline to Become Republic". Caribbean News Weekly. 8 June 2022. Retrieved 12 September 2022.
  116. "PM: Govt will let Bahamians decide if nation should transition to a republic". The Tribune. 11 June 2022. Retrieved 12 June 2022.
  117. "Antigua and Barbuda Prime Minister Gaston Browne plans referendum on replacing the monarchy". 10 September 2022. Retrieved 10 September 2022.


  • Bogdanor, Vernon (1995). The Monarchy and the Constitution. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
  • Cox, Noel (2002). "The Theory of Sovereignty and the Importance of the Crown in the Realms of The Queen". Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal. 2 (2): 237–255. doi:10.1080/14729342.2002.11421414. S2CID 218770069.
  • Forsey, Eugene (1968) [1943]. Royal Power of Dissolution on Parliament in the British Commonwealth. Toronto: Oxford University Press.
  • Maitland, Frederic (1901). "The Crown as a Corporation". Law Quarterly Review. 17 (131).
  • McIntyre, W. David (1999). "The Strange Death of Dominion Status". Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History. 27 (2): 193–212. doi:10.1080/03086539908583064.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.