Questions tagged [decimal-expansion]

For questions about decimal expansion, both practical and theoretical.

A number can be represented in many different ways, but the most common is via its decimal expansion. Such a representation takes the form

$$a_na_{n-1}\dots a_1a_0.a_{-1}a_{-2}\dots$$

where $a_n \in \{1, 2, \dots, 9\}$ and $a_i \in \{0, 1, 2, \dots, 9\}$ for $i = n - 1, n - 2, \dots, 1, 0, -1, -2, \dots$. In the case that there is $N > 0$ such that $a_i = 0$ for all $i < -N$, these numbers are supressed in which case the decimal expansion usually appears as

$$a_na_{n-1}\dots a_1a_0.a_{-1}a_{-2}\dots a_{-N}.$$

Note that concatenation does not represent multiplication, it is just a part of the notation. The . between $a_0$ and $a_{-1}$ does not represent multiplication either; it is sometimes called the decimal point.

To put the notation on a rigorous footing, the expression $a_na_{n-1}\dots a_1a_0.a_{-1}a_{-2}\dots$ is shorthand for

$$\sum_{i = 0}^na_i10^i + \sum_{i=1}^{\infty}a_{-i}\frac{1}{10^i} = \sum_{i = -\infty}^na_i10^i$$

which can be shown to be convergent irrespective of the choice of $a_i$.

1115 questions
339
votes
30 answers

Is it true that $0.999999999\ldots=1$?

I'm told by smart people that $$0.999999999\ldots=1$$ and I believe them, but is there a proof that explains why this is?
149
votes
14 answers

Why does an argument similiar to 0.999...=1 show 999...=-1?

I accept that two numbers can have the same supremum depending on how you generate a decimal representation. So $2.4999\ldots = 2.5$ etc. Can anyone point me to resources that would explain what the below argument that shows $999\ldots = -1$ is…
136
votes
2 answers

Is there any mathematical reason for this "digit-repetition-show"?

The number $$\sqrt{308642}$$ has a crazy decimal representation : $$555.5555777777773333333511111102222222719999970133335210666544640008\cdots $$ Is there any mathematical reason for so many repetitions of the digits ? A long block containing only…
Peter
  • 78,494
  • 15
  • 63
  • 194
90
votes
4 answers

How do we know that Cantor's diagonalization isn't creating a different decimal of the same number?

Edit: As the comments mention, I misunderstood how to use the diagonalization method. However, the issue I'm trying to understand is a potential problem with diagonalization and it is addressed in the answers so I will not delete the…
Hugh
  • 2,301
  • 13
  • 14
86
votes
6 answers

What is special about the numbers 9801, 998001, 99980001 ..?

Just saw this post, and realized that 1/9801…
Lazer
  • 1,445
  • 3
  • 15
  • 19
85
votes
1 answer

Numbers $n$ such that the digit sum of $n^2$ is a square

Let $S(n)$ be the digit sum of $n\in\mathbb N$ in the decimal system. About a month ago, a friend of mine taught me the…
mathlove
  • 122,146
  • 9
  • 107
  • 263
72
votes
3 answers

Is $ 0.112123123412345123456\dots $ algebraic or transcendental?

Let $$x=0.112123123412345123456\dots $$ Since the decimal expansion of $x$ is non-terminating and non-repeating, clearly $x$ is an irrational number. Can it be shown whether $x$ is algebraic or transcendental over $\mathbb{Q}$ ? I think $x$ is…
ASB
  • 3,819
  • 2
  • 29
  • 46
68
votes
7 answers

Why $9$ & $11$ are special in divisibility tests using decimal digit sums? (casting out nines & elevens)

I don't know if this is a well-known fact, but I have observed that every number, no matter how large, that is equally divided by $9$, will equal $9$ if you add all the numbers it is made from until there is $1$ digit. A quick example of what I…
61
votes
8 answers

The last digit of $2^{2006}$

My $13$ year old son was asked this question in a maths challenge. He correctly guessed $4$ on the assumption that the answer was likely to be the last digit of $2^6$. However is there a better explanation I can give him?
60
votes
10 answers

Can a number have infinitely many digits before the decimal point?

I asked my teacher if a number can have infinitely many digits before the decimal point. He said that this isn't possible, even though there are numbers with infinitely many digits after the decimal point. I asked why and he said that if you keep…
Landing
  • 611
  • 1
  • 5
  • 5
58
votes
3 answers

Why do we miss 8 in the decimal expansion of 1/81, and 98 in the decimal expansion of 1/9801?

Why do we miss $8$ in the decimal expansion of $1/81$, and $98$ in the decimal expansion of $1/9801$? I've seen this happen that when you divide in a fraction using the square of any number with only nines in the denominator. Like in $$ …
Mathster
  • 1,021
  • 7
  • 18
  • 25
58
votes
2 answers

Is $6.12345678910111213141516171819202122\ldots$ transcendental?

My son was busily memorizing digits of $\pi$ when he asked if any power of $\pi$ was an integer. I told him: $\pi$ is transcendental, so no non-zero integer power can be an integer. After tiring of memorizing $\pi$, he resolved to discover a new…
Fixee
  • 11,199
  • 6
  • 39
  • 64
50
votes
3 answers

Why does the first 100,000 zeroes of the Riemann Zeta function have double-digit sequence count discontinuities at 00,11,22,33,44,55,66,77,88,99?

Why do the first 100,000 zeroes of the Riemann Zeta function have double-digit sequence count discontinuities at 00,11,22,33,44,55,66,77,88,99? I was investigating Benford Law type behaviors and was running some analyses on the web page "Andrew…
phdmba7of12
  • 970
  • 7
  • 22
50
votes
5 answers

What is the smallest positive multiple of 450 whose digits are all zeroes and ones?

What is the smallest positive multiple of 450 whose digits are all zeroes and ones? I tried guess and check but the numbers grew big fast. Thanks in advance!
49
votes
1 answer

Is $0.1010010001000010000010000001 \ldots$ transcendental?

Does anyone know if this number is algebraic or transcendental, and why? $$\sum\limits_{n = 1}^\infty {10}^{ - n(n + 1)/2} = 0.1010010001000010000010000001 \ldots $$
Raffaele
  • 25,898
  • 2
  • 18
  • 34
1
2 3
74 75