6

How do I detect the timescale precision used in a simulation from the source code ?. Consider I have a configuration parameter(cfg_delay_i) of some delay value given by user in timeunits as fs .If the user gives 1000 , my code has to wait 1000fs or 1ps before executing further. 

#(cfg_delay_i * 1fs );//will wait only if timescale is 1ps/1fs
do_something();

If the timescale precision is 1fs ,there won’t be any problem but if the precision is higher than that it won’t wait and it will work as 0 delay . So I want to write a code which will determine the timescale used by the user and give the delay accordingly.My expected pseudo-code will be like below, 

if(timeprecision == 1fs )#(cfg_delay_i * 1fs ) ; 
else if(timeprecision == 1ps )#(cfg_delay_i/1000 * 1ps ) ;

Please help me with the logic to determine the timescale unit and precision internally.

Sreejin TJ
  • 157
  • 11

1 Answers1

6

You can write if (int'(1fs)!=0) // the time precision is 1fs and so on. But there's no need to do this.

#(cfg_delay_i/1000.0 * 1ps)

The above works regardless if the precision is 1ps or smaller. Note the use of the real literal 1000.0 to keep the division real. 1ps is already a real number, so the result of the entire expression will be real. You could also do

#(cfg_delay_i/1.e6 * 1ns)

If the time precision at the point where this code is located is greater than 1fs, the result gets rounded to the nearest precision unit. For example if cfg_delay is 500 and the current precision is 1ps, this would get rounded to #1ps.

Do be aware that the user setting cfg_delay has to take the same care to make sure their value is set with the correct scaling/precision.

dave_59
  • 30,490
  • 3
  • 22
  • 48
  • Thank you sir .When using real literal it avoids the problem but the value has to be taken care of by the user. Also I think that the expression **int'(1fs) == 1** can be used to find the timeunit and not the precision used. (**`eg. if(int'(1ps) == 1)//if yes timeunit is 1ps, it doesn’t infer anything about precision`**).Kindly let me know if I can find the exact precision used in a similar way. – Sreejin TJ Oct 01 '19 at 09:04
  • 1
    You can do a chain of `if/else` or `case` statement checking each precision in increasing magnitude. `1fs!=0.0, 10fs!=0.0, etc.` The first real non-zero is the precision. – dave_59 Oct 01 '19 at 15:48