199

Books on Number Theory for anyone who loves Mathematics?

(Beginner to Advanced & just for someone who has a basic grasp of math)

Choripán Con Pebre
  • 1,236
  • 4
  • 21
Prasoon Saurav
  • 570
  • 3
  • 5
  • 16
  • 12
    @Prasoon: It's from Math Overflow: it means that there isn't one right answer your your question, but instead you expect lots of alternative answers. – Charles Stewart Jul 21 '10 at 13:59
  • 2
    @Prasoon: Those types of questions are typically also community wiki, for the same reason. – Larry Wang Jul 21 '10 at 14:36
  • 1
    This is absolutely absurd, why on earth are you linking to wikipedia? – quanta Apr 26 '11 at 16:22
  • 7
    @quanta But what was the problem with the link to the Wikipedia article about number theory? – Adrián Barquero Apr 26 '11 at 16:42
  • How can a question with 180 upvotes and 183 stars ever be closed? – nilo de roock May 12 '19 at 13:41
  • nilo de roock It is closed by the mediocre and petty that can contribute nothing else but accumulate 'reputation' by trying to close posts and answers. – onepound May 15 '21 at 10:28
  • 1
    Does this answer your question? [Highschool level number theory book recommendations](https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/725011/highschool-level-number-theory-book-recommendations) – NNOX Apps Jul 20 '21 at 07:50

32 Answers32

133

A Classical Introduction to Modern Number Theory by Ireland and Rosen hands down!

claws
  • 619
  • 7
  • 21
Moor Xu
  • 2,184
  • 2
  • 23
  • 28
  • 9
    +1 Their *A Classical Introduction to Modern Number Theory* is an excellent treatise on number theory that covers a lot of material in an intuitive and friendly, yet rigorous, presentation. The only bad thing is that you cannot skip around. – Daniel Trebbien Sep 26 '10 at 15:35
  • 9
    It's VERY hard to argue with anyone that picks this awesome text-it's certainly the best book for strong undergraduate mathematics majors.But there are just SO many good textbooks on this ancient and critical subject,I don't think there's a unique answer to it. – Mathemagician1234 Sep 12 '12 at 07:06
  • 6
    From the first year undergraduate perspective, this book is worth a try but as @DanielTrebbien has noted, it is quite rigorous. Furthermore, it assumes that you know concepts such as rings to begin with. So, it can be difficult trying to understand everything the authors are trying to say. – Jeel Shah Jan 11 '14 at 16:46
  • 2
    But why is it hands down the best? – nilo de roock Mar 07 '15 at 11:18
  • Why don't you try reading it yourself? – Confuse Oct 03 '16 at 10:00
  • 1
    Is this book accessible to a complete beginner? Considering I have not taken a course in abstract algebra or number theory before. – TheLast Cipher Sep 05 '17 at 17:51
  • 4
    @TheLastCipher The book is accessible without prior exposure to number theory, but I'd say a course in abstract algebra is necessary. Parts of the book also require concepts from analysis. – qoppa Oct 11 '17 at 22:12
  • 1
    it's not cheap (currently about 70 dollars)... – PatrickT Aug 16 '20 at 05:19
  • Does it come with a good amount of quality problems? – Choripán Con Pebre Sep 28 '21 at 02:18
72

I would still stick with Hardy and Wright, even if it is quite old.

mau
  • 9,311
  • 3
  • 39
  • 70
51

I like Niven and Zuckerman, Introduction to the Theory of Numbers.

Jason S
  • 2,917
  • 1
  • 19
  • 24
  • 1
    The most recent edition, which is Niven, Zuckerman, and Montgomery, is even better than the earlier editions, which were very good. – Gerry Myerson Apr 26 '11 at 13:06
  • 15
    This book is great. Back in college, I heard someone mention a warning he had heard: "Be very wary of reading this book; it may turn you into a number theorist". The guy who said this to me did read the book, and turned into a number theorist. – ShreevatsaR Sep 05 '12 at 02:30
  • May I know what is the latest version of this book? I would love to read it. But I don't have a flair nor much of an interest in number theory... – ireallydonknow Dec 21 '13 at 17:16
  • It is a good book but it requires a lot of time to get through this book as it has so many exercises. Is there a new edition – matqkks Oct 24 '18 at 14:28
49

Serre's "A course in Arithmetic" is pretty phenomenal.

BBischof
  • 5,397
  • 1
  • 34
  • 45
41

I recommend Primes of the Form x2 + ny2, by David Cox. The question of which primes can be written as the sum of two squares was settled by Euler. The more general question turns out to be much harder, and leads you to more advanced techniques in number theory like class field theory and elliptic curves with complex multiplication.

arsmath
  • 1,905
  • 16
  • 23
29

Apostol, Introduction to Analytic Number Theory. I think it' very well written, I got a lot out of it from self-study.

Tom Dickens
  • 1
  • 2
  • 2
26

There are many books on this list that I'm a fan of, but I'd have to go with Neukirch's Algebraic Number Theory. Great style, great selection of topics.

Zev Chonoles
  • 124,702
  • 19
  • 297
  • 503
23

A concise introduction to the theory of numbers by Alan Baker (1970 Fields medalist) covers a lot of ground in less than 100 pages, and does so in a fluid way that never feels rushed. I love this little book.

user115
  • 1,355
  • 1
  • 10
  • 13
18

One of my colleagues, a number theorist, recommended the little book by van den eynden for beginners. my favorite is by trygve nagell. (I am a geometer.) One of my friends, preparing for a PhD in arithmetic geometry?, started with the one recommended by Barry, Basic number theory. As I recall it's for people who can handle Haar measure popping up on the first page of a "basic" book on number theory.

I also recommend Gauss's Disquisitiones Arithmeticae.

Assad Ebrahim
  • 1,051
  • 9
  • 23
roy smith
  • 1,434
  • 14
  • 16
17

A Friendly Introduction to Number Theory by Joseph H. Silverman. Although the proofs provided are fairly rigorous, the prose is very conversational, which makes for an easy read. Also, the material is presented so that even a student with a low to moderate level of mathematical maturity can follow the text conceptually and do many of the exercises, but there are plenty of exercises to stretch the more curious mathematician's mind.

As an undergrad I found it very useful and even years later it is one of my all-time favorite number theory references.

pocketsand
  • 1
  • 1
  • 2
15

Elementary Number Theory - by David M. Burton if you want it somewhere halfway between fast and slow.

link

Myself
  • 8,443
  • 28
  • 44
  • 2
    its my favorite as it is written in a simple language and is perfect for self studying + can be easily understood by a high schooler. – Shreya Dec 12 '12 at 11:53
13

It depends on the level.

For an undergraduate interested in algebraic number theory, I would strongly suggest (parts of) Serre's Cours d'arithmetique and also Samuel's Théorie algébriques des nombres.

For a graduate student aiming at a future of research work in number theory, Cassels & Fröhlich is a must.

Andrea Mori
  • 24,810
  • 1
  • 41
  • 76
  • Well, how about the Jurgen Neukirch? – awllower Mar 01 '11 at 11:38
  • 6
    Is Cassels and Frohlich still a must? I had the impression that Neukirch, or Milne's notes http://www.jmilne.org/math/CourseNotes/cft.html were adequate substitutes, and perhaps more readable. – David E Speyer Jun 29 '11 at 03:11
11

Basic Number Theory by Andre Weil. It's hard going and mind-blowing.

Barry Smith
  • 4,971
  • 23
  • 36
  • It is already mentioned. – awllower Mar 01 '11 at 11:51
  • 11
    Yes, by me. And by someone else referring to my comment...I don't understand why you come along three months later and post this. – Barry Smith Apr 04 '11 at 18:02
  • Excuse moi? What are you referring to? – awllower Apr 05 '11 at 06:04
  • I was the first one to mention this book. The only other person to mention it (at least in a comment or answer that is still visible) is Roy Smith. And he only mentioned it in reference to my comment right here, as clearly indicated in his comment. I was the first one to mention Weil's book, so you are wrong, it had not been mentioned at the time of my post; and even if it had been, why would you come along 3 months later and point it out? – Barry Smith Apr 08 '11 at 19:31
  • 3
    For you are the first, I agree; for the three months later, well, it's because I forgot this website at that time, and recently I came up with it, so... – awllower Apr 09 '11 at 02:37
  • 13
    This is so far the funniest conversation I ever saw on MSE.(LoL) – Tomarinator May 18 '12 at 11:34
  • 1
    Well,this response gets off on a technicality-I THOUGHT the question was asking for the best INTRODUCTION to the subject.Apparently not.Weil's book is NOT an elementary textbook anymore then Nathan Jacobson's BASIC ALGEBRA is a baby introduction to undergraduate algebra. – Mathemagician1234 Sep 12 '12 at 07:09
  • 1
    The first few chapters of Weil's book are fantastic, but I found the second half (on class field theory) very unappetizing. He totally (and intentionally) ignores the modern cohomological toolkit, which makes the statements (and proofs) of theorems nowhere near as clear as they could be. – Daniel Miller Aug 04 '13 at 17:42
  • What sentence, paragraph or theorem did you find "mind-blowing"? – nilo de roock May 12 '19 at 13:49
11

One of my favorites is H. Davenport's ${\bf The\ Higher\ Arithmetic}$

i. m. soloveichik
  • 4,140
  • 1
  • 15
  • 26
11

Kato's "Fermat's Dream" is a jewel. (Full disclosure: actually I saw it mentioned either here or on mathoverflow, and I was looking for the post to thank the source.)

11

Problems in Algebraic Number Theory is written in a style I'd like to see in more textbooks

Simon Morris
  • 126
  • 5
10

My favorite is Elementary Number Theory by Rosen, which combines computer programming with number theory, and is accessible at a high school level.

Lucky
  • 1,149
  • 3
  • 13
  • 25
  • 1
    +1. It's not my favorite,but for sheer fun readability and scholarship that can inspire the raw beginner, Rosen's very hard to beat! – Mathemagician1234 Sep 12 '12 at 07:10
  • This is probably the only answer here that OP would consider considering he's a programmer with a calculus background. – Okoyos May 10 '21 at 17:30
10

For a highly motivated account of analytic number theory, I'd recommend Harold Davenport's Multiplicative Number Theory.

John M
  • 7,078
  • 20
  • 48
9

Number Theory For Beginners by Andre Weil is the slickest,most concise yet best written introduction to number theory I've ever seen-it's withstood the test of time very well. For math students that have never learned number theory and want to learn it quickly and actively, this is still your best choice.

For more advanced readers with a good undergraduate background in classical analysis, Melvyn Nathason's Elementary Number Theory is outstanding and very underrated. It's very well written and probably the most comprehensive introductory textbook on the subject I know,ranging from the basics of the integers through analytic number theory and concluding with a short introduction to additive number theory, a terrific and very active current area of research the author has been very involved in.I heartily recommend it.

Mathemagician1234
  • 16,324
  • 3
  • 55
  • 77
8

One book I think everyone should see is the one by Joe Roberts, Elementary Number Theory : A Problem Oriented Approach. First reason: the first third of the book is just problems, then the rest of the book is solutions. Second reason: the whole book is done in calligraphy.

Gerry Myerson
  • 168,500
  • 12
  • 196
  • 359
8

W.Sierpinski

Elementary Number Theory

From the master.

8

Manin and Panchishkin's Introduction to Modern Number Theory

Who
  • 250
  • 2
  • 8
8

Another interesting book: A Pathway Into Number Theory - Burn

[B.B] The book is composed entirely of exercises leading the reader through all the elementary theorems of number theory. Can be tedious (you get to verify, say, Fermat's little theorem for maybe $5$ different sets of numbers) but a good way to really work through the beginnings of the subject on one's own.

7

I was shocked to see no one mentioned LeVeque's Fundamentals of Number Theory (Dover). He also authored Elementary Theory of Numbers with same publisher.

Sniper Clown
  • 1,220
  • 2
  • 17
  • 35
5

For people interested in Computational aspects of Number Theory, A Computational Introduction to Number Theory and Algebra - Victor Shoup , is a good book. It is available online.

rrampage
  • 367
  • 3
  • 9
3

Stewart&Tall's "Algebraic Number Theory" is great.

Noah Snyder
  • 9,445
  • 3
  • 37
  • 58
  • 1
    I am not sure if Stewart&Tall lives up to be "everyone who loves Mathematics should read". Though it is written as a first course in ANT and supposed to be an easy-read, it has some (at least three as I am aware of) logical gaps that may be difficult for beginners to fill in. And it has many annoying typos in Fraktur, especially in chapter 5, which distracts the reader. Of course they will not cause serious problems if it is used as a classroom text, where the instructor can provide corrections and relevant information. – eltonjohn Jan 17 '14 at 12:17
3

William Stein has shared his Elementary Number Theory online: http://wstein.org/ent/ It is accessible, lots of examples and has some nice computation integration using SAGE. I'll be using it this semester with secondary teachers, and will report back if things go particularly well or poorly with it.

John Golden
  • 151
  • 5
  • 1
    How did the semester go? I'm thinking of using some of the Sage in a elementary number theory course teach in the spring. Currently, my plan was to use Jones and Jones Elementary Number Theory supplemented by some examples/exercises from Stein. Thoughts? – James S. Cook Sep 30 '14 at 14:49
  • It was good. Sagemath helped a lot with the programming, as it gave more time for compiling than other online free compilers. The number theory commands in Sage are powerful, though, so I was glad they wrote programs to investigate some of the early ideas first. But once we got to the totient function and the like, it really supported the students. Stein wrote a lot of the number theory routines for Sage, so the book was a perfect fit for that. – John Golden Oct 01 '14 at 15:18
2

Books on Number Theory for anyone who loves Mathematics? (Beginner to Advanced & just for someone who has a basic grasp of math)

New answer to an old question:

An Illustrated Theory of Numbers, by Martin H. Weissman ($2017$)

J. W. Tanner
  • 1
  • 3
  • 35
  • 77
2

Perhaps "best ever" is putting it a bit strong, but for me one of the best besides L E Dickson's books was "Elementary Number Theory" by B A Venkov, which does have an English translation.

One advantage of this book is that it covers an unusual and quite eclectic mix of topics, such as a chapter devoted to Liouville's methods on partitions, and some of these are hard to find in other texts.

The best benefit for me, paradoxically, was that the English translation I worked with was littered with misprints, in places a dozen or more per page. So after a while it became quite an enjoyable challenge to find them, and this meant having to study and consider the text more closely than one might have done otherwise!

Willie Wong
  • 68,963
  • 11
  • 143
  • 246
John R Ramsden
  • 303
  • 1
  • 7
1

Elementary Number Theory by Underwood Dudley. This is cheap being a dover book (so no big financial investment) and has witty & imaginatively written proofs, although it might be challenging to the complete beginner. Nevertheless, there are hints for a lot of the exercises.

Okoyos
  • 286
  • 2
  • 10
onepound
  • 1,105
  • 7
  • 19
1

For someone who wants to see a lot of neat Number Theory facts and isn't too interested in proofs, Albert Beiler, Recreations in the Theory of Numbers, is perfect.

Gerry Myerson
  • 168,500
  • 12
  • 196
  • 359
1

In my opinion, "the theory of numbers" by Neal H. Mccoy contains all number theory knowledge that a common person should have.

fernanfio
  • 226
  • 1
  • 5