12

I am a undergraduate student pursuing a degree in mathematics and I hope to pursue graduate level studies and eventually be a professor. I have taken math classes through calculus. I am looking to read upper level maths to find out what I am interested in studying in the higher levels of math.

Can you please recommend subject matter, specific papers or books about higher level math that I may be interested in pursuing? I am not opposed to having to do some reading/research in order to understand the topic.

NNOX Apps
  • 1
  • 15
  • 118
  • 216
Matthew
  • 121
  • 3
  • 1
    Wait, is this as vague as I think it is? :P That said, you should probably pursue what you're good at, because that's usually an indicator you like doing it. – akkkk Apr 23 '12 at 21:51
  • 6
    http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/59486/advice-for-self-study, http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/56902/materials-for-self-study-problems-and-answers – utdiscant Apr 23 '12 at 21:52
  • I recommend accumulating a general knowledge of undergraduate mathematics before you figure out which particular higher math subject most interests you. If you're familiar with analysis you might want to try learning abstract algebra now. – anon Apr 23 '12 at 22:05
  • Also, [how important is programming for mathematicans](http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/132042/how-important-is-programming-for-mathematicians/132095#132095)? – dtldarek Apr 23 '12 at 23:46

1 Answers1

14

I strongly urge you to read an answer that I wrote up for another question: (link).

The landscape of higher education is changing rapidly right now, and the path to becoming a tenured professor is not very similar anymore to what it was even just 15 years ago. I believe (others will disagree) that this process will change even more dramatically in the next 15 years.

If math is what you love, you should definitely continue studying it and pursue it to see what options are available to you. But don't disregard the need to assess your aptitudes and honestly appraise your skill next to the skill of other PhD quality mathematicians vying for the same faculty jobs.

Along these lines, I personally think it's better to go for an applied course of study. Devote time to learning excellent programming skills in multiple languages, as well as non-trivial software design skills. Knowing how to tinker in Matlab, Maple, and Mathematica is not worth anything. Similarly, learn advanced statistics. Study what people do with large data sets (mostly computational Bayesian methods these days). Learn about scientific computing and implementational details.

Additionally, choose a topical domain for which you believe the job outlook will be good. This could be computational finance, computational biology, applied machine learning, or a host of others about which I am less familiar.

Ask your current professors for advice on this. But be careful. People who were lucky enough to make it to the position of professor often suffer from narrative fallacy and selection bias. That is, rather than acknowledging that they are not much more skillful than peers who were not able to win faculty jobs, professors tend to attribute their fortunate position to various narrative stories about what they specifically did to work hard and achieve things. But what worked for one person in one situation is too idiosyncratic for you to care about; it doesn't describe what works for general situations, nor for the future situation that will be relevant to you.

Do lots of research before committing yourself to one direction or another. And consider many other important life factors, not just how much you like math, such as:

  • Do you want to have a family? Children?
  • How important is salary for the lifestyle you want to lead?
  • How important is geography? Young professors rarely get to pick where they live.
  • How employable will your skill set be if you don't get tenure and/or cannot find an academic job?

These things matter a great deal in your decision in college to orient yourself towards a future career. Most people will give advice to you in far-thinking mode, but this isn't a good thing. You should realize that the economic landscape of the world in 5-15 years will determine what jobs you have the option of doing. That's just an attribute of reality. And the more time you spend reflecting on that and planning for what reality will be like, the better suited you'll be to try to make your own goals happen. And, more importantly, the better capable you'll be of re-orienting your goals to match with what is possible.

Community
  • 1
ely
  • 2,455
  • 1
  • 21
  • 25
  • 1
    Thank you for this very much, you've given me a lot to think about. – Matthew Apr 23 '12 at 22:35
  • I agree, but I think that "doing what you like is important" (or better "do what will allow you to do what you like") is not emphasized enough, you should actually weight what is important to you (math, taking care of family, whatever). As one could say that I fallen prey to some fallacy, I will just state the following (interpret it in any way you wish): I do what I like, I like what I do, I value such situation very highly and appreciate it very much. From people I know I (subjectively) estimate that those who do what they like are far more (subjectively) happy than the others. Good luck! – dtldarek Apr 23 '12 at 23:36
  • @Matthew Oh, and don't forget, that your values, world view, etc. will probably change in the future! Estimation from your parents, older friends, older people who do similar things or have similar interests or share similar character, situation, whatever, etc. might be a good idea. – dtldarek Apr 23 '12 at 23:48
  • Of course you should give weight to your preferences. I am merely suggesting that most people give *too much* weight to what they currently enjoy doing, and not enough weight to the real externalities involved. Obviously, do not do something you don't enjoy. But surely most people enjoy more than one thing. I mostly think that when someone says, "I do what I love", they haven't thought about it very much. Surely you don't love just one vocation. It's a fallacy that is unique to high standard-of-living countries that we teach our young to focus almost exclusively on imagined preferences. – ely Apr 24 '12 at 00:37
  • 1
    Your approximation is indeed very crude. Quick (crude^^) data gathering shows that on average the question gets 0.0328 votes per view and any single answer gets 0.4251 votes per view. I leave the interpretation to you, but for the question $7.0/125.0/0.0328 = 1.7$ and for your answer $3.0/125.0/0.04251 = 0.546$. Moreover, to address the comment on drop-out rate, you should take into account, that there are many things that lure grad students out of the academia. Maybe it is a sensible choice to do some science or learn something new while waiting for a nice opportunity? – dtldarek Apr 24 '12 at 07:05