3352

In Java, are there clear rules on when to use each of access modifiers, namely the default (package private), public, protected and private, while making class and interface and dealing with inheritance?

Steve Chambers
  • 31,993
  • 15
  • 129
  • 173
intrepion
  • 34,999
  • 4
  • 21
  • 21
  • 172
    `private` hides from other classes within the package. `public` exposes to classes outside the package. `protected` is a version of `public` restricted only to subclasses. – Museful Feb 13 '13 at 09:56
  • 94
    @Tennenrishin — No ; contrary to C++, in Java `protected` makes the method also accessible from the whole package. This stupidity in Java's visiblity model breaks the goal of `protected`. – Nicolas Barbulesco Aug 21 '13 at 09:51
  • 38
    @Nicolas It is accessible from the whole package, with or without `protected`. As an access *modifier*, all that `protected` does is to expose to subclasses outside the package. – Museful Mar 14 '14 at 10:59
  • 16
    @tennenrishin - well, that is what Nicolas said... and you are just repeating it now. What you originally said was that `protected` - and I quote - 'is a version of public restricted only to subclasses' which is not true by your own admission since protected also allows access through the whole package (ergo, it does not **restrict** access to subclasses.) – luis.espinal Apr 07 '14 at 13:45
  • 14
    I also agree with Nicolas in that the protected access mode in Java is idiotic. What happened is that Java conflated horizontal (lattice) and vertical access restriction qualifiers. Default scope is a horizontal/lattice restriction with the lattice being the package. Public is another horizontal restriction where the lattice is the whole world. Private and (C++) protected are vertical. It would have been better if we had a cross-cut access, say, `protected-package` for the rare cases where we actually needed it, leaving `protected` to be equivalent to the C++ version of protected. – luis.espinal Apr 07 '14 at 13:53
  • 8
    @luis.espinal Then he was just repeating what the first comment had said. You cannot expose what is already visible, and saying that `protected` is a restricted exposer does not imply that it *hides* anything. Otherwise even "`public` exposes to classes outside the package" would suggest that `public` *hides* from classes inside the package. – Museful Jan 27 '15 at 19:43
  • 1
    The accepted answer is not incorrect, it's just incomplete and a mere copy+paste job from the external resource. @Mechanical snail's answer (http://stackoverflow.com/a/12401576/639520) is much better IMO. – E-Riz Sep 01 '15 at 15:28
  • 3
    @NicolasBarbulesco Contrary to C++? C++ doesn't have packages, you cannot really make the method accessible to a number of classes unless you make each of them a friend of the class manually. If Java had no concept of packages, it would work exactly the same. Speaking of the stupidity, the code from the same package is supposed to come from the same developer anyway, so I don't really see a huge problem here. – Malcolm Nov 05 '15 at 16:39
  • 1
    @Malcolm - "the code from the same package is supposed to come from the same developer anyway" Who says that? Often, this is not the case. – Nicolas Barbulesco Nov 20 '15 at 10:02
  • 1
    @NicolasBarbulesco I don't see how this is possible if the packages are properly prefixed with the developer's domain. – Malcolm Nov 20 '15 at 10:06
  • 2
    No one else noticed the joke that moderator Mystical `protected` this question to prevent *everyone* from answering?? Genius! – NoName Jun 23 '17 at 08:42
  • @Malcolm that is not true, we regularly put our own classes in same packages as libraries due to package-private access – Enerccio May 18 '18 at 07:12
  • @Enerccio What isn't true? I didn't say that no one does it. That's bad practice though, you are accessing some private APIs that way which makes the code brittle, and starting with Java 9 packages split across modules are not allowed at all. – Malcolm May 18 '18 at 13:28
  • @Malcolm package private was just a bad idea and java should have never had one. Recently I had to create default JSON element that would not throw NPE if data was null but I couldn't do it because one method on JSONElement was package private. So I had to fudge it. – Enerccio May 19 '18 at 14:01
  • @Enerccio I don't see how inconvenient API design makes it Java's fault. – Malcolm May 19 '18 at 21:32
  • @Malcolm java's fault is the fact that there is package private – Enerccio May 21 '18 at 05:27
  • @Enerccio You've stated this already, you didn't provide the reasoning. We can [continue in the chat](https://chat.stackoverflow.com/rooms/171452/room-for-malcolm-and-enerccio). – Malcolm May 21 '18 at 09:41

29 Answers29

5914

The official tutorial may be of some use to you.


Class Package Subclass
(same pkg)
Subclass
(diff pkg)
World
public + + + + +
protected + + + +
no modifier + + +
private +

+ : accessible
blank : not accessible

M. Justin
  • 5,160
  • 1
  • 38
  • 65
David Segonds
  • 78,317
  • 10
  • 43
  • 66
  • 27
    The protected member can only be accessed from subclass of same package but not subclass from different package. There should be a correction in above table – niks Sep 01 '17 at 08:35
  • 2
    I am still not able to differentiate between 'Public' and 'Protected'. And what is 'World' in this answer. Does it mean access out of project folder in a different project & package?? But that is not taking place. Need help on this. – Deepak Apr 25 '18 at 12:25
  • 2
    @Deepak, World is within your project. If you have a class that is public, any other class can instantiate that class. Same as methods. If it is public, anyone that uses that class can use that method. Package refers to the "folder" that you are in. So, `ca.my.package.controllers` is different than `ca.my.package.models`. Public items are accessible outside of those packages, but the rest are not. package-private are considered public within the package, essentially. Protected means anything that inherits it, or within the same package. Private removes all outside access, including package. – adprocas May 03 '18 at 12:59
  • 7
    _World is within your project_. I should explain further. Libraries are within your project, and if you're creating a library, they would expose these public classes and methods as well. So, saying just within your project is a bit off. "Everything that uses it" is a better description. – adprocas May 03 '18 at 13:02
  • 1
    @adpro - I tried at my end making methods public and protected but both of these types of methods are accessible outside their primary package and user has to extend the parent class in both the cases which is quite obvious. I am still unsure of the difference. A little bit more explanation or trick might help. – Deepak May 04 '18 at 06:23
  • 1
    @Deepak, if you are extending (inheriting) the class then that class that is inheriting will have access to all public and protected methods and properties. If you instead instantiate that class in another class (not extend) and try to do something like `object.protectedMethod()` on a protected method, you won't be able to unless it is in the same package. – adprocas May 04 '18 at 12:22
  • 5
    For example, if I have `MyClass` and I'm doing `AnotherClass extends MyClass` I will have access to all protected and public methods and properties from within `AnotherClass`. If I do `MyClass myClass = new MyClass();` in `AnotherClass` somewhere - let's say the constructor - I will only have access to the public methods if it is in a different package. Note that if I do `= new MyClass() { @Override protected void protectedMethod() { //some logic } };` it appears that I can access protected methods, but this kind of the same as extending it, but inline instead. – adprocas May 04 '18 at 12:25
  • 7
    Unfortunately, this answer is a gross oversimplification. Reality is a bit more complicated, especially when you consider `protected` (which is actually quite a difficult access modifier to fully understand - most people who think they know what `protected` means really don't). Also, as Bohemian pointed out, it doesn't answer the question - it says _nothing_ about when to use each access modifier. In my opinion, this answer isn't _quite_ bad enough to downvote, but close. But over 4000 upvotes? How did this happen? – Dawood ibn Kareem Jul 11 '18 at 06:26
  • 1
    Subclass (same package) field is misleading, It's better to remove that column. Because it doesn't matter is that a subclass or not. – Anatolii Stepaniuk Sep 06 '18 at 07:04
  • 4
    @DawoodsaysreinstateMonica It's a great answer, it's exactly what most people that find this page are looking for. Also, that table is from the official Oracle tutorial. But how about you toss us a link so we can learn what "protected" really means? – Heinzlmaen Feb 06 '20 at 14:58
  • 2
    protected is only accessible in same package. Its not accessible outside of that package . protected specifier in java is called package level specifier. – Badri Paudel May 08 '20 at 10:18
  • 1
    @UsagiMiyamoto : Can you please elaborate more on how can "private members can be seen/used by any class/static method in the same source-file" ? – jayjay Jul 29 '20 at 22:44
  • 3
    @niks : I am able to access protected members from subclass of different packages – jayjay Jul 29 '20 at 22:46
  • 6
    @niks protected members CAN be accessed by subclasses from a different package. Isn't that the point? Otherwise what's the difference between default and protected? – Jack Oct 15 '20 at 12:30
  • 4
    @Jack Yeah, niks' comment is wrong despite the many upvotes stating otherwise. The Java Tutorials link in the answer clearly says that protected members can also be accessed within subclasses from a different package. It seems that he/she meant "package-level" instead of "protected", or was referring to a different edit. – Piovezan Feb 05 '21 at 02:57
  • 2
    @DawoodsaysreinstateMonica I think the issue here is that the title & body are asking two different questions: "What is the difference between the access modifiers" and "When should the different access modifiers be used." This answer is answering the question in the title, but not the question in the body. – M. Justin Feb 17 '21 at 07:38
515

(Caveat: I am not a Java programmer, I am a Perl programmer. Perl has no formal protections which is perhaps why I understand the problem so well :) )

Private

Like you'd think, only the class in which it is declared can see it.

Package Private

It can only be seen and used by the package in which it was declared. This is the default in Java (which some see as a mistake).

Protected

Package Private + can be seen by subclasses or package members.

Public

Everyone can see it.

Published

Visible outside the code I control. (While not Java syntax, it is important for this discussion).

C++ defines an additional level called "friend" and the less you know about that the better.

When should you use what? The whole idea is encapsulation to hide information. As much as possible you want to hide the detail of how something is done from your users. Why? Because then you can change them later and not break anybody's code. This lets you optimize, refactor, redesign, and fix bugs without worry that someone was using that code you just overhauled.

So, the rule of thumb is to make things only as visible as they have to be. Start with private and only add more visibility as needed. Only make public that which is absolutely necessary for the user to know, every detail you make public cramps your ability to redesign the system.

If you want users to be able to customize behaviors, rather than making internals public so they can override them, it's often a better idea to shove those guts into an object and make that interface public. That way they can simply plug in a new object. For example, if you were writing a CD player and wanted the "go find info about this CD" bit customizable, rather than make those methods public you'd put all that functionality into its own object and make just your object getter/setter public. In this way being stingy about exposing your guts encourages good composition and separation of concerns

Personally, I stick with just "private" and "public". Many OO languages just have that. "Protected" can be handy, but it's really a cheat. Once an interface is more than private it's outside of your control and you have to go looking in other people's code to find uses.

This is where the idea of "published" comes in. Changing an interface (refactoring it) requires that you find all the code which is using it and change that, too. If the interface is private, well no problem. If it's protected you have to go find all your subclasses. If it's public you have to go find all the code which uses your code. Sometimes this is possible, for example, if you're working on corporate code that's for internal use only it doesn't matter if an interface is public. You can grab all the code out of the corporate repository. But if an interface is "published", if there is code using it outside your control, then you're hosed. You must support that interface or risk breaking code. Even protected interfaces can be considered published (which is why I don't bother with protected).

Many languages find the hierarchical nature of public/protected/private to be too limiting and not in line with reality. To that end, there is the concept of a trait class, but that's another show.

Krishna Sony
  • 957
  • 6
  • 21
Schwern
  • 127,817
  • 21
  • 150
  • 290
  • 26
    friends -> "The less you know about it the better" ---> It gives selective visibility, which is still superior to package privacy. In C++, it has its uses, because not all functions can be member functions, and friends is better than public'ing. Of course there is a danger of misuse by evil minds. – Sebastian Mach Jun 07 '11 at 10:13
  • 32
    It should also be noted that "protected" in C++ has a different meaning - a protected method is effectively private, but can still be called from an inheriting class. (As opposed to Java where it can be called by any class within the same package.) – Rhys van der Waerden Oct 02 '11 at 12:34
  • 9
    @RhysvanderWaerden C# is the same as C++ in this aspect. I find it pretty odd that Java doesn't allow to declare a member that's accessible to the subclass but not the entire package. It's sort of upside down to me - a package is broader scope than a child class! – Konrad Morawski Oct 15 '13 at 17:36
  • 15
    @KonradMorawski IMHO package is smaller scope than subclass. If you haven't declared your class final, users should be able to subclass it - so java protected is part of your published interface. OTOH, packages are implicitly developed by a single organization: e.g. com.mycompany.mypackage. If your code declares itself in my package, you implicitly declare yourself part of my organization, so we should be communicating. Thus, package publishes to a smaller/easier to reach audience (people in my company) than subclass (people who extend my object) and so counts as lower visibility. – Eponymous May 22 '14 at 20:37
  • 1
    `friend` only is good for special cases, like overloading classes. otherwise it's a bad-practice for architectural design, since it will mess up layering-concept – Khaled.K May 28 '14 at 05:36
  • 2
    `friend` is good for defining special relationships between classes. It allows superior encapsulation in many cases when used correctly. For example it can be used by a privileged factory class to inject internal dependencies into a constructed type. It has a bad name because people who don't care about correctly maintaining a well designed object model can abuse it to ease their workload. – Dennis Dec 08 '14 at 10:05
  • @konrad-morawski Java did, in very ancient times (before 1.03), have an additional access modifier `private protected`, that did just that. There were several reasons it was removed, but the primary one in my opinion is that a package in Java *is* indeed a narrower scope than a child class (that is usually in some other package), so this access made no real sense. I actually used it a couple times back then, but never really found a good case to use it in. I blame my C++ roots :) – Tomas Oct 29 '15 at 10:45
  • In Java private prevents overrides, protected doesn't (but also isn't totally public), so they all do have their uses. – User Oct 08 '16 at 09:48
  • "Once an interface is more than private it's outside of your control" - that's only true for those ignoring package visibility as you do. All modifiers are important for information hiding and a package is usually authored by a small tightly cooperating team which treats all package visible methods as private to them. +++ Similarly, `friend` isn't meant to wreak havoc on visibility, but to allow to tighten the rules more while adding an exception (any exception mechanism is prone to abuse; that's why package visibility is better, but maybe once a month I could use `friend`, too). – maaartinus Jun 10 '17 at 09:24
470

Here's a better version of the table, that also includes a column for modules.

Java Access Modifiers

Explanations

  • A private member (i) is only accessible within the same class as it is declared.

  • A member with no access modifier (j) is only accessible within classes in the same package.

  • A protected member (k) is accessible within all classes in the same package and within subclasses in other packages.

  • A public member (l) is accessible to all classes (unless it resides in a module that does not export the package it is declared in).


Which modifier to choose?

Access modifiers is a tool to help you to prevent accidentally breaking encapsulation(*). Ask yourself if you intend the member to be something that's internal to the class, package, class hierarchy or not internal at all, and choose access level accordingly.

Examples:

  • A field long internalCounter should probably be private since it's mutable and an implementation detail.
  • A class that should only be instantiated in a factory class (in the same package) should have a package restricted constructor, since it shouldn't be possible to call it directly from outside the package.
  • An internal void beforeRender() method called right before rendering and used as a hook in subclasses should be protected.
  • A void saveGame(File dst) method which is called from the GUI code should be public.

(*) What is Encapsulation exactly?

aioobe
  • 383,660
  • 99
  • 774
  • 796
  • 16
    Just saying: there are a lot of people who have problems with distinguishing red/green coloring. Tables using red/green (or yellow/orange/...) coloring schemes are rarely "better" at anything ;-) – GhostCat Oct 11 '18 at 10:50
  • 5
    @GhostCat, I disagree. I think red/green aligns intuitively with "works"/"does not work" for many people, i.e. it _is_ better than many alternatives. – aioobe Nov 14 '18 at 14:10
  • 10
    http://www.colourblindawareness.org/colour-blindness/types-of-colour-blindness/ ... *The 8% of colour blind men can be divided approximately into 1% deuteranopes, 1% protanopes, 1% protanomalous and **5% deuteranomalous**.* And as I am one of those 50% of that 5%, rest assured: red/green sucks. – GhostCat Nov 14 '18 at 14:13
  • 7
    @GhostCat Ok.. that's a larger part of the population than I expected. I uploaded the image in this [color blindness simulator](https://www.color-blindness.com/coblis-color-blindness-simulator/) and tested all different modes. Even in monochromacy/achromatopsia mode the color difference is reasonable. Can you see the difference or is the simulator off? (I'm still of the opinion that red/green is very intuitive for color seeing people.) – aioobe Nov 14 '18 at 14:32
  • 5
    I can see the difference, but I am also able to pass half of the color blindness tests that we have to do in Germany for the drivers licence ;-) ... but I think such a simulator is "good enough". – GhostCat Nov 14 '18 at 14:40
  • 2
    I got confused with the colors – RMati Jun 24 '19 at 05:26
212
____________________________________________________________________
                | highest precedence <---------> lowest precedence
*———————————————+———————————————+———————————+———————————————+———————
 \ xCanBeSeenBy | this          | any class | this subclass | any
  \__________   | class         | in same   | in another    | class
             \  | nonsubbed     | package   | package       |    
Modifier of x \ |               |           |               |       
————————————————*———————————————+———————————+———————————————+———————
public          |       ✔       |     ✔     |       ✔       |   ✔  
————————————————+———————————————+———————————+———————————————+———————
protected       |       ✔       |     ✔     |       ✔       |   ✘   
————————————————+———————————————+———————————+———————————————+———————
package-private |               |           |               |
(no modifier)   |       ✔       |     ✔     |       ✘       |   ✘   
————————————————+———————————————+———————————+———————————————+———————
private         |       ✔       |     ✘     |       ✘       |   ✘    
____________________________________________________________________
Clark Kent
  • 35
  • 7
Abdull
  • 23,005
  • 22
  • 116
  • 159
  • 2
    It is worth putting in words - "Protected modifier makes the object available across other packages, whereas default/no-modifier restricts access to the same package" – vanguard69 Aug 15 '16 at 16:53
  • 2
    @vanguard69, the `protected` modifier makes the marked *thing* (class, method, or field) available to some other class in some other package **only iff** said other class is a subclass of the class where that `protected`- marked *thing* is declared. – Abdull Aug 15 '16 at 18:14
  • "nonsubbed"? "this subclass in another package"? Huh. I thought I knew Java. – sehe Dec 10 '17 at 12:24
169

Easy rule. Start with declaring everything private. And then progress towards the public as the needs arise and design warrants it.

When exposing members ask yourself if you are exposing representation choices or abstraction choices. The first is something you want to avoid as it will introduce too many dependencies on the actual representation rather than on its observable behavior.

As a general rule I try to avoid overriding method implementations by subclassing; it's too easy to screw up the logic. Declare abstract protected methods if you intend for it to be overridden.

Also, use the @Override annotation when overriding to keep things from breaking when you refactor.

kvantour
  • 20,742
  • 4
  • 38
  • 51
John Nilsson
  • 16,089
  • 8
  • 29
  • 41
118

It's actually a bit more complicated than a simple grid shows. The grid tells you whether an access is allowed, but what exactly constitutes an access? Also, access levels interact with nested classes and inheritance in complex ways.

The "default" access (specified by the absence of a keyword) is also called package-private. Exception: in an interface, no modifier means public access; modifiers other than public are forbidden. Enum constants are always public.

Summary

Is an access to a member with this access specifier allowed?

  • Member is private: Only if member is defined within the same class as calling code.
  • Member is package private: Only if the calling code is within the member's immediately enclosing package.
  • Member is protected: Same package, or if member is defined in a superclass of the class containing the calling code.
  • Member is public: Yes.

What access specifiers apply to

Local variables and formal parameters cannot take access specifiers. Since they are inherently inaccessible to the outside according to scoping rules, they are effectively private.

For classes in the top scope, only public and package-private are permitted. This design choice is presumably because protected and private would be redundant at the package level (there is no inheritance of packages).

All the access specifiers are possible on class members (constructors, methods and static member functions, nested classes).

Related: Java Class Accessibility

Order

The access specifiers can be strictly ordered

public > protected > package-private > private

meaning that public provides the most access, private the least. Any reference possible on a private member is also valid for a package-private member; any reference to a package-private member is valid on a protected member, and so on. (Giving access to protected members to other classes in the same package was considered a mistake.)

Notes

  • A class's methods are allowed to access private members of other objects of the same class. More precisely, a method of class C can access private members of C on objects of any subclass of C. Java doesn't support restricting access by instance, only by class. (Compare with Scala, which does support it using private[this].)
  • You need access to a constructor to construct an object. Thus if all constructors are private, the class can only be constructed by code living within the class (typically static factory methods or static variable initializers). Similarly for package-private or protected constructors.
    • Only having private constructors also means that the class cannot be subclassed externally, since Java requires a subclass's constructors to implicitly or explicitly call a superclass constructor. (It can, however, contain a nested class that subclasses it.)

Inner classes

You also have to consider nested scopes, such as inner classes. An example of the complexity is that inner classes have members, which themselves can take access modifiers. So you can have a private inner class with a public member; can the member be accessed? (See below.) The general rule is to look at scope and think recursively to see whether you can access each level.

However, this is quite complicated, and for full details, consult the Java Language Specification. (Yes, there have been compiler bugs in the past.)

For a taste of how these interact, consider this example. It is possible to "leak" private inner classes; this is usually a warning:

class Test {
    public static void main(final String ... args) {
        System.out.println(Example.leakPrivateClass()); // OK
        Example.leakPrivateClass().secretMethod(); // error
    }
}

class Example {
    private static class NestedClass {
        public void secretMethod() {
            System.out.println("Hello");
        }
    }
    public static NestedClass leakPrivateClass() {
        return new NestedClass();
    }
}

Compiler output:

Test.java:4: secretMethod() in Example.NestedClass is defined in an inaccessible class or interface
        Example.leakPrivateClass().secretMethod(); // error
                                  ^
1 error

Some related questions:

Community
  • 1
  • 1
Mechanical snail
  • 26,499
  • 14
  • 83
  • 107
  • 2
    *"modifiers other than public are forbidden"* — as of Java 9, this is no longer the case: interfaces can also have private methods. – MC Emperor Aug 25 '18 at 20:34
97

As a rule of thumb:

  • private: class scope.
  • default (or package-private): package scope.
  • protected: package scope + child (like package, but we can subclass it from different packages). The protected modifier always keeps the "parent-child" relationship.
  • public: everywhere.

As a result, if we divide access right into three rights:

  • (D)irect (invoke from a method inside the same class, or via "this" syntax).
  • (R)eference (invoke a method using a reference to the class, or via "dot" syntax).
  • (I)nheritance (via subclassing).

then we have this simple table:

+—-———————————————+————————————+———————————+
|                 |    Same    | Different |
|                 |   Package  | Packages  |
+—————————————————+————————————+———————————+
| private         |   D        |           |
+—————————————————+————————————+———————————+
| package-private |            |           |
| (no modifier)   |   D R I    |           |
+—————————————————+————————————+———————————+
| protected       |   D R I    |       I   |
+—————————————————+————————————+———————————+
| public          |   D R I    |    R  I   |
+—————————————————+————————————+———————————+
Hoa Nguyen
  • 10,964
  • 11
  • 42
  • 42
55

In very short

  • public: accessible from everywhere.
  • protected: accessible by the classes of the same package and the subclasses residing in any package.
  • default (no modifier specified): accessible by the classes of the same package.
  • private: accessible within the same class only.
Ravi
  • 28,657
  • 41
  • 110
  • 158
49

The most misunderstood access modifier in Java is protected. We know that it's similar to the default modifier with one exception in which subclasses can see it. But how? Here is an example which hopefully clarifies the confusion:

  • Assume that we have 2 classes; Father and Son, each in its own package:

    package fatherpackage;
    
    public class Father
    {
    
    }
    
    -------------------------------------------
    
    package sonpackage;
    
    public class Son extends Father
    {
    
    }
    
  • Let's add a protected method foo() to Father.

    package fatherpackage;
    
    public class Father
    {
        protected void foo(){}
    }
    
  • The method foo() can be called in 4 contexts:

    1. Inside a class that is located in the same package where foo() is defined (fatherpackage):

      package fatherpackage;
      
      public class SomeClass
      {
          public void someMethod(Father f, Son s)
          {
              f.foo();
              s.foo();
          }
      }
      
    2. Inside a subclass, on the current instance via this or super:

      package sonpackage;
      
      public class Son extends Father
      {
          public void sonMethod()
          {
              this.foo();
              super.foo();
          }
      }
      
    3. On an reference whose type is the same class:

      package fatherpackage;
      
      public class Father
      {
          public void fatherMethod(Father f)
          {
              f.foo(); // valid even if foo() is private
          }
      }
      
      -------------------------------------------
      
      package sonpackage;
      
      public class Son extends Father
      {
          public void sonMethod(Son s)
          {
              s.foo();
          }
      }
      
    4. On an reference whose type is the parent class and it is inside the package where foo() is defined (fatherpackage) [This can be included inside context no. 1]:

      package fatherpackage;
      
      public class Son extends Father
      {
          public void sonMethod(Father f)
          {
              f.foo();
          }
      }
      
  • The following situations are not valid.

    1. On an reference whose type is the parent class and it is outside the package where foo() is defined (fatherpackage):

      package sonpackage;
      
      public class Son extends Father
      {
          public void sonMethod(Father f)
          {
              f.foo(); // compilation error
          }
      }
      
    2. A non-subclass inside a package of a subclass (A subclass inherits the protected members from its parent, and it makes them private to non-subclasses):

      package sonpackage;
      
      public class SomeClass
      {
          public void someMethod(Son s) throws Exception
          {
              s.foo(); // compilation error
          }
      }
      
Eng.Fouad
  • 107,075
  • 62
  • 298
  • 390
  • `Object#clone()` is an example of a `protected` member. – Eng.Fouad Nov 15 '13 at 20:08
  • What is the difference between doing `super.foo()` and the first invalid situation `f.foo()`? – cst1992 Oct 28 '17 at 09:18
  • 1
    @cst1992 It's confusing but see the Java Language Specification 6.6.2: "A protected member or constructor of an object may be accessed from outside the package in which it is declared only by code that is responsible for the implementation of that object". With super.foo() the reference "super" is "directly responsible for the implementation" but the reference "f" is not. Why? Because you can be 100% certain that "super" is of type Father, but not for "f"; at run-time it could be some other sub-type of Father. See https://docs.oracle.com/javase/specs/jls/se9/html/jls-6.html#jls-6.6.2.1 – skomisa Jan 30 '18 at 17:55
  • 1
    It's refreshing to read an answer from someone who understands `protected`. Unfortunately, all the other answers on this page that define `protected` get it a little bit wrong. – Dawood ibn Kareem Jul 11 '18 at 06:20
30

Private

  • Methods,Variables and Constructors

Methods, Variables and Constructors that are declared private can only be accessed within the declared class itself.

  • Class and Interface

Private access modifier is the most restrictive access level. Class and interfaces cannot be private.

Note

Variables that are declared private can be accessed outside the class if public getter methods are present in the class. Variables, methods and constructors which are declared protected in a superclass can be accessed only by the subclasses in other package or any class within the package of the protected members' class.


Protected

  • Class and Interface

The protected access modifier cannot be applied to class and interfaces.

Methods, fields can be declared protected, however methods and fields in a interface cannot be declared protected.

Note

Protected access gives the subclass a chance to use the helper method or variable, while preventing a nonrelated class from trying to use it.


Public

A class, method, constructor, interface etc declared public can be accessed from any other class.

Therefore fields, methods, blocks declared inside a public class can be accessed from any class belonging to the Java Universe.

  • Different Packages

However if the public class we are trying to access is in a different package, then the public class still need to be imported.

Because of class inheritance, all public methods and variables of a class are inherited by its subclasses.


Default -No keyword:

Default access modifier means we do not explicitly declare an access modifier for a class, field, method, etc.

  • Within the same Packages

A variable or method declared without any access control modifier is available to any other class in the same package. The fields in an interface are implicitly public static final and the methods in an interface are by default public.

Note

We cannot Override the Static fields.if you try to override it does not show any error but it doesnot work what we except.

Related Answers

References links

http://docs.oracle.com/javase/tutorial/java/javaOO/accesscontrol.html http://www.tutorialspoint.com/java/java_access_modifiers.htm

Community
  • 1
  • 1
Nambi
  • 11,454
  • 3
  • 34
  • 49
20

The difference can be found in the links already provided but which one to use usually comes down to the "Principle of Least Knowledge". Only allow the least visibility that is needed.

Joe Phillips
  • 44,686
  • 25
  • 93
  • 148
20

Private: Limited access to class only

Default (no modifier): Limited access to class and package

Protected: Limited access to class, package and subclasses (both inside and outside package)

Public: Accessible to class, package (all), and subclasses... In short, everywhere.

Peter Mortensen
  • 28,342
  • 21
  • 95
  • 123
samkit shah
  • 631
  • 7
  • 18
17

Access modifiers are there to restrict access at several levels.

Public: It is basically as simple as you can access from any class whether that is in same package or not.

To access if you are in same package you can access directly, but if you are in another package then you can create an object of the class.

Default: It is accessible in the same package from any of the class of package.

To access you can create an object of the class. But you can not access this variable outside of the package.

Protected: you can access variables in same package as well as subclass in any other package. so basically it is default + Inherited behavior.

To access protected field defined in base class you can create object of child class.

Private: it can be access in same class.

In non-static methods you can access directly because of this reference (also in constructors)but to access in static methods you need to create object of the class.

Peter Mortensen
  • 28,342
  • 21
  • 95
  • 123
Prashant
  • 2,480
  • 2
  • 17
  • 26
17

Access modifiers in Java.

Java access modifiers are used to provide access control in Java.

1. Default:

Accessible to the classes in the same package only.

For example,

// Saved in file A.java
package pack;

class A{
  void msg(){System.out.println("Hello");}
}

// Saved in file B.java
package mypack;
import pack.*;

class B{
  public static void main(String args[]){
   A obj = new A(); // Compile Time Error
   obj.msg(); // Compile Time Error
  }
}

This access is more restricted than public and protected, but less restricted than private.

2. Public

Can be accessed from anywhere. (Global Access)

For example,

// Saved in file A.java

package pack;
public class A{
  public void msg(){System.out.println("Hello");}
}

// Saved in file B.java

package mypack;
import pack.*;

class B{
  public static void main(String args[]){
    A obj = new A();
    obj.msg();
  }
}

Output:Hello

3. Private

Accessible only inside the same class.

If you try to access private members on one class in another will throw compile error. For example,

class A{
  private int data = 40;
  private void msg(){System.out.println("Hello java");}
}

public class Simple{
  public static void main(String args[]){
    A obj = new A();
    System.out.println(obj.data); // Compile Time Error
    obj.msg(); // Compile Time Error
  }
}

4. Protected

Accessible only to the classes in the same package and to the subclasses

For example,

// Saved in file A.java
package pack;
public class A{
  protected void msg(){System.out.println("Hello");}
}

// Saved in file B.java
package mypack;
import pack.*;

class B extends A{
  public static void main(String args[]){
    B obj = new B();
    obj.msg();
  }
}

Output: Hello

Enter image description here

Community
  • 1
  • 1
Affy
  • 2,425
  • 22
  • 32
14

Visible to the package. The default. No modifiers are needed.

Visible to the class only (private).

Visible to the world (public).

Visible to the package and all subclasses (protected).

Variables and methods can be declared without any modifiers that are called. Default examples:

String name = "john";

public int age(){
    return age;
}

Private access modifier - private:

Methods, variables and constructors that are declared private can only be accessed within the declared class itself. The private access modifier is the most restrictive access level. Class and interfaces cannot be private.

Variables that are declared private can be accessed outside the class if public getter methods are present in the class.

Using the private modifier is the main way that an object encapsulates itself and hides data from the outside world.

Examples:

Public class Details{

    private String name;

    public void setName(String n){
        this.name = n;
    }

    public String getName(){
        return this.name;
    }
}

Public access modifier - public:

A class, method, constructor, interface, etc. declared public can be accessed from any other class. Therefore fields, methods, blocks declared inside a public class can be accessed from any class belonging to the Java universe.

However, if the public class we are trying to access is in a different package, then the public class still need to be imported.

Because of class inheritance, all public methods and variables of a class are inherited by its subclasses.

Example:

public void cal(){

}

Protected access modifier - protected:

Variables, methods and constructors which are declared protected in a superclass can be accessed only by the subclasses in another package or any class within the package of the protected members' class.

The protected access modifier cannot be applied to class and interfaces. Methods, fields can be declared protected, however methods and fields in a interface cannot be declared protected.

Protected access gives the subclass a chance to use the helper method or variable, while preventing a nonrelated class from trying to use it.

class Van{

    protected boolean speed(){

    }
}

class Car{
    boolean speed(){
    }

}
Peter Mortensen
  • 28,342
  • 21
  • 95
  • 123
amila isura
  • 962
  • 1
  • 15
  • 26
14
  • public - accessible from anywhere in the application.

  • default - accessible from package.

  • protected - accessible from package and sub-classes in other package. as well

  • private - accessible from its class only.

Alex Weitz
  • 2,451
  • 2
  • 24
  • 41
11

This page writes well about the protected & default access modifier

.... Protected: Protected access modifier is the a little tricky and you can say is a superset of the default access modifier. Protected members are same as the default members as far as the access in the same package is concerned. The difference is that, the protected members are also accessible to the subclasses of the class in which the member is declared which are outside the package in which the parent class is present.

But these protected members are “accessible outside the package only through inheritance“. i.e you can access a protected member of a class in its subclass present in some other package directly as if the member is present in the subclass itself. But that protected member will not be accessible in the subclass outside the package by using parent class’s reference. ....

Peter Mortensen
  • 28,342
  • 21
  • 95
  • 123
dameng
  • 470
  • 7
  • 9
  • Just to add this "Once the child gets access to the parent class’s protected member, it becomes private (or rather I would say a special private member which can be inherited by the subclasses of the subclass) member of the subclass." – Anand Oct 27 '12 at 18:55
9

David's answer provides the meaning of each access modifier. As for when to use each, I'd suggest making public all classes and the methods of each class that are meant for external use (its API), and everything else private.

Over time you'll develop a sense for when to make some classes package-private and when to declare certain methods protected for use in subclasses.

Peter Mortensen
  • 28,342
  • 21
  • 95
  • 123
Dov Wasserman
  • 2,536
  • 16
  • 13
9

Java access modifies

enter image description here

Access modifier can be applicable for class, field[About], method. Try to access, subclass or override this.

  • Access to field or method is through a class.
  • Inheritance and Open Closed Principle.
    • Successor class(subclass) access modifier can be any.
    • Successor method(override) access modifier should be the same or expand it

Top level class(first level scope) can be public and default. Nested class[About] can have any of them

package is not applying for package hierarchy

[Swift access modifiers]

yoAlex5
  • 13,571
  • 5
  • 105
  • 98
6

Note: This is just a supplement for the accepted answer.

This is related to Java Access Modifiers.

From Java Access Modifiers:

A Java access modifier specifies which classes can access a given class and its fields, constructors and methods. Access modifiers can be specified separately for a class, its constructors, fields and methods. Java access modifiers are also sometimes referred to in daily speech as Java access specifiers, but the correct name is Java access modifiers. Classes, fields, constructors and methods can have one of four different Java access modifiers:

  • List item
  • private
  • default (package)
  • protected
  • public

From Controlling Access to Members of a Class tutorials:

Access level modifiers determine whether other classes can use a particular field or invoke a particular method. There are two levels of access control:

  • At the top level—public, or package-private (no explicit modifier).
  • At the member level—public, private, protected, or package-private (no explicit modifier).

A class may be declared with the modifier public, in which case that class is visible to all classes everywhere. If a class has no modifier (the default, also known as package-private), it is visible only within its own package

The following table shows the access to members permitted by each modifier.

╔═════════════╦═══════╦═════════╦══════════╦═══════╗
║ Modifier    ║ Class ║ Package ║ Subclass ║ World ║
╠═════════════╬═══════╬═════════╬══════════╬═══════╣
║ public      ║ Y     ║ Y       ║ Y        ║ Y     ║
║ protected   ║ Y     ║ Y       ║ Y        ║ N     ║
║ no modifier ║ Y     ║ Y       ║ N        ║ N     ║
║ private     ║ Y     ║ N       ║ N        ║ N     ║
╚═════════════╩═══════╩═════════╩══════════╩═══════╝

The first data column indicates whether the class itself has access to the member defined by the access level. As you can see, a class always has access to its own members. The second column indicates whether classes in the same package as the class (regardless of their parentage) have access to the member. The third column indicates whether subclasses of the class declared outside this package have access to the member. The fourth column indicates whether all classes have access to the member.

Access levels affect you in two ways. First, when you use classes that come from another source, such as the classes in the Java platform, access levels determine which members of those classes your own classes can use. Second, when you write a class, you need to decide what access level every member variable and every method in your class should have.

ישו אוהב אותך
  • 22,515
  • 9
  • 59
  • 80
5

Public Protected Default and private are access modifiers.

They are meant for encapsulation, or hiding and showing contents of the class.

  1. Class can be public or default
  2. Class members can be public, protected, default or private.

Private is not accessible outside the class Default is accessible only in the package. Protected in package as well as any class which extends it. Public is open for all.

Normally, member variables are defined private, but member methods are public.

richa_v
  • 111
  • 1
  • 7
5

Often times I've realized that remembering the basic concepts of any language can made possible by creating real-world analogies. Here is my analogy for understanding access modifiers in Java:

Let's assume that you're a student at a university and you have a friend who's coming to visit you over the weekend. Suppose there exists a big statue of the university's founder in the middle of the campus.

  • When you bring him to the campus, the first thing that you and your friend sees is this statue. This means that anyone who walks in the campus can look at the statue without the university's permission. This makes the statue as PUBLIC.

  • Next, you want to take your friend to your dorm, but for that you need to register him as a visitor. This means that he gets an access pass (which is the same as yours) to get into various buildings on campus. This would make his access card as PROTECTED.

  • Your friend wants to login to the campus WiFi but doesn't have the any credentials to do so. The only way he can get online is if you share your login with him. (Remember, every student who goes to the university also possesses these login credentials). This would make your login credentials as NO MODIFIER.

  • Finally, your friend wants to read your progress report for the semester which is posted on the website. However, every student has their own personal login to access this section of the campus website. This would make these credentials as PRIVATE.

Hope this helps!

Greedy Coder
  • 81
  • 1
  • 9
5

Differences between public, private, default and protected access modifiers

This image will make you understand easily about the basic differences between public, private, protected and default access modifiers. The default modifier takes place automatically when you don't declare ant access modifiers in your code.

4

When you are thinking of access modifiers just think of it in this way (applies to both variables and methods):

public --> accessible from every where
private --> accessible only within the same class where it is declared

Now the confusion arises when it comes to default and protected

default --> No access modifier keyword is present. This means it is available strictly within the package of the class. Nowhere outside that package it can be accessed.

protected --> Slightly less stricter than default and apart from the same package classes it can be accessed by sub classes outside the package it is declared.

Pritam Banerjee
  • 15,297
  • 10
  • 71
  • 92
3

My two cents :)

private:

class -> a top level class cannot be private. inner classes can be private which are accessible from same class.

instance variable -> accessible only in the class. Cannot access outside the class.

package-private:

class -> a top level class can be package-private. It can only be accessible from same package. Not from sub package, not from outside package.

instance variable -> accessible from same package. Not from sub package, not from outside package.

protected:

class -> a top level class cannot be protected.

instance variable -> Only accessible in same package or subpackage. Can only be access outside the package while extending class.

public:

class -> accessible from package/subpackage/another package

instance variable -> accessible from package/subpackage/another package

Here is detailed answer

https://github.com/junto06/java-4-beginners/blob/master/basics/access-modifier.md

Mudassar
  • 1,468
  • 4
  • 20
  • 29
2

It is all about encapsulation (or as Joe Phillips stated, least knowledge).

Start with the most restrictive (private) and see if you need less restrictive modifiers later on.

We all use method and member modifiers like private, public, ... but one thing too few developers do is use packages to organize code logically.

For example: You may put sensitive security methods in a 'security' package. Then put a public class which accesses some of the security related code in this package but keep other security classes package private. Thus other developers will only be able to use the publicly available class from outside of this package (unless they change the modifier). This is not a security feature, but will guide usage.

Outside world -> Package (SecurityEntryClass ---> Package private classes)

Another thing is that classes which depend a lot on each other may end up in the same package and could eventually be refactored or merged if the dependency is too strong.

If on the contrary you set everything as public it will not be clear what should or should not be accessed, which may lead to writing a lot of javadoc (which does not enforce anything via the compiler...).

Christophe Roussy
  • 13,732
  • 2
  • 75
  • 75
2

private-protected-public-perfect-analogy-for-the-variable-data-types

Following block diagram explain how data members of base class are inherited when derived class access mode is private.

enter image description here

Note: Declaring data members with private access specifier is known as data hiding.

Source : Access Specifiers – Private, Public and Protected

leonidaa
  • 714
  • 8
  • 10
1
  • public

    If a class member is declared with public then it can be accessed from anywhere

  • protected

    If a class member is declared with keyword protected then it can be accessed from same class members, outside class members within the same package and inherited class members. If a class member is protected then it can NOT be accessed from outside package class unless the outside packaged class is inherited i.e. extends the other package superclass. But a protected class member is always available to same package classes it does NOT matter weather the same package class is inherited or NOT

  • default

    In Java default is NOT an access modifier keyword. If a class member is declared without any access modifier keyword then in this case it is considered as default member. The default class member is always available to same package class members. But outside package class member can NOT access default class members even if outside classes are subclasses unlike protected members

  • private

    If a class member is declared with keyword protected then in this case it is available ONLY to same class members

Vipul Verma
  • 99
  • 1
  • 6
-1

Access Specifiers in Java: There are 4 access specifiers in java, namely private, package-private (default), protected and public in increasing access order.

Private: When you are developing some class and you want member of this class not to be exposed outside this class then you should declare it as private. private members can be accessed only in class where they are defined i.e. enclosing class. private members can be accessed on 'this' reference and also on other instances of class enclosing these members, but only within the definition of this class.

Package-private (default): This access specifier will provide access specified by private access specifier in addition to access described below.

When you are developing some package and hence some class (say Class1) within it, you may use default (need not be mentioned explicitly) access specifier, to expose member within class, to other classes within your (same) package. In these other classes (within same package), you can access these default members on instance of Class1. Also you can access these default members within subclasses of Class1, say Class2 (on this reference or on instance of Class1 or on instance of Class2).

Basically, within same package you can access default members on instance of class directly or on 'this' reference in subclasses.

protected: This access specifier will provide access specified by package-private access specifier in addition to access described below.

When you are developing some package and hence some class (say Class1) within it, then you should use protected access specifier for data member within Class1 if you don't want this member to be accessed outside your package (say in package of consumer of your package i.e. client who is using your APIs) in general, but you want to make an exception and allow access to this member only if client writes class say Class2 that extends Class1. So, in general, protected members will be accessible on 'this' reference in derived classes i.e. Class2 and also on explicit instances of Class2.

Please note:

  1. You won't be able to access inherited protected member of Class1 in Class2, if you attempt to access it on explicit instance of Class1, although it is inherited in it.
  2. When you write another class Class3 within same/different package that extends Class2, protected member from Class1 will be accessible on this reference and also on explicit instance of Class3. This will be true for any hierarchy that is extended i.e. protected member will still be accessible on this reference or instance of extended class. Note that in Class3, if you create instance of Class2 then you will not be able to access protected member from Class1 though it is inherited.

So bottom line is, protected members can be accessed in other packages, only if some class from this other package, extends class enclosing this protected member and protected member is accessed on 'this' reference or explicit instances of extended class, within definition of extended class.

public: This access specifier will provide access specified by protected access specifier in addition to access described below.

When you are developing some package and hence some class (say Class1) within it, then you should use public access specifier for data member within Class1 if you want this member to be accessible in other packages on instance of Class1 created in some class of other package. Basically this access specifier should be used when you intent to expose your data member to world without any condition.