a post that grew out of a comment to this page:
Unfortunately my comment was rejected (too many links).
So here is an excerpt from that comment, and a link to the now-fully-fledged blog post, in which I have aggregated all the Disqus links, pro, con, and neutral, that illustrate their respective points.
Having contemplated the wonderful pitter-patter of keyboards that,
all-too-often, does not warm this blog from underneath, I decided
renovation might be just the thing. Disqus has an overall style that
definitely appeals to me. According to the brief overview I quickly
search-engined for myself, Disqus has problems with privacy and
anonymity, just like (it should by now go without saying) Facebook.
The question, for me, is: exactly how close is the resemblance.
And the real question is, how dissimilar can any data-mining,
profile-generating, social-network-enabling corporate entity be from
such creeping Evil. Breaches of privacy cannot be easily explained by
accident, by exceptional circumstances, especially if they recur.
They are soon exposed for what they are: evidence of the sort of
underlying motivations best met with corresponding breaches of trust.
I remain as yet unconvinced and undecided.
In case anyone in interested, these are the Disqus issues that my very
brief search uncovered, with relelevant links, loosely seperated into
general, pro, and con:
the accidental public disclosure of private information such as email address, photo, or real name, when signing up or signing in; the
forcing of users to enable 3d party cookies; difficulty or
impossibility of integration with exclusive HTTPS.
the forcing of users to enable 3d party cookies; difficulty or impossibility of integration with exclusive HTTPS.
difficulty or impossibility of integration with exclusive HTTPS.
For the links to which this excerpt refers, follow go to
A Better Comment Platform Should Be Possible