484

In Python, I have an ndarray y that is printed as array([0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1])

I'm trying to count how many 0s and how many 1s are there in this array.

But when I type y.count(0) or y.count(1), it says

numpy.ndarray object has no attribute count

What should I do?

yatu
  • 75,195
  • 11
  • 47
  • 89
mflowww
  • 5,315
  • 6
  • 15
  • 18

31 Answers31

792
a = numpy.array([0, 3, 0, 1, 0, 1, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 3, 4])
unique, counts = numpy.unique(a, return_counts=True)
dict(zip(unique, counts))

# {0: 7, 1: 4, 2: 1, 3: 2, 4: 1}

Non-numpy way:

Use collections.Counter;

import collections, numpy
a = numpy.array([0, 3, 0, 1, 0, 1, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 3, 4])
collections.Counter(a)

# Counter({0: 7, 1: 4, 3: 2, 2: 1, 4: 1})
Scott
  • 2,415
  • 3
  • 21
  • 38
ozgur
  • 41,172
  • 16
  • 73
  • 106
  • 4
    That would be ``` unique, counts = numpy.unique(a, return_counts=True) dict(zip(unique, counts)) ``` – shredding Mar 16 '16 at 13:14
  • 33
    If you want the dictionary, `dict(zip(*numpy.unique(a, return_counts=True)))` – Seppo Enarvi Apr 28 '16 at 13:19
  • 2
    What if I want to access the number of occurences of each unique elements of the array without assigning to the variable - counts. Any hints on that ? – sajis997 Dec 24 '16 at 23:08
  • I have the same goal as @sajis997. I want to use 'count' as an aggregating function in a groupby – p_sutherland Mar 15 '18 at 16:34
  • @sajis997 if you do a groupby on the desired level of aggregation and use np.count_nonzero as the aggregate function it will return the number of occurrences of a each unique value – p_sutherland Mar 15 '18 at 16:52
  • Does this do anything weird if the array contains `NaN`? – jpmc26 May 12 '18 at 06:05
  • 3
    this is a hack. Numpy has functions for this called bincount() or histogram() – john ktejik Oct 22 '18 at 03:01
  • for reference, you can use np.size in groupby: df.groupby('client')['value'].agg([np.size, np.mean]) # describe already does that, but if you need to customize you can use in this way – J. Ceron Jul 22 '19 at 09:54
  • 4
    Tried using both methods for a very large array (~30Gb). Numpy method ran out of memory whereas the `collections.Counter` worked just fine – Ivan Novikov Nov 26 '19 at 13:10
325

What about using numpy.count_nonzero, something like

>>> import numpy as np
>>> y = np.array([1, 2, 2, 2, 2, 0, 2, 3, 3, 3, 0, 0, 2, 2, 0])

>>> np.count_nonzero(y == 1)
1
>>> np.count_nonzero(y == 2)
7
>>> np.count_nonzero(y == 3)
3
Aziz Alto
  • 14,579
  • 4
  • 64
  • 50
169

Personally, I'd go for: (y == 0).sum() and (y == 1).sum()

E.g.

import numpy as np
y = np.array([0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1])
num_zeros = (y == 0).sum()
num_ones = (y == 1).sum()
Gus Hecht
  • 1,691
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 1
    It's definitely the easiest to read. The question is which is fastest, and most space efficient – Nathan May 30 '18 at 19:02
  • 1
    Mightbe less space efficient than numpy.count_nonzero(y==0), since it evaluates the vector (y==0) – Sridhar Thiagarajan Oct 27 '18 at 22:21
  • 1
    I like this because is similar to matlab/octave `sum( vector==value )` – ePi272314 Aug 17 '19 at 17:01
  • This is also going to work for other values in the array - not just 0 and 1; they don't even have to be numbers. `(y == "A")` returns an array of `bool` values. Since booleans are equal to 0 and 1 in Python, so they can be summed: `(y == "A").sum()` will return the count of `A`s in the array `y`. – natka_m Dec 17 '20 at 15:00
48

For your case you could also look into numpy.bincount

In [56]: a = np.array([0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1])

In [57]: np.bincount(a)
Out[57]: array([8, 4])  #count of zeros is at index 0 : 8
                        #count of ones is at index 1 : 4
Akavall
  • 68,050
  • 39
  • 179
  • 227
  • 1
    This code may be one of the fastest solutions for larger arrays I experimented. Getting the result as a list is a bonus, too. Thanx! – Youngsup Kim Oct 24 '18 at 22:56
  • And if 'a' is an n-dimensional array, we can just use: np.bincount(np.reshape(a, a.size)) – Ari Jan 15 '20 at 09:01
24
y = np.array([0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1])

If you know that they are just 0 and 1:

np.sum(y)

gives you the number of ones. np.sum(1-y) gives the zeroes.

For slight generality, if you want to count 0 and not zero (but possibly 2 or 3):

np.count_nonzero(y)

gives the number of nonzero.

But if you need something more complicated, I don't think numpy will provide a nice count option. In that case, go to collections:

import collections
collections.Counter(y)
> Counter({0: 8, 1: 4})

This behaves like a dict

collections.Counter(y)[0]
> 8
Joel
  • 17,416
  • 3
  • 50
  • 81
23

Convert your array y to list l and then do l.count(1) and l.count(0)

>>> y = numpy.array([0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1])
>>> l = list(y)
>>> l.count(1)
4
>>> l.count(0)
8 
Milind Dumbare
  • 2,768
  • 2
  • 16
  • 32
15

If you know exactly which number you're looking for, you can use the following;

lst = np.array([1,1,2,3,3,6,6,6,3,2,1])
(lst == 2).sum()

returns how many times 2 is occurred in your array.

CanCeylan
  • 2,550
  • 8
  • 32
  • 48
10

No one suggested to use numpy.bincount(input, minlength) with minlength = np.size(input), but it seems to be a good solution, and definitely the fastest:

In [1]: choices = np.random.randint(0, 100, 10000)

In [2]: %timeit [ np.sum(choices == k) for k in range(min(choices), max(choices)+1) ]
100 loops, best of 3: 2.67 ms per loop

In [3]: %timeit np.unique(choices, return_counts=True)
1000 loops, best of 3: 388 µs per loop

In [4]: %timeit np.bincount(choices, minlength=np.size(choices))
100000 loops, best of 3: 16.3 µs per loop

That's a crazy speedup between numpy.unique(x, return_counts=True) and numpy.bincount(x, minlength=np.max(x)) !

Næreen
  • 819
  • 1
  • 10
  • 20
  • hows it compare to histogram? – john ktejik Oct 22 '18 at 03:02
  • @johnktejik `np.histogram` does not compute the same thing. No point comparing the three approaches I propose with the `histogram` function, sorry. – Næreen Oct 24 '18 at 08:20
  • 1
    @Næreen `bincount` only works for integers though, so it works for the OP's problem, but maybe not for the generic problem described in the title. Also have you tried using `bincount` with arrays with very big ints? – Imperishable Night Oct 27 '18 at 13:19
  • @ImperishableNight no I haven't tried with large ints, but anyone is welcome to do so and post their own benchmark :-) – Næreen Oct 30 '18 at 17:47
  • Thank you for this underappreciated trick! On my machine `bincount` is about four times faster than `unique`. – Björn Lindqvist Oct 29 '19 at 20:47
9

Honestly I find it easiest to convert to a pandas Series or DataFrame:

import pandas as pd
import numpy as np

df = pd.DataFrame({'data':np.array([0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1])})
print df['data'].value_counts()

Or this nice one-liner suggested by Robert Muil:

pd.Series([0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1]).value_counts()
wordsforthewise
  • 8,361
  • 3
  • 56
  • 90
8

What about len(y[y==0]) and len(y[y==1]) ?

Anas
  • 786
  • 1
  • 12
  • 22
7

y.tolist().count(val)

with val 0 or 1

Since a python list has a native function count, converting to list before using that function is a simple solution.

michael
  • 353
  • 3
  • 11
6

I'd use np.where:

how_many_0 = len(np.where(a==0.)[0])
how_many_1 = len(np.where(a==1.)[0])
MaxG
  • 233
  • 3
  • 8
6

Yet another simple solution might be to use numpy.count_nonzero():

import numpy as np
y = np.array([0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1])
y_nonzero_num = np.count_nonzero(y==1)
y_zero_num = np.count_nonzero(y==0)
y_nonzero_num
4
y_zero_num
8

Don't let the name mislead you, if you use it with the boolean just like in the example, it will do the trick.

NaZo
  • 61
  • 1
  • 2
6

To count the number of occurrences, you can use np.unique(array, return_counts=True):

In [75]: boo = np.array([0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1])
 
# use bool value `True` or equivalently `1`
In [77]: uniq, cnts = np.unique(boo, return_counts=1)
In [81]: uniq
Out[81]: array([0, 1])   #unique elements in input array are: 0, 1

In [82]: cnts
Out[82]: array([8, 4])   # 0 occurs 8 times, 1 occurs 4 times
kmario23
  • 42,075
  • 12
  • 123
  • 130
4

take advantage of the methods offered by a Series:

>>> import pandas as pd
>>> y = [0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1]
>>> pd.Series(y).value_counts()
0    8
1    4
dtype: int64
4

Try this:

a = np.array([0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1])
list(a).count(1)
jarh1992
  • 316
  • 2
  • 6
3

You can use dictionary comprehension to create a neat one-liner. More about dictionary comprehension can be found here

>>>counts = {int(value): list(y).count(value) for value in set(y)}
>>>print(counts)
{0: 8, 1: 4}

This will create a dictionary with the values in your ndarray as keys, and the counts of the values as the values for the keys respectively.

This will work whenever you want to count occurences of a value in arrays of this format.

CB Madsen
  • 301
  • 2
  • 7
3

If you are interested in the fastest execution, you know in advance which value(s) to look for, and your array is 1D, or you are otherwise interested in the result on the flattened array (in which case the input of the function should be np.ravel(arr) rather than just arr), then Numba is your friend:

import numba as nb


@nb.jit
def count_nb(arr, value):
    result = 0
    for x in arr:
        if x == value:
            result += 1
    return result

or, for very large arrays where parallelization may be beneficial:

@nb.jit(parallel=True)
def count_nbp(arr, value):
    result = 0
    for i in nb.prange(arr.size):
        if arr[i] == value:
            result += 1
    return result

Benchmarking these against np.count_nonzero() (which also has a problem of creating a temporary array which may be avoided) and np.unique()-based solution

import numpy as np


def count_np(arr, value):
    return np.count_nonzero(arr == value)
import numpy as np


def count_np2(arr, value):
    uniques, counts = np.unique(a, return_counts=True)
    counter = dict(zip(uniques, counts))
    return counter[value] if value in counter else 0 

for input generated with:

def gen_input(n, a=0, b=100):
    return np.random.randint(a, b, n)

the following plots are obtained (the second row of plots is a zoom on the faster approach):

bm_full bm_zoom

Showing that Numba-based solution are noticeably faster than the NumPy counterparts, and, for very large inputs, the parallel approach is faster than the naive one.


Full code available here.

norok2
  • 18,523
  • 3
  • 47
  • 78
2

It involves one more step, but a more flexible solution which would also work for 2d arrays and more complicated filters is to create a boolean mask and then use .sum() on the mask.

>>>>y = np.array([0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1])
>>>>mask = y == 0
>>>>mask.sum()
8
Thomas
  • 393
  • 4
  • 11
2

A general and simple answer would be:

numpy.sum(MyArray==x)   # sum of a binary list of the occurence of x (=0 or 1) in MyArray

which would result into this full code as exemple

import numpy
MyArray=numpy.array([0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1])  # array we want to search in
x=0   # the value I want to count (can be iterator, in a list, etc.)
numpy.sum(MyArray==0)   # sum of a binary list of the occurence of x in MyArray

Now if MyArray is in multiple dimensions and you want to count the occurence of a distribution of values in line (= pattern hereafter)

MyArray=numpy.array([[6, 1],[4, 5],[0, 7],[5, 1],[2, 5],[1, 2],[3, 2],[0, 2],[2, 5],[5, 1],[3, 0]])
x=numpy.array([5,1])   # the value I want to count (can be iterator, in a list, etc.)
temp = numpy.ascontiguousarray(MyArray).view(numpy.dtype((numpy.void, MyArray.dtype.itemsize * MyArray.shape[1])))  # convert the 2d-array into an array of analyzable patterns
xt=numpy.ascontiguousarray(x).view(numpy.dtype((numpy.void, x.dtype.itemsize * x.shape[0])))  # convert what you search into one analyzable pattern
numpy.sum(temp==xt)  # count of the searched pattern in the list of patterns
sol
  • 1,150
  • 2
  • 15
  • 30
2

You have a special array with only 1 and 0 here. So a trick is to use

np.mean(x)

which gives you the percentage of 1s in your array. Alternatively, use

np.sum(x)
np.sum(1-x)

will give you the absolute number of 1 and 0 in your array.

CathyQian
  • 718
  • 9
  • 23
2
dict(zip(*numpy.unique(y, return_counts=True)))

Just copied Seppo Enarvi's comment here which deserves to be a proper answer

Dr_Hope
  • 1,475
  • 14
  • 19
1

This can be done easily in the following method

y = np.array([0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1])
y.tolist().count(1)
Eli Sadoff
  • 6,628
  • 6
  • 29
  • 54
1

Since your ndarray contains only 0 and 1, you can use sum() to get the occurrence of 1s and len()-sum() to get the occurrence of 0s.

num_of_ones = sum(array)
num_of_zeros = len(array)-sum(array)
Sabeer Ebrahim
  • 105
  • 1
  • 1
  • 7
1

For generic entries:

x = np.array([11, 2, 3, 5, 3, 2, 16, 10, 10, 3, 11, 4, 5, 16, 3, 11, 4])
n = {i:len([j for j in np.where(x==i)[0]]) for i in set(x)}
ix = {i:[j for j in np.where(x==i)[0]] for i in set(x)}

Will output a count:

{2: 2, 3: 4, 4: 2, 5: 2, 10: 2, 11: 3, 16: 2}

And indices:

{2: [1, 5],
3: [2, 4, 9, 14],
4: [11, 16],
5: [3, 12],
10: [7, 8],
11: [0, 10, 15],
16: [6, 13]}
deckard
  • 699
  • 5
  • 10
0

If you don't want to use numpy or a collections module you can use a dictionary:

d = dict()
a = [0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1]
for item in a:
    try:
        d[item]+=1
    except KeyError:
        d[item]=1

result:

>>>d
{0: 8, 1: 4}

Of course you can also use an if/else statement. I think the Counter function does almost the same thing but this is more transparant.

JLT
  • 662
  • 8
  • 15
0

here I have something, through which you can count the number of occurrence of a particular number: according to your code

count_of_zero=list(y[y==0]).count(0)

print(count_of_zero)

// according to the match there will be boolean values and according to True value the number 0 will be return

The Guy
  • 381
  • 3
  • 10
0

if you are dealing with very large arrays using generators could be an option. The nice thing here it that this approach works fine for both arrays and lists and you dont need any additional package. Additionally, you are not using that much memory.

my_array = np.array([0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1])
sum(1 for val in my_array if val==0)
Out: 8
0

This funktion returns the number of occurences of a variable in an array:

def count(array,variable):
    number = 0
    for i in range(array.shape[0]):
        for j in range(array.shape[1]):
            if array[i,j] == variable:
                number += 1
    return number
BendiXB
  • 48
  • 6
-1

Numpy has a module for this. Just a small hack. Put your input array as bins.

numpy.histogram(y, bins=y)

The output are 2 arrays. One with the values itself, other with the corresponding frequencies.

Ishan Tomar
  • 1,252
  • 1
  • 14
  • 19
-3
using numpy.count

$ a = [0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1]

$ np.count(a, 1)
Suraj Rao
  • 28,186
  • 10
  • 88
  • 94