1042

I have a dictionary: keys are strings, values are integers.

Example:

stats = {'a':1000, 'b':3000, 'c': 100}

I'd like to get 'b' as an answer, since it's the key with a higher value.

I did the following, using an intermediate list with reversed key-value tuples:

inverse = [(value, key) for key, value in stats.items()]
print max(inverse)[1]

Is that one the better (or even more elegant) approach?

Darshana
  • 2,366
  • 6
  • 25
  • 49
ricafeal
  • 10,839
  • 4
  • 17
  • 10
  • 1
    Um, what's wrong with `max(stats)`? – John Red Dec 13 '17 at 10:22
  • 36
    `max(stats)` will use the labels as keys (it will return `'c'`, given that's the maximum label), `max(stats, key=lambda key: stats[key])` is what OP was after (which will return `'b'`, label of maximal indexed value). Is it any clearer? – Atcold Jan 06 '18 at 11:59

26 Answers26

1451
max(stats, key=stats.get)
A. Coady
  • 44,841
  • 8
  • 28
  • 36
708

You can use operator.itemgetter for that:

import operator
stats = {'a':1000, 'b':3000, 'c': 100}
max(stats.iteritems(), key=operator.itemgetter(1))[0]

And instead of building a new list in memory use stats.iteritems(). The key parameter to the max() function is a function that computes a key that is used to determine how to rank items.

Please note that if you were to have another key-value pair 'd': 3000 that this method will only return one of the two even though they both have the maximum value.

>>> import operator
>>> stats = {'a':1000, 'b':3000, 'c': 100, 'd':3000}
>>> max(stats.iteritems(), key=operator.itemgetter(1))[0]
'b' 

If using Python3:

>>> max(stats.items(), key=operator.itemgetter(1))[0]
'b'
  • 272
    Even cleaner, I think= `max(stats.iterkeys(), key=(lambda key: stats[key]))` – Lucretiel Dec 16 '12 at 07:22
  • 31
    Why not just use `key=lambda x: x[1]`? – BenDundee Jan 23 '14 at 22:32
  • 53
    in python 3 @Lucretiel's (correctly spelled) solution fails. it should be: max(stats.keys(), key=(lambda k: stats[k])) since keys() now does what iterkeys() used to do automatically. – watsonic May 05 '15 at 01:58
  • 96
    Rigth you are. Interestingly, a solution that's exactly as memory efficient and works in both Python 2 and 3 is: `max(stats, key=lambda key: stats[key])` – Lucretiel May 05 '15 at 21:56
  • 6
    Honestly I think that the comments have the cleaner and better solution. – Augusto Gonzalez Sep 19 '19 at 16:35
  • 2
    `max(d.items(), key=operator.itemgetter(1))[0]` for python3. – Philippe Remy Oct 04 '19 at 14:49
  • I'm getting the following exception trying this: 'int' object is not callable stats = {'a':1000, 'b':3000, 'c': 100, 'd':3000} print(max(stats, key=lambda key: stats[key])) – MPL Jul 12 '20 at 10:45
  • @BenDundee: Using a lambda instead of operator.itemgetter is significantly slower, but functionally equivalent. – Endlisnis Mar 16 '21 at 02:16
  • `this method will only return one of the two` Is it randomly selected? What's the criteria? – ihavenoidea May 06 '21 at 00:03
228

I have tested MANY variants, and this is the fastest way to return the key of dict with the max value:

def keywithmaxval(d):
     """ a) create a list of the dict's keys and values; 
         b) return the key with the max value"""  
     v=list(d.values())
     k=list(d.keys())
     return k[v.index(max(v))]

To give you an idea, here are some candidate methods:

def f1():  
     v=list(d1.values())
     k=list(d1.keys())
     return k[v.index(max(v))]

def f2():
    d3={v:k for k,v in d1.items()}
    return d3[max(d3)]

def f3():
    return list(filter(lambda t: t[1]==max(d1.values()), d1.items()))[0][0]    

def f3b():
    # same as f3 but remove the call to max from the lambda
    m=max(d1.values())
    return list(filter(lambda t: t[1]==m, d1.items()))[0][0]        

def f4():
    return [k for k,v in d1.items() if v==max(d1.values())][0]    

def f4b():
    # same as f4 but remove the max from the comprehension
    m=max(d1.values())
    return [k for k,v in d1.items() if v==m][0]        

def f5():
    return max(d1.items(), key=operator.itemgetter(1))[0]    

def f6():
    return max(d1,key=d1.get)     

def f7():
     """ a) create a list of the dict's keys and values; 
         b) return the key with the max value"""    
     v=list(d1.values())
     return list(d1.keys())[v.index(max(v))]    

def f8():
     return max(d1, key=lambda k: d1[k])     

tl=[f1,f2, f3b, f4b, f5, f6, f7, f8, f4,f3]     
cmpthese.cmpthese(tl,c=100) 

The test dictionary:

d1={1: 1, 2: 2, 3: 8, 4: 3, 5: 6, 6: 9, 7: 17, 8: 4, 9: 20, 10: 7, 11: 15, 
    12: 10, 13: 10, 14: 18, 15: 18, 16: 5, 17: 13, 18: 21, 19: 21, 20: 8, 
    21: 8, 22: 16, 23: 16, 24: 11, 25: 24, 26: 11, 27: 112, 28: 19, 29: 19, 
    30: 19, 3077: 36, 32: 6, 33: 27, 34: 14, 35: 14, 36: 22, 4102: 39, 38: 22, 
    39: 35, 40: 9, 41: 110, 42: 9, 43: 30, 44: 17, 45: 17, 46: 17, 47: 105, 48: 12, 
    49: 25, 50: 25, 51: 25, 52: 12, 53: 12, 54: 113, 1079: 50, 56: 20, 57: 33, 
    58: 20, 59: 33, 60: 20, 61: 20, 62: 108, 63: 108, 64: 7, 65: 28, 66: 28, 67: 28, 
    68: 15, 69: 15, 70: 15, 71: 103, 72: 23, 73: 116, 74: 23, 75: 15, 76: 23, 77: 23, 
    78: 36, 79: 36, 80: 10, 81: 23, 82: 111, 83: 111, 84: 10, 85: 10, 86: 31, 87: 31, 
    88: 18, 89: 31, 90: 18, 91: 93, 92: 18, 93: 18, 94: 106, 95: 106, 96: 13, 9232: 35, 
    98: 26, 99: 26, 100: 26, 101: 26, 103: 88, 104: 13, 106: 13, 107: 101, 1132: 63, 
    2158: 51, 112: 21, 113: 13, 116: 21, 118: 34, 119: 34, 7288: 45, 121: 96, 122: 21, 
    124: 109, 125: 109, 128: 8, 1154: 32, 131: 29, 134: 29, 136: 16, 137: 91, 140: 16, 
    142: 104, 143: 104, 146: 117, 148: 24, 149: 24, 152: 24, 154: 24, 155: 86, 160: 11, 
    161: 99, 1186: 76, 3238: 49, 167: 68, 170: 11, 172: 32, 175: 81, 178: 32, 179: 32, 
    182: 94, 184: 19, 31: 107, 188: 107, 190: 107, 196: 27, 197: 27, 202: 27, 206: 89, 
    208: 14, 214: 102, 215: 102, 220: 115, 37: 22, 224: 22, 226: 14, 232: 22, 233: 84, 
    238: 35, 242: 97, 244: 22, 250: 110, 251: 66, 1276: 58, 256: 9, 2308: 33, 262: 30, 
    263: 79, 268: 30, 269: 30, 274: 92, 1300: 27, 280: 17, 283: 61, 286: 105, 292: 118, 
    296: 25, 298: 25, 304: 25, 310: 87, 1336: 71, 319: 56, 322: 100, 323: 100, 325: 25, 
    55: 113, 334: 69, 340: 12, 1367: 40, 350: 82, 358: 33, 364: 95, 376: 108, 
    377: 64, 2429: 46, 394: 28, 395: 77, 404: 28, 412: 90, 1438: 53, 425: 59, 430: 103, 
    1456: 97, 433: 28, 445: 72, 448: 23, 466: 85, 479: 54, 484: 98, 485: 98, 488: 23, 
    6154: 37, 502: 67, 4616: 34, 526: 80, 538: 31, 566: 62, 3644: 44, 577: 31, 97: 119, 
    592: 26, 593: 75, 1619: 48, 638: 57, 646: 101, 650: 26, 110: 114, 668: 70, 2734: 41, 
    700: 83, 1732: 30, 719: 52, 728: 96, 754: 65, 1780: 74, 4858: 47, 130: 29, 790: 78, 
    1822: 43, 2051: 38, 808: 29, 850: 60, 866: 29, 890: 73, 911: 42, 958: 55, 970: 99, 
    976: 24, 166: 112}

And the test results under Python 3.2:

    rate/sec       f4      f3    f3b     f8     f5     f2    f4b     f6     f7     f1
f4       454       --   -2.5% -96.9% -97.5% -98.6% -98.6% -98.7% -98.7% -98.9% -99.0%
f3       466     2.6%      -- -96.8% -97.4% -98.6% -98.6% -98.6% -98.7% -98.9% -99.0%
f3b   14,715  3138.9% 3057.4%     -- -18.6% -55.5% -56.0% -56.4% -58.3% -63.8% -68.4%
f8    18,070  3877.3% 3777.3%  22.8%     -- -45.4% -45.9% -46.5% -48.8% -55.5% -61.2%
f5    33,091  7183.7% 7000.5% 124.9%  83.1%     --  -1.0%  -2.0%  -6.3% -18.6% -29.0%
f2    33,423  7256.8% 7071.8% 127.1%  85.0%   1.0%     --  -1.0%  -5.3% -17.7% -28.3%
f4b   33,762  7331.4% 7144.6% 129.4%  86.8%   2.0%   1.0%     --  -4.4% -16.9% -27.5%
f6    35,300  7669.8% 7474.4% 139.9%  95.4%   6.7%   5.6%   4.6%     -- -13.1% -24.2%
f7    40,631  8843.2% 8618.3% 176.1% 124.9%  22.8%  21.6%  20.3%  15.1%     -- -12.8%
f1    46,598 10156.7% 9898.8% 216.7% 157.9%  40.8%  39.4%  38.0%  32.0%  14.7%     --

And under Python 2.7:

    rate/sec       f3       f4     f8    f3b     f6     f5     f2    f4b     f7     f1
f3       384       --    -2.6% -97.1% -97.2% -97.9% -97.9% -98.0% -98.2% -98.5% -99.2%
f4       394     2.6%       -- -97.0% -97.2% -97.8% -97.9% -98.0% -98.1% -98.5% -99.1%
f8    13,079  3303.3%  3216.1%     --  -5.6% -28.6% -29.9% -32.8% -38.3% -49.7% -71.2%
f3b   13,852  3504.5%  3412.1%   5.9%     -- -24.4% -25.8% -28.9% -34.6% -46.7% -69.5%
f6    18,325  4668.4%  4546.2%  40.1%  32.3%     --  -1.8%  -5.9% -13.5% -29.5% -59.6%
f5    18,664  4756.5%  4632.0%  42.7%  34.7%   1.8%     --  -4.1% -11.9% -28.2% -58.8%
f2    19,470  4966.4%  4836.5%  48.9%  40.6%   6.2%   4.3%     --  -8.1% -25.1% -57.1%
f4b   21,187  5413.0%  5271.7%  62.0%  52.9%  15.6%  13.5%   8.8%     -- -18.5% -53.3%
f7    26,002  6665.8%  6492.4%  98.8%  87.7%  41.9%  39.3%  33.5%  22.7%     -- -42.7%
f1    45,354 11701.5% 11399.0% 246.8% 227.4% 147.5% 143.0% 132.9% 114.1%  74.4%     -- 

You can see that f1 is the fastest under Python 3.2 and 2.7 (or, more completely, keywithmaxval at the top of this post)

the wolf
  • 29,808
  • 12
  • 50
  • 71
  • 13
    This seems fishy. `f7` is like `f1`, just not giving a name to an intermediate object. `f7` should be (very slightly) faster than `f1`, not **much** slower. And that's what I get: `>>> timeit.timeit("f1()","from __main__ import f1, f7, d1", number=10000) 0.26785888786807277 >>> timeit.timeit("f7()","from __main__ import f1, f7, d1", number=10000) 0.26770628307832567` – Reinstate Monica Nov 21 '12 at 21:47
  • 1
    agree f1 is like f7. Did test with ipython %timeit and both came with same performance on my machine on python 2.7. Testing: f1 - 18 µs per loop Testing: f2 - 33.7 µs per loop Testing: f3b - 50 µs per loop Testing: f4b - 30.7 µs per loop Testing: f5 - 28 µs per loop Testing: f6 - 23 µs per loop Testing: f7 - 18 µs per loop Testing: f8 - 43.9 µs per loop Testing: f4 - 2.16 ms per loop Testing: f3 - 2.29 ms per loop – Joop Sep 17 '14 at 08:55
  • f1 is also applicable wherever max(d, key) is not available. – Nikos Alexandris Mar 25 '15 at 15:41
  • 7
    I thought dict is unsorted, couldn't d.keys and d.values theoretically be ordered differently? – Dimath Apr 01 '15 at 13:28
  • 1
    The list-copy solutions are smelly to me. How's the performance on a dict with thousands or millions of entries? – Lucretiel Sep 29 '15 at 18:08
  • @the_wolf, I understand that tuples are faster than lists in Python (this is one of their advantages) – Nick_F Dec 18 '16 at 04:15
  • @Dimath you are right. That's what happening to me. – Neo Ravi May 13 '18 at 05:32
  • doesn't matter. they're all O(nlogn) – Max Eisenhardt Nov 12 '18 at 02:40
  • @DonaldAllen But some are O(n) :) – rosstex Jan 03 '19 at 08:34
74

If you need to know only a key with the max value you can do it without iterkeys or iteritems because iteration through dictionary in Python is iteration through it's keys.

max_key = max(stats, key=lambda k: stats[k])

EDIT:

From comments, @user1274878 :

I am new to python. Can you please explain your answer in steps?

Yep...

max

max(iterable[, key])

max(arg1, arg2, *args[, key])

Return the largest item in an iterable or the largest of two or more arguments.

The optional key argument describes how to compare elements to get maximum among them:

lambda <item>: return <a result of operation with item> 

Returned values will be compared.

Dict

Python dict is a hash table. A key of dict is a hash of an object declared as a key. Due to performance reasons iteration though a dict implemented as iteration through it's keys.

Therefore we can use it to rid operation of obtaining a keys list.

Closure

A function defined inside another function is called a nested function. Nested functions can access variables of the enclosing scope.

The stats variable available through __closure__ attribute of the lambda function as a pointer to the value of the variable defined in the parent scope.

Community
  • 1
  • 1
I159
  • 24,762
  • 27
  • 88
  • 124
66

You can use:

max(d, key = d.get) 
# which is equivalent to 
max(d, key = lambda k : d.get(k))

To return the key, value pair use:

max(d.items(), key = lambda k : k[1])
pk786
  • 1,190
  • 10
  • 18
64

Example:

stats = {'a':1000, 'b':3000, 'c': 100}

if you wanna find the max value with its key, maybe follwing could be simple, without any relevant functions.

max(stats, key=stats.get)

the output is the key which has the max value.

leo022
  • 825
  • 4
  • 7
48

Here is another one:

stats = {'a':1000, 'b':3000, 'c': 100}
max(stats.iterkeys(), key=lambda k: stats[k])

The function key simply returns the value that should be used for ranking and max() returns the demanded element right away.

  • 10
    .iterkeys is not needed in your answer (it's the default when iterating a dict). However, note that the .iteritems method fetches both key and value in one step, so there is no need for an extra __getitem__ per key as needed with .iterkeys. – tzot Nov 06 '08 at 13:07
  • This is a great answer because it is very clear what's going on and is thus easy to extend to other situations. – Leopd Apr 25 '13 at 23:23
  • 2
    in python3 version: `max(stats, key=lambda k: stats[k])` – OfirD Feb 14 '20 at 12:13
41
key, value = max(stats.iteritems(), key=lambda x:x[1])

If you don't care about value (I'd be surprised, but) you can do:

key, _ = max(stats.iteritems(), key=lambda x:x[1])

I like the tuple unpacking better than a [0] subscript at the end of the expression. I never like the readability of lambda expressions very much, but find this one better than the operator.itemgetter(1) IMHO.

Davoud Taghawi-Nejad
  • 14,180
  • 11
  • 56
  • 78
Tim Ottinger
  • 1,382
  • 7
  • 5
  • 9
    `_` could be used instead of `ignored`. – jfs Nov 11 '08 at 21:50
  • 1
    @J.F.Sebastian I agree `ignored` looks pretty ugly, but some people are against using `_` for several reasons. I think the first snippet is fine even if you ignore the value – jamylak Apr 11 '13 at 05:15
32

Given that more than one entry my have the max value. I would make a list of the keys that have the max value as their value.

>>> stats = {'a':1000, 'b':3000, 'c': 100, 'd':3000}
>>> [key for m in [max(stats.values())] for key,val in stats.iteritems() if val == m]
['b', 'd']

This will give you 'b' and any other max key as well.

Note: For python 3 use stats.items() instead of stats.iteritems()

Climbs_lika_Spyder
  • 4,480
  • 2
  • 27
  • 45
  • 9
    Your solution is OK but computes the maximum value as many times as there are items in the dict. If computing `max` were expensive (e.g., a LONG dictionary) I'd recommend `[key for m in [max(stats.values())] for key,val in stats.iteritems() if val == m]` if you want an one-liner, otherwise compute `m = ...` beforehand. – gboffi Dec 02 '14 at 22:57
  • 4
    Just a short note: For python 3 use stats.items() instead of stats.iteritems(). – Susa Aug 04 '18 at 16:41
21

To get the maximum key/value of the dictionary stats:

stats = {'a':1000, 'b':3000, 'c': 100}
  • Based on keys

>>> max(stats.items(), key = lambda x: x[0]) ('c', 100)

  • Based on values

>>> max(stats.items(), key = lambda x: x[1]) ('b', 3000)

Of course, if you want to get only the key or value from the result, you can use tuple indexing. For Example, to get the key corresponding to the maximum value:

>>> max(stats.items(), key = lambda x: x[1])[0] 'b'

Explanation

The dictionary method items() in Python 3 returns a view object of the dictionary. When this view object is iterated over, by the max function, it yields the dictionary items as tuples of the form (key, value).

>>> list(stats.items()) [('c', 100), ('b', 3000), ('a', 1000)]

When you use the lambda expression lambda x: x[1], in each iteration, x is one of these tuples (key, value). So, by choosing the right index, you select whether you want to compare by keys or by values.

Python 2

For Python 2.2+ releases, the same code will work. However, it is better to use iteritems() dictionary method instead of items() for performance.

Notes

Karim Sonbol
  • 2,422
  • 1
  • 14
  • 14
14
d = {'A': 4,'B':10}

min_v = min(zip(d.values(), d.keys()))
# min_v is (4,'A')

max_v = max(zip(d.values(), d.keys()))
# max_v is (10,'B')
priya khokher
  • 492
  • 5
  • 12
12

I was not satisfied with any of these answers. max always picks the first key with the max value. The dictionary could have multiple keys with that value.

def keys_with_top_values(my_dict):
    return [key  for (key, value) in my_dict.items() if value == max(my_dict.values())]

Posting this answer in case it helps someone out. See the below SO post

Which maximum does Python pick in the case of a tie?

kslote1
  • 650
  • 6
  • 13
11

Per the iterated solutions via comments in the selected answer...

In Python 3:

max(stats.keys(), key=(lambda k: stats[k]))

In Python 2:

max(stats.iterkeys(), key=(lambda k: stats[k]))
watsonic
  • 2,512
  • 1
  • 23
  • 29
11

I got here looking for how to return mydict.keys() based on the value of mydict.values(). Instead of just the one key returned, I was looking to return the top x number of values.

This solution is simpler than using the max() function and you can easily change the number of values returned:

stats = {'a':1000, 'b':3000, 'c': 100}

x = sorted(stats, key=(lambda key:stats[key]), reverse=True)
['b', 'a', 'c']

If you want the single highest ranking key, just use the index:

x[0]
['b']

If you want the top two highest ranking keys, just use list slicing:

x[:2]
['b', 'a']
ron_g
  • 936
  • 1
  • 14
  • 31
  • This is a very inefficient solution. Sorting the dict will incur a runtime of n log (n) because you're concerning yourself with a bunch of values that are not the maximum. Using the max function will incur a runtime of just n which is much faster. – Peter Graham Aug 22 '19 at 23:41
  • 1
    @PeterGraham pretty much every solution here (including the accepted answer) uses `max()`. It's clear it's the fastest. I thought I'd offer a different solution with the benefit of slicing, which was more useful to me at the time – ron_g Aug 27 '19 at 09:52
9

max(stats, key=stats.get) if stats else None

stats can be an empty dictionary as well and max(stats, key=stats.get) will break in that situation.

Bhindi
  • 1,027
  • 9
  • 12
8

With collections.Counter you could do

>>> import collections
>>> stats = {'a':1000, 'b':3000, 'c': 100}
>>> stats = collections.Counter(stats)
>>> stats.most_common(1)
[('b', 3000)]

If appropriate, you could simply start with an empty collections.Counter and add to it

>>> stats = collections.Counter()
>>> stats['a'] += 1
:
etc. 
ukrutt
  • 1,790
  • 2
  • 15
  • 25
7

Much simpler to understand approach:

mydict = { 'a':302, 'e':53, 'g':302, 'h':100 }
max_value_keys = [key for key in mydict.keys() if mydict[key] == max(mydict.values())]
print(max_value_keys) # prints a list of keys with max value

Output: ['a', 'g']

Now you can choose only one key:

maximum = mydict[max_value_keys[0]]
Ali Sajjad
  • 828
  • 5
  • 16
6

A heap queue is a generalised solution which allows you to extract the top n keys ordered by value:

from heapq import nlargest

stats = {'a':1000, 'b':3000, 'c': 100}

res1 = nlargest(1, stats, key=stats.__getitem__)  # ['b']
res2 = nlargest(2, stats, key=stats.__getitem__)  # ['b', 'a']

res1_val = next(iter(res1))                       # 'b'

Note dict.__getitem__ is the method called by the syntactic sugar dict[]. As opposed to dict.get, it will return KeyError if a key is not found, which here cannot occur.

jpp
  • 134,728
  • 29
  • 196
  • 240
5

max((value, key) for key, value in stats.items())[1]

Jasha
  • 1,208
  • 1
  • 17
  • 24
2

+1 to @Aric Coady's simplest solution.
And also one way to random select one of keys with max value in the dictionary:

stats = {'a':1000, 'b':3000, 'c': 100, 'd':3000}

import random
maxV = max(stats.values())
# Choice is one of the keys with max value
choice = random.choice([key for key, value in stats.items() if value == maxV])
blueseal
  • 245
  • 2
  • 4
  • 14
Woooody Amadeus
  • 1,204
  • 1
  • 8
  • 7
1
Counter = 0
for word in stats.keys():
    if stats[word]> counter:
        Counter = stats [word]
print Counter
Corv Vette
  • 13
  • 2
Erika Sawajiri
  • 1,074
  • 2
  • 11
  • 18
1

How about:

 max(zip(stats.keys(), stats.values()), key=lambda t : t[1])[0]
user2399453
  • 2,378
  • 2
  • 22
  • 49
1

For scientific python users, here is a simple solution using Pandas:

import pandas as pd
stats = {'a': 1000, 'b': 3000, 'c': 100}
series = pd.Series(stats)
series.idxmax()

>>> b
wkzhu
  • 1,204
  • 8
  • 20
0

I tested the accepted answer AND @thewolf's fastest solution against a very basic loop and the loop was faster than both:

import time
import operator


d = {"a"+str(i): i for i in range(1000000)}

def t1(dct):
    mx = float("-inf")
    key = None
    for k,v in dct.items():
        if v > mx:
            mx = v
            key = k
    return key

def t2(dct):
    v=list(dct.values())
    k=list(dct.keys())
    return k[v.index(max(v))]

def t3(dct):
    return max(dct.items(),key=operator.itemgetter(1))[0]

start = time.time()
for i in range(25):
    m = t1(d)
end = time.time()
print ("Iterating: "+str(end-start))

start = time.time()
for i in range(25):
    m = t2(d)
end = time.time()
print ("List creating: "+str(end-start))

start = time.time()
for i in range(25):
    m = t3(d)
end = time.time()
print ("Accepted answer: "+str(end-start))

results:

Iterating: 3.8201940059661865
List creating: 6.928712844848633
Accepted answer: 5.464320182800293
ragardner
  • 1,503
  • 2
  • 16
  • 36
0

In the case you have more than one key with the same value, for example:

stats = {'a':1000, 'b':3000, 'c': 100, 'd':3000, 'e':3000}

You could get a collection with all the keys with max value as follow:

from collections import defaultdict
from collections import OrderedDict

groupedByValue = defaultdict(list)
for key, value in sorted(stats.items()):
    groupedByValue[value].append(key)

# {1000: ['a'], 3000: ['b', 'd', 'e'], 100: ['c']}

groupedByValue[max(groupedByValue)]
# ['b', 'd', 'e']
Ignacio Alorre
  • 6,038
  • 6
  • 50
  • 76
0

In case of stats is empty, one can check a condition before finding valued key like,

stats = {'a':1000, 'b':3000, 'c': 100}
max_key = None
if bool(stats):
   max_key = max(stats, key=stats.get)
print(max_key)

This can first check if the dictionary is empty or not, then process.

>>> b
Shaonsani
  • 135
  • 7