97

I want to find the cumulative or running amount of field and insert it from staging to table. My staging structure is something like this:

ea_month    id       amount    ea_year    circle_id
April       92570    1000      2014        1
April       92571    3000      2014        2
April       92572    2000      2014        3
March       92573    3000      2014        1
March       92574    2500      2014        2
March       92575    3750      2014        3
February    92576    2000      2014        1
February    92577    2500      2014        2
February    92578    1450      2014        3          

I want my target table to look something like this:

ea_month    id       amount    ea_year    circle_id    cum_amt
February    92576    1000      2014        1           1000 
March       92573    3000      2014        1           4000
April       92570    2000      2014        1           6000
February    92577    3000      2014        2           3000
March       92574    2500      2014        2           5500
April       92571    3750      2014        2           9250
February    92578    2000      2014        3           2000
March       92575    2500      2014        3           4500
April       92572    1450      2014        3           5950

I am really very much confused with how to go about achieving this result. I want to achieve this result using PostgreSQL.

Can anyone suggest how to go about achieving this result-set?

Erwin Brandstetter
  • 479,275
  • 111
  • 893
  • 1,042
Yousuf Sultan
  • 2,304
  • 6
  • 25
  • 53
  • 1
    How do you get the cum_amount of 1000 in your target table? For circle_id, the amount seems to be 2000. –  Feb 24 '17 at 21:21
  • @user1724295 He is grouping by `ea_year`, `circle_id`, `ea_month`. Then want to take `cum_amt` – Rahmat Ali Jan 17 '21 at 14:43

1 Answers1

151

Basically, you need a window function. That's a standard feature nowadays. In addition to genuine window functions, you can use any aggregate function as window function in Postgres by appending an OVER clause.

The special difficulty here is to get partitions and sort order right:

SELECT ea_month, id, amount, ea_year, circle_id
     , sum(amount) OVER (PARTITION BY circle_id
                         ORDER BY ea_year, ea_month) AS cum_amt
FROM   tbl
ORDER  BY circle_id, month;

And no GROUP BY.

The sum for each row is calculated from the first row in the partition to the current row - or quoting the manual to be precise:

The default framing option is RANGE UNBOUNDED PRECEDING, which is the same as RANGE BETWEEN UNBOUNDED PRECEDING AND CURRENT ROW. With ORDER BY, this sets the frame to be all rows from the partition start up through the current row's last ORDER BY peer.

... which is the cumulative or running sum you are after. Bold emphasis mine.

Rows with the same (circle_id, ea_year, ea_month) are "peers" in this query. All of those show the same running sum with all peers added to the sum. But I assume your table is UNIQUE on (circle_id, ea_year, ea_month), then the sort order is deterministic and no row has peers.

Now, ORDER BY ... ea_month won't work with strings for month names. Postgres would sort alphabetically according to the locale setting.

If you have actual date values stored in your table you can sort properly. If not, I suggest to replace ea_year and ea_month with a single column mon of type date in your table.

  • Transform what you have with to_date():

      to_date(ea_year || ea_month , 'YYYYMonth') AS mon
    
  • For display, you can get original strings with to_char():

      to_char(mon, 'Month') AS ea_month
      to_char(mon, 'YYYY') AS ea_year
    

While stuck with the unfortunate design, this will work:

SELECT ea_month, id, amount, ea_year, circle_id
     , sum(amount) OVER (PARTITION BY circle_id ORDER BY mon) AS cum_amt
FROM   (SELECT *, to_date(ea_year || ea_month, 'YYYYMonth') AS mon FROM tbl)
ORDER  BY circle_id, mon;
Erwin Brandstetter
  • 479,275
  • 111
  • 893
  • 1,042
  • Thanks for the solution.. Can you help me with one more thing. I want to implement the same thing using a cursor with the logic being every circle will have just one record for a month of a year. And the function is supposed to run once every month. How can I achieve this? – Yousuf Sultan Apr 04 '14 at 04:10
  • 4
    @YousufSultan: Most of the time there is a better solution than a cursor. That's definitely stuff for a new question. Please start a new question. – Erwin Brandstetter Apr 04 '14 at 14:51
  • I find this answer incomplete without at least a note that there is "framing" going on here which defaults to `range unbounded preceding`, which is the same as `range between unbounded preceding and current row`. This is why `sum()`when used as a window function produces a running total -- while other window functions don't have this default frame. – Colin 't Hart Nov 24 '16 at 12:34
  • 1
    @Colin'tHart: I added some more above to clarify. – Erwin Brandstetter Nov 25 '16 at 01:05
  • Here's a link to a similar question with a simpler query (the `PARTITION` is not always needed to create a running total): https://stackoverflow.com/a/5700744/175830 – Jason Axelson Nov 14 '17 at 00:33