Efficiency-wise, would it be quicker to make an ArrayList or use an array when adding to the first index?

Question

I am using Java. I want to add to the start of an Array. Would it be more efficient to move all variables up one space in the array, leaving one spot for a new variable to be added in index 0, or to just use an ArrayList?

I am aware an ArrayList will move the values for me, but I have heard that they are very inefficient, is this true?

Are there any other APIs that will do this efficiently?

possible duplicate of [Java Performance - ArrayLists versus Arrays for lots of fast reads](http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1182892/java-performance-arraylists-versus-arrays-for-lots-of-fast-reads) — Raptor, Dec 13 '13 at 10:53
Are you going to add to the first index only once? or a lot of times per list? A LinkedList is much more efficient for adding elements at the head - at the cost of not having a random access to all elements in the list. — amit, Dec 13 '13 at 10:54
@ShivanRaptor How is that a dupe? The linked question is about a lot of reads. He asks about **writing** an element to the head of the list. — amit, Dec 13 '13 at 10:55
I will be adding to the front lots of times, I think Linked list sounds like the best choice! — Haych, Dec 13 '13 at 11:20

score 2 · Answer 1 · answered Dec 13 '13 at 10:57

Neither would be efficient, because each insertion at the beginning needs to move what you've added so far. This means that inserting N elements takes O(N²) time, which is rather inefficient.

LinkedList<T>s are better for situations when you need to insert at the beginning of the list. However, they have memory overhead, and do not allow fast lookup based on the index.

If you do not need to use your list until after all elements have been inserted, you may be better off inserting elements at the back of the list, and then reversing the list before starting to use it.

score 2 · Accepted Answer · answered Dec 13 '13 at 11:01

Apart from the method call overhead and some small maintenance cost, ArrayList is no more inefficient than copying array elements yourself. Some implementations of ArrayList may even be faster at moving data, by allowing the list to start somewhere else in the backing array than at index 0, as ArrayDeque does.

score 0 · Answer 3 · answered Dec 13 '13 at 10:55

ArrayList also uses Arrays internally to store the data. But, Sun/Oracle added a fastest algorithm to add the item in index 0 and move the items starting from index 1. So, better use the ArrayList for simpler coding, But if you can tweak a better algorithm, then go for Array.

score 0 · Answer 4 · answered Dec 13 '13 at 11:00

If you would be adding to the first index very frequenlty, it will be very expensive as it needs to relocate all the indices from 1 to end of the array i.e it will resize it itself to adjust a new element at the top. LinkedLists provide better performance in such cases but they do not implement the Random Access behaviour .

Eel Lee · Answer 5 · 2013-12-13T11:22:42.900

ArrayList provides enough performance for normal usage, and what's even more important - they are safe. So you don't need to worry about getting out-of-bounds, null-pointers etc.

To make it "faster" you can, for example, get rid of ArrayList's checking capacity etc., but then you are making your code unsafe, which means you must be sure you are setting the right parameters, because if not you will be getting IndexOutOfBounds etc.

You can read a very interesting post about Trove - using primitive collections for performance, for more information.

But 99 times out of 100, there is no real need. Remember and repeat after me:

Premature optimization is the root of all evil.

Besides, I really recommend checking out the JDK source code yourself. You can learn a lot and, obviously, see how it's made.

Efficiency-wise, would it be quicker to make an ArrayList or use an array when adding to the first index?

5 Answers5