19

I keep seeing different examples of creating controllers and services in AngularJS and I'm confused, can anyone explain to me the differences between the two approaches?

app.service('reverseService', function() {
    this.reverse = function(name) {
        return name.split("").reverse().join("");
    };
});

app.factory('reverseService', function() {
    return {
        reverse : function(name) {
            return name.split("").reverse().join("");
        }
    }
});

And also a controller example:

function ExampleCtrl($scope) {
    $scope.data = "some data";
}

app.controller("ExampleCtrl", function($scope) {
    $scope.data = "some data";
}
C1pher
  • 1,867
  • 6
  • 29
  • 50
Neil
  • 7,171
  • 3
  • 47
  • 67

2 Answers2

20

The first one will pollute the global namespace, which is not what you want in the long run.

function ExampleCtrl($scope){
    $scope.data = "some data";
}

The second one scopes the Controller to that module instance. It makes it also injectable. Better still is using the array notation (as below), since this will survive minification.

app.controller("ExampleCtrl", ['$scope', function($scope){
    $scope.data = "some data";
}]);

The difference between an (angular) service and factory seems quite small. A service wraps a factory, which uses $injector.instantiate to initialize the service.

Community
  • 1
  • 1
asgoth
  • 34,208
  • 12
  • 85
  • 94
0

My preferred way of creating controllers and directives is as following:

/**
* SomeCoolModule.controller.js
*/

(function(){
'use strict';

    angular.module('app.modals.SomeCoolModule').controller('SomeCoolModuleController', SomeCoolModuleController);

    AddFlowCurveModalController.$inject =
        [
            '$scope',
            '$filter',
            '$log',
        ];

    function SomeCoolModuleController($scope, $filter, $log) {
        /* controller body goes here */
    }
})();

PS: no global namespace pollution is taking place above due to IIFE.

Dan Ochiana
  • 2,827
  • 1
  • 26
  • 25