289

I have four projects in my Visual Studio solution (everyone targeting .NET 3.5) - for my problem only these two are important:

  1. MyBaseProject <- this class library references a third-party DLL file (elmah.dll)
  2. MyWebProject1 <- this web application project has a reference to MyBaseProject

I added the elmah.dll reference to MyBaseProject in Visual studio 2008 by clicking "Add reference..." → "Browse" tab → selecting the "elmah.dll".

The Properties of the Elmah Reference are as follows:

  • Aliases - global
  • Copy local - true
  • Culture -
  • Description - Error Logging Modules and Handlers (ELMAH) for ASP.NET
  • File Type - Assembly
  • Path - D:\webs\otherfolder\_myPath\__tools\elmah\Elmah.dll
  • Resolved - True
  • Runtime version - v2.0.50727
  • Specified version - false
  • Strong Name - false
  • Version - 1.0.11211.0

In MyWebProject1 I added the reference to Project MyBaseProject by: "Add reference..." → "Projects" tab → selecting the "MyBaseProject". The Properties of this reference are the same except the following members:

  • Description -
  • Path - D:\webs\CMS\MyBaseProject\bin\Debug\MyBaseProject.dll
  • Version - 1.0.0.0

If I run the build in Visual Studio the elmah.dll file is copied to my MyWebProject1's bin directory, along with MyBaseProject.dll!

However if I clean and run MSBuild for the solution (via D:\webs\CMS> C:\WINDOWS\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v3.5\MSBuild.exe /t:ReBuild /p:Configuration=Debug MyProject.sln) the elmah.dll is missing in MyWebProject1's bin directory - although the build itself contains no warning or errors!

I already made sure that the .csproj of MyBaseProject contains the private element with the value "true" (that should be an alias for "copy local" in Visual Studio):

<Reference Include="Elmah, Version=1.0.11211.0, Culture=neutral, processorArchitecture=MSIL">
  <SpecificVersion>False</SpecificVersion>
  <HintPath>..\mypath\__tools\elmah\Elmah.dll</HintPath>
    **<Private>true</Private>**
</Reference>

(The private tag didn't appear in the .csproj's xml by default, although Visual Studio said "copy local" true. I switched "copy local" to false - saved - and set it back to true again - save!)

What is wrong with MSBuild? How do I get the (elmah.dll) reference copied to MyWebProject1's bin?

I do NOT want to add a postbuild copy action to every project's postbuild command! (Imagine I would have many projects depend on MyBaseProject!)

Peter Mortensen
  • 28,342
  • 21
  • 95
  • 123
toebens
  • 3,849
  • 6
  • 20
  • 29

19 Answers19

172

I just deal with it like this. Go to the properties of your reference and do this:

Set "Copy local = false"
Save
Set "Copy local = true"
Save

and that's it.

Visual Studio 2010 doesn't initially put: <private>True</private> in the reference tag and setting "copy local" to false causes it to create the tag. Afterwards it will set it to true and false accordingly.

andrew
  • 2,217
  • 3
  • 17
  • 21
  • 10
    This was a godsend. Thank you for this! – Rebecca Nov 21 '11 at 15:09
  • 1
    This worked for me as well. The DLLs were not being copied when doing a TFS build, and this fixed it. – Martin Mar 06 '12 at 15:44
  • 23
    Didn't work for me with MSBuild 4 / VS2012. That is, I was able to update references to say `true` but it seemed to have no effect on MSBuild. In the end, I just added NuGet references to downlevel projects. – Michael Teper Jan 18 '13 at 21:48
  • 1
    @MichaelTeper i had to do this + change Copy Local to False then to True to get True setting in csproj... after this everything copied as expected – felickz May 14 '13 at 16:26
  • 2
    Didn't work for me. It still doesn't copy System.Net.Http.Formatting to the bin folder. – Akira Yamamoto Nov 08 '13 at 16:25
  • 1
    @felickz - Any chance you could post your answer? I'm having the same issue and I'd gladly upvote you if it works! – longda Feb 10 '14 at 23:16
  • @Iongda just make sure your ref in csproj looks has True. This was my [issue](http://bronumski.blogspot.com/2009/06/project-reference-fun-and-games.html). ` ..\..\..\packages\ServerAppFabric.Client.1.1.2106\lib\Microsoft.ApplicationServer.Caching.Client.dll True ` – felickz Feb 11 '14 at 13:34
  • In VS2013 UI Project References, you can just switch between Copy Local True to False to True for all references then save. It will then copy the binaries to the bin folder. Weird this issue just started today for me. – Andez Mar 26 '14 at 11:55
  • 5
    This is the equivalent to `Have you tried turning it off and on again?`, and it worked! – FarFigNewton Jun 18 '14 at 20:52
  • as written above i've set true in project file but this did not help (at least for sure way back then with VS 2008). see deadlydog's answer for an explanation and a possible workaround and/or my own answer. However i'm still confused why that worked in VS but not with msbuild. Anyway i had this problem long time ago and hope this problem was fixed with newer VS versions by Microsoft. – toebens Feb 25 '15 at 20:51
  • 6
    Looks like VS2015 still behaves the same: setting 'Copy Local' to 'False' then back to 'True' on referenced .dll's, works. – flip Aug 23 '15 at 04:59
  • Works for me with VS. But does not work with MSBuild – Shahzad Jul 21 '17 at 15:14
  • Nice solution! For those that can NOT get this method to work; Edit project file in text editor, find the reference to dll, remove any True/False from that dll dependency, save. Then go back to VS, right click dll reference and view properties.One should be able to set the copy local property for this dependency. – Ji_in_coding Nov 08 '17 at 15:18
  • Works in VS2017 :) – Royi Mindel Jan 22 '18 at 07:54
  • I also had to remove the reference and save; and add it back and save prior to your steps. Thanks! – Khoait Nov 06 '18 at 12:25
  • 1
    In VS 2019 this bug still exists, and the workaround still works. Make sure to do a Save All between each action, so your save effects the project. – AaronLS Mar 11 '20 at 21:01
  • Didn't work for me in VS 2019. I followed the steps and confirmed that True was set, but still the dll wasn't copied. The accepted answer did work for me. – Mark Dec 30 '20 at 03:32
163

I'm not sure why it is different when building between Visual Studio and MsBuild, but here is what I have found when I've encountered this problem in MsBuild and Visual Studio.

Explanation

For a sample scenario let's say we have project X, assembly A, and assembly B. Assembly A references assembly B, so project X includes a reference to both A and B. Also, project X includes code that references assembly A (e.g. A.SomeFunction()). Now, you create a new project Y which references project X.

So the dependency chain looks like this: Y => X => A => B

Visual Studio / MSBuild tries to be smart and only bring references over into project Y that it detects as being required by project X; it does this to avoid reference pollution in project Y. The problem is, since project X doesn't actually contain any code that explicitly uses assembly B (e.g. B.SomeFunction()), VS/MSBuild doesn't detect that B is required by X, and thus doesn't copy it over into project Y's bin directory; it only copies the X and A assemblies.

Solution

You have two options to solve this problem, both of which will result in assembly B being copied to project Y's bin directory:

  1. Add a reference to assembly B in project Y.
  2. Add dummy code to a file in project X that uses assembly B.

Personally I prefer option 2 for a couple reasons.

  1. If you add another project in the future that references project X, you won't have to remember to also include a reference to assembly B (like you would have to do with option 1).
  2. You can have explicit comments saying why the dummy code needs to be there and not to remove it. So if somebody does delete the code by accident (say with a refactor tool that looks for unused code), you can easily see from source control that the code is required and to restore it. If you use option 1 and somebody uses a refactor tool to clean up unused references, you don't have any comments; you will just see that a reference was removed from the .csproj file.

Here is a sample of the "dummy code" that I typically add when I encounter this situation.

    // DO NOT DELETE THIS CODE UNLESS WE NO LONGER REQUIRE ASSEMBLY A!!!
    private void DummyFunctionToMakeSureReferencesGetCopiedProperly_DO_NOT_DELETE_THIS_CODE()
    {
        // Assembly A is used by this file, and that assembly depends on assembly B,
        // but this project does not have any code that explicitly references assembly B. Therefore, when another project references
        // this project, this project's assembly and the assembly A get copied to the project's bin directory, but not
        // assembly B. So in order to get the required assembly B copied over, we add some dummy code here (that never
        // gets called) that references assembly B; this will flag VS/MSBuild to copy the required assembly B over as well.
        var dummyType = typeof(B.SomeClass);
        Console.WriteLine(dummyType.FullName);
    }
deadlydog
  • 19,009
  • 14
  • 91
  • 101
  • 5
    What isn't being discussed here is that there is a difference between the copying of build products in /bin of a web project and the routine copying to the target output directory (e.g. /bin/x86/Debug). The former is done by the referenced project when it builds and the latter is done by the dependent web project. Examining Microsoft.Common.targets helps understand this. Copies to the web /bin do not depend on copy local behaviour at all - copy local impacts on the copy to the output target dir which is not part of the structure referenced by Cassini running via Debug. – user1164178 Jul 18 '14 at 04:55
  • 8
    can you explain why it had worked with VS WITHOUT adding that "dummy code" but not with msbuild? – toebens Feb 25 '15 at 20:54
  • 3
    Even less invasive than invoking a function, you can assign the type of a class contained inside the assembly to a dummy variable. `Type dummyType = typeof(AssemblyA.AnyClass);` – Arithmomaniac Mar 16 '15 at 14:50
  • @Arithmomaniac Thanks! I've updated the post with your modification :) – deadlydog Mar 16 '15 at 16:12
  • 1
    Solution #1 didn't work for me. Solution #2 also would not work for me because the assembly in question (Oracle.ManagedDataAccess.EntityFramework.dll) does not expose ANY public types! Any other ideas? – Greg Z. Jun 26 '15 at 18:50
  • 17
    Solution #2 as shown above will work unless you have the 'Optimize Code' setting checked in Visual Studio. In that case, it will still exclude the dll. I added one more line to override its "optimization". `Console.WriteLine(dummyType.FullName);` – JasonG Jul 24 '15 at 20:22
  • Thanks @JasonG I've updated the solution with the extra line you mentioned – deadlydog Jan 19 '16 at 16:37
  • 1
    What if all classes in the assembly B are internal? I had this issue with Microsoft.SqlServer.SqlClrProvider.dll. But all the classes in that dll are internal. – bigbearzhu Jan 22 '16 at 06:10
  • @bigbearzhu hmmm, that's a tough one. I'm not sure if you could maybe instantiate one of the classes via reflection? Other than that, I guess you might just have to go with option #1. – deadlydog Jan 22 '16 at 21:28
  • This answer makes sense once I got past the confusing bit of the sample dependency illustration having the arrows going in the wrong direction. – Suncat2000 Mar 03 '17 at 13:13
  • 4
    Solution 2 did not work for me in Visual Studio 2017. I first thought it was because, in my assembly X, I was only using an `enum` from B and I assumed the enum was being inlined. I added code to directly use a type from B and that didn't help. It has also always been the case the my X uses types in A that subclass types in B so I cannot fathom how the compiler thinks that B is not required by X and can be ignored. This is bonkers. – Xharlie Apr 25 '17 at 12:18
  • 1
    @deadlydog : _The problem is, since project X doesn't actually contain any code that explicitly uses assembly B_ i did not understand this point. Its being quite old post, things changed ? Shouldn't msbuild should refer to assembly A manifest to check for dependent assemblies ? I do refer nuget packages where this is common scenario where my project will directly calling api on main assembly and main assembly internally must be using dependent assemblies. I never have to write dummy code for dependent assemblies. – rahulaga_dev Mar 16 '18 at 13:16
39

If you are not using the assembly directly in code then Visual Studio whilst trying to be helpful detects that it is not used and doesn't include it in the output. I'm not sure why you are seeing different behaviour between Visual Studio and MSBuild. You could try setting the build output to diagnostic for both and compare the results see where it diverges.

As for your elmah.dll reference if you are not referencing it directly in code you could add it as an item to your project and set the Build Action to Content and the Copy to Output Directory to Always.

Peter Mortensen
  • 28,342
  • 21
  • 95
  • 123
John Hunter
  • 3,912
  • 3
  • 23
  • 34
  • 3
    +1 for your copy to Output Directory comment, if Elmah isn't being used in code, makes sense to copy as content. – Kit Roed Jul 26 '10 at 17:00
  • 4
    Indeed it ignores assemblies that are not used, BUT one major thing to note, as of VS 2010 using assembly in XAML resource dictionaries is not considered as using assmebly by VS, so it will not copy it. – Alex Burtsev Oct 08 '11 at 05:54
  • 3
    https://connect.microsoft.com/VisualStudio/feedback/details/693740/msbuild-doesnt-include-assemblies-as-dependencies-from-referenced-projects-if-they-are-used-in-xaml-resource-dictionaries – Alex Burtsev Oct 10 '11 at 10:39
  • This is better for a Unit Test project where I need the dll. I don't want to add a dll that the main project doesn't need just to make the tests run! – Lukos Jun 07 '18 at 12:32
16

Take a look at:

This MSBuild forum thread I started

You will find my temporary solution / workaround there!

(MyBaseProject needs some code that is referencing some classes (whatever) from the elmah.dll for elmah.dll being copied to MyWebProject1's bin!)

Peter Mortensen
  • 28,342
  • 21
  • 95
  • 123
toebens
  • 3,849
  • 6
  • 20
  • 29
  • 1
    Damn - this is the only solution I had come to too - hoped there might be a better way to do it! – nickspoon Aug 22 '13 at 22:06
  • 2
    See andrew's reponse below for a less hacky solution (no offence!) – MPritchard Oct 31 '13 at 16:26
  • 1
    For those looking at this now, [toebens' answer](https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/vstudio/en-US/52407f5b-4e63-4071-bbf1-854ec5dac7b8/msbuild-doesn8217t-copy-references-dlls-if-using-project-dependencies-in-solution?forum=msbuild#466121dc-9c68-4c7f-ba93-93f3d611ae73) on MSDN is essentially the same as [deadlydog's answer](https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1132243/msbuild-doesnt-copy-references-dll-files-if-using-project-dependencies-in-sol#21055664), provided some years later. – jpaugh Dec 18 '18 at 16:30
9

I had the same problem.

Check if the framework version of your project is the same of the framework version of the dll that you put on reference.

In my case, my client was compiled using "Framework 4 Client" and the DLL was in "Framework 4".

Kuffs
  • 34,562
  • 10
  • 74
  • 91
Andre Avelar
  • 91
  • 1
  • 1
7

The issue I was facing was I have a project that is dependent on a library project. In order to build I was following these steps:

msbuild.exe myproject.vbproj /T:Rebuild
msbuild.exe myproject.vbproj /T:Package

That of course meant I was missing my library's dll files in bin and most importantly in the package zip file. I found this works perfectly:

msbuild.exe myproject.vbproj /T:Rebuild;Package

I have no idea why this work or why it didn't in the first place. But hope that helps.

vangorra
  • 1,551
  • 18
  • 22
  • I had the same issue building whole solution using /t:Build from TeamCity in one step then in the next /t:Package on WebAPI project. Any dlls referenced by any project references were not included. This was fixed using the above - /T:Rebuild;Package on the WebAPI then included those dlls. – Andy Hoyle Sep 21 '17 at 09:43
6

As Alex Burtsev mentioned in a comment anything that’s only used in a XAML resource dictionary, or in my case, anything that’s only used in XAML and not in code behind, isn't deemed to be 'in use' by MSBuild.

So simply new-ing up a dummy reference to a class/component in the assembly in some code behind was enough convince MSBuild that the assembly was actually in use.

Peter Mortensen
  • 28,342
  • 21
  • 95
  • 123
Scott
  • 3,935
  • 6
  • 35
  • 49
  • This was exactly my issue and the solution that worked. Spent too long trying to figure this out. Thanks Scott & @Alex Burstev – karol Aug 03 '16 at 15:57
  • Good grief, this was driving me crazy. *Yes*, I was using FontAwesome.WPF, and *only* from within the XAML (for obvious reasons). Adding a dummy method helped. Thanks! And yes, VS 2017 15.6 is still affected, so I filed a bug: https://github.com/dotnet/roslyn/issues/25349 – Sören Kuklau Mar 08 '18 at 18:32
6

I just had the exact same problem and it turned out to be caused by the fact that 2 projects in the same solution were referencing a different version of the 3rd party library.

Once I corrected all the references everything worked perfectly.

Steven Engels
  • 81
  • 1
  • 6
5

Using deadlydog's scheme,

Y => X => A => B,

my problem was when I built Y, the assemblies (A and B, all 15 of them) from X were not showing up in Y's bin folder.

I got it resolved by removing the reference X from Y, save, build, then re-add X reference (a project reference), and save, build, and A and B started showing up in Y's bin folder.

J Z
  • 119
  • 2
  • 2
4

Changing the target framework from .NET Framework 4 Client Profile to .NET Framework 4 fixed this problem for me.

So in your example: set the target framework on MyWebProject1 to .NET Framework 4

Fuyu Persimmon
  • 471
  • 6
  • 13
3

I had the same problem and the dll was a dynamically loaded reference. To solve the problem I have added an "using" with the namespace of the dll. Now the dll is copied in the output folder.

Spamme
  • 41
  • 1
3

This requires adding a .targets file to your project and setting it to be included in the project's includes section.

See my answer here for the procedure.

Community
  • 1
  • 1
Alex Essilfie
  • 11,613
  • 9
  • 64
  • 103
3

Referencing assemblies that are not used during build is not the correct practice. You should augment your build file so it will copy the additional files. Either by using a post build event or by updating the property group.

Some examples can be found in other post

Community
  • 1
  • 1
verbedr
  • 647
  • 6
  • 11
3

Another scenario where this shows up is if you are using the older "Web Site" project type in Visual Studio. For that project type, it is unable to reference .dlls that are outside of it's own directory structure (current folder and down). So in the answer above, let's say your directory structure looks like this:

enter image description here

Where ProjectX and ProjectY are parent/child directories, and ProjectX references A.dll which in turn references B.dll, and B.dll is outside the directory structure, such as in a Nuget package on the root (Packages), then A.dll will be included, but B.dll will not.

Focker
  • 307
  • 2
  • 6
2

I had a similar issue today, and this is most certainly not the answer to your question. But I'd like to inform everyone, and possibly provide a spark of insight.

I have a ASP.NET application. The build process is set to clean and then build.

I have two Jenkins CI scripts. One for production and one for staging. I deployed my application to staging and everything worked fine. Deployed to production and was missing a DLL file that was referenced. This DLL file was just in the root of the project. Not in any NuGet repository. The DLL was set to do not copy.

The CI script and the application was the same between the two deployments. Still after the clean and deploy in the staging environment the DLL file was replaced in the deploy location of the ASP.NET application (bin/). This was not the case for the production environment.

It turns out in a testing branch I had added a step to the build process to copy over this DLL file to the bin directory. Now the part that took a little while to figure out. The CI process was not cleaning itself. The DLL was left in the working directory and was being accidentally packaged with the ASP.NET .zip file. The production branch never had the DLL file copied in the same way and was never accidentally deploying this.

TLDR; Check and make sure you know what your build server is doing.

Peter Mortensen
  • 28,342
  • 21
  • 95
  • 123
Jason Portnoy
  • 597
  • 6
  • 21
1

Make sure that both projects are in the same .net version also check copy local property but this should be true as default

john.kernel
  • 192
  • 2
  • 13
1

Using Visual Studio 2015 adding the additional parameter

/deployonbuild=false

to the msbuild command line fixed the issue.

Giles Roberts
  • 5,449
  • 5
  • 42
  • 60
0

I just ran into a very similar issue. When compiling using Visual Studio 2010, the DLL file was included in the bin folder. But when compiling using MSBuild the third-party DLL file was not included.

Very frustrating. The way I solved it was to include the NuGet reference to the package in my web project even though I'm not using it directly there.

Peter Mortensen
  • 28,342
  • 21
  • 95
  • 123
Gary Brunton
  • 1,538
  • 1
  • 18
  • 29
-2

Including all referenced DLL files from your projectreferences in the Website project is not always a good idea, especially when you're using dependency injection: your web project just want to add a reference to the interface DLL file/project, not any concrete implementation DLL file.

Because if you add a reference directly to an implementation DLL file/project, you can't prevent your developer from calling a "new" on concrete classes of the implementation DLL file/project instead of via the interface. It's also you've stated a "hardcode" in your website to use the implementation.

Peter Mortensen
  • 28,342
  • 21
  • 95
  • 123
Hung Nguyen
  • 479
  • 7
  • 19