9

In Python, is there any way to write this list comprehension without the "x in" variable (since it is left completely unused)? Same applies to a generator expression. I doubt this comes up very often, but I stumbled onto this a few times and was curious to know.

Here's an example:

week_array = ['']*7
four_weeks = [week_array[:] for x in range(4)]

(Also perhaps, is there a more elegant way to build this?)

senderle
  • 125,265
  • 32
  • 201
  • 223
TimY
  • 4,677
  • 5
  • 42
  • 54

4 Answers4

18

I don't believe so, and there is no harm in the x. A common thing to see when a value is unused in this way is to use an underscore as the free variable, e.g.:

[week_array[:] for _ in range(4)]

But it's nothing more than a convention to denote that the free variable goes unused.

wim
  • 266,989
  • 79
  • 484
  • 630
3

No. Both constructs must have an iterator, even if its value is unused.

Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams
  • 699,552
  • 132
  • 1,235
  • 1,283
1
week_array = ['']*7
four_weeks = map(list, [week_array]*4)
0

This is similar to other answers, in that I use map, but what I did uses the same function you are using.

four_weeks = map(lambda i: week_array[:], range(4))

Also, the main advantage compared to using _ for example is that it could already be used (_ is used by gettext often) and it changes its value in to the last item in the iterator. See this example:

[x for x in range(4)]
assert x == 3, 'x should be equal to 3'
jadkik94
  • 6,274
  • 2
  • 27
  • 38