259

In a nutshell, I'm searching for a working autocompletion feature for the Vim editor. I've argued before that Vim completely replaces an IDE under Linux and while that's certainly true, it lacks one important feature: autocompletion.

I know about Ctrl+N, Exuberant Ctags integration, Taglist, cppcomplete and OmniCppComplete. Alas, none of these fits my description of “working autocompletion:”

  • Ctrl+N works nicely (only) if you've forgotton how to spell class, or while. Oh well.
  • Ctags gives you the rudiments but has a lot of drawbacks.
  • Taglist is just a Ctags wrapper and as such, inherits most of its drawbacks (although it works well for listing declarations).
  • cppcomplete simply doesn't work as promised, and I can't figure out what I did wrong, or if it's “working” correctly and the limitations are by design.
  • OmniCppComplete seems to have the same problems as cppcomplete, i.e. auto-completion doesn't work properly. Additionally, the tags file once again needs to be updated manually.

I'm aware of the fact that not even modern, full-blown IDEs offer good C++ code completion. That's why I've accepted Vim's lack in this area until now. But I think a fundamental level of code completion isn't too much to ask, and is in fact required for productive usage. So I'm searching for something that can accomplish at least the following things.

  • Syntax awareness. cppcomplete promises (but doesn't deliver for me), correct, scope-aware auto-completion of the following:

    variableName.abc
variableName->abc
typeName::abc

    And really, anything else is completely useless.

  • Configurability. I need to specify (easily) where the source files are, and hence where the script gets its auto-completion information from. In fact, I've got a Makefile in my directory which specifies the required include paths. Eclipse can interpret the information found therein, why not a Vim script as well?

  • Up-to-dateness. As soon as I change something in my file, I want the auto-completion to reflect this. I do not want to manually trigger ctags (or something comparable). Also, changes should be incremental, i.e. when I've changed just one file it's completely unacceptable for ctags to re-parse the whole directory tree (which may be huge).

Did I forget anything? Feel free to update.

I'm comfortable with quite a lot of configuration and/or tinkering but I don't want to program a solution from scratch, and I'm not good at debugging Vim scripts.

A final note, I'd really like something similar for Java and C# but I guess that's too much to hope for: ctags only parses code files and both Java and C# have huge, precompiled frameworks that would need to be indexed. Unfortunately, developing .NET without an IDE is even more of a PITA than C++.

Community
  • 1
  • 1
Konrad Rudolph
  • 482,603
  • 120
  • 884
  • 1,141
  • 4
    It's been a long time since you asked this question, have you finally found a good one? I am asking because I don't see any accepted answers. Personally though I have to admit I resorted into prefixing my variables/functions. For example, all of them start with `sh` (meaning it's in my library) and followed by the abbreviation of my class. For example `shP` for `Parser` class. Then all you need to do is write `shP` and hit CTRL+p (or CTRL+n if you want) and get the class members from last use to first (or first to last if CTRL+n) – Shahbaz Oct 14 '11 at 15:21
  • 4
    @Shahbaz In fact, I’m convinced that there is no good enough solution at the moment. `clang_complete` is technically the most sound but prohibitively slow due to lack of caching the results and partial compilation. I have to admit that I haven’t tried all answers because some require a convoluted, time-consuming setup. I’ll hold my breath for a usable plugin now that clang finally allows developers to build ASTs from C++ sources (until now, there were no good free parsers for C++ available). – Konrad Rudolph Oct 14 '11 at 15:28
  • 2
    Have you tried `clang_complete` recently? It can use `libclang` with caching now and thus should be faster. – Jan Larres Oct 17 '11 at 04:28
  • @Jan Thanks for the info. When I last tried it, libclang support was still sketchy. I should probably try again once I get the time. – Konrad Rudolph Oct 17 '11 at 09:56
  • (Reason for edit rollback: product names aren’t code, they don’t belong `formatted like this`.) – Konrad Rudolph Nov 21 '12 at 00:08

7 Answers7

173

Try YouCompleteMe. It uses Clang through the libclang interface, offering semantic C/C++/Objective-C completion. It's much like clang_complete, but substantially faster and with fuzzy-matching.

In addition to the above, YCM also provides semantic completion for C#, Python, Go, TypeScript etc. It also provides non-semantic, identifier-based completion for languages for which it doesn't have semantic support.

Tiro
  • 1,601
  • 16
  • 18
Valloric
  • 2,904
  • 2
  • 18
  • 10
  • 69
    In fact, I’m going to accept this solution. Finally a plugin that delivers. I’ve been using it for several days now. It only took four years to answer this question. ;-) – Konrad Rudolph Feb 08 '13 at 08:05
  • To get this to work on Arch make sure you install "gvim" instead of "vim", even if you use the terminal version of vim. – static_rtti Jun 21 '13 at 14:48
  • 5
    awesome job with YouCompletMe valloric ! congrats – statquant Jul 15 '13 at 18:44
  • 1
    This should be in standard package repositories with `yum install vim-ycm`. Great extension. – dashesy Sep 27 '13 at 21:35
  • 5
    Too bad YouCompleteMe is a complete PITA to install on Windows :( – x-x Oct 12 '13 at 03:46
  • 2
    @DrTwox From the readme: "YCM has **no official support for Windows**, but that doesn't mean you can't get it to work there. See the Windows Installation Guide wiki page. Feel free to add to it." – user456584 Feb 01 '14 at 20:34
  • Can YouCompleteMe handle / be used with the Linux kernel with all it's weird macro magic? – Robert S. Barnes Feb 06 '14 at 17:43
  • @static_rtti , regarding Arch , why so? – Abhinav Gauniyal Feb 06 '15 at 15:13
  • @AbhinavGauniyal : I don't remember. It may even be that my comment is no longer valid. Could you test and report back? – static_rtti Feb 06 '15 at 16:30
  • @static_rtti It works , but only if I compile with my system version of clang. On installing with binaries that are supplied with YCM , server crashes frequently. I just asked thinking I might be missing something :p – Abhinav Gauniyal Feb 06 '15 at 16:57
  • Can I use this plugin even though I compile my project with gcc? – becko Jun 15 '15 at 12:15
  • 7
    This post should mention that you are the author, as this is borderline self-promotion (although I won't argue it answers the question, you should include a disclaimer nonetheless). – EntangledLoops Dec 14 '16 at 19:53
  • When i type an object.methodName ycm shows all the methods instead of those inside the class. Is there any way to fix this ? – Sourav Mukherjee Sep 25 '17 at 01:08
36

There’s also clang_complete which uses the clang compiler to provide code completion for C++ projects. There’s another question with troubleshooting hints for this plugin.

The plugin seems to work fairly well as long as the project compiles, but is prohibitively slow for large projects (since it attempts a full compilation to generate the tags list).

Community
  • 1
  • 1
Konrad Rudolph
  • 482,603
  • 120
  • 884
  • 1,141
  • [The `clang_complete` plugin works nicely on Cygwin and Windows.](http://stackoverflow.com/a/10046633/269126) Can't say anything about large projects because I don't have any. :) – Lumi Apr 06 '12 at 17:05
  • It seems clang_complete using libclang has caching now. This should be then the accepted answer. Have you tried clang_complete on Linux kernel? the best indexing I have seen for kernel is using Eclipse CDT, if clang_complete can handle kernel it should be able to complete just anything. – dashesy Aug 14 '12 at 23:09
  • clang_complete is quite simply the best Vim plugin I use. – Cromulent Mar 24 '13 at 11:51
  • 1
    @Cromulent Ah, check YouCompleteMe, it’s much better. – Konrad Rudolph Mar 24 '13 at 12:02
  • @KonradRudolph Thanks. I'll check it out. – Cromulent Mar 24 '13 at 12:07
7

as per requested, here is the comment I gave earlier:

have a look at this:

this link should help you if you want to use monodevelop on a MacOSX

Good luck and happy coding.

Ric Tokyo
  • 6,439
  • 3
  • 27
  • 48
6

I've just found the project Eclim linked in another question. This looks quite promising, at least for Java integration.

Community
  • 1
  • 1
Konrad Rudolph
  • 482,603
  • 120
  • 884
  • 1,141
  • Have you tested it? Seems interesting. – Pacane Nov 16 '10 at 17:18
  • @Pacane: no. I haven’t had to use Java in months and didn’t have spare time to experiment. – Konrad Rudolph Nov 17 '10 at 12:07
  • 1
    Eclim seems to be a great solution for Java, although Eclipse still remains a beast to load even in a headless setup – Drupad Panchal Jun 03 '11 at 21:07
  • 2
    For Java, you can use [Vrapper](http://vrapper.sourceforge.net/home/). I find that it's usually OK with superb auto-completion. For the occasional text-heavy editing, I can launch real Vim as an external tool. – kizzx2 Jul 27 '11 at 03:22
3

I'm a bit late to the party but autocomplpop might be helpful.

romainl
  • 158,436
  • 18
  • 236
  • 264
2

is what you are looking for something like intellisense?

insevim seems to address the issue.

link to screenshots here

Ric Tokyo
  • 6,439
  • 3
  • 27
  • 48
  • 2
    This would be what I'm looking for, yes. Unfortunately, it only runs on Windows (I'm using OS X). Also, the last update seems to have been made around 2003. :-( – Konrad Rudolph Jul 12 '09 at 11:57
  • well you can get the source code :) if not that, the only thing I can think of is omnicompletion.. or have a look at this: http://ankitjain.org/blog/2007/06/30/integrating-vim-with-monodevelop/ for .net stuff at least.. – Ric Tokyo Jul 12 '09 at 13:02
  • Ric, please provide your comment as two separate answers, they're invaluable, and I'd like to honour them properly! That said, MonoDevelop is unusable under OS X as of now, and I'm currently looking into OmniCppComplete. – Konrad Rudolph Jul 12 '09 at 13:18
  • Lol this is windows only! :( Why should u want this on windows where u have VS.. I'm looking for a solution on Linux. – Nils Aug 17 '10 at 09:02
  • Nils: Not everyone has access to Visual Studio, also alot of people have vi skills which they want to apply in the Windows environment. There was a port to Linux, but its currently down. In any case, what are you trying to achieve? are you sure you dont just need the default auto-complete functions? http://www.linux.org/docs/ldp/howto/C-editing-with-VIM-HOWTO/auto-complete.html – Ric Tokyo Aug 18 '10 at 03:37
1

Did someone mention code_complete?

But you did not like ctags, so this is probably not what you are looking for...

Johan
  • 18,177
  • 25
  • 89
  • 107