414

I follow a development process where I create a new local branch for every new feature or story card. When finished I merge the branch into master and then push.

What tends to happen over time due to a combination of laziness or forgetfulness, is that I end up with a large list of local branches, some of which (such as spikes) may not have been merged.

I know how to list all my local branches and I know how to remove a single branch but I was wondering if there was a git command that allows me to delete all my local branches?

Below is the output of the git branch --merged command.

user@machine:~/projects/application[master]$ git branch --merged
  STORY-123-Short-Description
  STORY-456-Another-Description
  STORY-789-Blah-Blah
* master

All attempts to delete branches listed with grep -v \* (as per the answers below) result in errors:

error: branch 'STORY-123-Short-Description' not found.
error: branch 'STORY-456-Another-Description' not found.
error: branch 'STORY-789-Blah-Blah' not found.

I'm using:
git 1.7.4.1
ubuntu 10.04
GNU bash, version 4.1.5(1)-release
GNU grep 2.5.4

Louth
  • 8,926
  • 5
  • 25
  • 37
  • Not an answer but one thing to call out, that I often do, is when I reach peak laziness and the local clone is very dirty I simply `rm -rf /my_cool_repo` and reclone the repo. If I do not have an active branch that is the easiest way to "clean out all local branches" IMO. Clearly not the answer if you are actively doing work on a branch. – theJones Mar 12 '21 at 16:27
  • @theJones I wouldn't recommend re-cloning as you'd lose any changes in unversioned and ignored files e.g. IDE projects. The most popular answer below has perfectly worked for me for years. – Puterdo Borato May 06 '21 at 14:20

29 Answers29

502

The 'git branch -d' subcommand can delete more than one branch. So, simplifying @sblom's answer but adding a critical xargs:

git branch -D `git branch --merged | grep -v \* | xargs`

or, further simplified to:

git branch --merged | grep -v \* | xargs git branch -D 

Importantly, as noted by @AndrewC, using git branch for scripting is discouraged. To avoid it use something like:

git for-each-ref --format '%(refname:short)' refs/heads | grep -v master | xargs git branch -D

Caution warranted on deletes!

$ mkdir br
$ cd br; git init
Initialized empty Git repository in /Users/ebg/test/br/.git/
$ touch README; git add README; git commit -m 'First commit'
[master (root-commit) 1d738b5] First commit
 0 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 README
$ git branch Story-123-a
$ git branch Story-123-b
$ git branch Story-123-c
$ git branch --merged
  Story-123-a
  Story-123-b
  Story-123-c
* master
$ git branch --merged | grep -v \* | xargs
Story-123-a Story-123-b Story-123-c
$ git branch --merged | grep -v \* | xargs git branch -D
Deleted branch Story-123-a (was 1d738b5).
Deleted branch Story-123-b (was 1d738b5).
Deleted branch Story-123-c (was 1d738b5).
GoZoner
  • 59,252
  • 19
  • 87
  • 137
  • This command still reports the same errors as mentioned in the comments for the answer below. `error:branch 'STORY-123-Short-Description' not found.` for each of the branches listed. – Louth May 16 '12 at 00:53
  • 1
    Works for me; see above with details added. – GoZoner May 16 '12 at 01:03
  • All the steps you've shown work for me, right up until `git branch --merged | grep -v \* | xargs git branch -D` and then I get the errors I've shown in the answer. – Louth May 16 '12 at 01:18
  • 1
    So, did using git 1.7.10 solve your problem or do you prefer working directly in the .git repository? – GoZoner May 16 '12 at 06:29
  • 1
    If you get a `error:branch 'STORY-123-Short-Description' not found.` error, this is probably due to the git color settings. This worked for me (note the `--no-color` option): `git branch --no-color --merged | grep -v \* | xargs git branch -D` – marcok Mar 23 '16 at 10:24
  • 3
    The only answer on SO I've found that works. Thank you! – Kevin Suttle Mar 13 '19 at 15:24
  • After a long time, I'm here to share another solution for Node.js developers. https://github.com/jmlavoier/clear-branches `npx clear-branches`. – JmLavoier Sep 13 '20 at 19:23
  • Not an issue in 2012, but these days probably makes sense to use `grep -Ev 'main|master'` instead, to capture both the common options. – Michael Berry Jan 29 '21 at 11:08
155

I found a nicer way in a comment on this issue on github:

git branch --merged master --no-color | grep -v master | grep -v stable | xargs git branch -d

edit: added no-color option and excluding of stable branch (add other branches as needed in your case)

Robin James Kerrison
  • 1,628
  • 1
  • 13
  • 24
mBardos
  • 2,173
  • 1
  • 15
  • 15
134

Parsing the output of git branch is not recommended, and not a good answer for future readers on Stack Overflow.

  1. git branch is what is known as a porcelain command. Porcelain commands are not designed to be machine parsed and the output may change between different versions of Git.
  2. There are user configuration options that change the output of git branch in a way that makes it difficult to parse (for instance, colorization). If a user has set color.branch then you will get control codes in the output, this will lead to error: branch 'foo' not found. if you attempt to pipe it into another command. You can bypass this with the --no-color flag to git branch, but who knows what other user configurations might break things.
  3. git branch may do other things that are annoying to parse, like put an asterisk next to the currently checked out branch

The maintainer of git has this to say about scripting around git branch output

To find out what the current branch is, casual/careless users may have scripted around git branch, which is wrong. We actively discourage against use of any Porcelain command, including git branch, in scripts, because the output from the command is subject to change to help human consumption use case.

Answers that suggest manually editing files in the .git directory (like .git/refs/heads) are similarly problematic (refs may be in .git/packed-refs instead, or Git may change their internal layout in the future).

Git provides the for-each-ref command to retrieve a list of branches.

Git 2.7.X will introduce the --merged option to so you could do something like the below to find and delete all branches merged into HEAD

for mergedBranch in $(git for-each-ref --format '%(refname:short)' --merged HEAD refs/heads/)
do
    git branch -d ${mergedBranch}
done

Git 2.6.X and older, you will need to list all local branches and then test them individually to see if they have been merged (which will be significantly slower and slightly more complicated).

for branch in $(git for-each-ref --format '%(refname:short)' refs/heads/)
do
    git merge-base --is-ancestor ${branch} HEAD && git branch -d ${branch}
done
Andrew C
  • 11,594
  • 4
  • 44
  • 52
  • `git branch --no-color 2>/dev/null`? – Brent Bradburn Oct 24 '14 at 02:50
  • 5
    It's an improvement for sure. You will always have the problem of needing to filter out the *, and it does amusing things if somebody runs it from detached head. The main problem though is `git branch` is a porcelain command, and there is no guarantee that the output won't change in some future version of git. – Andrew C Oct 24 '14 at 03:42
  • Thank you @AndrewC - this is both answers the question bout the mysterious "branch not found" errors and provides a working solution using a more appropriate command! – Jason Jan 12 '16 at 17:04
  • 3
    How are 'Porcelain' and 'non-Porcelain' GIT commands identified? – GoZoner Mar 23 '16 at 15:04
  • Man pages for `git` on Mac OS... how quaint! :-) – GoZoner Mar 23 '16 at 23:35
  • 2
    Probably would be a useful enhancement to exclude 'dev' and 'master' by default? – PandaWood Oct 23 '17 at 00:30
  • @PandaWood - git branch -d will refuse to delete the currently checked out branch (error: Cannot delete branch 'master' checked out). Any other branch is fair game if it is merged. – Andrew C Oct 23 '17 at 15:51
  • Instead of `--merged` there is another option `--no-merged` for other branches, if anyone is looking for it. You will need to use `git branch -D ${noMergedBranch}` instead – krozaine Aug 20 '18 at 05:34
  • Has anyone managed to turn this into a git alias? That would be extremely convenient – ppicom Feb 10 '21 at 07:13
  • 1. Substitute single quotes for double quotes like this: ```for mergedBranch in $(git for-each-ref --format "%(refname:short)" --merged HEAD refs/heads/) do git branch -d ${mergedBranch} done``` 2. `git config --global alias.delete-merged-branches 'for mergedBranch in $(git for-each-ref --format "%(refname:short)" --merged HEAD refs/heads/)` _note_: open the single quote but don't close it. This lets you enter more than one line of text – ppicom Feb 10 '21 at 07:20
112

The simpler way to delete all branches but keeping others like "develop" and "master" is the following:

git branch | grep -v "develop" | grep -v "master" | xargs git branch -D

very useful !

geoom
  • 2,509
  • 2
  • 24
  • 37
  • 10
    You have resurrected an ages old thread and posted a virtually identical answer to an existing one, that is buggy and is missing the safety changes that it had. This is not a good answer. – Andrew C Oct 01 '14 at 23:45
  • 12
    This answer is clear in piping output from git branch, modifying it, and passing to git branch -D. No need to be mean. – Pam Aug 11 '15 at 14:18
  • 1
    This solution worked for me. Deleted all local branches. – Prad May 29 '19 at 22:50
  • 1
    This will not delete any branch contains word develop or master like 'develop_feature' or 'master_feature'. – django Sep 10 '19 at 14:29
  • 3
    THIS IS THE ANSWER I WAS LOOKING FOR – Konrad G Apr 13 '20 at 21:18
  • this wont delete a branch named "developX" (any `develop*` or `master*` branches wont be deleted as well) – selem mn Jan 29 '21 at 14:01
68

Try the following shell command:

git branch | grep -v "master" | xargs git branch -D

Explanation:

  • Get all branches (except for the master) via git branch | grep -v "master" command
  • Select every branch with xargs command
  • Delete branch with xargs git branch -D
anilbey
  • 1,286
  • 3
  • 17
  • 34
Pravin Bansal
  • 2,543
  • 20
  • 12
  • 3
    Although this may be a correct answer. One line of code isn't very useful without an explanation of what and how it solves the original question. Please provide details to your answer. – RyanNerd Sep 27 '19 at 22:24
  • 1
    How to delete all other branches except `master` and some other branch say `branchA` using this one line command? Currently I do `git branch | grep -v "master" | grep -v "branchA" | xargs git branch -D` – its4zahoor Jul 15 '20 at 08:44
  • I would also put a `git checkout master` in front: `git checkout master; git branch | grep -v "master" | xargs git branch -D` – Julian Aug 10 '20 at 07:44
66

To delete every branch except the one that you currently have checked out:

for b in `git branch --merged | grep -v \*`; do git branch -D $b; done

I would recommend changing git branch -D $b to an echo $b the first few times to make sure that it deletes the branches that you intend.

Henry
  • 16,294
  • 7
  • 56
  • 86
sblom
  • 25,623
  • 4
  • 65
  • 95
  • 1
    with this command I get `error:branch 'a_branch_name' not found.` I can see what you're trying to do and I've been playing around with the command but for some reason git doesn't seem to like the branch names supplied... – Louth May 16 '12 at 00:04
  • hmmm. to help troubleshoot, it would be useful to see some example output from `git branch --merged` – sblom May 16 '12 at 00:06
  • my branch names are of the format `STORY-123-Short-Description` – Louth May 16 '12 at 00:12
  • and when you run `git branch --merged`, you get a list with one of those on each line? – sblom May 16 '12 at 00:13
  • 1
    does it literally say `error:branch 'a_branch_name' not found.`? Or does it complain about one of the branch names from your `git branch` output above? – sblom May 16 '12 at 00:32
  • it says `error:branch 'STORY-123-Short-Description' not found.` for each of the branches listed above. – Louth May 16 '12 at 00:38
65

The below command will delete all the local branches except master branch.

git branch | grep -v "master" | xargs git branch -D

The above command

  1. list all the branches
  2. From the list ignore the master branch and take the rest of the branches
  3. delete the branch
030
  • 8,013
  • 8
  • 63
  • 100
Hunter
  • 2,212
  • 2
  • 19
  • 22
  • 4
    I would use `git branch | grep -v "master" | xargs git branch -d` first so I don't delete unmerged branches, just to be safe. But nice answer! – Jonas Lomholdt Sep 01 '18 at 14:28
  • 4
    Here is a powershell version `,@(git branch | Select-String -Pattern "[^(*?)\s? master]") | ForEach-Object{$_.Line.Trim()} | %{git branch -D $_}` – Jonas Lomholdt Sep 03 '18 at 08:20
  • 1
    @baklazan this would only work in Windows 10 command line if you have some tools installed. You probably have MINGW or some other such thing and you don't know it. – KthProg Jun 20 '19 at 13:37
42

Just a note, I would upgrade to git 1.7.10. You may be getting answers here that won't work on your version. My guess is that you would have to prefix the branch name with refs/heads/.

CAUTION, proceed with the following only if you made a copy of your working folder and .git directory.

I sometimes just go ahead and delete the branches I don't want straight from .git/refs/heads. All these branches are text files that contain the 40 character sha-1 of the commit they point to. You will have extraneous information in your .git/config if you had specific tracking set up for any of them. You can delete those entries manually as well.

Eugeniu Rosca
  • 4,947
  • 12
  • 39
Adam Dymitruk
  • 109,813
  • 21
  • 138
  • 137
  • At last a simple and pragmatic option. I like it :D – Melvyn Sep 14 '15 at 14:01
  • 2
    This will not work if you have packed refs, or even if you cloned from a remote server sometimes (which will provide you packed files). If you refs are packed, then the refs will not be stored in .git/refs/heads, they will be stored in a file called "packed-refs". See http://git-scm.com/docs/git-pack-refs. – Alexander Bird Sep 16 '15 at 16:27
  • 1
    It seems like a bad idea to remove the branch you have checked out at the moment – Moberg Oct 23 '18 at 06:33
  • @Moberg Just checkout a commit beforehand, and your detached HEAD will float all right. – RomainValeri Feb 09 '19 at 03:00
34

To delete all local branches in linux except the one you are on

// hard delete

git branch -D $(git branch)
Ashish Yadav
  • 2,355
  • 1
  • 11
  • 21
26

I found it easier to just use text editor and shell.

  1. Type git checkout <TAB> in shell. Will show all local branches.
  2. Copy them to a text editor, remove those you need to keep.
  3. Replace line breaks with spaces. (In SublimeText it's super easy.)
  4. Open shell, type git branch -D <PASTE THE BRANCHES NAMES HERE>.

That's it.

culebrón
  • 28,179
  • 18
  • 66
  • 97
16

If you want to delete all your local branches, here is the simple command:

git branch -D `git branch`

Note: This will delete all the branches except the current checked out branch

kgsnaidu
  • 321
  • 2
  • 7
15

From Windows Command Line, delete all except the current checked out branch using:

for /f "tokens=*" %f in ('git branch ^| find /v "*"') do git branch -D %f
kiewic
  • 14,245
  • 11
  • 71
  • 90
12

I had a similar kind of situation and recently found the following command useful.

git branch -D `git branch | awk '{ if ($0 !~ /<Branch_You_Want_to_Keep>/) printf "%s", $0 }'`

If you want to keep multiple branches, then

git branch -D `git branch | awk '{ if ($0 !~ /<Branch_You_Want_to_Keep1>|<Branch_You_Want_to_Keep2>/) printf "%s", $0 }'`

hope this helps someone.

monteirobrena
  • 2,316
  • 1
  • 30
  • 41
4u.Ans
  • 1,229
  • 14
  • 22
  • 1
    Nice one but I needed backticks to get it to work `git branch -D \`git branch | awk '{ if ($0 !~ /master/) printf "%s", $0 }'\`` --Actually I think you did have them originally but they got lost in the SO formatting. – tassinari Apr 10 '14 at 02:30
8

If you work with NodeJS, I wrote this command:

npx git-clear-branch

The command clears all of your local branch except master and current branch.

Rudy Huynh
  • 382
  • 3
  • 8
7

If you don't need to go through Git itself, you can also delete heads under .git/refs/heads manually or programmatically. The following should work with minimal tweaking under Bash:

shopt -s extglob
rm -rf .git/refs/heads/!(master)

This will delete every local branch except your master branch. Since your upstream branches are stored under .git/refs/remotes, they will remain untouched.

If you are not using Bash, or want to recurse a lot of Git repositories at once, you can do something similar with GNU find:

find . \
    -path remotes -path logs -prune -o \
    -wholename \*.git/refs/heads/\* \! -name master -print0 |
xargs -0 rm -rf

The find solution is probably more portable, but pruning paths and filenames is tricky and potentially more error-prone.

Todd A. Jacobs
  • 71,673
  • 14
  • 128
  • 179
6

None of the answers satisfied my needs fully, so here we go:

git branch --merged | grep -E "(feature|bugfix|hotfix)/" | xargs git branch -D && git remote prune origin

This will delete all local branches which are merged and starting with feature/, bugfix/ or hotfix/. Afterwards the upstream remote origin is pruned (you may have to enter a password).

Works on Git 1.9.5.

user4401817
  • 71
  • 1
  • 1
6

Although this isn't a command line solution, I'm surprised the Git GUI hasn't been suggested yet.

I use the command line 99% of the time, but in this case its either far to slow (hence the original question), or you don't know what you are about to delete when resorting to some lengthy, but clever shell manipulation.

The UI solves this issue since you can quickly check off the branches you want removed, and be reminded of ones you want to keep, without having to type a command for every branch.

From the UI go to Branch --> Delete and Ctrl+Click the branches you want to delete so they are highlighted. If you want to be sure they are merged into a branch (such as dev), under Delete Only if Merged Into set Local Branch to dev. Otherwise, set it to Always to ignore this check.

GitUI: delete local branches

Dane Bouchie
  • 351
  • 4
  • 10
6

Based on a combination of a number of answers here - if you want to keep all branches that exist on remote but delete the rest, the following oneliner will do the trick:

git for-each-ref --format '%(refname:short)' refs/heads | grep -Ev `git ls-remote --quiet --heads origin | awk '{print substr($2, 12)}'| paste -sd "|" -` | xargs git branch -D
5

If you want to keep master, develop and all remote branches. Delete all local branches which are not present on Github anymore.

$ git fetch --prune

$ git branch | grep -v "origin" | grep -v "develop" | grep -v "master" | xargs git branch -D

1] It will delete remote refs that are no longer in use on the remote repository.

2] This will get list of all your branches. Remove branch containing master, develop or origin (remote branches) from the list. Delete all branches in list.

Warning - This deletes your own local branches as well. So do this when you have merged your branch and doing a cleanup after merge, delete.

kapil
  • 1,692
  • 1
  • 15
  • 12
4

Here's the Powershell solution for anyone running on a Windows machine

git checkout master # by being on the master branch, you won't be able to delete it
foreach($branch in (git branch))
{
    git branch -D $branch.Trim()
}
Kolob Canyon
  • 4,727
  • 1
  • 35
  • 59
2

For powershell, this will work:

git branch --format '%(refname:lstrip=2)' --merged `
    | Where-Object { $_ -ne 'master' } `
    | ForEach-Object { git branch -d $_ }
Lucas
  • 11,997
  • 7
  • 62
  • 114
2

git branch -d [branch name] for local delete

git branch -D [branch name] also for local delete but forces it

2

I recommend a more moderate answer. Many of the answers here use -D which is forced delete regardless of whether changes have been merged or not. Here is a one liner which leaves untouched the branches which have un-merged changes.

git branch --merged | egrep -v "(^\*|master|dev)" | xargs git branch -d

Or you can try other examples listed but just change the -D to -d. I know the OP asked how to delete, but in most use cases, its safer to use -d.

ScottyBlades
  • 7,536
  • 2
  • 50
  • 60
0

The following script deletes branches. Use it and modify it at your own risk, etc. etc.

Based on the other answers in this question, I ended up writing a quick bash script for myself. I called it "gitbd" (git branch -D) but if you use it, you can rename it to whatever you want.

gitbd() {
if [ $# -le 1 ]
  then
    local branches_to_delete=`git for-each-ref --format '%(refname:short)' refs/heads/ | grep "$1"`
    printf "Matching branches:\n\n$branches_to_delete\n\nDelete? [Y/n] "
    read -n 1 -r # Immediately continue after getting 1 keypress
    echo # Move to a new line
    if [[ ! $REPLY == 'N' && ! $REPLY == 'n' ]]
      then
        echo $branches_to_delete | xargs git branch -D
    fi
else
  echo "This command takes one arg (match pattern) or no args (match all)"
fi
}

It will offer to delete any branches which match a pattern argument, if passed in, or all local branches when called with with no arguments. It will also give you a confirmation step, since, you know, we're deleting things, so that's nice.

It's kind of dumb - if there are no branches that match the pattern, it doesn't realize it.

An example output run:

$ gitbd test
Matching branches:

dummy+test1
dummy+test2
dummy+test3

Delete? [Y/n] 
dherman
  • 385
  • 4
  • 6
0

I wrote a shell script in order to remove all local branches except develop

branches=$(git branch | tr -d " *")
output=""
for branch in $branches 
do
  if [[ $branch != "develop" ]]; then
    output="$output $branch"
  fi
done
git branch -d $output
nhp
  • 3,302
  • 1
  • 11
  • 23
0

Above answers works fine. Here is another approach when we have lot of branches in local repo and we have to delete many branches except few which are lying in local machine.

First git branch will list all the local branches.

To transpose the column of branch names into single row in file by running a unix command
git branch > sample.txt
This will save it in sample.txt file. And run
awk 'BEGIN { ORS = " " } { print }' sample.txt
command in shell. This will transform the column to row and copy the list of branch names in single row.

And then run
git branch -D branch_name(s).
This will delete all listed branches present in local

Deepak G
  • 404
  • 5
  • 8
0

For this purpose, you can use git-extras

$ git delete-merged-branches
Deleted feature/themes (was c029ab3).
Deleted feature/live_preview (was a81b002).
Deleted feature/dashboard (was 923befa).
Andriy Orehov
  • 31
  • 1
  • 2
  • 8
0

I don't have grep or other unix on my box but this worked from VSCode's terminal:

git branch -d $(git branch).trim()

I use the lowercase d so it won't delete unmerged branches.

I was also on master when I did it, so * master doesn't exist so it didn't attempt deleting master.

Ron Newcomb
  • 2,261
  • 15
  • 23
0

Deleting many local branches at once

# delete all local unmerged branches
git branch --no-merged | egrep -v "(^\*|master|dev)" | xargs git branch -D
# delete all local branches (merged and unmerged).
git branch | egrep -v "(^\*|master|dev)" | xargs git branch -D  

Deleting remote branches

# Deleting non-existent tracking branches
git remote prune <remote> --dry-run
# Deleting a single remote branch
git push <remote> --delete <branch>
# Deleting many remote branches at once
git branch -r --merged | egrep -v "(^\*|master|dev)" | sed 's/origin\///' | xargs -n 1 git push origin --delete

Source

Premraj
  • 56,385
  • 22
  • 212
  • 157