Ultimate tensile strength

Ultimate tensile strength (UTS), often shortened to tensile strength (TS), ultimate strength, or within equations,[1][2][3] is the maximum stress that a material can withstand while being stretched or pulled before breaking. In brittle materials the ultimate tensile strength is close to the yield point, whereas in ductile materials the ultimate tensile strength can be higher.

Two vises apply tension to a specimen by pulling at it, stretching the specimen until it fractures. The maximum stress it withstands before fracturing is its ultimate tensile strength.

The ultimate tensile strength is usually found by performing a tensile test and recording the engineering stress versus strain. The highest point of the stress–strain curve is the ultimate tensile strength and has units of stress. The equivalent point for the case of compression, instead of tension, is called the compressive strength.

Tensile strengths are rarely of any consequence in the design of ductile members, but they are important with brittle members. They are tabulated for common materials such as alloys, composite materials, ceramics, plastics, and wood.


The ultimate tensile strength of a material is an intensive property; therefore its value does not depend on the size of the test specimen. However, depending on the material, it may be dependent on other factors, such as the preparation of the specimen, the presence or otherwise of surface defects, and the temperature of the test environment and material.

Some materials break very sharply, without plastic deformation, in what is called a brittle failure. Others, which are more ductile, including most metals, experience some plastic deformation and possibly necking before fracture.

Tensile strength is defined as a stress, which is measured as force per unit area. For some non-homogeneous materials (or for assembled components) it can be reported just as a force or as a force per unit width. In the International System of Units (SI), the unit is the pascal (Pa) (or a multiple thereof, often megapascals (MPa), using the SI prefix mega); or, equivalently to pascals, newtons per square metre (N/m2). A United States customary unit is pounds per square inch (lb/in2 or psi). Kilopounds per square inch (ksi, or sometimes kpsi) is equal to 1000 psi, and is commonly used in the United States, when measuring tensile strengths.

Ductile materials

Figure 1: "Engineering" stress–strain (σ–ε) curve typical of aluminum
  1. Ultimate strength
  2. Yield strength
  3. Proportional limit stress
  4. Fracture
  5. Offset strain (typically 0.2%)
figure 2: "Engineering" (red) and "true" (blue) stress–strain curve typical of structural steel.

Many materials can display linear elastic behavior, defined by a linear stress–strain relationship, as shown in figure 1 up to point 3. The elastic behavior of materials often extends into a non-linear region, represented in figure 1 by point 2 (the "yield point"), up to which deformations are completely recoverable upon removal of the load; that is, a specimen loaded elastically in tension will elongate, but will return to its original shape and size when unloaded. Beyond this elastic region, for ductile materials, such as steel, deformations are plastic. A plastically deformed specimen does not completely return to its original size and shape when unloaded. For many applications, plastic deformation is unacceptable, and is used as the design limitation.

After the yield point, ductile metals undergo a period of strain hardening, in which the stress increases again with increasing strain, and they begin to neck, as the cross-sectional area of the specimen decreases due to plastic flow. In a sufficiently ductile material, when necking becomes substantial, it causes a reversal of the engineering stress–strain curve (curve A, figure 2); this is because the engineering stress is calculated assuming the original cross-sectional area before necking. The reversal point is the maximum stress on the engineering stress–strain curve, and the engineering stress coordinate of this point is the ultimate tensile strength, given by point 1.

Ultimate tensile strength is not used in the design of ductile static members because design practices dictate the use of the yield stress. It is, however, used for quality control, because of the ease of testing. It is also used to roughly determine material types for unknown samples.[4]

The ultimate tensile strength is a common engineering parameter to design members made of brittle material because such materials have no yield point.[4]


Round bar specimen after tensile stress testing
Aluminium tensile test samples after breakage
The "cup" side of the "cup–cone" characteristic failure pattern
Some parts showing the "cup" shape and some showing the "cone" shape

Typically, the testing involves taking a small sample with a fixed cross-sectional area, and then pulling it with a tensometer at a constant strain (change in gauge length divided by initial gauge length) rate until the sample breaks.

When testing some metals, indentation hardness correlates linearly with tensile strength. This important relation permits economically important nondestructive testing of bulk metal deliveries with lightweight, even portable equipment, such as hand-held Rockwell hardness testers.[5] This practical correlation helps quality assurance in metalworking industries to extend well beyond the laboratory and universal testing machines.

Typical tensile strengths

Typical tensile strengths of some materials
MaterialYield strength
Ultimate tensile strength
Steel, structural ASTM A36 steel250400–5507.8
Steel, 1090 mild2478417.58
Chromium-vanadium steel AISI 61506209407.8
Steel, 2800 Maraging steel[6]261726938.00
Steel, AerMet 340[7]216024307.86
Steel, Sandvik Sanicro 36Mo logging cable precision wire[8]175820708.00
Steel, AISI 4130,
water quenched 855 °C (1570 °F), 480 °C (900 °F) temper[9]
Steel, API 5L X65[10]4485317.8
Steel, high strength alloy ASTM A5146907607.8
Acrylic, clear cast sheet (PMMA)[11]7287[12]1.16
High-density polyethylene (HDPE)26–33370.85
Steel, stainless AISI 302 – cold-rolled520 8608.19
Cast iron 4.5% C, ASTM A-481302007.3
"Liquidmetal" alloy1723550–16006.1
Beryllium[13] 99.9% Be3454481.84
Aluminium alloy[14] 2014-T64144832.8
Polyester resin (unreinforced)[15]5555 
Polyester and chopped strand mat laminate 30% E-glass[15]100100 
S-Glass epoxy composite[16]23582358 
Aluminium alloy 6061-T62413002.7
Copper 99.9% Cu702208.92
Cupronickel 10% Ni, 1.6% Fe, 1% Mn, balance Cu1303508.94
Brass200 +5008.73
Glass 33[17]2.53
E-GlassN/A1500 for laminates,
3450 for fibers alone
Basalt fiber[18]N/A48402.7
Carbon fiberN/A1600 for laminates,
4137 for fibers alone
Carbon fiber (Toray T1100G)[19]
(the strongest human-made fibres)
 7000 fibre alone1.79
Human hair140–160200–250[20] 
Bamboo fiber 350–5000.4-0.8
Spider silk (see note below)10001.3
Spider silk, Darwin's bark spider[21]1652
Silkworm silk500 1.3
Aramid (Kevlar or Twaron)362037571.44
UHMWPE fibers[23][24] (Dyneema or Spectra)2300–35000.97
Vectran 2850–33401.4
Polybenzoxazole (Zylon)[25]270058001.56
Wood, pine (parallel to grain) 40 
Bone (limb)104–1211301.6
Nylon, molded, 6PLA/6M [26]75-851.15
Nylon fiber, drawn[27]900[28]1.13
Epoxy adhesive12–30[29]
Silicon, monocrystalline (m-Si)N/A70002.33
Ultra-pure silica glass fiber-optic strands[30]4100
Sapphire (Al2O3)400 at 25 °C,
275 at 500 °C,
345 at 1000 °C
Boron nitride nanotubeN/A330002.62[31]
~80–90 GPa at microscale[32]
GrapheneN/Aintrinsic 130000;[33]
engineering 50000–60000[34]
First carbon nanotube ropes ?36001.3
Carbon nanotube (see note below)N/A11000–630000.037–1.34
Carbon nanotube compositesN/A1200[35]N/A
High-strength carbon nanotube filmN/A9600[36]N/A
Iron (pure mono-crystal)37.874
Limpet Patella vulgata teeth (goethite whisker nanocomposite) 4900
^a Many of the values depend on manufacturing process and purity or composition.
^b Multiwalled carbon nanotubes have the highest tensile strength of any material yet measured, with one measurement of 63 GPa, still well below one theoretical value of 300 GPa.[38] The first nanotube ropes (20 mm in length) whose tensile strength was published (in 2000) had a strength of 3.6 GPa.[39] The density depends on the manufacturing method, and the lowest value is 0.037 or 0.55 (solid).[40]
^c The strength of spider silk is highly variable. It depends on many factors including kind of silk (Every spider can produce several for sundry purposes.), species, age of silk, temperature, humidity, swiftness at which stress is applied during testing, length stress is applied, and way the silk is gathered (forced silking or natural spinning).[41] The value shown in the table, 1000 MPa, is roughly representative of the results from a few studies involving several different species of spider however specific results varied greatly.[42]
^d Human hair strength varies by ethnicity and chemical treatments.

Typical Properties of annealed elements

Typical properties for annealed elements[43]
Yield strength

See also


  1. "Generic MMPDS Mechanical Properties Table". stressebook.com. 6 December 2014. Archived from the original on 1 December 2017. Retrieved 27 April 2018.
  2. Degarmo, Black & Kohser 2003, p. 31
  3. Smith & Hashemi 2006, p. 223
  4. "Tensile Properties". Archived from the original on 16 February 2014. Retrieved 20 February 2015.
  5. E.J. Pavlina and C.J. Van Tyne, "Correlation of Yield Strength and Tensile Strength with Hardness for Steels", Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, 17:6 (December 2008)
  6. "MatWeb – The Online Materials Information Resource". Archived from the original on 15 December 2013. Retrieved 20 February 2015.
  7. "MatWeb – The Online Materials Information Resource". Archived from the original on 21 February 2015. Retrieved 20 February 2015.
  8. "MatWeb – The Online Materials Information Resource". Archived from the original on 21 February 2015. Retrieved 20 February 2015.
  9. "MatWeb – The Online Materials Information Resource". Archived from the original on 28 March 2017. Retrieved 20 February 2015.
  10. "USStubular.com". Archived from the original on 13 July 2009. Retrieved 27 June 2009.
  11. Archived 23 March 2014 at the Wayback MachineIAPD Typical Properties of Acrylics
  12. strictly speaking this figure is the flexural strength (or modulus of rupture), which is a more appropriate measure for brittle materials than "ultimate strength."
  13. "MatWeb – The Online Materials Information Resource". Archived from the original on 21 February 2015. Retrieved 20 February 2015.
  14. "MatWeb – The Online Materials Information Resource". Archived from the original on 21 February 2015. Retrieved 20 February 2015.
  15. "Guide to Glass Reinforced Plastic (fibreglass) – East Coast Fibreglass Supplies". Archived from the original on 16 February 2015. Retrieved 20 February 2015.
  16. "Properties of Carbon Fiber Tubes". Archived from the original on 24 February 2015. Retrieved 20 February 2015.
  17. "Soda-Lime (Float) Glass Material Properties :: MakeItFrom.com". Archived from the original on 3 July 2011. Retrieved 20 February 2015.
  18. "Basalt Continuous Fibers". Archived from the original on 3 November 2009. Retrieved 29 December 2009.
  19. "Toray Properties Document". Archived from the original on 17 September 2018. Retrieved 17 September 2018.
  20. "Tensile Testing Hair". instron.us. Archived from the original on 28 September 2017.
  21. Agnarsson, I; Kuntner, M; Blackledge, TA (2010). "Bioprospecting Finds the Toughest Biological Material: Extraordinary Silk from a Giant Riverine Orb Spider". PLOS ONE. 5 (9): e11234. Bibcode:2010PLoSO...511234A. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0011234. PMC 2939878. PMID 20856804.
  22. Oral, E; Christensen, SD; Malhi, AS; Wannomae, KK; Muratoglu, OK (2006). "PubMed Central, Table 3". J Arthroplasty. 21 (4): 580–91. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2005.07.009. PMC 2716092. PMID 16781413.
  23. "Tensile and creep properties of ultra high molecular weight PE fibres" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 28 June 2007. Retrieved 11 May 2007.
  24. "Mechanical Properties Data". www.mse.mtu.edu. Archived from the original on 3 May 2007.
  25. "MatWeb – The Online Materials Information Resource". Archived from the original on 21 February 2015. Retrieved 20 February 2015.
  26. https://advancednylons.co.za/Materialproperties.pdf
  27. "Nylon Fibers". University of Tennessee. Archived from the original on 19 April 2015. Retrieved 25 April 2015.
  28. "Comparing aramids". Teijin Aramid. Archived from the original on 3 May 2015.
  29. "Uhu endfest 300 epoxy: Strength over setting temperature". Archived from the original on 19 July 2011.
  30. "Fols.org" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 25 July 2011. Retrieved 1 September 2010.
  31. "What is the density of Hydrogenated Boron Nitride Nanotubes (H-BNNT)?". space.stackexchange.com. Archived from the original on 13 April 2017.
  32. Dang, Chaoqun; et al. (1 January 2021). "Achieving large uniform tensile elasticity in microfabricated diamond". Science. 371 (6524): 76–78. Bibcode:2021Sci...371...76D. doi:10.1126/science.abc4174. PMID 33384375.
  33. Lee, C.; et al. (2008). "Measurement of the Elastic Properties and Intrinsic Strength of Monolayer Graphene". Science. 321 (5887): 385–8. Bibcode:2008Sci...321..385L. doi:10.1126/science.1157996. PMID 18635798. S2CID 206512830. Archived from the original on 19 February 2009.
  34. Cao, K. (2020). "Elastic straining of free-standing monolayer graphene". Nature Communications. 11 (284): 284. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11..284C. doi:10.1038/s41467-019-14130-0. PMC 6962388. PMID 31941941.
  35. IOP.org Z. Wang, P. Ciselli and T. Peijs, Nanotechnology 18, 455709, 2007.
  36. Xu, Wei; Chen, Yun; Zhan, Hang; Nong Wang, Jian (2016). "High-Strength Carbon Nanotube Film from Improving Alignment and Densification". Nano Letters. 16 (2): 946–952. Bibcode:2016NanoL..16..946X. doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b03863. PMID 26757031.
  37. Barber, A. H.; Lu, D.; Pugno, N. M. (2015). "Extreme strength observed in limpet teeth". Journal of the Royal Society Interface. 12 (105): 105. doi:10.1098/rsif.2014.1326. PMC 4387522. PMID 25694539.
  38. Yu, Min-Feng; Lourie, O; Dyer, MJ; Moloni, K; Kelly, TF; Ruoff, RS (2000). "Strength and Breaking Mechanism of Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes Under Tensile Load". Science. 287 (5453): 637–640. Bibcode:2000Sci...287..637Y. doi:10.1126/science.287.5453.637. PMID 10649994.
  39. Li, F.; Cheng, H. M.; Bai, S.; Su, G.; Dresselhaus, M. S. (2000). "Tensile strength of single-walled carbon nanotubes directly measured from their macroscopic ropes". Applied Physics Letters. 77 (20): 3161. Bibcode:2000ApPhL..77.3161L. doi:10.1063/1.1324984. Archived from the original on 28 December 2012.
  40. K.Hata. "From Highly Efficient Impurity-Free CNT Synthesis to DWNT forests, CNTsolids and Super-Capacitors" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 12 June 2010.
  41. Elices; et al. "Finding Inspiration in Argiope Trifasciata Spider Silk Fibers". JOM. Archived from the original on 15 January 2009. Retrieved 23 January 2009.
  42. Blackledge; et al. (2005). "Quasistatic and continuous dynamic characterization of the mechanical properties of silk from the cobweb of the black widow spider Latrodectus hesperus". Journal of Experimental Biology. The Company of Biologists. 208 (10): 1937–1949. doi:10.1242/jeb.01597. PMID 15879074. S2CID 9678391. Archived from the original on 1 February 2009. Retrieved 23 January 2009.
  43. A.M. Howatson, P. G. Lund, and J. D. Todd, Engineering Tables and Data, p. 41

Further reading

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.