Royal Thai Armed Forces

The Royal Thai Armed Forces (RTARF) (Thai: กองทัพไทย; RTGS: Kong Thap Thai) are the armed forces of the Kingdom of Thailand.

Royal Thai Armed Forces
Emblem of the Royal Thai Armed Forces
Flag of the Royal Thai Armed Forces
Founded18 January 1852 (18 January 1852)
Service branches
HeadquartersRoyal Thai Armed Forces Headquarters, Bangkok
Highest Commander of the Armed Forces King Vajiralongkorn
Prime Minister & Minister of Defence General Prayut Chan-o-cha
Chief of the Defence Force General Chalermpol Srisawat
Military age21–45
Conscription21 years of age
Reaching military
age annually
1,045,000 (2016)[1]
Active personnel360,850[2] (ranked 13th)
Reserve personnel200,000[2]
Budget223,464 million baht (~$7.15 billion);[3](FY2021)
Percent of GDP1.5% [4]
Domestic suppliers
  • Panus Assembly
  • Preecha Thavorn Industry
  • Chaiseri Defence
  • Defense Technology Institute
  • Thai Rung Union Car
  • Thai Aviation Industry
  • Bangkok Dock
  • Italthai Marine
  • Mahidol Adulyadej Naval Dockyard
  • Marsun Shipbuilding
  • Asian Marine Services
Foreign suppliersFirms in  US
Related articles
HistoryMilitary history of Thailand
RanksMilitary ranks of Thailand

The nominal head of the Thai Armed Forces (จอมทัพไทย; RTGS: Chom Thap Thai) is the King of Thailand.[5] The armed forces are managed by the Ministry of Defense of Thailand, which is headed by the minister of defence and commanded by the Royal Thai Armed Forces Headquarters, which in turn is headed by the Chief of Defence Forces.[6] The commander in chief of the Royal Thai Army is considered the most powerful position in the Thai Armed Forces.[7]

Royal Thai Armed Forces Day is celebrated on 18 January to commemorate the victory of King Naresuan the Great in battle against the Viceroy of Burma in 1593.[8]


The Royal Thai Armed Forces official role is the protection of the sovereignty and territorial integrity of the Kingdom of Thailand. The armed forces are also charged with the defence of the monarchy of Thailand against all threats, foreign and domestic.[9] Apart from these roles, the armed forces also responsible for ensuring public order and participating in social development programs by aiding the civilian government. The armed forces are also charged with assisting victims of national disasters and drug control.

Some critics have contended that, in reality, the Thai armed forces serve two main functions: a) internal security: to safeguard ruling class hegemony from challenges by mass movements to expand the democratic space, and b) to satisfy the self-enrichment goals of the upper echelons of the Thai military.[10][11][12]

In recent years the Royal Thai Armed Forces has increased its role on the international stage by providing peacekeeping forces to the United Nations (UN), in the International Force for East Timor (INTERFET), from 1999 to 2002[13] and participating in the multinational force in Iraq, contributing 423 personnel from 2003 to 2004.[14]


As of 2020, the Royal Thai Armed Forces number 360,850 active duty and 200,000 reserve personnel,[15] nearly one percent of Thailand's population of 70 million. This percentage is higher than that of the US, but lower than that of nearby Vietnam.[16]:5[17] The Thai military has more than 1,700 flag officers (generals and admirals), roughly one general for every 212 troops, a bloated number for a military of its size.[18][19] By comparison, the US military as of 1 November 2018 had 920 active duty general and flag officers (GFOs) for a force of 1,317,325 personnel, or one flag officer for every 1430 troops.[20]:2,5 On 2 May 2015 1,043 new Thai flag officers of all three services promoted in 2014–2015 took the oath of allegiance.[21] It is not clear how many retired during the same period. According to one observer, each Thai general has three aims: to align himself with politicians of the right political party; to ensure that he receives the best possible postings; and to enrich himself and share his takings with his subordinates thus ensuring their loyalty.[12]

In early 2021, the Ministry of Defence announced a program to reduce the number of flag officers by 25% by 2029. As of March 2021, the RTARF has about 1,400 generals and admirals on its payroll: 250 at RTARF headquarters; 400 in the army; 250 in the navy; 190 in the air force; and 300 in the Office of the Permanent Secretary of Defence.[22]


Conscription was introduced in Thailand in 1905.[23] According to the Constitution of the Kingdom, serving in the armed forces is a national duty of all Thai citizens.[24] In practice, only males over the age of 21 who have not gone through reserve training are subject to conscription. The enlistment draft is held in early-April annually. On the draftee selection day, those who are called up for the draft report to their selection center at 07:00. During roll call, eligible draftees can request to volunteer to serve, or they may choose to stay for the lottery. Those who volunteer then undergo physical and mental health examinations including a urine test for drugs.[25] The results of the urine test for drugs are entered into a Narcotics Control Board database. In 2018, of the first 182,910 men entered in the database, 12,209 men, or 6.7 percent, tested positive for drugs: 11,139 for methamphetamine, 750 for marijuana, and the remainder for other drugs. Over 3,000 of those who tested positive will serve in the military where they will receive drug rehabilitation treatment. Those who tested positive, but who were not drafted, will undergo a 13-day rehabilitation regimen in their home provinces.[25] Those who do not pass the physical and mental health examinations are promptly released. Enlisting volunteers then choose their service branch (Royal Thai Army, Royal Thai Navy, or Royal Thai Air Force) and the reporting date of their choice, and receive documentation of the year's draft selection, and an enlistment order to report for basic training with notification details of the reporting time and location. The enlistees are then dismissed for the day until the day that they must report for basic training.

After the enlisting volunteers are dismissed for the day, the lottery process begins. Each selection center has a set quota, and the number of individuals conscripted through the lottery at each selection center will be the quota subtracted by the number of volunteers. Those who choose to proceed with the lottery then undergo the same physical and mental health exams as the volunteers, with the same procedure for dismissal for those who do not pass the health exams. Each man who stays for the lottery draws a card out of an opaque box. Those who draw a black card are released from their military service requirement and are issued the letter of exemption. Those who draw a red card are required to serve starting from the induction date specified on the card. Those with higher educational qualifications can request a reduction of service obligation. In 2018, the Royal Thai Armed Forces called up more than 500,000 men for selection. The combined quota was approximately 104,000 men: 80,000 men for the Royal Thai Army, 16,000 for the Royal Thai Navy, and 8,700 for the Royal Thai Air Force. On selection day, there were 44,800 men who volunteered to serve. After accepting the volunteers and dismissing those who were deemed ineligible, there remained a quota of approximately 60,000 slots for approximately 450,000 men who entered the draft lottery, i.e., the overall probability of drawing a red card in the lottery was approximately 13 percent.[26] In 2017, 103,097 men participated in the draft between 1–12 April. The armed forces needed only 77,000 conscripts per annum. It has not been uncommon for some selection centers to not have to conduct the balloting lottery at all, because quotas were met by the enlisting volunteers. In such instances, those who decided not to volunteer and stay for the lottery were all issued with a certificate of exemption.

Length of service varies by whether a person volunteers to enlist and their educational background. Serving a shortened period of time is given to those who enlist voluntarily. Those without a high school diploma are required to serve two years regardless of whether they volunteer. High school graduates who volunteer are required to serve one year, while high school graduates who draw red cards are required to serve two years. Those with an associate degree or higher who volunteer are required to serve for six months. Those with an associate degree or more who draw red cards can request a reduction in time of service of up to one year. University students can request for deferment of conscription until they are awarded their diploma or reach 26 years of age.

All conscripts are assigned the rank of Private / Seaman / Aircraftman (OR-1) for their entire length of service, regardless of educational qualification. There are wage increases after completion of basic training and for time-in-grade. Although it is alleged that more than half of conscripts end up as servants[27] to senior officers or clerks in military cooperative shops,[28][29] most conscripts regardless of their volunteer status and educational background are placed in an occupational specialty dictated by the needs of their service branch. The most common specialties are infantryman (for Royal Thai Army conscripts), Royal Marine (for Royal Thai Navy conscripts), and security forces specialist (for Royal Thai Air Force conscripts). Duties may include carrying out military operations, manning security checkpoints, force generation, as well as manual labor and clerical duties, depending on the needs of the unit. At the end of their service, conscripts are given the option of reenlisting to remain in the service. In April 2020, only 5,460 out of 42,000 conscripts scheduled for discharge at the end of the month volunteered to remain in the military.[30]

Top government officials insist that conscription is indispensable,[31][32] but some question the need for conscription in the 21st century Thailand and call for an open debate on its efficacy and value to the nation.[33][34][35] Critics claim that external threats to Thailand are negligible in 2019. The Thai government appears to agree: Thailand's new National Security Plan, published in the Royal Gazette on 22 November 2019, sees external geo-political threats to the country as insignificant in the years ahead. The plan, in effect from 19 November 2019 to 30 September 2022, views domestic issues, especially declining faith in the monarchy and political divisions, as greater concerns.[36]

In a report issued in March 2020, Amnesty International charged that Thai military conscripts face institutionalised abuse systematically hushed up by military authorities.[37] According to Amnesty, the practice has "long been an open secret in Thai society".[38] One of infamous cases was in 2011 which 10 officers torturing Wichian Pueksom to death. Until today there is still no verdict to the officials.[39]


The defence budget nearly tripled from 78.1 billion baht in 2005 to 207 billion baht for FY2016 (1 October 2015 – 30 September 2016), amounting to roughly 1.5% of GDP.[40] The budget for FY2017 is 214 billion baht (US$6.1 billion)—including funds for a submarine purchase[41]—a nominal increase of three percent.[42] The proposed budget again represents around 1.5% of GDP and eight percent of total government spending for FY2017.[43] The FY2018 defence budget is 220 billion baht, 7.65% of the total budget.[44] According to Jane's Defence Budgets, the Royal Thai Army generally receives 50% of defense expenditures while the air force and navy receive 22% each.[16]:29 The Ministry of Defense budget for FY2021 is 223,464 million baht, down from 231,745M baht in FY2020.[45]


Ancient military forces

The Royal Siamese Armed Forces was the military arm of the Siamese monarchy from the 12th to the 19th centuries. It refers to the military forces of the Sukhothai Kingdom, the Ayutthaya Kingdom, the Thonburi Kingdom and the early Rattanakosin Kingdom in chronological order. The Siamese army was one of the dominant armed forces in Southeast Asia. As Thailand has never been colonized by a European power, the Royal Thai Armed Forces boasts one of the longest and uninterrupted military traditions in Asia.

The army was organized into a small standing army of a few thousand, which defended the capital and the palace, and a much larger conscription-based wartime army. Conscription was based on the "ahmudan" system, which required local chiefs to supply, in times of war, a predetermined quota of men from their jurisdiction on the basis of population. The wartime army also consisted of elephantry, cavalry, artillery, and naval units.

In 1852, the Royal Siamese Armed Forces came into existence as permanent force at the behest of King Mongkut, who needed a European trained military force to thwart any Western threat and any attempts at colonialisation. By 1887, during the next reign of King Chulalongkorn, a permanent military command in the Kalahom Department was established. The office of Kalahom, as a permanent office of war department, was established by King Borommatrailokkanat (1431–1488) in the mid-15th century during the Ayutthaya Kingdom.[46] Siam's history of organized warfare is thus one of Asia's longest and uninterrupted military traditions.[47] However, since 1932, when the military, with the help of civilians, overthrew the system of absolute monarchy and instead created a constitutional system, the military has dominated and been in control of Thai politics, providing it with many prime ministers and carrying out many coups d'état, the most recent being in 2014.


The Royal Thai Armed Forces were involved in many conflicts throughout its history, including global, regional and internal conflicts. However, most these were within Southeast Asia. The only three foreign incursions into Thai territory were the Franco-Siamese War, the Japanese invasion of Thailand in December 1941, and in the 1980s with Vietnamese incursions into Thailand that led to several battles with the Thai Army. Operations on foreign territory were either territorial wars (such as the Laos Civil War) or conflicts mandated by the United Nations.

Franco-Siamese War (1893)

With the rapid expansion of the French Empire into Indochina, conflicts necessarily occurred. War became inevitable when a French mission led by Auguste Pavie to King Chulalongkorn to try to bring Laos under French rule ended in failure. The French colonialists invaded Siam from the northeast and sent two warships to fight their way past the river forts and train their guns on the Grand Palace in Bangkok (the Paknam Incident). The French also declared a blockade around Bangkok, which almost brought them into conflict with the United Kingdom. Siam was forced to accept the French ultimatum and surrendered Laos to France, also allowing French troops to occupy the Thai province of Chantaburi for several decades.[48]

The Siamese Expeditionary Force in Paris, 1919.

World War I (1917–1918)

King Vajiravudh on 22 July 1917 declared war on the Central Powers and joined the Entente Powers on the Western Front. He sent a volunteer corps, the Siamese Expeditionary Force, composed of 1,233 modern-equipped and trained men commanded by Field Marshal Prince Chakrabongse Bhuvanath. The force included air and medical personnel, the medical units actually seeing combat. Siam became the only independent Asian nation with forces in Europe during the Great War. Although Siam's participation militarily was minimal, it enabled the revision or complete cancellation of so-called "unequal treaties" with the Western powers.[49] The Expeditionary Force was given the honour of marching in the victory parade under the Arc de Triomphe in Paris.[50] Nineteen Siamese soldiers died during the conflict, and their ashes are interred in the World War I monument at the north end of Bangkok's Pramane Grounds.

Franco-Thai War (1940–1941)

The Franco-Thai War began in October 1940, when the country under the rule of Field Marshal Prime Minister Plaek Phibunsongkhram followed up border clashes by invading a French Indo-China, under the Vichy regime (after the Nazi occupation of Paris) to regain lost land and settle territorial disputes. The war also bolstered Phibun's program of promoting Thai nationalism.[51] The war ended indecisively, with Thai victories on land and a naval defeat at sea. However, the disputed territories in French Indochina were ceded to Thailand.

World War II (1942–1945)

To attack British India, British Burma and British Malaya, the Empire of Japan needed to use bases in Thailand. By playing both nations against one another, Prime Minister Phibunsongkhram was able to maintain a degree of neutrality for some time. However, this ended in the early hours of 8 December 1941, when Japan launched a surprise attack on Thailand at nine places along the coastline and from French Indo-China. The greatly outnumbered Thai forces put up resistance, but were soon overwhelmed. By 07:30, Phibun ordered an end to hostilities, though resistance continued for at least another day until all units could be notified. Phibun signed an armistice with Japan that allowed the empire to move its troops through Thai territory. Impressed by Japan's easy conquest of British Malaya, Phibun formally made Thailand part of the Axis by declaring war on the United Kingdom and the United States, though the Regent refused to sign it in the young king's name. (The Thai ambassador to Washington refused to deliver the declaration, and the United States continued to consider Thailand an occupied country.) An active and foreign-assisted underground resistance movement, the Free Thai, was largely successful and helped Thailand to viewed positively in the eyes of the victorious Allies after the war and be treated as an occupied nation rather than a defeated enemy.[52][53]

Korean War (1950–1953)

Thailand soldiers arriving at Busan

During the United Nations-mandated conflict in the Korean peninsula, Thailand provided the reinforced 1st Battalion of the 21st Infantry Regiment, Some 65,000 Thais served in Korea during the war. Thai foot soldiers took part in the 1953 Battle of Pork Chop Hill. During the war the battalion was attached at various times to U.S. 187th Airborne Regimental Combat Team and the British 29th Infantry Brigade. The kingdom also provided four naval vessels, the HTMS Bangprakong, Bangpako, Tachin, and Prasae, and an air transport unit to the UN command structure. The Thai contingent was actively engaged and suffered heavy casualties, including 139 dead and more than 300 wounded. They remained in South Korea after the cease fire, returning to Thailand in 1955.[54][55][56]

Vietnam War (1955–1975)

Thai soldiers boarding a USAF aircraft, during the Vietnam War.

Due to its proximity to Thailand, Vietnam's conflicts were closely monitored by Bangkok. Thai involvement did not become official until the total involvement of the United States in support of South Vietnam in 1963. The Thai government then allowed the United States Air Force in Thailand to use its air and naval bases. At the height of the war, almost 50,000 American military personnel were stationed in Thailand, mainly airmen.[57]

In October 1967 a regiment-size Thai unit, the Queen's Cobras, were sent to Camp Bearcat at Bien Hoa, to fight alongside the Americans, Australians, New Zealanders and South Vietnamese. About 40,000 Thai military would serve in South Vietnam, with 351 killed in action and 1,358 wounded.[57][58][59] Thai troops earned a reputation for bravery and would serve in Vietnam until 1971, when the men of the Royal Thai Army Expeditionary Division (Black Panthers) returned home.[58]

Thailand was also involved in the Laotian Civil War, supporting covert operations against the communist Pathet Lao and the North Vietnamese from 1964 to 1972.

By 1975 relations between Bangkok and Washington had soured, and the government of Kukrit Pramoj requested the withdrawal of all US military personnel and the closure of all US bases. This was completed by March 1976.[60]

Communist insurgency (1976–1980s)

The communist victory in Vietnam in 1975 emboldened the communist movement in Thailand, which had been in existence since the 1920s. After the Thammasat University massacre of leftist student demonstrators in 1976 and the repressive policies of right-wing Prime Minister Tanin Kraivixien, sympathies for the movement increased. By the late-1970s, it is estimated that the movement had as many as 12,000 armed insurgents,[61] mostly based in the northeast along the Laotian border and receiving foreign support. By the 1980s, however, all insurgent activities had been defeated. In 1982 Prime Minister Prem Tinsulanonda issued a general amnesty for all former communist insurgents.

Vietnamese border raids (1979–1988)

With the Vietnamese invasion of Cambodia in 1978, communist Vietnam had a combined force of about 300,000 in Laos and Cambodia. This posed a massive potential threat to the Thais, as they could no longer rely on Cambodia to act as a buffer state. Small encounters occasionally took place when Vietnamese forces crossed into Thailand in pursuit of fleeing Khmer Rouge troops. However, a full and official conflict was never declared, as neither country wanted it.

Thai–Laotian Border War (1987–1988)

This was a small conflict over mountainous territory including three disputed villages on the border between Sainyabuli Province in Laos and Phitsanulok Province in Thailand, whose ownership had been left unclear by the map drawn by the French some 80 years earlier. Caused by then-Army commander Chavalit Yongchaiyudh against the wishes of the government, the war ended with a stalemate and return to status quo ante bellum. The two nations suffered combined casualties of about 1,000.[62]

East Timor (1999–2002)

After the East Timor crisis, Thailand, with 28 other nations, provided troops for the International Force for East Timor or INTERFET. Thailand also provided the force commander, Lieutenant General Winai Phattiyakul.[13] The force was based in Dili and lasted from 25 October 1999 to 20 May 2002.

Thai and US military training together during Cobra Gold 2001.

Iraq War (2003–2004)

After the successful US invasion of Iraq, Thai Humanitarian Assistance Task Force 976 Thai-Iraq Thailand contributed 423 non-combat troops in August 2003 to nation building and medical assistance in post-Saddam Iraq.[63] The Thais could not leave their base in Karbala as their rules governing their participation restricted them to humanitarian assistance which could not be accomplished due to the insurgency during the Thai's tenure in Iraq.[64] Troops of the Royal Thai Army were attacked in the 2003 Karbala bombings, which killed two soldiers and wounded five others.[65] However, the Thai mission in Iraq was considered an overall success, and Thailand withdrew its forces in August 2004. The mission is considered the main reason the United States decided to designate Thailand as a major non-NATO ally in 2003.[14]

South Thailand insurgency (2001–ongoing)

The ongoing southern insurgency had begun in response to Prime Minister Plaek Phibunsongkhram's 1944 National Cultural Act, which replaced the use of Malaya in the region's schools with the Thai language and also abolished the local Islamic courts in the three ethnic Malay and Muslim majority border provinces of Yala, Pattani, and Narathiwat.[66] However, it had always been on a comparatively small scale. The insurgency intensified in 2001, during the government of Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra. Terrorist attacks were now extended to the ethnic Thai minority in the provinces.[67] The Royal Thai Armed Forces also went beyond their orders and retaliated with strong armed tactics that only encouraged more violence.[68] By the end of 2012 the conflict had claimed 3,380 lives, including 2,316 civilians, 372 soldiers, 278 police, 250 suspected insurgents, 157 education officials, and seven Buddhist monks. Many of the dead were Muslims themselves, but they had been targeted because of their presumed support of the Thai government.[69]

Cambodian–Thai border stand-off (2008–2011)

Is an event that began in June 2008 over the border dispute with the Temple of Preah Vihear afterwards. There were many clashes between the two sides. Along with the claims of each party over the said dispute territory.

Sudan (2010–2011)

Thai soldiers joined UNMIS in 2011.[70]

Current developments

Thai and US Army Soldiers practice tactical manoeuvres during exercise Cobra Gold 2006 in Lop Buri.

Thai military deputized as police

On 29 March 2016, in a move that the Bangkok Post said will "...will inflict serious and long-term damage...", the NCPO, under a Section 44 order (NCPO Order 13/2559) signed by junta chief Prayut Chan-o-cha, granted to commissioned officers of the Royal Thai Armed Forces broad police powers to suppress and arrest anyone they suspect of criminal activity without a warrant and detain them secretly at almost any location without charge for up to seven days. Bank accounts can be frozen, and documents and property can be seized. Travel can be banned. Automatic immunity for military personnel has been built into the order, and there is no independent oversight or recourse in the event of abuse. The order came into immediate effect. The net result is that the military will have more power than the police and less oversight.[71]

The government has stated that the purpose of this order is to enable military officers to render their assistance in an effort to "...suppress organized crimes such as extortion, human trafficking, child and labor abuses, gambling, prostitution, illegal tour guide services, price collusion, and firearms. It neither aims to stifle nor intimidate dissenting voices. Defendants in such cases will go through normal judicial process, with police as the main investigator...trial[s] will be conducted in civilian courts, not military ones. Moreover, this order does not deprive the right of the defendants to file complaints against military officers who have abused their power."[72]

The NCPO said that the reason for its latest order is that there are simply not enough police, in spite of the fact that there are about 230,000 officers in the Royal Thai Police force. They make up about 17 percent of all non-military public servants. This amounts to 344 police officers for every for every 100,000 persons in Thailand, more than twice the ratio in Myanmar and the Philippines, one and a half times that of Japan and Indonesia and roughly the same proportion as the United States.[73]

In a joint statement released on 5 April 2016, six groups, including Human Rights Watch (HRW), Amnesty International, and the International Commission of Jurists (ICJ), condemned the move.[74]


The Asia Sentinel in 2014 called the Thai military one of the most deeply corrupt militaries in Asia.[75] The Thai armed forces have a history of procurement scandals and dodgy dealings dating back to at least the 1980s.[75]

  • In the 1980s, the army bought hundreds of substandard armored personnel carriers (APC) from the Chinese that were so shoddy that light was visible through the welds securing the armor plate.[75]
  • The Thai air force bought Chinese jets with short-lived engines so delicate that the planes were towed to the flight line for takeoff and towed back on landing in order to minimize engine hours.[75]
  • In 1997, the HTMS Chakri Naruebet aircraft carrier was commissioned. Due to its lackluster operational history, the Thai media have nicknamed the ship "Thai-tanic", and consider her to be a white elephant.[76][77]
  • The Aeros 40D S/N 21 airship, nicknamed "Sky Dragon", was purchased for 350 million baht in 2009.[78] It cost 2.8 million baht to inflate and 280,000 baht a month to keep inflated.[75] It served for eight years, mostly in storage, and crashed once. The present leadership of the NCPO was instrumental in approving its purchase.[78]

Weapons and equipment

The aircraft carrier HTMS Chakri Naruebet of the Royal Thai Navy.
Saab JAS 39 Gripen of the Royal Thai Air Force.

Thailand's defense spending has soared since 2006. Since then the military has seized control from civilian governments on two occasions. Defense spending has increased by US$1 billion since the latest coup in 2014.[79]

Equipment[80] QuantityIn ServiceOn Order
Main Battle Tank and Light Tank788788200
APCs, IFVs, ARVs, LCVs26202620300
Self-propelled artillery1072107260
Combat warplanes1831790
Transport warplanes1141140
Training warplanes565512
Military helicopters28228225
Aircraft carriers110
Warships17172 LPD
Fast Attack Craft-Missile (FAC-M)s666
Patrol boats1271272

In early January 2022, Thailand's cabinet backed a plan to buy four fighter jets starting in 2023 with 13.8 billion baht ($413.67 million) budgeted for the purchase over a 4 year period to replace some of the country's aging F-16 jets.[81]

Uniforms, ranks, insignia

To build institutional solidarity and esprit de corps, each Thai service component has developed its own distinctive uniforms, ranking system, and insignia.[82] Many Thai military uniforms reflect historical foreign influences. For example, most of the distinctive service uniforms were patterned on those of the US, but lower ranking enlisted navy personnel wear uniforms resembling those of their French counterparts. The early influence of British advisers to the Thai royal court and the historical role of the military in royal pomp and ceremony contributed to the splendor of formal dress uniforms worn by high-ranking officers and guards of honour on ceremonial occasions.

The Royal Thai Army Band in uniforms of various royal guards unit, ranked in the shape of the flag of Thailand

The rank structures of the three armed services are similar to those of the respective branches of the US Armed Forces, although the Thai system has fewer NCO and warrant officer designations. The king, as head of state and constitutional head of the armed forces, commissions all officers. Appointments to NCO ranks are authorised by the minister of defence. In theory, the authority and responsibilities of officers of various ranks correspond to those of their US counterparts. However, because of a perennial surplus of senior officers—in 1987 there were some 600 generals and admirals in a total force of about 273,000—Thai staff positions are often held by officers of higher rank than would be the case in the US or other Western military establishments.

Thai military personnel are highly conscious of rank distinctions and of the duties, obligations, and benefits they entail. Relationships among officers of different grades and among officers, NCOs, and the enlisted ranks are governed by military tradition in a society where observance of differences in status are highly formalised. The social distance between officers and NCOs is widened by the fact that officers usually are college or military academy graduates, while most NCOs have not gone beyond secondary school. There is a wider gap between officers and conscripts, most of whom have even less formal education, service experience, or specialised training.

Formal honours and symbols of merit occupy an important place in Thai military tradition. The government grants numerous awards, and outstanding acts of heroism, courage, and meritorious service receive prompt recognition.

Officer and enlisted rank insignia

Rank group General/flag officers Senior officers Junior officers Officer cadet
 Royal Thai Army[83]
Chom phon
Phon ek
Phon tho
Phon tri
Phan ek
Phan tho
Phan tri
Roi ek
Roi tho
Roi tri
Nak-rian nairoi
 Royal Thai Navy[83]
Chom phon ruea
Phon ruea ek
Phon ruea tho
Phon ruea tri
Nawa ek
Nawa tho
Nawa tri
Ruea ek
Ruea tho
Ruea tri
Nak-rian nairuea
 Royal Thai Air Force[83]
Chom phon akat
Phon akat ek
Phon akat tho
Phon akat tri
Nawa akat ek
Nawa akat tho
Nawa akat tri
Ruea akat ek
Ruea akat tho
Ruea akat tri
Nak-rian nairuea akat
Rank group Senior NCOs Junior NCOs Enlisted
 Royal Thai Army[83]
No insignia
Cha sip ek
Cha sip tho
Cha sip tri
Sip ek
Sip tho
Sip tri
Phon thahan
 Royal Thai Navy[83]
No insignia
Phan cha ek
Phan cha tho
Phan cha tri
Cha ek
Cha tho
Cha tri
Phon thahan
 Royal Thai Air Force[83]
No insignia
Phan cha akat ek
Phan cha akat tho
Phan cha akat tri
Cha akat ek
Cha akat tho
Cha akat tri
Phon thahan

See also


This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain. Country Studies. Federal Research Division.

  1. "Manpower Reaching Military Age Annually". Global Firepower. Global Firepower. Archived from the original on 5 July 2018. Retrieved 5 July 2018.
  2. International Institute for Strategic Studies (2019). The Military Balance 2019. London: Routledge. p. 310. ISBN 978-1857439885.
  3. "223,464,000,000 THB to USD Live Rates - Thai Baht to US Dollars".
  4. "GDP declines at softer rate in the fourth quarter". 18 February 2021.
  5. Chapter 2 of the 2007 Constitution of Thailand. Retrieved on 18 January 2012.
  6. Ministry of Defense Archived 9 April 2010 at the Wayback Machine. Retrieved on 18 January 2012.
  7. "Apirach set to become Army chief in military appointments". The Nation. 20 July 2018. Archived from the original on 19 July 2018. Retrieved 20 July 2018.
  8. "เรื่อง การเปลี่ยนแปลงวันกองทัพไทย". Secretariat of the Cabinet website (in Thai). Retrieved 1 June 2019.
  9. Vision.
  10. Ungpakorn, Giles Ji (6 February 2016). "Why Does Thailand Need an Army?". Uglytruth-Thailand. Archived from the original on 6 December 2019. Retrieved 25 March 2016.
  11. Eoseewong, Nidhi (19 February 2016). "What's the point of having a military?". Prachatai English. Archived from the original on 20 March 2016. Retrieved 27 March 2016.
  12. Rappa, Antonio L (2017). "Preface". The King and the Making of Modern Thailand. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 978-1138221031. Archived from the original on 10 April 2018. Retrieved 10 April 2018.
  13. UNTAET Archived 7 August 2009 at the Wayback Machine. Retrieved on 18 January 2012.
  14. Thailand.
  15. Macan-Markar, Marwaan (24 April 2020). "Thai military battles loss of recruits as abuses come to light". Nikkei Asian Review. Retrieved 24 April 2020.
  16. Chambers, Paul (2015). Civil-Military Relations in Thailand since the 2014 Coup; The Tragedy of Security Sector "Deform". Frankfurt: Peace Research Institute Frankfurt (PRIF). ISBN 978-3-946459-04-0. Archived from the original on 13 August 2016. Retrieved 22 June 2016.
  17. "Active Military Manpower by Country". Global Firepower. Archived from the original on 24 September 2014. Retrieved 16 October 2014.
  18. Chambers, Paul (25 September 2019). "Scrutinising Thailand's 2019 annual military reshuffle". New Mandala. Retrieved 12 February 2020.
  19. Cole, John; Sciacchitano, Steve (1 October 2013). "Thai army: new line-up, same fault-lines". Asia Times. Archived from the original on 11 August 2015. Retrieved 4 April 2015.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: unfit URL (link)
  20. Kapp, Lawrence (1 February 2019). General and Flag Officers in the U.S. Armed Forces: Background and Considerations for Congress (R44389, v.5, updated ed.). Washington DC: Congressional Research Service (CRS). Archived from the original on 23 February 2020. Retrieved 23 February 2020.
  21. "New generals take oath before the Crown Prince". National News Bureau of Thailand (NNT). 3 May 2015. Archived from the original on 29 June 2015. Retrieved 3 May 2015.
  22. Nanuam, Wassana (8 March 2021). "Generals face job cuts". Bangkok Post. Retrieved 10 March 2021.
  23. Baker, Chris; Phongpaichit, Pasuk (2009). A History of Thailand (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 62. ISBN 978-0521759151.
  24. Chapter 4 of the 2007 Constitution of Thailand
  25. Laohong, King-Oua (20 April 2018). "12,000 draftees 'on drugs'". Bangkok Post. Retrieved 20 April 2018.
  26. Nanuam, Wassana (15 April 2018). "Image, pay draw volunteers for armed service". Bangkok Post. Retrieved 15 April 2018.
  27. "Prawit denies servant for officer policy". Bangkok Post. 18 July 2018. Retrieved 18 July 2018.
  28. "Ex-private stands firm after being harassed online for criticising military". Pratchatai English. 3 November 2017. Archived from the original on 7 November 2017. Retrieved 4 November 2017.
  29. "Conscripts aren't servants" (Opinion). Bangkok Post. 19 July 2018. Retrieved 20 July 2018.
  30. "Thais seem ever less impressed by the army". The Economist. 9 May 2020. Retrieved 13 May 2020.
  31. "Prawit defends army spending". Bangkok Post. 3 December 2019. Retrieved 5 December 2019.
  32. "PM insists mandatory conscription is still needed". Thai PBS. 7 August 2018. Archived from the original on 29 August 2018. Retrieved 29 August 2018.
  33. "Let's stop forcing boys to be soldiers" (Opinion). The Nation. 29 August 2018. Archived from the original on 28 August 2018. Retrieved 29 August 2018.
  34. "Do away with conscription" (Opinion). Bangkok Post. 24 March 2018. Retrieved 29 August 2018.
  35. Draper, John; Sripokangkul, Siwach (30 September 2017). "Transform conscription to national service" (Opinion). Bangkok Post. Retrieved 29 August 2018.
  36. Ganjanakhundee, Supalak (27 November 2019). "Thailand's New Security Highlights Threats to the Throne". ISEAS Yusof Ishak Institute. Institute of Southeast Asian Studies (ISEAS). Archived from the original on 5 December 2019. Retrieved 5 December 2019.
  37. "Weeks after Korat massacre, Amnesty report describes conscript abuses". Bangkok Post. Reuters. 23 March 2020. Retrieved 23 March 2020.
  38. We Were Just Toys to Them; Physical, Mental, and Sexual Abuse of Conscripts in Thailand's Military (PDF). London: Amnesty International. March 2020. p. 8. Archived from the original (PDF) on 23 March 2020. Retrieved 23 March 2020.
  39. "9 Years of waiting, Military prosecutors file a case against 9 soldiers in Narathiwat who attacked Army conscript Wichian Pueksom, resulting in his death in 2011". Cross Cultural Foundation. 16 November 2020.
  40. "Bullets, cluster bombs at Thai arms fair despite censure over junta rule". Agence France Presse. 4 November 2015. Retrieved 8 November 2015.
  41. Macan-Markar, Marwaan (2 February 2017). "Thailand and China: Brothers in arms". Nikkei Asian Review. Archived from the original on 2 February 2017. Retrieved 2 February 2017.
  42. "Thai junta-picked MPs give military $124m budget hike". Daily Times. Agence France-Presse. 9 September 2016. Archived from the original on 10 September 2016. Retrieved 9 September 2016.
  43. Grevatt, Jon (17 May 2016). "Thai government proposes small increase in defence spending". IHS Jane's 360. Archived from the original on 18 May 2016. Retrieved 18 May 2016.
  44. Editor2 (13 June 2017). "15 years hike of defence budget". Prachatai English. Archived from the original on 4 October 2017. Retrieved 4 October 2017. {{cite news}}: |last1= has generic name (help)
  45. "Thailand's Budget in Brief Fiscal Year 2021". Budget Bureau. 2 October 2020. p. 82. Retrieved 7 December 2020.
  46. The Royal Thai Army. Brief History.
  47. Military History Archived 27 April 2009 at the Wayback Machine. Retrieved on 18 January 2012.
  48. Legacy of the Paknam clash Archived 21 April 2009 at the Wayback Machine. 2 November 2005
  49. Feature Articles – Thailand and the First World War Archived 18 May 2013 at the Wayback Machine. First World (22 August 2009). Retrieved on 2012-01-18.
  50. 90th Anniversary of World War I. This Is The History of Siamese Volunteer Crop. Thai Military Information Blog Archived 2 April 2009 at the Wayback Machine. (11 November 2008). Retrieved on 2012-01-18.
  51. "Nation-building and the Pursuit of Nationalism under Field Marshal Plaek Phibunsongkhram". Archived from the original on 31 July 2009.
  52. Thailand. (8 December 1941). Retrieved on 2012-01-18. Archived 8 November 2017 at the Wayback Machine
  53. Hughes, Les. "The Free Thai". Insigne. Archived from the original on 8 November 2017. Retrieved 8 November 2017.
  54. Factsheet.
  55. Rottman, Gordon (2002). Korean War Order of Battle: United States, United Nations, and Communist Ground, Naval, and Air Forces, 1950–1953. Praeger. pp. 120–121. ISBN 978-0275978358.
  56. Satjipanon, Chaiyong (22 June 2010). "Heroism of the Little Tigers". The Korean Herald. Archived from the original on 11 October 2016. Retrieved 22 June 2016.
  57. Ruth, Richard A (7 November 2017). "Why Thailand Takes Pride in the Vietnam War" (Editorial). New York Times. Archived from the original on 7 November 2017. Retrieved 8 November 2017.
  58. Trauschweizer, Ingo (December 2011). "Forgotten Soldiers in Vietnam" (Book review). H-Net Online. Archived from the original on 8 November 2017. Retrieved 8 November 2017.
  59. "Thailand Involvement in Vietnam War". The Vietnam War. 29 March 2015. Archived from the original on 10 December 2017. Retrieved 10 December 2017.
  60. Comptroller General of the United States (1 November 1977). "WITHDRAWAL OF U.S. FORCES FROM THAILAND: Ways to Improve Future Withdrawal Operations" (PDF). US Government Accountability Office. Archived from the original (PDF) on 30 May 2017. Retrieved 8 November 2017.
  61. Thailand Communist Insurgency 1959–Present Archived 5 July 2008 at the Wayback Machine. Retrieved on 18 January 2012.
  62. Thailand-Laos Border War 1987–1988 Archived 3 February 2009 at the Wayback Machine. The History Guy. Retrieved on 18 January 2012.
  63. Thailand to withdraw troops from Iraq if attacked. Asian Tribune (21 April 2004).
  64. Ricks, Thomas E (2006). Fiasco; The American Military Adventure in Iraq. London: Penguin. pp. 346–347. ISBN 9780141028507.
  65. Karbala attacks kill 12, wound dozens Archived 20 April 2008 at the Wayback Machine. CNN (27 December 2003). Retrieved on 2012-01-18.
  66. Patani
  67. Search – Global Edition – The New York Times Archived 18 April 2009 at the Wayback Machine. International Herald Tribune (29 March 2009). Retrieved on 2012-01-18.
  68. Thailand's counter-insurgency operations Archived 3 December 2008 at the Wayback Machine. (19 November 2007). Retrieved on 2012-01-18.
  69. Data from the (governmental) Southern Border Provinces Administrative Centre, cited in ISRANews Archived 1 August 2013 at the Wayback Machine report, 4 January 2013
  70. "Thailand Dispatches Soldiers to Join UN Peacekeeping Force in Sudan - World Affairs Journal". Archived from the original on 15 August 2016. Retrieved 5 July 2016.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: unfit URL (link)
  71. "Affront to justice system" (Editorial). Bangkok Post. 1 April 2016. Retrieved 4 April 2016.
  72. "The Dissemination of the Final Constitution Draft and the issuance of the Head of the NCPO's Order No. 13/2559". Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Kingdom of Thailand. 3 April 2016. Archived from the original (Press release) on 13 April 2016. Retrieved 4 April 2016.
  73. "In the dark on army's shadowy powers" (Editorial). Bangkok Post. 3 April 2016. Retrieved 4 April 2016.
  74. "Giving soldiers police powers 'wrong': human rights groups". The Nation. Agence France Presse. 5 April 2016. Archived from the original on 8 April 2016. Retrieved 5 April 2016.
  75. "Thailand's Crooked Army". Asia Sentinel. 20 August 2014. Archived from the original on 26 September 2018. Retrieved 26 September 2018.
  76. Bishop, Chris; Chant, Christopher (2004). Aircraft Carriers: the world's greatest naval vessels and their aircraft. London: MBI. p. 88. ISBN 0-7603-2005-5. OCLC 56646560. Archived from the original on 24 March 2017. Retrieved 26 September 2018.
  77. Carpenter, William M.; Wiencek, David G. (2000). Asian Security Handbook 2000. M. E. Sharpe. p. 302. ISBN 978-0-7656-0715-7. Archived from the original on 11 January 2014. Retrieved 26 September 2018.
  78. Nanuam, Wassana (15 September 2017). "Military finally dumps B350m airship". Bangkok Post. Retrieved 26 September 2018.
  79. "Planes, tanks, subs: the Thai generals' shopping list". The Economic Times. AFP. 14 February 2019. Archived from the original on 15 February 2019. Retrieved 14 February 2019.
  80. The Institute for National Security Studies", chapter Israel, 2008, 23 March 2008.
  81. "Thailand approves $414 mln budget for fighter jets upgrade". Reuters. 12 January 2022. Retrieved 19 July 2022.
  82. Thailand Archived 10 January 2009 at the Wayback Machine. Retrieved on 18 January 2012.
  83. "เครื่องหมายยศทหาร" [Military Rank Insignia]. (in Thai). Thai Naval Education Department. Retrieved 13 June 2021.

Further reading

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.