Origin of birds

The scientific question of within which larger group of animals birds evolved has traditionally been called the "origin of birds". The present scientific consensus is that birds are a group of maniraptoran theropod dinosaurs that originated during the Mesozoic Era.

The Berlin specimen of Archaeopteryx lithographica

A close relationship between birds and dinosaurs was first proposed in the nineteenth century after the discovery of the primitive bird Archaeopteryx in Germany. Birds and extinct non-avian dinosaurs share many unique skeletal traits.[1] Moreover, fossils of more than thirty species of non-avian dinosaur with preserved feathers have been collected. There are even very small dinosaurs, such as Microraptor and Anchiornis, which have long, vaned arm and leg feathers forming wings. The Jurassic basal avialan Pedopenna also shows these long foot feathers. Paleontologist Lawrence Witmer concluded in 2009 that this evidence is sufficient to demonstrate that avian evolution went through a four-winged stage.[2] Fossil evidence also demonstrates that birds and dinosaurs shared features such as hollow, pneumatized bones, gastroliths in the digestive system, nest-building and brooding behaviors.

Although the origin of birds has historically been a contentious topic within evolutionary biology, only a few scientists still dispute the dinosaurian origin of birds, suggesting descent from other types of archosaurian reptiles. Within the consensus that supports dinosaurian ancestry, the exact sequence of evolutionary events that gave rise to the early birds within maniraptoran theropods is disputed. The origin of bird flight is a separate but related question for which there are also several proposed answers.

Research history

Huxley, Archaeopteryx and early research

Thomas Henry Huxley (1825–1895)

Scientific investigation into the origin of birds began shortly after the 1859 publication of Charles Darwin's On the Origin of Species.[3] In 1860, a fossilized feather was discovered in Germany's Late Jurassic Solnhofen limestone. Christian Erich Hermann von Meyer described this feather as Archaeopteryx lithographica the next year.[4] Richard Owen described a nearly complete skeleton in 1863, recognizing it as a bird despite many features reminiscent of reptiles, including clawed forelimbs and a long, bony tail.[5]

Biologist Thomas Henry Huxley, known as "Darwin's Bulldog" for his tenacious support of the new theory of evolution by means of natural selection, almost immediately seized upon Archaeopteryx as a transitional fossil between birds and reptiles. Starting in 1868, and following earlier suggestions by Karl Gegenbaur,[6] and Edward Drinker Cope,[7] Huxley made detailed comparisons of Archaeopteryx with various prehistoric reptiles and found that it was most similar to dinosaurs like Hypsilophodon and Compsognathus.[8][9] The discovery in the late 1870s of the iconic "Berlin specimen" of Archaeopteryx, complete with a set of reptilian teeth, provided further evidence. Like Cope, Huxley proposed an evolutionary relationship between birds and dinosaurs. Although Huxley was opposed by the very influential Owen, his conclusions were accepted by many biologists, including Baron Franz Nopcsa,[10] while others, notably Harry Seeley,[11] argued that the similarities were due to convergent evolution.

Heilmann and the thecodont hypothesis

A turning point came in the early twentieth century with the writings of Gerhard Heilmann of Denmark. An artist by trade, Heilmann had a scholarly interest in birds and from 1913 to 1916, expanding on earlier work by Othenio Abel,[12] published the results of his research in several parts, dealing with the anatomy, embryology, behavior, paleontology, and evolution of birds.[13] His work, originally written in Danish as Vor Nuvaerende Viden om Fuglenes Afstamning, was compiled, translated into English, and published in 1926 as The Origin of Birds.

Heilmann's hypothetical illustration of a pair of fighting 'Proaves' from 1916

Like Huxley, Heilmann compared Archaeopteryx and other birds to an exhaustive list of prehistoric reptiles, and also came to the conclusion that theropod dinosaurs like Compsognathus were the most similar. However, Heilmann noted that birds had clavicles (collar bones) fused to form a bone called the furcula ("wishbone"), and while clavicles were known in more primitive reptiles, they had not yet been recognized in dinosaurs. Since he was a firm believer in an interpretation of Dollo's law that stated that evolution was not "reversible", Heilmann could not accept that clavicles were lost in dinosaurs and re-evolved in birds. He was therefore forced to rule out dinosaurs as bird ancestors and ascribe all of their similarities to convergent evolution. Heilmann stated that bird ancestors would instead be found among the more primitive "thecodont" grade of reptiles.[14] Heilmann's extremely thorough approach ensured that his book became a classic in the field, and its conclusions on bird origins, as with most other topics, were accepted by nearly all evolutionary biologists for the next four decades.[15]

Clavicles are relatively delicate bones and therefore in danger of being destroyed or at least damaged beyond recognition. Nevertheless, some fossil theropod clavicles had actually been excavated before Heilmann wrote his book, but these had been misidentified.[16] The absence of clavicles in dinosaurs became the orthodox view despite the discovery of clavicles in the primitive theropod Segisaurus in 1936.[17] The next report of clavicles in a dinosaur was in a Russian article in 1983.[18]

Contrary to what Heilmann believed, paleontologists now accept that clavicles and in most cases furculae are a standard feature not just of theropods but of saurischian dinosaurs. Up to late 2007 ossified furculae (i.e. made of bone rather than cartilage) have been found in all types of theropods except the most basal ones, Eoraptor and Herrerasaurus.[19] The original report of a furcula in the primitive theropod Segisaurus (1936) was confirmed by a re-examination in 2005.[20] Joined, furcula-like clavicles have also been found in Massospondylus, an Early Jurassic sauropodomorph.[21]

Ostrom, Deinonychus and the dinosaur renaissance

The similarity of the forelimbs of Deinonychus (left) and Archaeopteryx (right) led John Ostrom to revive the link between dinosaurs and birds.

The tide began to turn against the 'thecodont' hypothesis after the 1964 discovery of a new theropod dinosaur in Montana. In 1969, this dinosaur was described and named Deinonychus by John Ostrom of Yale University.[22] The next year, Ostrom redescribed a specimen of Pterodactylus in the Dutch Teyler Museum as another skeleton of Archaeopteryx.[23] The specimen consisted mainly of a single wing and its description made Ostrom aware of the similarities between the wrists of Archaeopteryx and Deinonychus.[24]

In 1972, British paleontologist Alick Walker hypothesized that birds arose not from 'thecodonts' but from crocodile ancestors like Sphenosuchus.[25] Ostrom's work with both theropods and early birds led him to respond with a series of publications in the mid-1970s in which he laid out the many similarities between birds and theropod dinosaurs, resurrecting the ideas first put forth by Huxley over a century before.[26][27][28] Ostrom's recognition of the dinosaurian ancestry of birds, along with other new ideas about dinosaur metabolism,[29] activity levels, and parental care,[30] began what is known as the dinosaur renaissance, which began in the 1970s and continues to this day.

Ostrom's revelations also coincided with the increasing adoption of phylogenetic systematics (cladistics), which began in the 1960s with the work of Willi Hennig.[31] Cladistics is an exact method of arranging species based strictly on their evolutionary relationships, which are calculated by determining the evolutionary tree implying the least number of changes in their anatomical characteristics. In the 1980s, cladistic methodology was applied to dinosaur phylogeny for the first time by Jacques Gauthier and others, showing unequivocally that birds were a derived group of theropod dinosaurs.[32] Early analyses suggested that dromaeosaurid theropods like Deinonychus were particularly closely related to birds, a result that has been corroborated many times since.[33][34]

Feathered dinosaurs in China

Fossil of Sinosauropteryx prima

The early 1990s saw the discovery of spectacularly preserved bird fossils in several Early Cretaceous geological formations in the northeastern Chinese province of Liaoning.[35][36] In 1996, Chinese paleontologists described Sinosauropteryx as a new genus of bird from the Yixian Formation,[37] but this animal was quickly recognized as a more basal theropod dinosaur closely related to Compsognathus. Surprisingly, its body was covered by long filamentous structures. These were dubbed 'protofeathers' and considered homologous with the more advanced feathers of birds,[38] although some scientists disagree with this assessment.[39] Chinese and North American scientists described Caudipteryx and Protarchaeopteryx soon after. Based on skeletal features, these animals were non-avian dinosaurs, but their remains bore fully formed feathers closely resembling those of birds.[40] "Archaeoraptor", described without peer review in a 1999 issue of National Geographic,[41] turned out to be a smuggled forgery,[42] but legitimate remains continue to pour out of the Yixian, both legally and illegally. Feathers or "protofeathers" have been found on a wide variety of theropods in the Yixian,[43][44] and the discoveries of extremely bird-like non-avian dinosaurs,[45] as well as non-avian dinosaur-like primitive birds,[46] have almost entirely closed the morphological gap between non-avian theropods and birds.

Digit homology

There is a debate between embryologists and paleontologists whether the hands of theropod dinosaurs and birds are essentially different, based on phalangeal counts—a count of the number of phalanges (finger bones) in the hand.

Embryologists and some paleontologists who oppose the bird-dinosaur link have long numbered the digits of birds II-III-IV on the basis of multiple studies of the development in the egg.[47] This is based on the fact that in most amniotes, the first digit to form in a 5-fingered hand is digit IV, which develops a primary axis. Therefore, embryologists have identified the primary axis in birds as digit IV, and the surviving digits as II-III-IV. The fossils of advanced theropod (Tetanurae) hands appear to have the digits I-II-III (some genera within Avetheropoda also have a reduced digit IV[48]). If this is true, then the II-III-IV development of digits in birds is an indication against theropod (dinosaur) ancestry. However, with no ontogenical (developmental) basis to definitively state which digits are which on a theropod hand (because no non-avian theropods can be observed growing and developing today), the labelling of the theropod hand is not absolutely conclusive.

Paleontologists have traditionally identified avian digits as I-II-III. They argue that the digits of birds number I-II-III, just as those of theropod dinosaurs do, by the conserved phalangeal formula. The phalangeal count for archosaurs is 2-3-4-5-3; many archosaur lineages have a reduced number of digits, but have the same phalangeal formula in the digits that remain. In other words, paleontologists assert that archosaurs of different lineages tend to lose the same digits when digit loss occurs, from the outside to the inside. The three digits of dromaeosaurs, and Archaeopteryx have the same phalangeal formula of I-II-III as digits I-II-III of basal archosaurs. Therefore, the lost digits would be V and IV. If this is true, then modern birds would also possess digits I-II-III.[47] Also, one 1999 publication proposed a frame-shift in the digits of the theropod line leading to birds (thus making digit I into digit II, II to III, and so forth).[49][50] However, such frame shifts are rare in amniotes and—to be consistent with the theropod origin of birds—would have had to occur solely in the bird-theropod lineage forelimbs and not the hindlimbs (a condition unknown in any animal).[51] This is called Lateral Digit Reduction (LDR) versus Bilateral Digit Reduction (BDR) (see also Limusaurus).[52]

A small minority, known by the acronym BAND (Birds Are Not Dinosaurs),[53] including ornithologists Alan Feduccia and Larry Martin,[54] continues to assert that birds are more closely related to earlier reptiles, such as Longisquama or Euparkeria, than to dinosaurs.[55][56] Embryological studies of bird developmental biology have raised questions about digit homology in bird and dinosaur forelimbs.[57] However, due to the cogent evidence provided by comparative anatomy and phylogenetics, as well as the dramatic feathered dinosaur fossils from China, the idea that birds are derived dinosaurs, first championed by Huxley and later by Nopcsa and Ostrom, enjoys near-unanimous support among today's paleontologists.[15]

Thermogenic muscle hypothesis

A 2011 publication suggested that selection for the expansion of skeletal muscle, rather than the evolution of flight, was the driving force for the emergence of this clade.[58][59] Muscles became larger in prospectively endothermic saurians, according to this hypothesis, as a response to the loss of the vertebrate mitochondrial uncoupling protein, UCP1,[60] which is thermogenic. In mammals, UCP1 functions within brown adipose tissue to protect newborns against hypothermia. In modern birds, skeletal muscle serves a similar function and is presumed to have done so in their ancestors. In this view, bipedality and other avian skeletal alterations were side effects of muscle hyperplasia, with further evolutionary modifications of the forelimbs, including adaptations for flight or swimming, and vestigiality, being secondary consequences of two-leggedness.


Simplified phylogenetic tree showing the relationship between modern birds and other dinosaurs [61]

Archaeopteryx has historically been considered the first bird, or Urvogel. Although newer fossil discoveries filled the gap between theropods and Archaeopteryx, as well as the gap between Archaeopteryx and modern birds, phylogenetic taxonomists, in keeping with tradition, almost always use Archaeopteryx as a specifier to help define Aves.[62][63] Aves has more rarely been defined as a crown group consisting only of modern birds.[32] Nearly all palaeontologists regard birds as coelurosaurian theropod dinosaurs.[15] Within Coelurosauria, multiple cladistic analyses have found support for a clade named Maniraptora, consisting of therizinosauroids, oviraptorosaurs, troodontids, dromaeosaurids, and birds.[33][34][64] Of these, dromaeosaurids and troodontids are usually united in the clade Deinonychosauria, which is a sister group to birds (together forming the node-clade Eumaniraptora) within the stem-clade Paraves.[33][65]

Other studies have proposed alternative phylogenies, in which certain groups of dinosaurs usually considered non-avian may have evolved from avian ancestors. For example, a 2002 analysis found that oviraptorosaurs were basal avians.[66] Alvarezsaurids, known from Asia and the Americas, have been variously classified as basal maniraptorans,[33][34][67][68] paravians,[64] the sister taxon of ornithomimosaurs,[69] as well as specialized early birds.[70][71] The genus Rahonavis, originally described as an early bird,[72] has been identified as a non-avian dromaeosaurid in several studies.[65][73] Dromaeosaurids and troodontids themselves have also been suggested to lie within Aves rather than just outside it.[74][75]

Features linking birds and dinosaurs

Many anatomical[76] features are shared by birds and theropod dinosaurs.


Archaeopteryx, the first good example of a "feathered dinosaur", was discovered in 1861. The first specimen was found in the Solnhofen limestone in southern Germany, which is a lagerstätte, a rare and remarkable geological formation known for its superbly detailed fossils. Archaeopteryx is a transitional fossil, with features clearly intermediate between those of non-avian theropod dinosaurs and birds. Discovered just two years after Darwin's seminal Origin of Species, its discovery spurred the nascent debate between proponents of evolutionary biology and creationism. This early bird is so dinosaur-like that, without a clear impression of feathers in the surrounding rock, at least one specimen was mistaken for Compsognathus.[77]

  1. Blank out numbers in image
Hollow shaft
Parts of a feather

Since the 1990s, a number of additional feathered dinosaurs have been found, providing even stronger evidence of the close relationship between dinosaurs and modern birds. The first of these were initially described as simple filamentous protofeathers, which were reported in dinosaur lineages as primitive as compsognathids and tyrannosauroids.[78] However, feathers indistinguishable from those of modern birds were soon after found in non-avialan dinosaurs as well.[40]

A small minority of researchers have claimed that the simple filamentous "protofeather" structures are simply the result of the decomposition of collagen fiber under the dinosaurs' skin or in fins along their backs, and that species with unquestionable feathers, such as oviraptorosaurs and dromaeosaurs are not dinosaurs, but true birds unrelated to dinosaurs.[79] However, a majority of studies have concluded that feathered dinosaurs are in fact dinosaurs, and that the simpler filaments of unquestionable theropods represent simple feathers. Some researchers have demonstrated the presence of color-bearing melanin in the structures—which would be expected in feathers but not collagen fibers.[80] Others have demonstrated, using studies of modern bird decomposition, that even advanced feathers appear filamentous when subjected to the crushing forces experienced during fossilization, and that the supposed "protofeathers" may have been more complex than previously thought.[81] Detailed examination of the "protofeathers" of Sinosauropteryx prima showed that individual feathers consisted of a central quill (rachis) with thinner barbs branching off from it, similar to but more primitive in structure than modern bird feathers.[82]

Fossil cast of NGMC 91, a probable specimen of Sinornithosaurus


Because feathers are often associated with birds, feathered dinosaurs are often touted as the "missing link" between birds and other dinosaurs. However, the multiple skeletal features also shared by the two groups represent the more important proof for paleontologists.

Comparisons of bird and dinosaur skeletons, as well as cladistic analysis, strengthens the case for the link, particularly for a branch of theropods called Maniraptora. Skeletal similarities include the skull, tooth build, neck, uncinate processes on the ribs, an open hip socket,[83] a retroverted long pubis, flexible wrist (semi-lunate carpal), long arms, three-fingered hand, general pectoral girdle, shoulder blade, furcula, and breast bones. Almost all skeletal traits of Archaeopteryx can be found in non-avian maniraptorans.

A study comparing embryonic, juvenile and adult archosaur skulls concluded that bird skulls are derived from those of theropod dinosaurs by progenesis, a type of paedomorphic heterochrony, which resulted in retention of juvenile characteristics of their ancestors.[84]


Comparison between the air sacs of Majungasaurus and a bird (duck)

Large meat-eating dinosaurs had a complex system of air sacs similar to those found in modern birds, according to an investigation led by Patrick M. O'Connor of Ohio University. In theropod dinosaurs (carnivores that walked on two legs and had birdlike feet) flexible soft tissue air sacs likely pumped air through the stiff lungs, as is the case in birds. "What was once formally considered unique to birds was present in some form in the ancestors of birds", O'Connor said.[85][86]


Computed tomography (CT) scans conducted in 2000 of the chest cavity of a specimen of the ornithopod Thescelosaurus found the apparent remnants of a complex four-chambered heart, much like those found in today's mammals and birds.[87] The idea is controversial within the scientific community, criticised for being bad anatomical science[88] or simply wishful thinking.[89]

A study published in 2011 applied multiple lines of inquiry to the question of the object's identity, including more advanced CT scanning, histology, X-ray diffraction, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, and scanning electron microscopy. From these methods, the authors found that: the object's internal structure does not include chambers but is made up of three unconnected areas of lower density material, and is not comparable to the structure of an ostrich's heart; the "walls" are composed of sedimentary minerals not known to be produced in biological systems, such as goethite, feldspar minerals, quartz, and gypsum, as well as some plant fragments; carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus, chemical elements important to life, were lacking in their samples; and cardiac cellular structures were absent. There was one possible patch with animal cellular structures. The authors found their data supported identification as a concretion of sand from the burial environment, not the heart, with the possibility that isolated areas of tissues were preserved.[90]

The question of how this find reflects metabolic rate and dinosaur internal anatomy is moot, though, regardless of the object's identity.[90] Both modern crocodilians and birds, the closest living relatives of dinosaurs, have four-chambered hearts (albeit modified in crocodilians), so dinosaurs probably had them as well; the structure is not necessarily tied to metabolic rate.[91]

Sleeping posture

Fossils of the troodonts Mei and Sinornithoides demonstrate that the dinosaurs slept like certain modern birds, with their heads tucked under their arms.[92] This behavior, which may have helped to keep the head warm, is also characteristic of modern birds.

Reproductive biology

When laying eggs, female birds grow a special type of bone in their limbs. This medullary bone forms as a calcium-rich layer inside the hard outer bone, and is used as a calcium source to make eggshells. The presence of endosteally derived bone tissues lining the interior marrow cavities of portions of a Tyrannosaurus rex specimen's hind limb suggested that T. rex used similar reproductive strategies, and revealed that the specimen is female.[93] Further research has found medullary bone in the theropod Allosaurus and ornithopod Tenontosaurus. Because the line of dinosaurs that includes Allosaurus and Tyrannosaurus diverged from the line that led to Tenontosaurus very early in the evolution of dinosaurs, this suggests that dinosaurs in general produced medullary tissue.[94]

Brooding and care of young

Several Citipati specimens have been found resting over the eggs in its nest in a position most reminiscent of brooding.[95]

Numerous dinosaur species, for example Maiasaura, have been found in herds mixing both very young and adult individuals, suggesting rich interactions between them.

A dinosaur embryo was found without teeth, which suggests some parental care was required to feed the young dinosaur, possibly the adult dinosaur regurgitated food into the young dinosaur's mouth (see altricial). This behaviour is seen in numerous bird species; parent birds regurgitate food into the hatchling's mouth.

Gizzard stones

Both birds and dinosaurs use gizzard stones. These stones are swallowed by animals to aid digestion and break down food and hard fibres once they enter the stomach. When found in association with fossils, gizzard stones are called gastroliths.[96] Gizzard stones are also found in some fish (mullets, mud shad, and the gillaroo, a type of trout) and in crocodiles.

Molecular evidence

On several occasions, the extraction of DNA and proteins from Mesozoic dinosaurs fossils has been claimed, allowing for a comparison with birds. Several proteins have putatively been detected in dinosaur fossils,[97] including hemoglobin.[98]

In the March 2005 issue of Science, Dr. Mary Higby Schweitzer and her team announced the discovery of flexible material resembling actual soft tissue inside a 68-million-year-old Tyrannosaurus rex leg bone of specimen MOR 1125 from the Hell Creek Formation in Montana. The seven collagen types obtained from the bone fragments, compared to collagen data from living birds (specifically, a chicken), suggest that older theropods and birds are closely related.[99] The soft tissue allowed a molecular comparison of cellular anatomy and protein sequencing of collagen tissue published in 2007, both of which indicated that T. rex and birds are more closely related to each other than either is to Alligator.[100][101] A second molecular study robustly supported the relationship of birds to dinosaurs, though it did not place birds within Theropoda, as expected. This study utilized eight additional collagen sequences extracted from a femur of the "mummified" Brachylophosaurus canadensis specimen MOR 2598, a hadrosaur.[102] However, these results have been very controversial. No other peptides of a Mesozoic age have been reported. In 2008, it was suggested that the presumed soft tissue was in fact a bacterial microfilm.[103] In response, it was argued that these very microfilms protected the soft tissue.[104] Another objection was that the results could have been caused by contamination.[105] In 2015, under more controlled conditions safeguarding against contamination, the peptides were still identified.[106] In 2017, a study found that a peptide was present in the bone of the modern ostrich that was identical to that found in the Tyrannosaurus and Brachylophosaurus specimens, highlighting the danger of a cross-contamination.[107]

The successful extraction of ancient DNA from dinosaur fossils has been reported on two separate occasions, but upon further inspection and peer review, neither of these reports could be confirmed.[108]

Origin of bird flight

Debates about the origin of bird flight are almost as old as the idea that birds evolved from dinosaurs, which arose soon after the discovery of Archaeopteryx in 1862. Two theories have dominated most of the discussion since then: the cursorial ("from the ground up") theory proposes that birds evolved from small, fast predators that ran on the ground; the arboreal ("from the trees down") theory proposes that powered flight evolved from unpowered gliding by arboreal (tree-climbing) animals. A more recent theory, "wing-assisted incline running" (WAIR), is a variant of the cursorial theory and proposes that wings developed their aerodynamic functions as a result of the need to run quickly up very steep slopes such as trees, which would help small feathered dinosaurs escape from predators.

In March 2018, scientists reported that Archaeopteryx was likely capable of flight, but in a manner substantially different from that of modern birds.[109][110]

Cursorial ("from the ground up") theory

Reconstruction of Rahonavis, a ground-dwelling feathered dinosaur that some researchers think was well equipped for flight

The cursorial theory of the origin of flight was first proposed by Samuel Wendell Williston, and elaborated upon by Baron Nopcsa. This hypothesis proposes that some fast-running animals with long tails used their arms to keep their balance while running. Modern versions of this theory differ in many details from the Williston-Nopcsa version, mainly as a result of discoveries since Nopcsa's time.

Nopcsa theorized that increasing the surface area of the outstretched arms could have helped small cursorial predators keep their balance, and that the scales of the forearms elongated, evolving into feathers. The feathers could also have been used to trap insects or other prey. Progressively, the animals leapt for longer distances, helped by their evolving wings. Nopcsa also proposed three stages in the evolution of flight. First, animals developed passive flight, in which developing wing structures served as a sort of parachute. Second, they achieved active flight by flapping the wings. He used Archaeopteryx as an example of this second stage. Finally, birds gained the ability to soar.[111]

Proposed development of flight in a book from 1922: Tetrapteryx, Archaeopteryx, Hypothetical Stage, Modern Bird

Current thought is that feathers did not evolve from scales, as feathers are made of different proteins.[112] More seriously, Nopcsa's theory assumes that feathers evolved as part of the evolution of flight, and recent discoveries prove that assumption is false.

Feathers are very common in coelurosaurian dinosaurs (including the early tyrannosauroid Dilong).[113] Modern birds are classified as coelurosaurs by nearly all palaeontologists,[114] though not by a few ornithologists.[115][116][117] The modern version of the "from the ground up" hypothesis argues that birds' ancestors were small, feathered, ground-running predatory dinosaurs (rather like roadrunners in their hunting style[118]) that used their forelimbs for balance while pursuing prey, and that the forelimbs and feathers later evolved in ways that provided gliding and then powered flight. The most widely suggested original functions of feathers include thermal insulation and competitive displays, as in modern birds.[119][120]

All of the Archaeopteryx fossils come from marine sediments, and it has been suggested that wings may have helped the birds run over water in the manner of the Jesus Christ Lizard (common basilisk).[121]

Most recent refutations of the "from the ground up" hypothesis attempt to refute the modern version's assumption that birds are modified coelurosaurian dinosaurs. The strongest attacks are based on embryological analyses that conclude that birds' wings are formed from digits 2, 3, and 4, (corresponding to the index, middle, and ring fingers in humans. The first of a bird's three digits forms the alula, which they use to avoid stalling in low-speed flight—for example, when landing). The hands of coelurosaurs, however, are formed by digits 1, 2, and 3 (thumb and first two fingers in humans).[122] However, these embryological analyses were immediately challenged on the embryological grounds that the "hand" often develops differently in clades that have lost some digits in the course of their evolution, and that birds' "hands" do develop from digits 1, 2, and 3.[123][124][125] This debate is complex and not yet resolved - see "Digit homology".

Wing-assisted incline running

The wing-assisted incline running (WAIR) hypothesis was prompted by observation of young chukar chicks, and proposes that wings developed their aerodynamic functions as a result of the need to run quickly up very steep slopes such as tree trunks, for example to escape from predators.[126] This makes it a specialized type of cursorial ("from the ground up") theory. Note that in this scenario birds need downforce to give their feet increased grip.[127][128] But early birds, including Archaeopteryx, lacked the shoulder mechanism by which modern birds' wings produce swift, powerful upstrokes. Since the downforce WAIR depends on is generated by upstrokes, it seems that early birds were incapable of WAIR.[129] Because WAIR is a behavioural trait without osteological specializations, the phylogenetic placement of the flight stroke before the divergence of the Neornithes, the group which contains all extant birds, makes it impossible to determine if WAIR is ancestral to the avian flight stroke or derived from it.[130]

Arboreal ("from the trees down") theory

The four-winged Microraptor, a member of the Dromaeosauridae, a group of dinosaurs closely related to birds

Most versions of the arboreal hypothesis state that the ancestors of birds were very small dinosaurs that lived in trees, springing from branch to branch. This small dinosaur already had feathers, which were co-opted by evolution to produce longer, stiffer forms that were useful in aerodynamics, eventually producing wings. Wings would have then evolved and become increasingly refined as devices to give the leaper more control, to parachute, to glide, and to fly in stepwise fashion. The arboreal hypothesis also notes that, for arboreal animals, aerodynamics are far more energy efficient, since such animals simply fall to achieve minimum gliding speeds.[131][132]

Several small dinosaurs from the Jurassic or Early Cretaceous, all with feathers, have been interpreted as possibly having arboreal and/or aerodynamic adaptations. These include Scansoriopteryx, Epidexipteryx, Microraptor, Pedopenna, and Anchiornis. Anchiornis is particularly important to this subject, as it lived at the beginning of the Late Jurassic, long before Archaeopteryx.[133]

Analysis of the proportions of the toe bones of the most primitive birds Archaeopteryx and Confuciusornis, compared to those of living species, suggest that the early species may have lived both on the ground and in trees.[134]

One study suggested that the earliest birds and their immediate ancestors did not climb trees. This study determined that the amount of toe claw curvature of early birds was more like that seen in modern ground-foraging birds than in perching birds.[135]

Diminished significance of Archaeopteryx

Archaeopteryx was the first and for a long time the only known feathered Mesozoic animal. As a result, discussion of the evolution of birds and of bird flight centered on Archaeopteryx at least until the mid-1990s.

The supracoracoideus works using a pulley-like system to lift the wing while the pectorals provide the powerful downstroke.

There has been debate about whether Archaeopteryx could really fly. It appears that Archaeopteryx had the brain structures and inner-ear balance sensors that birds use to control their flight.[136] Archaeopteryx also had a wing feather arrangement like that of modern birds and similarly asymmetrical flight feathers on its wings and tail. But Archaeopteryx lacked the shoulder mechanism by which modern birds' wings produce swift, powerful upstrokes (see diagram above of supracoracoideus pulley); this may mean that it and other early birds were incapable of flapping flight and could only glide.[129]

But the discovery since the early 1990s of many feathered dinosaurs means that Archaeopteryx is no longer the key figure in the evolution of bird flight. Other small feathered coelurosaurs from the Cretaceous and Late Jurassic show possible precursors of avian flight. These include Rahonavis, a ground-runner with a Velociraptor-like raised sickle claw on the second toe, that some paleontologists assume to have been better adapted for flight than Archaeopteryx,[137] Scansoriopteryx, an arboreal dinosaur that may support the "from the trees down" theory,[138] and Microraptor, an arboreal dinosaur possibly capable of powered flight but, if so, more like a biplane, as it had well-developed feathers on its legs.[139] As early as 1915, some scientists argued that the evolution of bird flight may have gone through a four-winged (or tetrapteryx) stage.[140][141] Hartman et al. (2019) found that, because of how basal flying paravians are phylogenetically distributed, flight most likely evolved five times among paravians instead of only once. Yi, Archaeopteryx, Rahonavis and Microraptor were thus considered examples of convergent evolution instead of precursors of bird flight.[142]

Secondary flightlessness in dinosaurs







Archaeopteryx and Rahonavis






Simplified cladogram from Mayr et al. (2005)
Groups usually regarded as birds are in bold type.[75]

A minority hypothesis, credited to the books Predatory Dinosaurs of the World (1988) and Dinosaurs of the Air (2002) by scientific illustrator Gregory Paul, suggests that some groups of non-flying carnivorous dinosaurs — especially deinonychosaurs, but perhaps others such as oviraptorosaurs, therizinosaurs, alvarezsaurids and ornithomimosaurs — actually descend from birds or other flighted maniraptorans. Paul also proposed that the ancestors of these groups were more advanced in their flight adaptations than Archaeopteryx. The hypothesis would mean that Archaeopteryx is less closely related to extant birds than these dinosaurs are.[143] In 2016, Paul suggested that omnivoropterygid avialans were closely related to oviraptorosaurs and that jeholornithid avialans were closely related to therizinosaurs; he considered them to not be avians but suggested that they shared a flighted ancestor.[144]

Mayr et al. (2005) analyzed a new, tenth specimen of Archaeopteryx, and concluded that Archaeopteryx was the sister clade to the Deinonychosauria, but that the more advanced bird Confuciusornis was within the Dromaeosauridae.[145] This paper, however, excluded all other birds and thus did not sample their character distributions. The paper was criticized by Corfe and Butler (2006) who found the authors could not support their conclusions statistically. Mayr et al. agreed that the statistical support for the authors' earlier paper was weak but stated that it is also weak for the alternative scenarios.[146]

Most subsequent cladistic analyses, an exception being that of Hartman and colleagues (2019),[142] do not support Paul's hypothesis about the position of Archaeopteryx. Instead, they indicate that Archaeopteryx is closer to birds, within the clade Avialae, than it is to deinonychosaurs or oviraptorosaurs. Microraptor, Pedopenna, and Anchiornis all have winged feet, share many features and lie close to the base of the clade Paraves. This suggests that the ancestral paravian may have been a four-winged glider.[2] Deinonychus may also display partial volancy, with the young being capable of flight or gliding and the adults being flightless.[147] In 2018, a study concluded that the last common ancestor of the Pennaraptora had joint surfaces on the fingers, and between the metatarsus and the wrist, that were optimised to stabilise the hand in flight. This was seen as an indication for secondary flightlessness in heavy basal members of that group.[148]

In Euornithes, the earliest unequivocal example of secondary flightlessness is Patagopteryx.[149]

See also

 Dinosaurs portal


  1. Chiappe, Luis M. (2009). "Downsized Dinosaurs: The Evolutionary Transition to Modern Birds". Evolution: Education and Outreach. 2 (2): 248–256. doi:10.1007/s12052-009-0133-4.
  2. Witmer, LM (2009). "Palaeontology: Feathered dinosaurs in a tangle". Nature. 461 (7264): 601–2. Bibcode:2009Natur.461..601W. doi:10.1038/461601a. PMID 19794481. S2CID 205049989.
  3. Darwin, Charles R. (1859). On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. London: John Murray. p. 502pp. ISBN 978-1-4353-9386-8.
  4. von Meyer, C.E. Hermann. (1861). "Archaeopteryx lithographica (Vogel-Feder) und Pterodactylus von Solnhofen". Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie, Geologie und Paläontologie (in German). 1861: 678–679.
  5. Owen, Richard. (1863). "On the Archeopteryx [sp] of von Meyer, with a description of the fossil remains of a long-tailed species, from the lithographic stone of Solenhofen [sp]". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. 153: 33–47. doi:10.1098/rstl.1863.0003.
  6. Gegenbaur, K. (1863). "Vergleichend-anatomische Bemerkungen über das Fußskelet der Vögel". Archiv für Anatomie, Physiologie und Wissenschaftliche Medicin. 1863: 450–472.
  7. Cope, E.D. (1867). "An account of the extinct reptiles which approached the birds". Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia. 19: 234–235.link
  8. Huxley, T.H. (1868). "On the animals which are most nearly intermediate between birds and reptiles". Annals and Magazine of Natural History. 4th. 2: 66–75.
  9.  Huxley, Thomas H. (1870). "Further Evidence of the Affinity between the Dinosaurian Reptiles and Birds". Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London. Vol. 26. pp. 12–31. doi:10.1144/GSL.JGS.1870.026.01-02.08 via Wikisource.
  10. Nopcsa, Franz. (1907). "Ideas on the origin of flight". Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London. 77: 223–238. doi:10.1111/j.1096-3642.1907.tb01811.x.
  11. Seeley, Harry G. (1901). Dragons of the Air: An Account of Extinct Flying Reptiles. London: Methuen & Co. p. 239pp.
  12. Abel, O (1911). "Die Vorfahren der Vögel und ihre Lebensweise". Verhandlungen der Zoologisch-Botanischen Gesellschaft in Wien. 61: 144–191.
  13. Nieuwland, Ilja J.J. (2004). "Gerhard Heilmann and the artist's eye in science, 1912-1927" (PDF). PalArch's Journal of Vertebrate Palaeontology. 3 (2). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-02-24. Retrieved 2009-05-21.
  14. Heilmann, Gerhard (1926). The Origin of Birds. London: Witherby. p. 208pp. ISBN 978-0-486-22784-9.
  15. Padian, Kevin. (2004). "Basal Avialae". In Weishampel, David B.; Dodson, Peter; Osmólska, Halszka (eds.). The Dinosauria (Second ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press. pp. 210–231. ISBN 978-0-520-24209-8.
  16. For example in 1923, three years before Heilmans's book, Roy Chapman Andrews found a good Oviraptor fossil in Mongolia, but Henry Fairfield Osborn, who analyzed the fossil in 1924, misidentified the furcula as an interclavicle; described in Paul, G.S. (2002). Dinosaurs of the Air: The Evolution and Loss of Flight in Dinosaurs and Birds. JHU Press. ISBN 978-0-8018-6763-7.
  17. Camp, Charles L. (1936). "A new type of small theropod dinosaur from the Navajo Sandstone of Arizona". Bulletin of the University of California Department of Geological Sciences. 24: 39–65.
  18. In an Oviraptor: Barsbold, R. (1983). "Carnivorous dinosaurs from the Cretaceous of Mongolia". Trudy Soumestnaya Sovetsko-Mongol'skaya Paleontogicheskaya Ekspeditsiya (in Russian). 19: 1–117. See the summary and pictures at "A wish for Coelophysis". Archived from the original on February 3, 2008.
  19. Lipkin, C., Sereno, P.C., and Horner, J.R. (November 2007). "The Furcula In Suchomimus Tenerensis And Tyrannosaurus Rex (Dinosauria: Theropoda: Tetanurae)". Journal of Paleontology. 81 (6): 1523–1527. doi:10.1666/06-024.1. S2CID 86234363.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - full text currently online at "The Furcula in Suchomimus Tenerensis and Tyrannosaurus rex". 2007-11-11. Archived from the original on 2011-05-22. Retrieved 2008-04-17. This lists a large number of theropods in which furculae have been found, as well as describing those of Suchomimus Tenerensis and Tyrannosaurus rex.
  20. Carrano, M.R., Hutchinson, J.R., and Sampson, S.D. (December 2005). "New information on Segisaurus halli, a small theropod dinosaur from the Early Jurassic of Arizona" (PDF). Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 25 (4): 835–849. doi:10.1671/0272-4634(2005)025[0835:NIOSHA]2.0.CO;2. ISSN 0272-4634. S2CID 30039789. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2006-05-12.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  21. Yates, Adam M.; and Vasconcelos, Cecilio C. (2005). "Furcula-like clavicles in the prosauropod dinosaur Massospondylus". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 25 (2): 466–468. doi:10.1671/0272-4634(2005)025[0466:FCITPD]2.0.CO;2. ISSN 0272-4634. S2CID 85679726.
  22. Ostrom, John H. (1969). "Osteology of Deinonychus antirrhopus, an unusual theropod from the Lower Cretaceous of Montana". Bulletin of the Peabody Museum of Natural History. 30: 1–165.
  23. Ostrom, John H. (1970). "Archaeopteryx: Notice of a "new" specimen". Science. 170 (3957): 537–8. Bibcode:1970Sci...170..537O. doi:10.1126/science.170.3957.537. PMID 17799709. S2CID 46682559.
  24. Chambers, Paul (2002). Bones of Contention: The Archaeopteryx Scandals. London: John Murray Ltd. pp. 183–184. ISBN 978-0-7195-6054-5.
  25. Walker, Alick D. (1972). "New light on the origin of birds and crocodiles". Nature. 237 (5353): 257–263. Bibcode:1972Natur.237..257W. doi:10.1038/237257a0. S2CID 4174690.
  26. Ostrom, John H. (1973). "The ancestry of birds". Nature. 242 (5393): 136. Bibcode:1973NPhS..242..136O. doi:10.1038/242136a0. S2CID 29873831.
  27. Ostrom, John H. (1975). The origin of birds. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences. Vol. 3. pp. 55–77. Bibcode:1975AREPS...3...55O. doi:10.1146/annurev.ea.03.050175.000415. ISBN 978-0-912532-57-8.
  28. Ostrom, John H. (1976). "Archaeopteryx and the origin of birds" (PDF). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 8 (2): 91–182. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.1976.tb00244.x.
  29. Bakker, Robert T. (1972). "Anatomical and ecological evidence of endothermy in dinosaurs". Nature. 238 (5359): 81–85. Bibcode:1972Natur.238...81B. doi:10.1038/238081a0. S2CID 4176132.
  30. Horner, John R.; Makela, Robert (1979). "Nest of juveniles provides evidence of family structure among dinosaurs". Nature. 282 (5736): 296–298. Bibcode:1979Natur.282..296H. doi:10.1038/282296a0. S2CID 4370793.
  31. Hennig, E.H. Willi (1966). Phylogenetic Systematics. translated by Davis, D. Dwight; & Zangerl, Rainer. Urbana: University of Illinois Press. ISBN 978-0-252-06814-0.
  32. Gauthier, Jacques. (1986). "Saurischian monophyly and the origin of birds". In Padian, Kevin (ed.). The Origin of Birds and the Evolution of Flight. Memoirs of the California Academy of Sciences 8. pp. 1–55.
  33. Senter, Phil (2007). "A new look at the phylogeny of Coelurosauria (Dinosauria: Theropoda)". Journal of Systematic Palaeontology. 5 (4): 429–463. doi:10.1017/S1477201907002143. S2CID 83726237.
  34. Turner, Alan H.; Hwang, Sunny; & Norell, Mark A. (2007). "A small derived theropod from Öösh, Early Cretaceous, Baykhangor, Mongolia". American Museum Novitates (3557): 1–27. doi:10.1206/0003-0082(2007)3557[1:ASDTFS]2.0.CO;2. hdl:2246/5845. ISSN 0003-0082. S2CID 31096081.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  35. Sereno, Paul C.; Rao Chenggang (1992). "Early evolution of avian flight and perching: new evidence from the Lower Cretaceous of China". Science. 255 (5046): 845–8. Bibcode:1992Sci...255..845S. doi:10.1126/science.255.5046.845. PMID 17756432. S2CID 41106677.
  36. Hou Lian-Hai, Lian-hai; Zhou Zhonghe; Martin, Larry D.; & Feduccia, Alan (1995). "A beaked bird from the Jurassic of China". Nature. 377 (6550): 616–618. Bibcode:1995Natur.377..616H. doi:10.1038/377616a0. S2CID 4357707.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  37. Ji Qiang; Ji Shu-an (1996). "On the discovery of the earliest bird fossil in China and the origin of birds" (PDF). Chinese Geology. 233: 30–33.
  38. Chen Pei-ji, Pei-ji; Dong Zhiming; & Zhen Shuo-nan. (1998). "An exceptionally preserved theropod dinosaur from the Yixian Formation of China" (PDF). Nature. 391 (6663): 147–152. Bibcode:1998Natur.391..147C. doi:10.1038/34356. S2CID 4430927.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  39. Lingham-Soliar, Theagarten; Feduccia, Alan; & Wang Xiaolin. (2007). "A new Chinese specimen indicates that 'protofeathers' in the Early Cretaceous theropod dinosaur Sinosauropteryx are degraded collagen fibres". Proceedings of the Royal Society B. 274 (1620): 1823–9. doi:10.1098/rspb.2007.0352. PMC 2270928. PMID 17521978.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  40. Ji Qiang, Philip J.; Currie, Philip J.; Norell, Mark A.; & Ji Shu-an. (1998). "Two feathered dinosaurs from northeastern China" (PDF). Nature. 393 (6687): 753–761. Bibcode:1998Natur.393..753Q. doi:10.1038/31635. S2CID 205001388.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  41. Sloan, Christopher P. (1999). "Feathers for T. rex?". National Geographic. 196 (5): 98–107. Archived from the original on 2012-10-11.
  42. Monastersky, Richard (2000). "All mixed up over birds and dinosaurs". Science News. 157 (3): 38. doi:10.2307/4012298. JSTOR 4012298. Archived from the original on 2008-10-03. Retrieved 2008-07-04.
  43. Xu Xing, Xing; Tang Zhi-lu; & Wang Xiaolin. (1999). "A therizinosaurid dinosaur with integumentary structures from China". Nature. 399 (6734): 350–354. Bibcode:1999Natur.399..350X. doi:10.1038/20670. S2CID 204993327.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  44. Xu Xing, X; Norell, Mark A.; Kuang Xuewen; Wang Xiaolin; Zhao Qi; & Jia Chengkai. (2004). "Basal tyrannosauroids from China and evidence for protofeathers in tyrannosauroids" (PDF). Nature. 431 (7009): 680–4. Bibcode:2004Natur.431..680X. doi:10.1038/nature02855. PMID 15470426. S2CID 4381777.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  45. Xu Xing, X; Zhou Zhonghe; Wang Xiaolin; Kuang Xuewen; Zhang Fucheng; & Du Xiangke (2003). "Four-winged dinosaurs from China" (PDF). Nature. 421 (6921): 335–40. Bibcode:2003Natur.421..335X. doi:10.1038/nature01342. PMID 12540892. S2CID 1160118.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  46. Zhou, Zhonghe; Zhang Fucheng (2002). "A long-tailed, seed-eating bird from the Early Cretaceous of China". Nature. 418 (6896): 405–9. Bibcode:2002Natur.418..405Z. doi:10.1038/nature00930. PMID 12140555. S2CID 4423299.
  47. Chatterjee, Sankar (17 April 1998). "Counting the Fingers of Birds and Dinosaurs". Science. 280 (5362): 355a–355. Bibcode:1998Sci...280..355C. doi:10.1126/science.280.5362.355a.
  48. University of Maryland department of geology home page, "Theropoda I" on Avetheropoda, 14 July 2006.
  49. Wagner, G. P.; Gautthier, J. A. (1999). "1,2,3 = 2,3,4: A solution to the problem of the homology of the digits in the avian hand". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 96 (9): 5111–6. Bibcode:1999PNAS...96.5111W. doi:10.1073/pnas.96.9.5111. PMC 21825. PMID 10220427.
  50. Scienceblogs: Limusaurus is awesome Archived 2009-06-22 at the Wayback Machine.
  51. Developmental Biology 8e Online. Chapter 16: Did Birds Evolve From the Dinosaurs? Archived 2008-01-18 at the Wayback Machine
  52. Vargas AO, Wagner GP and Gauthier, JA. 2009. Limusaurus and bird digit identity. Available from Nature Precedings
  53. Havstad, Joyce C.; Smith, N. Adam (2019). "Fossils with Feathers and Philosophy of Science". Systematic Biology. 68 (5): 840–851. doi:10.1093/sysbio/syz010. ISSN 1076-836X. PMC 6701454. PMID 30753719.
  54. Darren Naish. 2021. "Birds Are Not Dinosaurs (or BAND)" p 23-27 in Dinopedia — A Brief Compendium of Dinosaur Lore. Princeton University Press
  55. Martin, Larry D. (2004). "A basal archosaurian origin for birds". Acta Zoologica Sinica. 50 (6): 978–990.
  56. Feduccia, Alan; Lingham-Soliar, Theagarten; & Hincliffe, J. Richard. (2005). "Do feathered dinosaurs exist? Testing the hypothesis on neontological and paleontological evidence". Journal of Morphology. 266 (2): 125–66. doi:10.1002/jmor.10382. PMID 16217748. S2CID 15079072.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  57. Burke, Ann C.; Feduccia, Alan (1997). "Developmental patterns and the identification of homologies in the avian hand". Science. 278 (5338): 666–668. Bibcode:1997Sci...278..666B. doi:10.1126/science.278.5338.666.
  58. Newman SA (2011). "Thermogenesis, muscle hyperplasia, and the origin of birds". BioEssays. 33 (9): 653–656. doi:10.1002/bies.201100061. PMID 21695679. S2CID 42012034.
  59. Newman SA, Mezentseva NV, Badyaev AV (2013). "Gene loss, thermogenesis, and the origin of birds". Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 1289 (1): 36–47. Bibcode:2013NYASA1289...36N. doi:10.1111/nyas.12090. PMID 23550607. S2CID 12240405.
  60. Mezentseva NV, Kumaratilake JS, Newman SA (2008). "The brown adipocyte differentiation pathway in birds: An evolutionary road not taken". BMC Biology. 6 (1): 17. doi:10.1186/1741-7007-6-17. PMC 2375860. PMID 18426587.
  61. Plotnick, Roy E.; Theodor, Jessica M.; Holtz, Thomas R. (2015-09-24). "Jurassic Pork: What Could a Jewish Time Traveler Eat?". Evolution: Education and Outreach. 8 (1): 17. doi:10.1186/s12052-015-0047-2. ISSN 1936-6434. S2CID 16195453.
  62. Sereno, Paul C. (1997). "The origin and evolution of dinosaurs" (PDF). Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences. 25 (1): 435–489. Bibcode:1997AREPS..25..435S. doi:10.1146/annurev.earth.25.1.435.
  63. Chiappe, Luis M. (1997). "Aves". In Currie, Philip J.; Padian, Kevin (eds.). Encyclopedia of Dinosaurs. San Diego: Academic Press. pp. 45–50. ISBN 978-0-12-226810-6.
  64. Holtz, Thomas R.; Osmólska, Halszka. (2004). "Saurischia". In Weishampel, David B.; Dodson, Peter; Osmólska, Halszka (eds.). The Dinosauria (Second ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press. pp. 21–24. ISBN 978-0-520-24209-8.
  65. Turner, Alan H.; Pol, Diego; Clarke, Julia A.; Erickson, Gregory M.; & Norell, Mark A. (2007). "A basal dromaeosaurid and size evolution preceding avian flight". Science. 317 (5843): 1378–81. Bibcode:2007Sci...317.1378T. doi:10.1126/science.1144066. PMID 17823350.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  66. Osmólska, Halszka; Maryańska, Teresa; & Wolsan, Mieczysław. (2002). "Avialan status for Oviraptorosauria". Acta Palaeontologica Polonica. 47 (1): 97–116.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  67. Martinelli, Agustín G.; Vera, Ezequiel I. (2007). "Achillesaurus manazzonei, a new alvarezsaurid theropod (Dinosauria) from the Late Cretaceous Bajo de la Carpa Formation, Río Negro Province, Argentina" (PDF). Zootaxa. 1582: 1–17. doi:10.11646/zootaxa.1582.1.1.
  68. Novas, Fernando E.; Pol, Diego. (2002). "Alvarezsaurid relationships reconsidered". In Chiappe, Luis M.; Witmer, Lawrence M. (eds.). Mesozoic Birds: Above the Heads of Dinosaurs. Berkeley: University of California Press. pp. 121–125. ISBN 978-0-520-20094-4.
  69. Sereno, Paul C. (1999). "The evolution of dinosaurs". Science. 284 (5423): 2137–47. doi:10.1126/science.284.5423.2137. PMID 10381873.
  70. Perle, Altangerel; Norell, Mark A.; Chiappe, Luis M.; & Clark, James M. (1993). "Flightless bird from the Cretaceous of Mongolia". Nature. 362 (6421): 623–626. Bibcode:1993Natur.362..623A. doi:10.1038/362623a0. S2CID 4252852.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  71. Chiappe, Luis M.; Norell, Mark A.; & Clark, James M. (2002). "The Cretaceous, short-armed Alvarezsauridae: Mononykus and its kin". In Chiappe, Luis M.; Witmer, Lawrence M. (eds.). Mesozoic Birds: Above the Heads of Dinosaurs. Berkeley: University of California Press. pp. 87–119. ISBN 978-0-520-20094-4.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  72. Forster, Catherine A.; Sampson, Scott D.; Chiappe, Luis M.; & Krause, David W. (1998). "The theropod ancestry of birds: new evidence from the Late Cretaceous of Madagascar". Science. 279 (5358): 1915–9. Bibcode:1998Sci...279.1915F. doi:10.1126/science.279.5358.1915. PMID 9506938.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  73. Makovicky, Peter J.; Apesteguía, Sebastián; & Agnolín, Federico L. (2005). "The earliest dromaeosaurid theropod from South America". Nature. 437 (7061): 1007–11. Bibcode:2005Natur.437.1007M. doi:10.1038/nature03996. PMID 16222297. S2CID 27078534.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  74. Paul, Gregory S. (2002). Dinosaurs of the Air: The Evolution and Loss of Flight in Dinosaurs and Birds. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. p. 472pp. ISBN 978-0-8018-6763-7.
  75. Mayr, Gerald; Pohl, Burkhard; & Peters, D. Stefan (2005). "A well-preserved Archaeopteryx specimen with theropod features" (PDF). Science. 310 (5753): 1483–6. Bibcode:2005Sci...310.1483M. doi:10.1126/science.1120331. PMID 16322455. S2CID 28611454.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  76. Chatterjee, Immoor; L. Immoor (9 September 2005). "The Dinosaurs of the Jurassic Park Movies". Geolor.com. Archived from the original on 12 May 2008. Retrieved June 23, 2007.
  77. Wellnhofer, P. (1988). "Ein neuer Exemplar von Archaeopteryx". Archaeopteryx. 6: 1–30.
  78. Xu X, Norell MA, Kuang X, Wang X, Zhao Q, Jia C (October 2004). "Basal tyrannosauroids from China and evidence for protofeathers in tyrannosauroids" (PDF). Nature. 431 (7009): 680–4. Bibcode:2004Natur.431..680X. doi:10.1038/nature02855. PMID 15470426. S2CID 4381777.
  79. Feduccia, A. (2012). Riddle of the Feathered Dragons: Hidden Birds of China. Yale University Press, ISBN 0-300-16435-1, ISBN 978-0-300-16435-0
  80. Zhang, F.; Kearns, S.L.; Orr, P.J.; Benton, M.J.; Zhou, Z.; Johnson, D.; Xu, X.; and Wang, X. (2010). "Fossilized melanosomes and the colour of Cretaceous dinosaurs and birds" (PDF). Nature. 463 (7284): 1075–1078. Bibcode:2010Natur.463.1075Z. doi:10.1038/nature08740. PMID 20107440. S2CID 205219587.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  81. Foth, C (2012). "On the identification of feather structures in stem-line representatives of birds: evidence from fossils and actuopalaeontology". Paläontologische Zeitschrift. 86: 91–102. doi:10.1007/s12542-011-0111-3. S2CID 86362907.
  82. Currie, P.J.; Chen, P.-j. (2001). "Anatomy of Sinosauropteryx prima from Liaoning, northeastern China" (PDF). Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences. 38 (1): 705–727. Bibcode:2001CaJES..38.1705C. doi:10.1139/cjes-38-12-1705.
  83. Egawa, Shiro (2018). "Morphogenetic mechanism of the acquisition of the dinosaur-type acetabulum". R. Soc. Open Sci. 5 (10): 180604. doi:10.1098/rsos.180604. PMC 6227947. PMID 30473817.
  84. Bhullar, B. A. S.; Marugán-Lobón, J. S.; Racimo, F.; Bever, G. S.; Rowe, T. B.; Norell, M. A.; Abzhanov, A. (2012). "Birds have paedomorphic dinosaur skulls". Nature. 487 (7406): 223–226. Bibcode:2012Natur.487..223B. doi:10.1038/nature11146. PMID 22722850. S2CID 4370675.
  85. O'Connor, P.M.; Claessens, L.P.A.M. (2005). "Basic avian pulmonary design and flow-through ventilation in non-avian theropod dinosaurs". Nature. 436 (7048): 253–6. Bibcode:2005Natur.436..253O. doi:10.1038/nature03716. PMID 16015329. S2CID 4390587.
  86. Paul C. Sereno, Ricardo N. Martinez, Jeffrey A. Wilson, David J. Varricchio, Oscar A. Alcober, Hans C. E. Larsson (2008). Kemp, Tom (ed.). "Evidence for Avian Intrathoracic Air Sacs in a New Predatory Dinosaur from Argentina". PLOS ONE. 3 (9): e3303. Bibcode:2008PLoSO...3.3303S. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0003303. PMC 2553519. PMID 18825273.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  87. Fisher, P. E.; Russell, D. A.; Stoskopf, M. K.; Barrick, R. E.; Hammer, M.; Kuzmitz, A. A. (2000). "Cardiovascular evidence for an intermediate or higher metabolic rate in an ornithischian dinosaur". Science. 288 (5465): 503–5. Bibcode:2000Sci...288..503F. doi:10.1126/science.288.5465.503. PMID 10775107.
  88. Hillenius, W. J.; Ruben, J. A. (2004). "The evolution of endothermy in terrestrial vertebrates: Who? when? why?". Physiological and Biochemical Zoology. 77 (6): 1019–42. doi:10.1086/425185. PMID 15674773. S2CID 29300018.
  89. Rowe, T.; McBride, E. F.; Sereno, P. C.; Russell, D. A.; Fisher, P. E.; Barrick, R. E.; Stoskopf, M. K. (2001). "Dinosaur with a Heart of Stone". Science. 291 (5505): 783. doi:10.1126/science.291.5505.783a. PMID 11157158.
  90. Cleland, Timothy P.; Stoskopf, Michael K.; and Schweitzer, Mary H. (2011). "Histological, chemical, and morphological reexamination of the "heart" of a small Late Cretaceous Thescelosaurus". Naturwissenschaften. 98 (3): 203–211. Bibcode:2011NW.....98..203C. doi:10.1007/s00114-010-0760-1. PMID 21279321. S2CID 2408562.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  91. Chinsamy, Anusuya; and Hillenius, Willem J. (2004). "Physiology of nonavian dinosaurs". The Dinosauria, 2nd. 643–659.
  92. Xu, X.; Norell, M.A. (2004). "A new troodontid dinosaur from China with avian-like sleeping posture" (PDF). Nature. 431 (7010): 838–41. Bibcode:2004Natur.431..838X. doi:10.1038/nature02898. PMID 15483610. S2CID 4362745. See commentary on the article
  93. Schweitzer, M.H.; Wittmeyer, J.L.; and Horner, J.R. (2005). "Gender-specific reproductive tissue in ratites and Tyrannosaurus rex" (PDF). Science. 308 (5727): 1456–60. Bibcode:2005Sci...308.1456S. doi:10.1126/science.1112158. PMID 15933198. S2CID 30264554.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  94. Lee, Andrew H.; Werning, Sarah (2008). "Sexual maturity in growing dinosaurs does not fit reptilian growth models". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 105 (2): 582–7. Bibcode:2008PNAS..105..582L. doi:10.1073/pnas.0708903105. PMC 2206579. PMID 18195356.
  95. Norell, M. A., Clark, J. M., Dashzeveg, D., Barsbold, T., Chiappe, L. M., Davidson, A. R., McKenna, M. C. and Novacek, M. J. (November 1994). "A theropod dinosaur embryo and the affinities of the Flaming Cliffs Dinosaur eggs". Science. 266 (5186): 779–82. Bibcode:1994Sci...266..779N. doi:10.1126/science.266.5186.779. PMID 17730398. S2CID 22333224.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  96. Wings O (2007). "A review of gastrolith function with implications for fossil vertebrates and a revised classification". Palaeontologica Polonica. 52 (1): 1–16.
  97. Embery, G; Milner, AC; Waddington, RJ; Hall, RC; Langley, MS; Milan, AM (2003). "Identification of proteinaceous material in the bone of the dinosaur Iguanodon". Connective Tissue Research. 44 (Suppl 1): 41–6. doi:10.1080/03008200390152070. PMID 12952172. S2CID 2249126.
  98. Schweitzer, MH; Marshall, M; Carron, K; Bohle, DS; Busse, SC; Arnold, EV; Barnard, D; Horner, JR; Starkey, JR (June 1997). "Heme compounds in dinosaur trabecular bone". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 94 (12): 6291–6. Bibcode:1997PNAS...94.6291S. doi:10.1073/pnas.94.12.6291. PMC 21042. PMID 9177210.
  99. Schweitzer, MH; Wittmeyer, JL; Horner, JR; Toporski, JK (2005). "Soft-Tissue Vessels and Cellular Preservation in Tyrannosaurus rex". Science. 307 (5717): 1952–5. Bibcode:2005Sci...307.1952S. doi:10.1126/science.1108397. PMID 15790853. S2CID 30456613. Also covers the Reproduction Biology paragraph in the Feathered dinosaurs and the bird connection section.
  100. Asara, JM; Schweitzer MH, Freimark LM, Phillips M, Cantley LC (2007). "Protein Sequences from Mastodon and Tyrannosaurus Rex Revealed by Mass Spectrometry". Science. 316 (5822): 280–5. Bibcode:2007Sci...316..280A. doi:10.1126/science.1137614. PMID 17431180. S2CID 85299309.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  101. Organ, CL; Schweitzer, MH; Zheng, W; Freimark, LM; Cantley, LC; Asara, JM (2008). "Molecular phylogenetics of mastodon and Tyrannosaurus rex". Science. 320 (5875): 499. Bibcode:2008Sci...320..499O. doi:10.1126/science.1154284. PMID 18436782. S2CID 24971064.
  102. Schweitzer, M. H.; Zheng W., Organ C. L., Avci R., Suo Z., Freimark L. M., Lebleu V. S., Duncan M. B., Vander Heiden M. G., Neveu J. M., Lane W. S., Cottrell J. S., Horner J. R., Cantley L. C., Kalluri R. & Asara J. M. (2009). "Biomolecular Characterization and Protein Sequences of the Campanian Hadrosaur B. canadensis". Science. 324 (5927): 626–31. Bibcode:2009Sci...324..626S. doi:10.1126/science.1165069. PMID 19407199. S2CID 5358680.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  103. Kaye, TG; Gaugler, G; Sawlowicz, Z (2008). "Dinosaurian soft tissues interpreted as bacterial biofilms". PLOS ONE. 3 (7): e2808. Bibcode:2008PLoSO...3.2808K. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0002808. PMC 2483347. PMID 18665236.
  104. Peterson, JE; Lenczewski, ME; Scherer, RP (2010). "Influence of microbial biofilms on the preservation of primary soft tissue in fossil and extant archosaurs". PLOS ONE. 5 (10): e13334. Bibcode:2010PLoSO...513334P. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0013334. PMC 2953520. PMID 20967227.
  105. Bern, M; Phinney, BS; Goldberg, D (2009). "Reanalysis of Tyrannosaurus rex mass spectra". Journal of Proteome Research. 8 (9): 4328–4332. doi:10.1021/pr900349r. PMC 2738754. PMID 19603827.
  106. Cleland, TP; et al. (2015). "Mass spectrometry and antibody-based characterization of blood vessels from Brachylophosaurus canadensis". Journal of Proteome Research. 14 (12): 5252–5262. doi:10.1021/acs.jproteome.5b00675. PMC 4768904. PMID 26595531.
  107. Buckley, Michael; Warwood, Stacey; van Dongen, Bart; Kitchener, Andrew C.; Manning, Phillip L. (2017). "A fossil protein chimera; difficulties in discriminating dinosaur peptide sequences from modern cross-contamination". Proceedings of the Royal Society B. 284 (1855): 20170544. doi:10.1098/rspb.2017.0544. PMC 5454271. PMID 28566488.
  108. Wang, HL; Yan, ZY; Jin, DY (1997). "Reanalysis of published DNA sequence amplified from Cretaceous dinosaur egg fossil". Molecular Biology and Evolution. 14 (5): 589–91. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025796. PMID 9159936.
  109. Voeten, Dennis F.A.E.; et al. (13 March 2018). "Wing bone geometry reveals active flight in Archaeopteryx". Nature Communications. 9 (923): 923. Bibcode:2018NatCo...9..923V. doi:10.1038/s41467-018-03296-8. PMC 5849612. PMID 29535376.
  110. Guarino, Ben (13 March 2018). "This feathery dinosaur probably flew, but not like any bird you know". The Washington Post. Retrieved 13 March 2018.
  111. Terres, John K. (1980). The Audubon Society Encyclopedia of North American Birds. New York, NY: Knopf. pp. 398–401. ISBN 978-0-394-46651-4.
  112. Poling, J. (1996). "Feathers, scutes and the origin of birds". dinosauria.com. Archived from the original on 2008-04-02. Retrieved 2008-03-21.
  113. Prum, R. & Brush, A.H. (2002). "The evolutionary origin and diversification of feathers" (PDF). The Quarterly Review of Biology. 77 (3): 261–95. doi:10.1086/341993. PMID 12365352. S2CID 6344830. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2003-10-15. Retrieved 2018-09-17.
  114. Mayr G, Pohl B, Peters D (2005). "A well-preserved Archaeopteryx specimen with theropod features" (PDF). Science. 310 (5753): 1483–6. Bibcode:2005Sci...310.1483M. doi:10.1126/science.1120331. PMID 16322455. S2CID 28611454.
  115. Feduccia, A. (1999). The Origin and Evolution of Birds. Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0-300-07861-9.
  116. Feduccia, A. (February 1995). "Explosive Evolution in Tertiary Birds and Mammals". Science. 267 (5198): 637–8. Bibcode:1995Sci...267..637F. doi:10.1126/science.267.5198.637. PMID 17745839. S2CID 42829066. Archived from the original on 2008-03-20.
  117. Feduccia, A. (1993).
  118. Cretaceous tracks of a bird with a similar lifestyle have been found - Lockley, M.G., Li, R., Harris, J.D., Matsukawa, M., and Liu, M. (August 2007). "Earliest zygodactyl bird feet: evidence from Early Cretaceous roadrunner-like tracks" (PDF). Naturwissenschaften. 94 (8): 657–65. Bibcode:2007NW.....94..657L. doi:10.1007/s00114-007-0239-x. PMID 17387416. S2CID 15821251.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  119. Burgers, P. & L. M. Chiappe (1999). "The wing of Archaeopteryx as a primary thrust generator". Nature. 399 (6731): 60–62. Bibcode:1999Natur.399...60B. doi:10.1038/19967. S2CID 4430686.
  120. Cowen, R. (1991). History of Life. Blackwell Science. ISBN 978-0-7266-0287-0.
  121. Videler, J.J. 2005: Avian Flight. Oxford University. Press, Oxford.
  122. Burke, A.C. & Feduccia, A. (1997). "Developmental patterns and the identification of homologies in the avian hand". Science. 278 (5338): 666–668. Bibcode:1997Sci...278..666B. doi:10.1126/science.278.5338.666. Summarized at "Embryo Studies Show Dinosaurs Could Not Have Given Rise To Modern Birds". ScienceDaily. October 1997.
  123. Chatterjee, S. (April 1998). "Counting the Fingers of Birds and Dinosaurs". Science. 280 (5362): 355a–355. Bibcode:1998Sci...280..355C. doi:10.1126/science.280.5362.355a.
  124. Vargas, A.O., Fallon, J.F. (October 2004). "Birds have dinosaur wings: The molecular evidence". Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution. 304B (1): 86–90. doi:10.1002/jez.b.21023. PMID 15515040.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  125. Pennisi, E. (January 2005). "Bird Wings Really Are Like Dinosaurs' Hands" (PDF). Science. 307 (5707): 194b. doi:10.1126/science.307.5707.194b. PMID 15653478. S2CID 82490156. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2011-07-27.
  126. There is a video clip of a very young chick doing this at "Wing assisted incline running and evolution of flight". YouTube. Archived from the original on 2021-12-19.
  127. Dial, K.P. (2003). "Wing-Assisted Incline Running and the Evolution of Flight". Science. 299 (5605): 402–4. Bibcode:2003Sci...299..402D. doi:10.1126/science.1078237. PMID 12532020. S2CID 40712093. Summarized in Morelle, Rebecca (24 January 2008). "Secrets of bird flight revealed" (Web). Scientists believe they could be a step closer to solving the mystery of how the first birds took to the air. BBC News. Retrieved 2008-01-25.
  128. Bundle, M.W. & Dial, K.P. (2003). "Mechanics of wing-assisted incline running (WAIR)" (PDF). The Journal of Experimental Biology. 206 (Pt 24): 4553–64. doi:10.1242/jeb.00673. PMID 14610039. S2CID 6323207.
  129. Senter, P. (2006). "Scapular orientation in theropods and basal birds, and the origin of flapping flight". Acta Palaeontologica Polonica. 51 (2): 305–313.
  130. Dececchi, T. Alexander; Larsson, Hans C. E. (2011). "Assessing Arboreal Adaptations of Bird Antecedents: Testing the Ecological Setting of the Origin of the Avian Flight Stroke". PLOS ONE. 6 (8): e22292. Bibcode:2011PLoSO...622292D. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0022292. PMC 3153453. PMID 21857918.
  131. Chatterjee, Sankar, Templin, R.J. (2004) "Feathered coelurosaurs from China: new light on the arboreal origin of avian flight" pp. 251-281. In Feathered Dragons: Studies on the Transition from Dinosaurs to Birds (P. J. Currie, E. B. Koppelhus, M. A. Shugar, and J. L. Wright (eds.). Indiana University Press, Bloomington.
  132. Tarsitano, Samuel F.; Russell, Anthony P.; Horne, Francis; Plummer, Christopher; Millerchip, Karen (2000). "On the Evolution of Feathers from an Aerodynamic and Constructional View Point". American Zoologist. 40 (4): 676–686. doi:10.1093/icb/40.4.676.
  133. Hu, D.; Hou, L.; Zhang, L. & Xu, X. (2009). "A pre-Archaeopteryx troodontid theropod from China with long feathers on the metatarsus". Nature. 461 (7264): 640–3. Bibcode:2009Natur.461..640H. doi:10.1038/nature08322. PMID 19794491. S2CID 205218015.
  134. Hopson, James A. "Ecomorphology of avian and nonavian theropod phalangeal proportions:Implications for the arboreal versus terrestrial origin of bird flight" (2001) From New Perspectives on the Origin and Early Evolution of Birds: Proceedings of the International Symposium in Honor of John H. Ostrom. J. Gauthier and L. F. Gall, eds. New Haven: Peabody Mus. Nat. Hist., Yale Univ. ISBN 0-912532-57-2.© 2001 Peabody Museum of Natural History, Yale University. All rights reserved.
  135. Glen, C.L. & Bennett, M.B. (November 2007). "Foraging modes of Mesozoic birds and non-avian theropods". Current Biology. 17 (21): R911–2. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2007.09.026. PMID 17983564. S2CID 535424.
  136. Alonso, P.D., Milner, A.C., Ketcham, R.A., Cokson, M.J. and Rowe, T.B. (August 2004). "The avian nature of the brain and inner ear of Archaeopteryx" (PDF). Nature. 430 (7000): 666–9. Bibcode:2004Natur.430..666A. doi:10.1038/nature02706. PMID 15295597. S2CID 4391019.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  137. Chiappe, L.M. (2007-02-02). Glorified Dinosaurs: The Origin and Early Evolution of Birds. Sydney: UNSW Press. ISBN 978-0-471-24723-4.
  138. Zhang, F., Zhou, Z., Xu, X. & Wang, X. (2002). "A juvenile coelurosaurian theropod from China indicates arboreal habits". Naturwissenschaften. 89 (9): 394–8. Bibcode:2002NW.....89..394Z. doi:10.1007/s00114-002-0353-8. PMID 12435090. S2CID 556221.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  139. Chatterjee, S; Templin, RJ (2007). "Biplane wing planform and flight performance of the feathered dinosaur Microraptor gui" (PDF). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 104 (5): 1576–80. Bibcode:2007PNAS..104.1576C. doi:10.1073/pnas.0609975104. PMC 1780066. PMID 17242354.
  140. Beebe, C. W. A. (1915). "Tetrapteryx stage in the ancestry of birds". Zoologica. 2: 38–52.
  141. Lucas, Frederic A. (Frederic Augustus); American Museum of Natural History (13 June 2018). Animals of the past : an account of some of the creatures of the ancient world. New York : [Amer. Mus. Press] via Internet Archive.
  142. Hartman, Scott; Mortimer, Mickey; Wahl, William R.; Lomax, Dean R.; Lippincott, Jessica; Lovelace, David M. (2019-07-10). "A new paravian dinosaur from the Late Jurassic of North America supports a late acquisition of avian flight". PeerJ. 7: e7247. doi:10.7717/peerj.7247. ISSN 2167-8359. PMC 6626525. PMID 31333906.
  143. Paul, G.S. (2002). Dinosaurs of the Air: The Evolution and Loss of Flight in Dinosaurs and Birds. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. p. 257.
  144. Paul, G.S. (2016). "Avepods". The Princeton Field Guide to Dinosaurs (2nd ed.). Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press. pp. 161, 170. ISBN 978-0-691-16766-4.
  145. Mayr, G. (2006). "Response to Comment on A Well-Preserved Archaeopteryx Specimen with Theropod Features". Science. 313 (5791): 1238c. Bibcode:2006Sci...313.1238M. doi:10.1126/science.1130964.
  146. Corfe, I. J.; Butler, RJ (2006). "Comment on A Well- Preserved Archaeopteryx Specimen With Theropod Features". Science. 313 (5791): 1238b. Bibcode:2006Sci...313.1238C. doi:10.1126/science.1130800. PMID 16946054. S2CID 19859320.
  147. Parsons, William L.; Parsons, Kristen M. (2015). "Morphological Variations within the Ontogeny of Deinonychus antirrhopus (Theropoda, Dromaeosauridae)". PLOS ONE. 10 (4): e0121476. Bibcode:2015PLoSO..1021476P. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0121476. PMC 4398413. PMID 25875499.
  148. Hutson, Joel D.; Hutson, Kelda N. (2018). "Retention of the flight-adapted avian finger-joint complex in the Ostrich helps identify when wings began evolving in dinosaurs". Ostrich: Journal of African Ornithology. 89 (2): 173–186. doi:10.2989/00306525.2017.1422566. S2CID 91081348.
  149. Chiappe, Luis (2002-01-01), Osteology of the Flightless Patagopteryx deferrariisi from the Late Cretaceous of Patagonia (Argentina), pp. 281–316, ISBN 978-0-520-20094-4, retrieved 2020-07-27


This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.