Group 4 element

Group 4 is the second group of transition metals in the periodic table. It contains the four elements titanium (Ti), zirconium (Zr), hafnium (Hf), and rutherfordium (Rf). The group is also called the titanium group or titanium family after its lightest member.

Group 4 in the periodic table
Hydrogen Helium
Lithium Beryllium Boron Carbon Nitrogen Oxygen Fluorine Neon
Sodium Magnesium Aluminium Silicon Phosphorus Sulfur Chlorine Argon
Potassium Calcium Scandium Titanium Vanadium Chromium Manganese Iron Cobalt Nickel Copper Zinc Gallium Germanium Arsenic Selenium Bromine Krypton
Rubidium Strontium Yttrium Zirconium Niobium Molybdenum Technetium Ruthenium Rhodium Palladium Silver Cadmium Indium Tin Antimony Tellurium Iodine Xenon
Caesium Barium Lanthanum Cerium Praseodymium Neodymium Promethium Samarium Europium Gadolinium Terbium Dysprosium Holmium Erbium Thulium Ytterbium Lutetium Hafnium Tantalum Tungsten Rhenium Osmium Iridium Platinum Gold Mercury (element) Thallium Lead Bismuth Polonium Astatine Radon
Francium Radium Actinium Thorium Protactinium Uranium Neptunium Plutonium Americium Curium Berkelium Californium Einsteinium Fermium Mendelevium Nobelium Lawrencium Rutherfordium Dubnium Seaborgium Bohrium Hassium Meitnerium Darmstadtium Roentgenium Copernicium Nihonium Flerovium Moscovium Livermorium Tennessine Oganesson
group 3    group 5
IUPAC group number4
Name by elementtitanium group
CAS group number
(US, pattern A-B-A)
old IUPAC number
(Europe, pattern A-B)

Titanium (Ti)
22 Transition metal
Zirconium (Zr)
40 Transition metal
Hafnium (Hf)
72 Transition metal
7 Rutherfordium (Rf)
104 Transition metal

Black atomic number: solid

As is typical for early transition metals, zirconium and hafnium have only the group oxidation state of +4 as a major one, and are quite electropositive and have a less rich coordination chemistry. Due to the effects of the lanthanide contraction, they are very similar in properties. Titanium is somewhat distinct due to its smaller size: it has a well-defined +3 state as well (although +4 is more stable).

All the group 4 elements are hard, refractory metals. Their inherent reactivity is completely masked due to the formation of a dense oxide layer that protects them from corrosion, as well as attack by many acids and alkalis. The first three of them occur naturally. Rutherfordium is strongly radioactive: it does not occur naturally and must be produced by artificial synthesis, but its observed and theoretically predicted properties are consistent with it being a heavier homologue of hafnium. None of them have any biological role.


Zircon was known as a gemstone from ancient times,[1] but it was not known to contain a new element until the work of German chemist Martin Heinrich Klaproth in 1789. He analysed the zircon-containing mineral jargoon and found a new earth (oxide), but was unable to isolate the element from its oxide. Cornish chemist Humphry Davy also attempted to isolate this new element in 1808 through electrolysis, but failed: he gave it the name zirconium.[2] In 1824, Swedish chemist Jöns Jakob Berzelius isolated an impure form of zirconium, obtained by heating a mixture of potassium and potassium zirconium fluoride in an iron tube.[1]

Cornish mineralogist William Gregor first identified titanium in ilmenite sand beside a stream in Cornwall, Great Britain in the year 1791.[3] After analyzing the sand, he determined the weakly magnetic sand to contain iron oxide and a metal oxide that he could not identify.[4] During that same year, mineralogist Franz Joseph Muller produced the same metal oxide and could not identify it. In 1795, chemist Martin Heinrich Klaproth independently rediscovered the metal oxide in rutile from the Hungarian village Boinik.[3] He identified the oxide containing a new element and named it for the Titans of Greek mythology.[5] Berzelius was also the first to prepare titanium metal (albeit impurely), doing so in 1825.[6]

The X-ray spectroscopy done by Henry Moseley in 1914 showed a direct dependency between spectral line and effective nuclear charge. This led to the nuclear charge, or atomic number of an element, being used to ascertain its place within the periodic table. With this method, Moseley determined the number of lanthanides and showed that there was a missing element with atomic number 72.[7] This spurred chemists to look for it.[8] Georges Urbain asserted that he found element 72 in the rare earth elements in 1907 and published his results on celtium in 1911.[9] Neither the spectra nor the chemical behavior he claimed matched with the element found later, and therefore his claim was turned down after a long-standing controversy.[10]

By early 1923, several physicists and chemists such as Niels Bohr[11] and Charles Rugeley Bury[12] suggested that element 72 should resemble zirconium and therefore was not part of the rare earth elements group. These suggestions were based on Bohr's theories of the atom, the X-ray spectroscopy of Moseley, and the chemical arguments of Friedrich Paneth.[13][14] Encouraged by this, and by the reappearance in 1922 of Urbain's claims that element 72 was a rare earth element discovered in 1911, Dirk Coster and Georg von Hevesy were motivated to search for the new element in zirconium ores.[15] Hafnium was discovered by the two in 1923 in Copenhagen, Denmark.[16][17] The place where the discovery took place led to the element being named for the Latin name for "Copenhagen", Hafnia, the home town of Niels Bohr.[18]

Hafnium was separated from zirconium through repeated recrystallization of the double ammonium or potassium fluorides by Valdemar Thal Jantzen and von Hevesy.[19] Anton Eduard van Arkel and Jan Hendrik de Boer were the first to prepare metallic hafnium by passing hafnium tetraiodide vapor over a heated tungsten filament in 1924.[20][21] The long delay between the discovery of the lightest two group 4 elements and that of hafnium was partly due to the rarity of hafnium, and partly due to the extreme similarity of zirconium and hafnium, so that all previous samples of zirconium had in reality been contaminated with hafnium without anyone knowing.[22]

The last element of the group, rutherfordium, does not occur naturally and had to be made by synthesis. The first reported detection was by a team at the Joint Institute for Nuclear Research (JINR), which in 1964 claimed to have produced the new element by bombarding a plutonium-242 target with neon-22 ions, although this was later put into question.[23] More conclusive evidence was obtained by researchers at the University of California, Berkeley, who synthesised element 104 in 1969 by bombarding a californium-249 target with carbon-12 ions.[24] A controversy erupted on who had discovered the element, which each group suggesting its own name: the Dubna group named the element kurchatovium after Igor Kurchatov, while the Berkeley group named it rutherfordium after Ernest Rutherford.[25] Eventually a joint working party of IUPAC and IUPAP, the Transfermium Working Group, decided that credit for the discovery should be shared. After various compromises were attempted, in 1997 IUPAC officially named the element rutherfordium following the American proposal.[26]



Electron configurations of the group 4 elements
ZElementElectron configuration
22Ti, titanium2, 8, 10,  2[Ar]      3d2 4s2
40Zr, zirconium2, 8, 18, 10,  2[Kr]      4d2 5s2
72Hf, hafnium2, 8, 18, 32, 10,  2[Xe] 4f14 5d2 6s2
104Rf, rutherfordium2, 8, 18, 32, 32, 10, 2[Rn] 5f14 6d2 7s2

Like other groups, the members of this family show patterns in their electron configurations, especially the outermost shells, resulting in trends in chemical behavior. Most of the chemistry has been observed only for the first three members of the group; chemical properties of rutherfordium are not well-characterized, but what is known and predicted matches its position as a heavier homolog of hafnium.[27]

Titanium, zirconium, and hafnium are reactive metals, but this is masked in the bulk form because they form a dense oxide layer that sticks to the metal and reforms even if removed. As such, the bulk metals are very resistant to chemical attack; most aqueous acids have no effect unless heated, and aqueous alkalis have no effect even when hot. Oxidizing acids such as nitric acids indeed tend to reduce reactivity as they induce the formation of this oxide layer. The exception is hydrofluoric acid, as it forms soluble fluoro complexes of the metals. When finely divided, their reactivity shows as they become pyrophoric, directly reacting with oxygen and hydrogen, and even nitrogen in the case of titanium. All three are fairly electropositive, although less so than their predecessors in group 3.[28] The oxides TiO2, ZrO2 and HfO2 are white solids with high melting points and unreactive against most acids.[29]

The chemistry of group 4 elements is dominated by the group oxidation state. Zirconium and hafnium are in particular extremely similar, with the most salient differences being physical rather than chemical (melting and boiling points of compounds and their solubility in solvents).[29] This is an effect of the lanthanide contraction: the expected increase of atomic radius from the 4d to the 5d elements is wiped out by the insertion of the 4f elements before. Titanium, being smaller, is distinct from these two: its oxide is less basic than those of zirconium and hafnium, and its aqueous chemistry is more hydrolyzed.[28] Rutherfordium should have a still more basic oxide than zirconium and hafnium.[30]

The chemistry of all three is dominated by the +4 oxidation state, though this is too high to be well-described as totally ionic. Low oxidation states are not well-represented for zirconium and hafnium[28] (and should be even less well-represented for rutherfordium);[30] the +3 oxidation state of zirconium and hafnium reduces water. For titanium, this oxidation state is merely easily oxidised, forming a violet Ti3+ aqua cation in solution. The elements have a significant coordination chemistry: zirconium and hafnium are large enough to readily support the coordination number of 8. All three metals however form weak sigma bonds to carbon and because they have few d electrons, pi backbonding is not very effective either.[28]


The trends in group 4 follow those of the other early d-block groups and reflect the addition of a filled f-shell into the core in passing from the fifth to the sixth period. All the stable members of the group are silvery refractory metals, though impurities of carbon, nitrogen, and oxygen make them brittle.[31] They all crystallize in the hexagonal close-packed structure at room temperature,[32] and rutherfordium is expected to do the same.[33] At high temperatures, titanium, zirconium, and hafnium transform to a body-centered cubic structure. While they are better conductors of heat and electricity than their group 3 predecessors, they are still poor compared to most metals. This, along with the higher melting and boiling points, and enthalpies of fusion, vaporization, and atomization, reflects the extra d electron available for metallic bonding.[32]

The table below is a summary of the key physical properties of the group 4 elements. The four question-marked values are extrapolated.[34]

Properties of the group 4 elements
Name Ti, titanium Zr, zirconium Hf, hafnium Rf, rutherfordium
Melting point 1941 K (1668 °C)2130 K (1857 °C)2506 K (2233 °C)2400 K (2100 °C)?
Boiling point 3560 K (3287 °C)4682 K (4409 °C)4876 K (4603 °C)5800 K (5500 °C)?
Density 4.507 g·cm−36.511 g·cm−313.31 g·cm−317 g·cm−3?
Appearance silver metallicsilver whitesilver gray ?
Atomic radius 140 pm155 pm155 pm150 pm?


As a metal, titanium is recognized for its high strength-to-weight ratio.[35] It is a strong metal with low density that is quite ductile (especially in an oxygen-free environment),[36] lustrous, and metallic-white in color.[37] The relatively high melting point (1,668 °C or 3,034 °F) makes it useful as a refractory metal. It is paramagnetic and has fairly low electrical and thermal conductivity compared to other metals.[36] Titanium is superconducting when cooled below its critical temperature of 0.49 K.[38][39]


Zirconium is a lustrous, greyish-white, soft, ductile, malleable metal that is solid at room temperature, though it is hard and brittle at lesser purities.[2] In powder form, zirconium is highly flammable, but the solid form is much less prone to ignition. Zirconium is highly resistant to corrosion by alkalis, acids, salt water and other agents.[1] However, it will dissolve in hydrochloric and sulfuric acid, especially when fluorine is present.[40] Alloys with zinc are magnetic at less than 35 K.[1]


Hafnium is a shiny, silvery, ductile metal that is corrosion-resistant and chemically similar to zirconium[41] (due to its having the same number of valence electrons, being in the same group, but also to relativistic effects; the expected expansion of atomic radii from period 5 to 6 is almost exactly cancelled out by the lanthanide contraction). Hafnium changes from its alpha form, a hexagonal close-packed lattice, to its beta form, a body-centered cubic lattice, at 2388 K.[42] The physical properties of hafnium metal samples are markedly affected by zirconium impurities, especially the nuclear properties, as these two elements are among the most difficult to separate because of their chemical similarity.[41]


Rutherfordium is expected to be a solid under normal conditions and have a hexagonal close-packed crystal structure (c/a = 1.61), similar to its lighter congener hafnium.[33] It should be a metal with density ~17 g/cm3.[43][44] The atomic radius of rutherfordium is expected to be ~150 pm. Due to relativistic stabilization of the 7s orbital and destabilization of the 6d orbital, Rf+ and Rf2+ ions are predicted to give up 6d electrons instead of 7s electrons, which is the opposite of the behavior of its lighter homologs.[34] When under high pressure (variously calculated as 72 or ~50 GPa), rutherfordium is expected to transition to body-centered cubic crystal structure; hafnium transforms to this structure at 71±1 GPa, but has an intermediate ω structure that it transforms to at 38±8 GPa that should be lacking for rutherfordium.[45]


The production of the metals itself is difficult due to their reactivity. The formation of oxides, nitrides, and carbides must be avoided to yield workable metals; this is normally achieved by the Kroll process. The oxides (MO2) are reacted with coal and chlorine to form the chlorides (MCl4). The chlorides of the metals are then reacted with magnesium, yielding magnesium chloride and the metals.

Further purification is done by a chemical transport reaction developed by Anton Eduard van Arkel and Jan Hendrik de Boer. In a closed vessel, the metal reacts with iodine at temperatures above 500 °C forming metal(IV) iodide; at a tungsten filament of nearly 2000 °C the reverse reaction happens and the iodine and metal are set free. The metal forms a solid coating on the tungsten filament and the iodine can react with additional metal resulting in a steady turnover.[29][21]

M + 2 I2 (low temp.) → MI4
MI4 (high temp.) → M + 2 I2


Heavy minerals (dark) in a quartz beach sand (Chennai, India).

The abundance of the group 4 metals decreases with increase of atomic mass. Titanium is the seventh most abundant metal in Earth's crust and has an abundance of 6320 ppm, while zirconium has an abundance of 162 ppm and hafnium has only an abundance of 3 ppm.[46]

All three stable elements occur in heavy mineral sands ore deposits, which are placer deposits formed, most usually in beach environments, by concentration due to the specific gravity of the mineral grains of erosion material from mafic and ultramafic rock. The titanium minerals are mostly anatase and rutile, and zirconium occurs in the mineral zircon. Because of the chemical similarity, up to 5% of the zirconium in zircon is replaced by hafnium. The largest producers of the group 4 elements are Australia, South Africa and Canada.[47][48][49][50][51]


Titanium metal and its alloys have a wide range of applications, where the corrosion resistance, the heat stability and the low density (light weight) are of benefit. The foremost use of corrosion-resistant hafnium and zirconium has been in nuclear reactors. Zirconium has a very low and hafnium has a high thermal neutron-capture cross-section. Therefore, zirconium (mostly as zircaloy) is used as cladding of fuel rods in nuclear reactors,[41] while hafnium is used in control rods for nuclear reactors, because each hafnium atom can absorb multiple neutrons.[52][53]

Smaller amounts of hafnium[54] and zirconium are used in super alloys to improve the properties of those alloys.[55]

Biological occurrences

The group 4 elements are not known to be involved in the biological chemistry of any living systems.[56] They are hard refractory metals with low aqueous solubility and low availability to the biosphere. Titanium is one of the only two first row d-block transition metals with no known or suspected biological role (the other being scandium). Rutherfordium's radioactivity of just a couple of hours would make it toxic to living cells. However, it is a synthetic element, so it does not occur in nature or the human body.


Titanium is non-toxic even in large doses and does not play any natural role inside the human body.[56] An estimated quantity of 0.8 milligrams of titanium is ingested by humans each day, but most passes through without being absorbed in the tissues.[56] It does, however, sometimes bio-accumulate in tissues that contain silica. One study indicates a possible connection between titanium and yellow nail syndrome.[57]

Zirconium powder can cause irritation, but only contact with the eyes requires medical attention.[58] OSHA recommendations for zirconium are 5 mg/m3 time weighted average limit and a 10 mg/m3 short-term exposure limit.[59]

Only limited data exists on the toxicology of hafnium.[60] Care needs to be taken when machining hafnium because it is pyrophoric—fine particles can spontaneously combust when exposed to air. Compounds that contain this metal are rarely encountered by most people. The pure metal is not considered toxic, but hafnium compounds should be handled as if they were toxic because the ionic forms of metals are normally at greatest risk for toxicity, and limited animal testing has been done for hafnium compounds.[60]


  1. Lide, David R., ed. (2007–2008). "Zirconium". CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. Vol. 4. New York: CRC Press. p. 42. ISBN 978-0-8493-0488-0.
  2. Emsley 2001, pp. 506–510
  3. Emsley 2001, p. 452
  4. Barksdale 1968, p. 732
  5. Weeks, Mary Elvira (1932). "III. Some Eighteenth-Century Metals". Journal of Chemical Education. 9 (7): 1231–1243. Bibcode:1932JChEd...9.1231W. doi:10.1021/ed009p1231.
  6. Greenwood and Earnshaw, p. 954
  7. Heilbron, John L. (1966). "The Work of H. G. J. Moseley". Isis. 57 (3): 336. doi:10.1086/350143. S2CID 144765815.
  8. Heimann, P. M. (1967). "Moseley and celtium: The search for a missing element". Annals of Science. 23 (4): 249–260. doi:10.1080/00033796700203306.
  9. Urbain, M. G. (1911). "Sur un nouvel élément qui accompagne le lutécium et le scandium dans les terres de la gadolinite: le celtium (On a new element that accompanies lutetium and scandium in gadolinite: celtium)". Comptes Rendus (in French): 141. Retrieved 2008-09-10.
  10. Mel'nikov, V. P. (1982). "Some Details in the Prehistory of the Discovery of Element 72". Centaurus. 26 (3): 317–322. Bibcode:1982Cent...26..317M. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0498.1982.tb00667.x.
  11. Bohr, Niels (June 2008). The Theory of Spectra and Atomic Constitution: Three Essays. p. 114. ISBN 978-1-4365-0368-6.
  12. Bury, Charles R. (1921). "Langmuir's Theory of the Arrangement of Electrons in Atoms and Molecules". J. Am. Chem. Soc. 43 (7): 1602–1609. doi:10.1021/ja01440a023.
  13. Paneth, F. A. (1922). "Das periodische System (The periodic system)". Ergebnisse der Exakten Naturwissenschaften 1 (in German). p. 362.
  14. Fernelius, W. C. (1982). "Hafnium" (PDF). Journal of Chemical Education. 59 (3): 242. Bibcode:1982JChEd..59..242F. doi:10.1021/ed059p242. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2020-03-15. Retrieved 2021-02-03.
  15. Urbain, M. G. (1922). "Sur les séries L du lutécium et de l'ytterbium et sur l'identification d'un celtium avec l'élément de nombre atomique 72" [The L series from lutetium to ytterbium and the identification of element 72 celtium]. Comptes Rendus (in French). 174: 1347. Retrieved 2008-10-30.
  16. Coster, D.; Hevesy, G. (1923). "On the Missing Element of Atomic Number 72". Nature. 111 (2777): 79. Bibcode:1923Natur.111...79C. doi:10.1038/111079a0.
  17. Hevesy, G. (1925). "The Discovery and Properties of Hafnium". Chemical Reviews. 2: 1–41. doi:10.1021/cr60005a001.
  18. Scerri, Eric R. (1994). "Prediction of the nature of hafnium from chemistry, Bohr's theory and quantum theory". Annals of Science. 51 (2): 137–150. doi:10.1080/00033799400200161.
  19. van Arkel, A. E.; de Boer, J. H. (1924). "Die Trennung von Zirkonium und Hafnium durch Kristallisation ihrer Ammoniumdoppelfluoride (The separation of zirconium and hafnium by crystallization of the double ammonium fluorides)". Zeitschrift für Anorganische und Allgemeine Chemie (in German). 141: 284–288. doi:10.1002/zaac.19241410117.
  20. van Arkel, A. E.; de Boer, J. H. (1924). "Die Trennung des Zirkoniums von anderen Metallen, einschließlich Hafnium, durch fraktionierte Distillation (The separation of zirconium and hafnium by fractionated distillation)". Zeitschrift für Anorganische und Allgemeine Chemie (in German). 141: 289–296. doi:10.1002/zaac.19241410118.
  21. van Arkel, A. E.; de Boer, J. H. (1925). "Darstellung von reinem Titanium-, Zirkonium-, Hafnium- und Thoriummetall (Production of pure titanium, zirconium, hafnium and Thorium metal)". Zeitschrift für Anorganische und Allgemeine Chemie (in German). 148: 345–350. doi:10.1002/zaac.19251480133.
  22. Barksdale, Jelks (1968). "Titanium". In Hampel, Clifford A. (ed.). The Encyclopedia of the Chemical Elements. Skokie, Illinois: Reinhold Book Corporation. pp. 732–738. LCCN 68-29938.
  23. Barber, R. C.; Greenwood, N. N.; Hrynkiewicz, A. Z.; Jeannin, Y. P.; Lefort, M.; Sakai, M.; Ulehla, I.; Wapstra, A. P.; Wilkinson, D. H. (1993). "Discovery of the transfermium elements. Part II: Introduction to discovery profiles. Part III: Discovery profiles of the transfermium elements". Pure and Applied Chemistry. 65 (8): 1757–1814. doi:10.1351/pac199365081757. S2CID 195819585.
  24. Ghiorso, A.; Nurmia, M.; Harris, J.; Eskola, K.; Eskola, P. (1969). "Positive Identification of Two Alpha-Particle-Emitting Isotopes of Element 104" (PDF). Physical Review Letters. 22 (24): 1317–1320. Bibcode:1969PhRvL..22.1317G. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.22.1317.
  25. "Rutherfordium". Retrieved 2010-09-04.
  26. "Names and symbols of transfermium elements (IUPAC Recommendations 1997)". Pure and Applied Chemistry. 69 (12): 2471–2474. 1997. doi:10.1351/pac199769122471.
  27. Nagame, Y.; et al. (2005). "Chemical studies on rutherfordium (Rf) at JAERI" (PDF). Radiochimica Acta. 93 (9–10_2005): 519. doi:10.1524/ract.2005.93.9-10.519. S2CID 96299943. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2008-05-28.
  28. Greenwood and Earnshaw, pp. 958–61
  29. Holleman, Arnold F.; Wiberg, Egon; Wiberg, Nils (1985). Lehrbuch der Anorganischen Chemie (in German) (91–100 ed.). Walter de Gruyter. pp. 1056–1057. ISBN 3-11-007511-3.
  30. Periodic table poster by A. V. Kulsha and T. A. Kolevich
  31. Greenwood and Earnshaw, pp. 956–8
  32. Greenwood and Earnshaw, pp. 946–8
  33. Östlin, A.; Vitos, L. (2011). "First-principles calculation of the structural stability of 6d transition metals". Physical Review B. 84 (11): 113104. Bibcode:2011PhRvB..84k3104O. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.84.113104.
  34. Hoffman, Darleane C.; Lee, Diana M.; Pershina, Valeria (2006). "Transactinides and the future elements". In Morss; Edelstein, Norman M.; Fuger, Jean (eds.). The Chemistry of the Actinide and Transactinide Elements (3rd ed.). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer Science+Business Media. ISBN 1-4020-3555-1.
  35. "Titanium". Columbia Encyclopedia (6th ed.). New York: Columbia University Press. 2000–2006. ISBN 978-0-7876-5015-5.
  36. "Titanium". Encyclopædia Britannica. 2006. Retrieved 19 January 2022.
  37. Stwertka, Albert (1998). "Titanium". Guide to the Elements (Revised ed.). Oxford University Press. pp. 81–82. ISBN 978-0-19-508083-4.
  38. Steele, M. C.; Hein, R. A. (1953). "Superconductivity of Titanium". Phys. Rev. 92 (2): 243–247. Bibcode:1953PhRv...92..243S. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.92.243.
  39. Thiemann, M.; et al. (2018). "Complete electrodynamics of a BCS superconductor with μeV energy scales: Microwave spectroscopy on titanium at mK temperatures". Phys. Rev. B. 97 (21): 214516. arXiv:1803.02736. Bibcode:2018PhRvB..97u4516T. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.97.214516. S2CID 54891002.
  40. Considine, Glenn D., ed. (2005). "Zirconium". Van Nostrand's Encyclopedia of Chemistry. New York: Wylie-Interscience. pp. 1778–1779. ISBN 978-0-471-61525-5.
  41. Schemel, J. H. (1977). ASTM Manual on Zirconium and Hafnium. ASTM International. pp. 1–5. ISBN 978-0-8031-0505-8.
  42. O'Hara, Andrew; Demkov, Alexander A. (2014). "Oxygen and nitrogen diffusion in α-hafnium from first principles". Applied Physics Letters. 104 (21): 211909. Bibcode:2014ApPhL.104u1909O. doi:10.1063/1.4880657.
  43. Gyanchandani, Jyoti; Sikka, S. K. (10 May 2011). "Physical properties of the 6 d -series elements from density functional theory: Close similarity to lighter transition metals". Physical Review B. 83 (17): 172101. Bibcode:2011PhRvB..83q2101G. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.83.172101.
  44. Kratz; Lieser (2013). Nuclear and Radiochemistry: Fundamentals and Applications (3rd ed.). p. 631.
  45. Gyanchandani, Jyoti; Sikka, S. K. (2011). "Structural Properties of Group IV B Element Rutherfordium by First Principles Theory". arXiv:1106.3146. Bibcode:2011arXiv1106.3146G. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  46. "Abundance in Earth's Crust". Archived from the original on 2008-05-23. Retrieved 2007-04-14.
  47. "Dubbo Zirconia Project Fact Sheet" (PDF). Alkane Resources Limited. June 2007. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2008-02-28. Retrieved 2008-09-10.
  48. "Zirconium and Hafnium" (PDF). Mineral Commodity Summaries. US Geological Survey: 192–193. January 2008. Retrieved 2008-02-24.
  49. Callaghan, R. (2008-02-21). "Zirconium and Hafnium Statistics and Information". US Geological Survey. Retrieved 2008-02-24.
  50. "Minerals Yearbook Commodity Summaries 2009: Titanium" (PDF). US Geological Survey. May 2009. Retrieved 2008-02-24.
  51. Gambogi, Joseph (January 2009). "Titanium and Titanium dioxide Statistics and Information" (PDF). US Geological Survey. Retrieved 2008-02-24.
  52. Hedrick, James B. "Hafnium" (PDF). United States Geological Survey. Retrieved 2008-09-10.
  53. Spink, Donald (1961). "Reactive Metals. Zirconium, Hafnium, and Titanium". Industrial and Engineering Chemistry. 53 (2): 97–104. doi:10.1021/ie50614a019.
  54. Hebda, John (2001). "Niobium alloys and high Temperature Applications" (PDF). CBMM. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2008-12-17. Retrieved 2008-09-04.
  55. Donachie, Matthew J. (2002). Superalloys. ASTM International. pp. 235–236. ISBN 978-0-87170-749-9.
  56. Emsley, John (2001). "Titanium". Nature's Building Blocks: An A-Z Guide to the Elements. Oxford, England, UK: Oxford University Press. pp. 457–458. ISBN 978-0-19-850341-5.
  57. Berglund, Fredrik; Carlmark, Bjorn (October 2011). "Titanium, Sinusitis, and the Yellow Nail Syndrome". Biological Trace Element Research. 143 (1): 1–7. doi:10.1007/s12011-010-8828-5. PMC 3176400. PMID 20809268.
  58. "Zirconium". International Chemical Safety Card Database. International Labour Organization. October 2004. Retrieved 2008-03-30.
  59. "Zirconium Compounds". National Institute for Occupational Health and Safety. 2007-12-17. Retrieved 2008-02-17.
  60. "Occupational Safety & Health Administration: Hafnium". U.S. Department of Labor. Archived from the original on 2008-03-13. Retrieved 2008-09-10.


This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.