Golden Rule

The Golden Rule is the principle of treating others as one wants to be treated. Various expressions of this rule can be found in the tenets of most religions and creeds through the ages.[1] It can be considered an ethic of reciprocity in some religions, although different religions treat it differently.

"Golden Rule Sign" that hung above the door of the employees' entrance to the Acme Sucker Rod Factory in Toledo, Ohio, 1913.

The maxim may appear as a positive or negative injunction governing conduct:

  • Treat others as you would like others to treat you (positive or directive form)[1]
  • Do not treat others in ways that you would not like to be treated (negative or prohibitive form)
  • What you wish upon others, you wish upon yourself (empathetic or responsive form)

The idea dates at least to the early Confucian times (551–479 BCE), according to Rushworth Kidder, who identifies the concept appearing prominently in Buddhism, Christianity, Hinduism, Islam, Judaism, Taoism, Zoroastrianism, and "the rest of the world's major religions".[2] As part of the 1993 "Declaration Toward a Global Ethic", 143 leaders of the world's major faiths endorsed the Golden Rule.[3][4] According to Greg M. Epstein, it is "a concept that essentially no religion misses entirely", but belief in God is not necessary to endorse it.[5] Simon Blackburn also states that the Golden Rule can be "found in some form in almost every ethical tradition".[6]


The term "Golden Rule", or "Golden law", began to be used widely in the early 17th century in Britain by Anglican theologians and preachers;[7] the earliest known usage is that of Anglicans Charles Gibbon and Thomas Jackson in 1604.[8]

Ancient history

Ancient Egypt

Possibly the earliest affirmation of the maxim of reciprocity, reflecting the ancient Egyptian goddess Ma'at, appears in the story of "The Eloquent Peasant", which dates to the Middle Kingdom (c.2040–1650 BCE): "Now this is the command: Do to the doer to make him do."[9][10] This proverb embodies the do ut des principle.[11] A Late Period (c.664–323 BCE) papyrus contains an early negative affirmation of the Golden Rule: "That which you hate to be done to you, do not do to another."[12]

Sanskrit tradition

In Mahābhārata, the ancient epic of India, there is a discourse in which sage Brihaspati tells the king Yudhishthira the following about dharma, a philosophical understanding of values and actions that lend good order to life:

One should never do something to others that one would regard as an injury to one's own self. In brief, this is dharma. Anything else is succumbing to desire.

Mahābhārata 13.114.8 (Critical edition)

The Mahābhārata is usually dated to the period between 400 BCE and 400 CE.[13][14]

Tamil tradition

In Chapter 32 in the Book of Virtue of the Tirukkuṛaḷ (c.1st century BCE to 5th century CE), Valluvar says:

Do not do to others what you know has hurt yourself.

Kural 316[15]

Why does one hurt others knowing what it is to be hurt?

Kural 318[15]

Furthermore, in verse 312, Valluvar says that it is the determination or code of the spotless (virtuous) not to do evil, even in return, to those who have cherished enmity and done them evil. According to him, the proper punishment to those who have done evil is to put them to shame by showing them kindness, in return and to forget both the evil and the good done on both sides (verse 314).[16]

Ancient Greece

The Golden Rule in its prohibitive (negative) form was a common principle in ancient Greek philosophy. Examples of the general concept include:

  • "Avoid doing what you would blame others for doing." Thales[17] (c.624c.546 BCE)
  • "What you do not want to happen to you, do not do it yourself either." Sextus the Pythagorean.[18] The oldest extant reference to Sextus is by Origen in the third century of the common era.[19]
  • "Ideally, no one should touch my property or tamper with it, unless I have given him some sort of permission, and, if I am sensible I shall treat the property of others with the same respect." Plato[20] (c.420c.347 BCE)
  • "Do not do to others that which angers you when they do it to you." Isocrates[21] (436–338 BCE)

Ancient Persia

The Pahlavi Texts of Zoroastrianism (c.300 BCE – 1000 CE) were an early source for the Golden Rule: "That nature alone is good which refrains from doing to another whatsoever is not good for itself." Dadisten-I-dinik, 94,5, and "Whatever is disagreeable to yourself do not do unto others." Shayast-na-Shayast 13:29[22]

Ancient Rome

Seneca the Younger (c.4 BCE – 65 CE), a practitioner of Stoicism (c.300 BCE – 200 CE) expressed a hierarchical variation of the Golden Rule in his Letter 47, an essay regarding the treatment of slaves: "Treat your inferior as you would wish your superior to treat you."[23]

Religious context

The golden rule, as described in numerous world religions

According to Simon Blackburn, the Golden Rule "can be found in some form in almost every ethical tradition".[24] A multi-faith poster showing the Golden Rule in sacred writings from 13 faith traditions (designed by Paul McKenna of Scarboro Missions, 2000) has been on permanent display at the Headquarters of the United Nations since 4 January 2002.[25] Creating the poster "took five years of research that included consultations with experts in each of the 13 faith groups."[25] (See also the section on Global Ethic.)

Abrahamic religions


A rule of reciprocal altruism was stated positively in a well-known Torah verse (Hebrew: ואהבת לרעך כמוך):

You shall not take vengeance or bear a grudge against your kinsfolk. Love your neighbor as yourself: I am the LORD.

Leviticus 19:18[26]

Hillel the Elder (c.110 BCE – 10 CE),[27] used this verse as a most important message of the Torah for his teachings. Once, he was challenged by a gentile who asked to be converted under the condition that the Torah be explained to him while he stood on one foot. Hillel accepted him as a candidate for conversion to Judaism but, drawing on Leviticus 19:18, briefed the man:

What is hateful to you, do not do to your fellow: this is the whole Torah; the rest is the explanation; go and learn.

Hillel recognized brotherly love as the fundamental principle of Jewish ethics. Rabbi Akiva agreed, while Simeon ben Azzai suggested that the principle of love must have its foundation in Genesis chapter 1, which teaches that all men are the offspring of Adam, who was made in the image of God.[29][30] According to Jewish rabbinic literature, the first man Adam represents the unity of mankind. This is echoed in the modern preamble of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.[31][32] And it is also taught, that Adam is last in order according to the evolutionary character of God's creation:[30]

Why was only a single specimen of man created first? To teach us that he who destroys a single soul destroys a whole world and that he who saves a single soul saves a whole world; furthermore, so no race or class may claim a nobler ancestry, saying, 'Our father was born first'; and, finally, to give testimony to the greatness of the Lord, who caused the wonderful diversity of mankind to emanate from one type. And why was Adam created last of all beings? To teach him humility; for if he be overbearing, let him remember that the little fly preceded him in the order of creation.[30]

The Jewish Publication Society's edition of Leviticus states:

Thou shalt not hate thy brother, in thy heart; thou shalt surely rebuke thy neighbour, and not bear sin because of him. 18 Thou shalt not take vengeance, nor bear any grudge against the children of thy people, but thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself: I am the LORD.[33]

This Torah verse represents one of several versions of the Golden Rule, which itself appears in various forms, positive and negative. It is the earliest written version of that concept in a positive form.[34]

At the turn of the era, the Jewish rabbis were discussing the scope of the meaning of Leviticus 19:18 and 19:34 extensively:

The stranger who resides with you shall be to you as one of your citizens; you shall love him as yourself, for you were strangers in the land of Egypt: I the LORD am your God.

Leviticus 19:34[35]

Commentators interpret that this applies to foreigners (= Samaritans), proselytes (= 'strangers who reside with you')[36] and Jews.[37]

On the verse, "Love your fellow as yourself", the classic commentator Rashi quotes from Torat Kohanim, an early Midrashic text regarding the famous dictum of Rabbi Akiva: "Love your fellow as yourself – Rabbi Akiva says this is a great principle of the Torah."[38]

Israel's postal service quoted from the previous Leviticus verse when it commemorated the Universal Declaration of Human Rights on a 1958 postage stamp.[39]


The Sermon on the Mount by Carl Bloch (1877) portrays Jesus teaching during the Sermon on the Mount

The "Golden Rule" was proclaimed by Jesus of Nazareth[40] during his Sermon on the Mount and described by him as the second great commandment. The common English phrasing is "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you". A similar form of the phrase appeared in a Catholic catechism around 1567 (certainly in the reprint of 1583).[41] Various applications of the Golden Rule are stated positively numerous times in the Old Testament: "Thou shalt not avenge, nor bear any grudge against the children of thy people, but thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself."[42] Or, in Leviticus 19:34: "But treat them just as you treat your own citizens. Love foreigners as you love yourselves, because you were foreigners one time in Egypt. I am the Lord your God.".[43]

The Old Testament Deuterocanonical books of Tobit and Sirach, accepted as part of the Scriptural canon by Catholic Church, Eastern Orthodoxy, and the Non-Chalcedonian Churches, express a negative form of the golden rule:

"Do to no one what you yourself dislike."

Tobit 4:15

Recognize that your neighbor feels as you do, and keep in mind your own dislikes.

Sirach 31:15

Two passages in the New Testament quote Jesus of Nazareth espousing the positive form of the Golden rule:

Do to others what you want them to do to you. This is the meaning of the law of Moses and the teaching of the prophets.

And as ye would that men should do to you, do ye also to them likewise.

Luke 6:31[44]

A similar passage, a parallel to the Great Commandment, is Luke 10:25.[45]

Behold, a certain lawyer stood up and tested him, saying, "Teacher, what shall I do to inherit eternal life?"

He said to him, "What is written in the law? How do you read it?"

He answered, "You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, with all your soul, with all your strength, and with all your mind; and love your neighbor as yourself."

He said to him, "You have answered correctly. Do this, and you will live."

The passage in the book of Luke then continues with Jesus answering the question, "Who is my neighbor?", by telling the parable of the Good Samaritan, which John Wesley interprets as meaning that "your neighbor" is anyone in need.[46]

Jesus' teaching goes beyond the negative formulation of not doing what one would not like done to themselves, to the positive formulation of actively doing good to another that, if the situations were reversed, one would desire that the other would do for them. This formulation, as indicated in the parable of the Good Samaritan, emphasizes the needs for positive action that brings benefit to another, not simply restraining oneself from negative activities that hurt another.[47]

In one passage of the New Testament, Paul the Apostle refers to the golden rule, restating Jesus' second commandment:

For all the law is fulfilled in one word, even in this; Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.

Galatians 5:14[48]

St. Paul also comments on the golden rule in the book of Romans:

The commandments, "You shall not commit adultery", "You shall not murder", "You shall not steal", "You shall not covet", and whatever other command there may be, are summed up in this one command: "Love your neighbor as yourself."[49]


The Arabian peninsula was known to not practice the golden rule prior to the advent of Islam. According to Th. Emil Homerin: "Pre-Islamic Arabs regarded the survival of the tribe, as most essential and to be ensured by the ancient rite of blood vengeance."[50] Homerin goes on to say:

Similar examples of the golden rule are found in the hadith of the prophet Muhammad. The hadith recount what the prophet is believed to have said and done, and traditionally Muslims regard the hadith as second to only the Qur'an as a guide to correct belief and action.[51]

From the hadith, the collected oral and written accounts of Muhammad and his teachings during his lifetime:

A Bedouin came to the prophet, grabbed the stirrup of his camel and said: O the messenger of God! Teach me something to go to heaven with it. Prophet said: "As you would have people do to you, do to them; and what you dislike to be done to you, don't do to them. Now let the stirrup go! [This maxim is enough for you; go and act in accordance with it!]"

Kitab al-Kafi, vol. 2, p. 146

None of you [truly] believes until he wishes for his brother what he wishes for himself.

An-Nawawi's Forty Hadith 13 (p. 56)[52]

Seek for mankind that of which you are desirous for yourself, that you may be a believer.

Sukhanan-i-Muhammad (Teheran, 1938)[53]

That which you want for yourself, seek for mankind.[53]

The most righteous person is the one who consents for other people what he consents for himself, and who dislikes for them what he dislikes for himself.[53]

Ali ibn Abi Talib (4th Caliph in Sunni Islam, and first Imam in Shia Islam) says:

O my child, make yourself the measure (for dealings) between you and others. Thus, you should desire for others what you desire for yourself and hate for others what you hate for yourself. Do not oppress as you do not like to be oppressed. Do good to others as you would like good to be done to you. Regard bad for yourself whatever you regard bad for others. Accept that (treatment) from others which you would like others to accept from you ... Do not say to others what you do not like to be said to you.

Nahjul Balaghah, Letter 31[54]

Baháʼí Faith

The writings of the Baháʼí Faith encourage everyone to treat others as they would treat themselves and even prefer others over oneself:

O SON OF MAN! Deny not My servant should he ask anything from thee, for his face is My face; be then abashed before Me.

Blessed is he who preferreth his brother before himself.


And if thine eyes be turned towards justice, choose thou for thy neighbour that which thou choosest for thyself.


Ascribe not to any soul that which thou wouldst not have ascribed to thee, and say not that which thou doest not.


Indian religions


One should never do that to another which one regards as injurious to one’s own self. This, in brief, is the rule of dharma. Other behavior is due to selfish desires.

Brihaspati, Mahabharata 13.113.8 (Critical edition)[63]

By making dharma your main focus, treat others as you treat yourself[64]


श्रूयतां धर्मसर्वस्वं श्रुत्वा चाप्यवधार्यताम्।
आत्मनः प्रतिकूलानि परेषां न समाचरेत्।।

If the entire Dharma can be said in a few words, then it is—that which is unfavorable to us, do not do that to others.

Padmapuraana, shrushti 19/357–358


Buddha (Siddhartha Gautama, c.623–543 BCE)[65][66] made the negative formulation of the golden rule one of the cornerstones of his ethics in the 6th century BCE. It occurs in many places and in many forms throughout the Tripitaka.

Comparing oneself to others in such terms as "Just as I am so are they, just as they are so am I," he should neither kill nor cause others to kill.

Sutta Nipata 705

One who, while himself seeking happiness, oppresses with violence other beings who also desire happiness, will not attain happiness hereafter.

Dhammapada 10. Violence

Hurt not others in ways that you yourself would find hurtful.

Udanavarga 5:18

Putting oneself in the place of another, one should not kill nor cause another to kill.[67]


The Golden Rule is paramount in the Jainist philosophy and can be seen in the doctrines of ahimsa and karma. As part of the prohibition of causing any living beings to suffer, Jainism forbids inflicting upon others what is harmful to oneself.

The following line from the Acaranga Sutra sums up the philosophy of Jainism:

Nothing which breathes, which exists, which lives, or which has essence or potential of life, should be destroyed or ruled over, or subjugated, or harmed, or denied of its essence or potential. In support of this Truth, I ask you a question – "Is sorrow or pain desirable to you?" If you say "yes it is", it would be a lie. If you say, "No, It is not" you will be expressing the truth. Just as sorrow or pain is not desirable to you, so it is to all which breathe, exist, live or have any essence of life. To you and all, it is undesirable, and painful, and repugnant.[68]

A man should wander about treating all creatures as he himself would be treated.

Sutrakritanga, 1.11.33

In happiness and suffering, in joy and grief, we should regard all creatures as we regard our own self.

Lord Mahavira, 24th Tirthankara


Precious like jewels are the minds of all. To hurt them is not at all good. If thou desirest thy Beloved, then hurt thou not anyone's heart.

Guru Arjan Dev Ji 259, Guru Granth Sahib

Chinese religions


The same idea is also presented in V.12 and VI.30 of the Analects (c.500 BCE), which can be found in the online Chinese Text Project. The phraseology differs from the Christian version of the Golden Rule. It does not presume to do anything unto others, but merely to avoid doing what would be harmful. It does not preclude doing good deeds and taking moral positions.


The sage has no interest of his own, but takes the interests of the people as his own. He is kind to the kind; he is also kind to the unkind: for Virtue is kind. He is faithful to the faithful; he is also faithful to the unfaithful: for Virtue is faithful.

Tao Te Ching, Chapter 49

Regard your neighbor's gain as your own gain, and your neighbor's loss as your own loss.

T'ai Shang Kan Ying P'ien


If people regarded other people’s states in the same way that they regard their own, who then would incite their own state to attack that of another? For one would do for others as one would do for oneself. If people regarded other people’s cities in the same way that they regard their own, who then would incite their own city to attack that of another? For one would do for others as one would do for oneself. If people regarded other people’s families in the same way that they regard their own, who then would incite their own family to attack that of another? For one would do for others as one would do for oneself. And so if states and cities do not attack one another and families do not wreak havoc upon and steal from one another, would this be a harm to the world or a benefit? Of course one must say it is a benefit to the world.

Mozi, c.400 BCE[70]

Mozi regarded the golden rule as a corollary to the cardinal virtue of impartiality, and encouraged egalitarianism and selflessness in relationships.

Iranian religions


Do not do unto others whatever is injurious to yourself.

Shayast-na-Shayast 13.29


Hear ye these words and heed them well, the words of Dea, thy Mother Goddess, "I command thee thus, O children of the Earth, that that which ye deem harmful unto thyself, the very same shall ye be forbidden from doing unto another, for violence and hatred give rise to the same. My command is thus, that ye shall return all violence and hatred with peacefulness and love, for my Law is love unto all things. Only through love shall ye have peace; yea and verily, only peace and love will cure the world, and subdue all evil."

The Book of Ways, Devotional Wicca


Try not to do things to others that you would not like them to do to you.
Try to treat others as you would want them to treat you.

The Way to Happiness[71]


One who is going to take a pointed stick to pinch a baby bird should first try it on himself to feel how it hurts.

Yoruba Proverb


Secular context

Global ethic

The "Declaration Toward a Global Ethic"[72] from the Parliament of the World’s Religions[73][74] (1993) proclaimed the Golden Rule ("We must treat others as we wish others to treat us") as the common principle for many religions.[3] The Initial Declaration was signed by 143 leaders from all of the world's major faiths, including Baháʼí Faith, Brahmanism, Brahma Kumaris, Buddhism, Christianity, Hinduism, Indigenous, Interfaith, Islam, Jainism, Judaism, Native American, Neo-Pagan, Sikhism, Taoism, Theosophist, Unitarian Universalist and Zoroastrian.[3][4] In the folklore of several cultures the Golden Rule is depicted by the allegory of the long spoons.


In the view of Greg M. Epstein, a Humanist chaplain at Harvard University, " 'do unto others' ... is a concept that essentially no religion misses entirely. But not a single one of these versions of the golden rule requires a God".[75] Various sources identify the Golden Rule as a humanist principle:[76][77]

Trying to live according to the Golden Rule means trying to empathise with other people, including those who may be very different from us. Empathy is at the root of kindness, compassion, understanding and respect – qualities that we all appreciate being shown, whoever we are, whatever we think and wherever we come from. And although it isn’t possible to know what it really feels like to be a different person or live in different circumstances and have different life experiences, it isn’t difficult for most of us to imagine what would cause us suffering and to try to avoid causing suffering to others. For this reason many people find the Golden Rule’s corollary – "do not treat people in a way you would not wish to be treated yourself" – more pragmatic.[76]

Maria MacLachlan, Think Humanism[78]

Do not do to others what you would not want them to do to you. [is] (…) the single greatest, simplest, and most important moral axiom humanity has ever invented, one which reappears in the writings of almost every culture and religion throughout history, the one we know as the Golden Rule. Moral directives do not need to be complex or obscure to be worthwhile, and in fact, it is precisely this rule's simplicity which makes it great. It is easy to come up with, easy to understand, and easy to apply, and these three things are the hallmarks of a strong and healthy moral system. The idea behind it is readily graspable: before performing an action which might harm another person, try to imagine yourself in their position, and consider whether you would want to be the recipient of that action. If you would not want to be in such a position, the other person probably would not either, and so you should not do it. It is the basic and fundamental human trait of empathy, the ability to vicariously experience how another is feeling, that makes this possible, and it is the principle of empathy by which we should live our lives.

Adam Lee, Ebon Musings, "A decalogue for the modern world"[79]


When we say that man chooses for himself, we do mean that every one of us must choose himself; but by that we also mean that in choosing for himself he chooses for all men. For in effect, of all the actions a man may take in order to create himself as he wills to be, there is not one which is not creative, at the same time, of an image of man such as he believes he ought to be. To choose between this or that is at the same time to affirm the value of that which is chosen; for we are unable ever to choose the worse. What we choose is always the better; and nothing can be better for us unless it is better for all.

Classical Utilitarianism

John Stuart Mill in his book, Utilitarianism (originally published in 1861), wrote, "In the golden rule of Jesus of Nazareth, we read the complete spirit of the ethics of utility. 'To do as you would be done by,' and 'to love your neighbour as yourself,' constitute the ideal perfection of utilitarian morality."[81]

Other contexts

Human rights

According to Marc H. Bornstein, and William E. Paden, the Golden Rule is arguably the most essential basis for the modern concept of human rights, in which each individual has a right to just treatment, and a reciprocal responsibility to ensure justice for others.[82]

However, Leo Damrosch argued that the notion that the Golden Rule pertains to "rights" per se is a contemporary interpretation and has nothing to do with its origin. The development of human "rights" is a modern political ideal that began as a philosophical concept promulgated through the philosophy of Jean Jacques Rousseau in 18th century France, among others. His writings influenced Thomas Jefferson, who then incorporated Rousseau's reference to "inalienable rights" into the United States Declaration of Independence in 1776. Damrosch argued that to confuse the Golden Rule with human rights is to apply contemporary thinking to ancient concepts.[83]

Science and economics

There has been research published arguing that some 'sense' of fair play and the Golden Rule may be stated and rooted in terms of neuroscientific and neuroethical principles.[84]

The Golden Rule can also be explained from the perspectives of psychology, philosophy, sociology, human evolution, and economics. Psychologically, it involves a person empathizing with others. Philosophically, it involves a person perceiving their neighbor also as "I" or "self".[85] Sociologically, "love your neighbor as yourself" is applicable between individuals, between groups, and also between individuals and groups. In evolution, "reciprocal altruism" is seen as a distinctive advance in the capacity of human groups to survive and reproduce, as their exceptional brains demanded exceptionally long childhoods and ongoing provision and protection even beyond that of the immediate family.[86] In economics, Richard Swift, referring to ideas from David Graeber, suggests that "without some kind of reciprocity society would no longer be able to exist."[87]

Study of other primates provides evidence that the Golden Rule exists in other non-human species.[88]


Philosophers, such as Immanuel Kant[89] and Friedrich Nietzsche,[90] have objected to the rule on a variety of grounds. The most serious among these is its application. How does one know how others want to be treated? The obvious way is to ask them, but this cannot be done if one assumes they have not reached a particular and relevant understanding. One religion that officially rejects the Golden Rule is the Neo-Nazi religion of the "Creativity Movement" founded by Ben Klassen.[91] Followers of the religion believe that the Golden Rule doesn't make sense and is a "completely unworkable principle.".[92]

Differences in values or interests

George Bernard Shaw wrote, "Do not do unto others as you would that they should do unto you. Their tastes may not be the same."[93] This suggests that if your values are not shared with others, the way you want to be treated will not be the way they want to be treated. Hence, the Golden Rule of "do unto others" is "dangerous in the wrong hands",[94] according to philosopher Iain King, because "some fanatics have no aversion to death: the Golden Rule might inspire them to kill others in suicide missions."[95]

Differences in situations

Immanuel Kant famously criticized the golden rule for not being sensitive to differences of situation, noting that a prisoner duly convicted of a crime could appeal to the golden rule while asking the judge to release him, pointing out that the judge would not want anyone else to send him to prison, so he should not do so to others.[89] On the other hand, in a critique of the consistency of Kant's writings, several authors have noted the "similarity"[96] between the Golden Rule and Kant's Categorical Imperative, introduced in Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals (See discussion at this link).

Responses to criticisms

Walter Terence Stace, in The Concept of Morals (1937), wrote:

Mr Bernard Shaw's remark "Do not do unto others as you would that they should do unto you. Their tastes may be different" is no doubt a smart saying. But it seems to overlook the fact that "doing as you would be done by" includes taking into account your neighbour's tastes as you would that he should take yours into account. Thus the "golden rule" might still express the essence of a universal morality even if no two men in the world had any needs or tastes in common.[97]

Marcus George Singer observed that there are two importantly different ways of looking at the golden rule: as requiring (1) that you perform specific actions that you want others to do to you or (2) that you guide your behavior in the same general ways that you want others to.[98] Counter-examples to the golden rule typically are more forceful against the first than the second.

In his book on the golden rule, Jeffrey Wattles makes the similar observation that such objections typically arise while applying the golden rule in certain general ways (namely, ignoring differences in taste, in situation, and so forth). But if we apply the golden rule to our own method of using it, asking in effect if we would want other people to apply the golden rule in such ways, the answer would typically be no, since it is quite predictable that others' ignoring of such factors will lead to behavior which we object to. It follows that we should not do so ourselves—according to the golden rule. In this way, the golden rule may be self-correcting.[99] An article by Jouni Reinikainen develops this suggestion in greater detail.[100]

It is possible, then, that the golden rule can itself guide us in identifying which differences of situation are morally relevant. We would often want other people to ignore any prejudice against our race or nationality when deciding how to act towards us, but would also want them to not ignore our differing preferences in food, desire for aggressiveness, and so on. This principle of "doing unto others, wherever possible, as they would be done by..." has sometimes been termed the platinum rule.[101]

Charles Kingsley's The Water Babies (1863) includes a character named Mrs Do-As-You-Would-Be-Done-By (and another, Mrs Be-Done-By-As-You-Did).[102]

See also

  • Empathy
  • General welfare clause
  • Norm of reciprocity, social norm of in-kind responses to the behavior of others
  • Reciprocity (cultural anthropology), way of defining people's informal exchange of goods and labour
  • Reciprocity (evolution), mechanisms for the evolution of cooperation
  • Reciprocity (international relations), principle that favours, benefits, or penalties that are granted by one state to the citizens or legal entities of another, should be returned in kind
  • Reciprocity (social and political philosophy), concept of reciprocity as in-kind positive or negative responses for the actions of others; relation to justice; related ideas such as gratitude, mutuality, and the Golden Rule
  • Reciprocity (social psychology), in-kind positive or negative responses of individuals towards the actions of others
  • Serial reciprocity, where the benefactor of a gift or service will in turn provide benefits to a third party
  • Ubuntu (philosophy), an ethical philosophy originating from Southern Africa, which has been summarised as 'A person is a person through other people'


  1. Antony Flew, ed. (1979). "golden rule". A Dictionary of Philosophy. London: Pan Books in association with The MacMillan Press. p. 134. ISBN 978-0-330-48730-6.
  2. W.A. Spooner, "The Golden Rule," in James Hastings, ed. Encyclopedia of Religion and Ethics, Vol. 6 (New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1914) pp. 310–12, quoted in Rushworth M. Kidder, How Good People Make Tough Choices: Resolving the Dilemmas of Ethical Living, Harper, New York, 2003. ISBN 0-688-17590-2. p. 159
  3. Towards a Global Ethic Archived 16 April 2021 at the Wayback Machine (An Initial Declaration) – Under the subtitle, "We Declare," see third paragraph. The first line reads, "We must treat others as we wish others to treat us."
  4. "Parliament of the World's Religions – Towards a Global Ethic" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 11 April 2013. Retrieved 12 September 2013.
  5. Esptein, Greg M. (2010). Good Without God: What a Billion Nonreligious People Do Believe. New York: HarperCollins. p. 115. ISBN 978-0-06-167011-4.
  6. Simon, Blackburn (2001). Ethics: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. p. 101. ISBN 978-0-19-280442-6.
  7. Thomas Jackson: First Sermon upon Matthew 7,12 (1615; Werke Band 3, S. 612); Benjamin Camfield: The Comprehensive Rule of Righteousness (1671); George Boraston: The Royal Law, or the Golden Rule of Justice and Charity (1683); John Goodman: The Golden Rule, or, the Royal Law of Equity explained (1688; Titelseite als Faksimile at Google Books); dazu Olivier du Roy: The Golden Rule as the Law of Nature. In: Jacob Neusner, Bruce Chilton (Hrsg.): The Golden Rule – The Ethics of Reprocity in World Religions. London/New York 2008, S. 94.
  8. Gensler, Harry J. (2013). Ethics and the Golden Rule. Routledge. p. 84. ISBN 978-0-415-80686-2.
  9. Eloquent Peasant PDF Archived 25 September 2015 at the Wayback Machine "Now this is the command: do to the doer to make him do"
  10. "The Culture of Ancient Egypt", John Albert Wilson, p. 121, University of Chicago Press, 1956, ISBN 0-226-90152-1 "Now this is the command: Do to the doer to cause that he do"
  11. Eloquent Peasant PDF Archived 25 September 2015 at the Wayback Machine "The peasant quotes a proverb that embodies the do ut des principle"
  12. "A Late Period Hieratic Wisdom Text: P. Brooklyn 47.218.135", Richard Jasnow, p. 95, University of Chicago Press, 1992, ISBN 978-0-918986-85-6.
  13. Cush, D., Robinson, C., York, M. (eds.) (2008) "Mahābhārata" in Encyclopedia of Hinduism. Abingdon: Routledge, p 469
  14. van Buitenen, J.A.B. (1973) The Mahābhārata, Book 1: The Book of the Beginning. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press, p xxv
  15. Sundaram, P. S. (1990). Tiruvalluvar Kural. Gurgaon: Penguin. p. 50. ISBN 978-0-14-400009-8.
  16. Aiyar, V. V. S. (2007). The Kural or the Maxims of Tiruvalluvar (1 ed.). Chennai: Pavai. pp. 141–142. ISBN 978-81-7735-262-7.
  17. Diogenes Laërtius, "The Lives and Opinions of Eminent Philosophers", I:36
  18. "The Sentences of Sextus -- The Nag Hammadi Library".
  19. The Sentences of Sextus Article
  20. Plato, Laws, Book XI (Complete Works of Plato, 1997 edited Cooper ISBN 978-0-87220-349-5)
  21. Isocrates, Nicocles or the Cyprians, Isoc 3.61 (original text in Greek); cf. Isoc. 1.14, Isoc. 2.24, 38, Isoc. 4.81.
  22. Thomas Firminger Thiselton-Dyer (2008). Pahlavi Texts of Zoroastrianism, Part 2 of 5: The Dadistan-i Dinik and the Epistles of Manuskihar. Forgotten Books. ISBN 978-1-60620-199-2.
  23. Lucius Annaeus Seneca (1968). The Stoic Philosophy of Seneca: Essays and Letters of Seneca. Norton. ISBN 978-0-393-00459-5.
  24. Blackburn, Simon (2001). Ethics: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. p. 101. ISBN 978-0-19-280442-6.
  25. Mezei, Leslie (May 2002). "The Golden Rule Poster - A History: Multi-faith Sacred Writings and Symbols from 13 Traditions". Spiritan Missionary News / Scarboro Missions. Retrieved 21 February 2022.
  26. Bible, Leviticus 19:18
  27. Jewish Encyclopedia: Hillel: "His activity of forty years is perhaps historical; and since it began, according to a trustworthy tradition (Shab. 15a), one hundred years before the destruction of Jerusalem, it must have covered the period 30 BCE–10 CE"
  28. Shabbath folio:31a
  29. (Sifra, Ḳedoshim, iv.; Yer. Ned. ix. 41c; Genesis Rabba 24
  30. "ADAM". Retrieved 12 September 2013.
  31. "Mishnah Seder Nezikin Sanhedrin 4.5". Retrieved 17 July 2016.
  32. "Tosefta on Mishnah Seder Nezikin Sanhedrin 8.4–9 (Erfurt Manuscript)". 21 August 2012.
  33. "Leviticus". The Torah. Jewish Publication Society. p. 19:17.
  34. Plaut, The Torah – A Modern Commentary; Union of American Hebrew Congregations, New York 1981; p. 892.
  35. Bible, Leviticus 19:34
  36. Rabbi Akiva, bQuid 75b
  37. Rabbi Gamaliel, yKet 3, 1; 27a
  38. Kedoshim 19:18, Toras Kohanim, ibid. See also Talmud Yerushalmi, Nedarim 9:4; Bereishis Rabbah 24:7.
  39. "Sol Singer Collection of Philatelic Judaica". Emory University. Archived from the original on 7 April 2008.
  40. Matthew 7:12; see also Luke 6:31
  41. Vaux, Laurence (1885) [1583]. "What is the sum of the ten Commandments?". A Catechisme, or, Christian Doctrine. Manchester, England: The Chetham Society. p. 48. Archived from the original on 31 January 2009. The sum of the ten Commandments does consist in the love towards god [sic], and our neighbor (Ephe. 4., Matt. 7). In the first Table be three Commandments: which take away and forbid sin and vice against the worshipping of God. They forbid idolatry, apostasy, heresy, superstition, perjury, blasphemy, and move us to the pure and true worshipping of God in heart, word and deed. In the Second table be seven Commandments, which command us to give reverence and honor to every man in his degree, to profit all, and hurt none: to do unto others, as we would be done to ourselves.
  42. Leviticus 19:18
  43. Leviticus 19:34
  44. Luke 6:31
  45. Luke 10:25-28
  46. "John Wesley's Explanatory Notes on Luke 10". Retrieved 12 September 2013.
  47. Moore: Judaism in the First Centuries of the Christian Era; Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 1927–1930; Vol. 2, p. 87, Vol. 3, p. 180.
  48. Galatians 5:14
  49. Romans 13:8–9
  50. Th. Emil Homerin (2008). Neusner, Jacob (ed.). The Golden Rule: The Ethics of Reciprocity in World Religions. Bloomsbury Publishing. p. 99. ISBN 978-1-4411-9012-3.
  51. Th. Emil Homerin (2008). Neusner, Jacob (ed.). The Golden Rule: The Ethics of Reciprocity in World Religions. Bloomsbury Publishing. p. p. 102. ISBN 978-1-4411-9012-3.
  52. Wattles (191), Rost (100)
  53. "Sukhanan-i-Muhammad" [Conversations of Muhammad], Wattles (192); Rost (100); Donaldson Dwight M. (1963). Studies in Muslim Ethics, p. 82. London: S.P.C.K.
  54. Muḥammad ibn al-Ḥusayn Sharīf al-Raḍī and ʻAlī ibn Abī Ṭālib (eds.), Nahj Al-balāghah: Selection from Sermons, Letters and Sayings of Amir Al-Muʼminin, Volume 2. Translated by Syed Ali Raza. Ansariyan Publications ISBN 978-9644383816 p. 350
  55. "Baháʼí Reference Library – The Hidden Words of Bahá'u'lláh, p. 11". 31 December 2010. Retrieved 12 September 2013.
  56. "The Golden Rule Baháʼí Faith". 11 April 2009. Archived from the original on 11 April 2009. Retrieved 12 September 2013.
  57. Tablets of Bahá'u'lláh, p. 71
  58. "The Hidden Words of Bahá'u'lláh – Part II". Retrieved 12 September 2013.
  59. Epistle to the Son of the Wolf, p. 30
  60. Words of Wisdom See: The Golden Rule
  61. Bahá'u'lláh, Gleanings, LXVI:8
  62. Hidden Words of Bahá'u'lláh, p. 10
  63. "Mahabharata Book 13". 13 November 2006. Retrieved 12 September 2013.
  64. tasmād dharma-pradhānéna bhavitavyam yatātmanā | tathā cha sarva-bhūtéṣhu vartitavyam yathātmani ||

    तस्माद्धर्मप्रधानेन भवितव्यं यतात्मना। तथा च सर्वभूतेषु वर्तितव्यं यथात्मनि॥|title = Mahābhārata Shānti-Parva 167:9)
  65. Singleton, Esther. "Gautama Buddha (B.C. 623-543)" by T.W. Rhys-Davids, The World's Great Events, B.C. 4004–A.D. 70 (1908). pp. 124–135.
  66. "The Buddha (BC 623–BC 543) – Religion and spirituality Article – Buddha, BC, 623". Booksie. 8 July 2012. Retrieved 12 September 2013.
  67. Detachment and Compassion in Early Buddhism Archived 21 December 2007 at the Wayback Machine by Elizabeth J. Harris (
  68. Jacobi, Hermann (1884). Ācāranga Sūtra, Jain Sutras Part I, Sacred Books of the East. Vol. 22. Sutra 155–156.
  69. Chinese Text Project. Confucianism, The Analects, Section 15: Wei Ling Gong, (see number 24). Chinese Text Project. Retrieved 29 December 2011.
  70. Ivanhoe and Van Norden translation, 68–69
  71. Gensler, Harry J. (2013). Ethics and the Golden Rule. Routledge. p. 100. ISBN 978-1-136-57793-2.
  72. Towards a Global Ethic – Urban Dharma – Buddhism in America (This link includes a list of 143 signatories and their respective religions.)
  73. "Parliament of the World's Religions". 16 August 2013. Retrieved 12 September 2013.
  74. "The Council for a Parliament of the World's Religions". 16 August 2013. Retrieved 12 September 2013.
  75. Esptein, Greg M. (2010). Good Without God: What a Billion Nonreligious People Do Believe. New York: HarperCollins. p. 115. ISBN 978-0-06-167011-4. Italics in original.
  76. "". Archived from the original on 19 December 2016. Retrieved 12 September 2013.
  77. "". 15 March 2008. Archived from the original on 14 September 2002. Retrieved 12 September 2013.
  78. "Think Humanism". Think Humanism. Retrieved 12 September 2013.
  79. "A decalogue for the modern world". 1 January 1970. Retrieved 12 September 2013.
  80. Sartre, Jean-Paul (2007). Existentialism Is a Humanism. Yale University Press. pp. 291–292. ISBN 978-0-300-11546-8.
  81. Mill, John Stuart (1979) [First published 1861]. "Chapter 2 - What Utilitarianism Is". In Sher, George (ed.). Utilitarianism. Indianapolis - Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company. p. 16. ISBN 0-915144-41-7.
  82. Defined another way, it "refers to the balance in an interactive system such that each party has both rights and duties, and the subordinate norm of complementarity states that one's rights are the other's obligation."Bornstein, Marc H. (2002). Handbook of Parenting. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. p. 5. ISBN 978-0-8058-3782-7. See also: Paden, William E. (2003). Interpreting the Sacred: Ways of Viewing Religion. Beacon Press. pp. 131–132. ISBN 978-0-8070-7705-4.
  83. Damrosch, Leo (2008). Jean Jacques Russeau: Restless Genius. Houghton Mifflin Company. ISBN 978-0-618-44696-4.
  84. Pfaff, Donald W., "The Neuroscience of Fair Play: Why We (Usually) Follow the Golden Rule", Dana Press, The Dana Foundation, New York, 2007. ISBN 978-1-932594-27-0
  85. Wattles, Jeffrey (1996). The Golden Rule. Oxford University Press.
  86. Vogel, Gretchen. "The Evolution of the Golden Rule". Science. 303 (Feb 2004).
  87. Swift, Richard (July 2015). "Pathways & possibilities". New Internationalist. 484 (July/August 2015).
  88. Smith, Kerri (June 2005). "Is it a chimp-help-chimp world?". Nature. 484 (Online publication).
  89. Kant, Immanuel Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, footnote 12. Cambridge University Press (28 April 1998). ISBN 978-0-521-62695-8
  90. "Only a Game: The Golden Rule". 24 May 2007. Retrieved 12 September 2013.
  91. "The Creativity Movement | Southern Poverty Law Center". Archived from the original on 29 July 2017. Retrieved 20 March 2021.
  92. "World Church of the Creator".
  93. Shaw, George Bernard (1903). Man and Superman. Archibald Constable & Co. p. 227. Retrieved 23 February 2018.
  94. Source: p. 76 of How to Make Good Decisions and Be Right All the Time, Iain King, 2008, Continuum, ISBN 978-1-84706-347-2.
  95. Source: p. 76 of How to Make Good Decisions and Be Right All the Time, Iain King, 2008, Continuum, ISBN 978-1-84706-347-2.
  96. Alston, William P.; Brandt, Richard B., eds. (1978). The Problems of Philosophy. Boston, London, Sydney, Toronto: Allyn and Bacon. p. 139. ISBN 978-0205061105.
  97. Stace, Walter T. (1937). The Concept of Morals. New York: The MacMillan Company; (reprinted 1975 by permission of Macmillan Publishing Co. Inc.); (also reprinted by Peter Smith Publisher Inc, January 1990). p. 136. ISBN 978-0-8446-2990-2.
  98. M. G. Singer, The Ideal of a Rational Morality, p. 270
  99. Wattles, p. 6
  100. Jouni Reinikainen, "The Golden Rule and the Requirement of Universalizability." Journal of Value Inquiry. 39(2): 155–168, 2005.
  101. Karl Popper, The Open Society and Its Enemies, Vol. 2 (1966 [1945]), p. 386. Dubbed "the platinum rule" in business books such as Charles J. Jacobus, Thomas E. Gillett, Georgia Real Estate: An Introduction to the Profession, Cengage Learning, 2007, p. 409 and Jeremy Comfort, Peter Franklin, The Mindful International Manager: How to Work Effectively Across Cultures, Kogan Page, p. 65.
  102. "Mary Wakefield: What 'The Water Babies' can teach us about personal". The Independent. 22 October 2011.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.