Genetic variation

Genetic variation is the difference in DNA among individuals[1] or the differences between populations.[2] The multiple sources of genetic variation include mutation and genetic recombination.[3] Mutations are the ultimate sources of genetic variation, but other mechanisms, such as genetic drift, contribute to it, as well.[2]

Darwin's finches or Galapagos finches[4]
Parents have similar gene coding in this specific situation where they reproduce and variation in the offspring is seen. Offspring containing the variation also reproduce and passes down traits to their offspring.

Among individuals within a population

Genetic variation can be identified at many levels. Identifying genetic variation is possible from observations of phenotypic variation in either quantitative traits (traits that vary continuously and are coded for by many genes (e.g., leg length in dogs)) or discrete traits (traits that fall into discrete categories and are coded for by one or a few genes (e.g., white, pink, or red petal color in certain flowers)).

Genetic variation can also be identified by examining variation at the level of enzymes using the process of protein electrophoresis.[5] Polymorphic genes have more than one allele at each locus. Half of the genes that code for enzymes in insects and plants may be polymorphic, whereas polymorphisms are less common among vertebrates.

Ultimately, genetic variation is caused by variation in the order of bases in the nucleotides in genes. New technology now allows scientists to directly sequence DNA, which has identified even more genetic variation than was previously detected by protein electrophoresis. Examination of DNA has shown genetic variation in both coding regions and in the noncoding intron region of genes.

Genetic variation will result in phenotypic variation if variation in the order of nucleotides in the DNA sequence results in a difference in the order of amino acids in proteins coded by that DNA sequence, and if the resultant differences in amino-acid sequence influence the shape, and thus the function of the enzyme.[6]

Between populations

Geographic variation means genetic differences in populations from different locations. This is caused by natural selection or genetic drift.


Genetic variation within a population is commonly measured as the percentage of polymorphic gene loci or the percentage of gene loci in heterozygous individuals. The results can be very useful in understanding the process of adaption to the environment of each individual in the population.[7]


A range of variability in the mussel Donax variabilis

Random mutations are the ultimate source of genetic variation. Mutations are likely to be rare, and most mutations are neutral or deleterious, but in some instances, the new alleles can be favored by natural selection. Polyploidy is an example of chromosomal mutation. Polyploidy is a condition wherein organisms have three or more sets of genetic variation (3n or more).

Crossing over (genetic recombination) and random segregation during meiosis can result in the production of new alleles or new combinations of alleles. Furthermore, random fertilization also contributes to variation. Variation and recombination can be facilitated by transposable genetic elements, endogenous retroviruses, LINEs, SINEs, etc. For a given genome of a multicellular organism, genetic variation may be acquired in somatic cells or inherited through the germline.


Genetic variation can be divided into different forms according to the size and type of genomic variation underpinning genetic change. Small-scale sequence variation (<1 kilobase, kb) includes base-pair substitution and indels.[8] Large-scale structural variation (>1 kb) can be either copy number variation (loss or gain), or chromosomal rearrangement (translocation, inversion, or Segmental acquired uniparental disomy).[8] Genetic variation and recombination by transposable elements and endogenous retroviruses sometimes is supplemented by a variety of persistent viruses and their defectives which generate genetic novelty in host genomes. Numerical variation in whole chromosomes or genomes can be either polyploidy or aneuploidy.

Maintenance in populations

A variety of factors maintain genetic variation in populations. Potentially harmful recessive alleles can be hidden from selection in the heterozygous individuals in populations of diploid organisms (recessive alleles are only expressed in the less common homozygous individuals). Natural selection can also maintain genetic variation in balanced polymorphisms. Balanced polymorphisms may occur when heterozygotes are favored or when selection is frequency dependent.

RNA viruses

A high mutation rate caused by the lack of a proofreading mechanism appears to be a major source of the genetic variation that contributes to RNA virus evolution.[9] Genetic recombination also has been shown to play a key role in generating the genetic variation that underlies RNA virus evolution.[9] Numerous RNA viruses are capable of genetic recombination when at least two viral genomes are present in the same host cell.[10] RNA recombination appears to be a major driving force in determining genome architecture and the course of viral evolution among Picornaviridae ((+)ssRNA) (e.g. poliovirus).[11] In the Retroviridae ((+)ssRNA)(e.g. HIV), damage in the RNA genome appears to be avoided during reverse transcription by strand switching, a form of genetic recombination.[12][13][14] Recombination also occurs in the Coronaviridae ((+)ssRNA) (e.g. SARS).[15] Recombination in RNA viruses appears to be an adaptation for coping with genome damage.[10] Recombination can occur infrequently between animal viruses of the same species but of divergent lineages. The resulting recombinant viruses may sometimes cause an outbreak of infection in humans.[15]

History of genetic variation

Evolutionary biologists are often concerned with genetic variation, a term which in modern times has come to refer to differences in DNA sequences among individuals. However, quantifying and understanding genetic variation has been a central aim of those interested in understanding the varied life on earth since long before the sequencing of the first full genome, and even before the discovery of DNA as the molecule responsible for heredity.

While today's definition of genetic variation relies on contemporary molecular genetics, the idea of heritable variation was of central importance to those interested in the substance and development of life even before the writings of Charles Darwin. The concept of heritable variation—the presence of innate differences between life forms that are passed from parents to offspring, especially within categories such as species—does not rely on modern ideas of genetics, which were unavailable to 18th- and 19th-century minds.

Pre-Darwinian concepts of heritable variation

In the mid-1700s, Pierre Louis Maupertuis, a French scholar now known primarily for his work in mathematics and physics, posited that while species have a true, original form, accidents during the development of nascent offspring could introduce variations that could accumulate over time.[16] In his 1750 Essaie de Cosmologie, he proposed that the species we see today are only a small fraction of the many variations produced by "a blind destiny", and that many of these variations did not "conform" to their needs, thus did not survive.[17] In fact, some historians even suggest that his ideas anticipated the laws of inheritance further developed by Gregor Mendel.[18]

Simultaneously, French philosopher Denis Diderot proposed a different framework for the generation of heritable variation. Diderot borrowed Maupertuis' idea that variation could be introduced during reproduction and the subsequent growth of offspring,[19] and thought that production of a "normal" organism was no more probable than production of a "monstrous" one.[20] However, Diderot also believed that matter itself had lifelike properties and could self-assemble into structures with the potential for life.[19] Diderot's ideas on biological transformation, introduced in his 1749 work Letter on the Blind, were thus focused on variability of spontaneously generated forms, not variability within existing species.[21]

Both Maupertuis and Diderot built on the ideas of Roman poet and philosopher Lucretius, who wrote in De rerum natura that all the universe was created by random chance, and only the beings that were not self-contradictory survived.[22] Maupertuis' work is distinguished from the work of both Lucretius and Diderot in his use of the concept of conformity in explaining differential survival of beings, a new idea among those who believed that life changed over time.[22]

Like Diderot, two other influential minds of the 18th century—Erasmus Darwin and Jean-Baptiste Lamarck—believed that only very simple organisms could be generated by spontaneous generation, so another mechanism was necessary to generate the great variability of complex life observed on earth.[16] Erasmus Darwin proposed that changes acquired during an animal's life could be passed to its offspring, and that these changes seemed to be produced by the animal's endeavors to meet its basic needs.[23] Similarly, Lamarck's theory of the variability among living things was rooted in patterns of use and disuse, which he believed led to heritable physiological changes.[16] Both Erasmus Darwin and Lamarck believed that variation, whether it arose during development or during the animal's life, was heritable, a key step in theories of change over time extending from individuals to populations.

In the subsequent century, William Herschel's telescopic observations of diverse nebulae across the night sky suggested to him that different nebulae could each be in different stages in the process of condensation. This idea, which came to be known as the nebular hypothesis, suggested that natural processes could both create order out of matter and introduce variation, and that these processes could be observed over time.[16] While it may seem to the modern reader that astronomical theories are irrelevant to theories of organic variation, these ideas became significantly conflated with ideas of biological transformation—what we now know as evolution—in the mid-19th century, laying important groundwork for the work of subsequent thinkers such as Charles Darwin.[24]

Darwin's concept of heritable variation

Charles Darwin's ideas of heritable variation were shaped by both his own scientific work and the ideas of his contemporaries and predecessors.[25] Darwin ascribed heritable variation to many factors, but particularly emphasized environmental forces acting on the body. His theory of inheritance was rooted in the (now disproven) idea of gemmules - small, hypothetical particles, which capture the essence of an organism and travel from all over the body to the reproductive organs, from which they are passed to offspring.[26] Darwin believed that the causal relationship between the environment and the body was so complex that the variation this relationship produced was inherently unpredictable.[27] However, like Lamarck, he acknowledged that variability could also be introduced by patterns of use and disuse of organs.[28] Darwin was fascinated by variation in both natural and domesticated populations, and his realization that individuals in a population exhibited seemingly purposeless variation was largely driven by his experiences working with animal breeders.[29] Darwin believed that species changed gradually, through the accumulation of small, continuous variations, a concept that would remain hotly contested into the 20th century.[30]

Post-Darwinian concepts of heritable variation

In the 20th century, a field that came to be known as population genetics developed. This field seeks to understand and quantify genetic variation.[30] The section below consists of a timeline of selected developments in population genetics, with a focus on methods for quantifying genetic variation.

  • 1866 - Heterozygosity: Gregor Mendel's hybridization experiments introduced the concept that in the 1950s came to be recognized as heterozygosity.[28] In a diploid species, one that contains two copies of DNA within each cell (one from each parent), an individual is said to be a heterozygote at a particular location in the genome if its two copies of DNA differ at that site. Heterozygosity, the average frequency of heterozygotes in a population, became a fundamental measure of the genetic variation in a population by the mid-20th century.[31] If the heterozygosity of a population is zero, every individual is homozygous; that is, every individual has two copies of the same allele at the locus of interest and no genetic variation exists.
  • 1918 - Variance: In a seminal paper entitled "The correlation between relatives on the supposition of Mendelian inheritance", R.A. Fisher introduced the statistical concept of variance; the average of squared deviations of a collection of observations from their mean (), where is the variance and is the mean of the population from which the observations are drawn).[32] R.A. Fisher's work in population genetics was not just important to population genetics; these ideas would also form the foundations of modern statistics.
  • 1921 - Additive and dominant genetic variance: R.A. Fisher subsequently subdivided his general definition of variance into two components relevant to population genetics: additive and dominant genetic variance.[33] An additive genetic model assumes that genes do not interact and that a trait value can be estimated simply by summing the effect of each gene on the trait. Under Fisher's model, the total genetic variance is the sum of the additive genetic variance (the variance in a trait due to these additive effects) and the dominant genetic variance (which accounts for interactions between genes).[32]
  • 1948 - Entropy: Unlike variance, which was developed with the purpose of quantifying genetic variance, Claude Shannon's measure of diversity, now known as Shannon entropy, was developed as part of his work in communication theory as a way to quantify the amount of information contained in a message. However, the method quickly found use in population genetics, and was the central method used to quantify genetic diversity in a seminal paper by Richard Lewontin, "The Apportionment of Human Genetic Diversity".[34]
  • 1951 - F-statistics: F-statistics, also known as fixation indices, were developed by population geneticist Sewall Wright to quantify differences in genetic variation within and between populations. The most common of these statistics, FST, considers in its simplest definition two different versions of a gene, or alleles, and two populations that contain one or both of these two alleles. FST quantifies the genetic variability among these two populations by computing the average frequency of heterozygotes across the two populations relative to the frequency of heterozygotes if the two populations were pooled.[35] F-statistics introduced the idea of quantifying hierarchical concepts of variance and would become the foundation of many important population genetic methods, including a set of methods that tests for evidence of natural selection in the genome.[36]

See also


  1. "What is genetic variation?". EMBL-EBI Train online. 2017-06-05. Retrieved 2019-04-03.
  2. "Genetic Variation". Retrieved 2020-09-28.
  3. Levinson, Gene (2020). Rethinking evolution: the revolution that's hiding in plain sight. World Scientific. ISBN 9781786347268.
  4. Darwin, 1845. Journal of researches into the natural history and geology of the countries visited during the voyage of H.M.S. Beagle round the world, under the Command of Capt. Fitz Roy, R.N. 2d edition.
  5. "What is gel electrophoresis?".
  6. Pavlopoulos, GA; Oulas, A; Iacucci, E; Sifrim, A; Moreau, Y; Schneider, R; Aerts, J; Iliopoulos, I (25 July 2013). "Unraveling genomic variation from next generation sequencing data". BioData Mining. 6 (1): 13. doi:10.1186/1756-0381-6-13. PMC 3726446. PMID 23885890.
  7. "The Variety of Genes in the Gene Pool Can Be Quantified within a Population | Learn Science at Scitable". Retrieved 2022-07-15.
  8. Lars Feuk, Andrew R. Carson & Stephen W. Scherer (February 2006). "Structural variation in the human genome". Nature Reviews Genetics. 7 (2): 85–97. doi:10.1038/nrg1767. PMID 16418744. S2CID 17255998.
  9. Carrasco-Hernandez, R.; Jácome, Rodrigo; López Vidal, Yolanda; Ponce De León, Samuel (2017). "Are RNA Viruses Candidate Agents for the Next Global Pandemic? A Review". Ilar Journal. 58 (3): 343–358. doi:10.1093/ilar/ilx026. PMC 7108571. PMID 28985316.
  10. Barr JN, Fearns R (June 2010). "How RNA viruses maintain their genome integrity". The Journal of General Virology. 91 (Pt 6): 1373–87. doi:10.1099/vir.0.020818-0. PMID 20335491.
  11. Muslin C, Mac Kain A, Bessaud M, Blondel B, Delpeyroux F (September 2019). "Recombination in Enteroviruses, a Multi-Step Modular Evolutionary Process". Viruses. 11 (9): 859. doi:10.3390/v11090859. PMC 6784155. PMID 31540135.
  12. Hu WS, Temin HM (November 1990). "Retroviral recombination and reverse transcription". Science. 250 (4985): 1227–33. Bibcode:1990Sci...250.1227H. doi:10.1126/science.1700865. PMID 1700865.
  13. Rawson JM, Nikolaitchik OA, Keele BF, Pathak VK, Hu WS (November 2018). "Recombination is required for efficient HIV-1 replication and the maintenance of viral genome integrity". Nucleic Acids Research. 46 (20): 10535–45. doi:10.1093/nar/gky910. PMC 6237782. PMID 30307534.
  14. Bernstein H, Bernstein C, Michod RE (January 2018). "Sex in microbial pathogens". Infection, Genetics and Evolution. 57: 8–25. doi:10.1016/j.meegid.2017.10.024. PMID 29111273.
  15. Su S, Wong G, Shi W, Liu J, Lai AC, Zhou J, et al. (June 2016). "Epidemiology, Genetic Recombination, and Pathogenesis of Coronaviruses". Trends in Microbiology. 24 (6): 490–502. doi:10.1016/j.tim.2016.03.003. PMC 7125511. PMID 27012512.
  16. Bowler, Peter J. (1989). Evolution: the history of an idea (Rev. ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press. ISBN 0-520-06385-6. OCLC 17841313.
  17. Glass, Bentley (1947). "Maupertuis and the Beginnings of Genetics". The Quarterly Review of Biology. 22 (3): 196–210. doi:10.1086/395787. ISSN 0033-5770. PMID 20264553. S2CID 28185536.
  18. Sandler, Iris (1983). "Pierre Louis Moreau de Maupertuis: A precursor of Mendel?". Journal of the History of Biology. 16 (1): 102. doi:10.1007/bf00186677. ISSN 0022-5010. PMID 11611246. S2CID 26835071.
  19. Gregory, Mary (2006-10-23). Diderot and the Metamorphosis of Species. Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203943823. ISBN 978-1-135-91583-4.
  20. Hill, Emita (1968). "Materialism and Monsters in "Le Rêve de d'Alembert"". Diderot Studies. 10: 67–93. ISSN 0070-4806. JSTOR 40372379.
  21. Zirkle, Conway (1941). "Natural Selection before the "Origin of Species"". Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society. 84 (1): 71–123. ISSN 0003-049X. JSTOR 984852.
  22. Gregory, Mary Efrosini (2008). Evolutionism in eighteenth-century French thought. New York: Peter Lang. ISBN 978-1-4331-0373-5. OCLC 235030545.
  23. Zirkle, Conway (1946). "The Early History of the Idea of the Inheritance of Acquired Characters and of Pangenesis". Transactions of the American Philosophical Society. 35 (2): 91–151. doi:10.2307/1005592. ISSN 0065-9746. JSTOR 1005592.
  24. Schweber, S.S. (1989). "John Herschel and Charles Darwin: A study in parallel lives". Journal of the History of Biology. 22 (1): 1–71. doi:10.1007/bf00209603. ISSN 0022-5010. S2CID 122572397.
  25. Egerton, Frank N. (1976). "Darwin's Early Reading of Lamarck". Isis. 67 (3): 452–456. doi:10.1086/351636. ISSN 0021-1753. JSTOR 230686. S2CID 144074540.
  26. Winther, Rasmus G. (2000). "Darwin on Variation and Heredity". Journal of the History of Biology. 33 (3): 425–455. doi:10.1023/A:1004834008068. ISSN 0022-5010. JSTOR 4331610. S2CID 55795712.
  27. Beatty, John (2006-12-01). "Chance Variation: Darwin on Orchids". Philosophy of Science. 73 (5): 629–641. doi:10.1086/518332. ISSN 0031-8248. S2CID 170396888.
  28. Deichmann, Ute (2010). "Gemmules and Elements: On Darwin's and Mendel's Concepts and Methods in Heredity". Journal for General Philosophy of Science. 41 (1): 85–112. doi:10.1007/s10838-010-9122-0. ISSN 0925-4560. JSTOR 20722529. S2CID 42385140.
  29. Bowler, Peter J. (2009-01-09). "Darwin's Originality". Science. 323 (5911): 223–226. doi:10.1126/science.1160332. ISSN 0036-8075. PMID 19131623. S2CID 1170705.
  30. Provine, William B. (2001). The origins of theoretical population genetics (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-68463-6. OCLC 46660910.
  31. "Heterozygosity". Oxford Bibliographies. Retrieved 2021-12-11.
  32. Charlesworth, Brian; Edwards, Anthony W. F. (2018-07-26). "A century of variance". Significance. 15 (4): 20–25. doi:10.1111/j.1740-9713.2018.01170.x. ISSN 1740-9705.
  33. Dietrich, Michael (2013-01-01). "R.A. Fisher and the Foundations of Statistical Biology". Outsider Scientists: Routes to Innovation in Biology.
  34. Rosenberg, Noah A. (2018). "Variance-Partitioning and Classification in Human Population Genetics". In Rasmus Grønfeldt Winther (ed.). Phylogenetic Inference, Selection Theory, and History of Science. Cambridge University Press. pp. 399–404. doi:10.1017/9781316276259.040. ISBN 9781316276259.
  35. Alcala, Nicolas; Rosenberg, Noah A (2017-07-01). "Mathematical Constraints on FST: Biallelic Markers in Arbitrarily Many Populations". Genetics. 206 (3): 1581–1600. doi:10.1534/genetics.116.199141. ISSN 1943-2631. PMC 5500152. PMID 28476869.
  36. Excoffier, L.; Hofer, T.; Foll, M. (October 2009). "Detecting loci under selection in a hierarchically structured population". Heredity. 103 (4): 285–298. doi:10.1038/hdy.2009.74. ISSN 1365-2540. PMID 19623208.

Further reading

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.