Distance education

Distance education, also known as distance learning, is the education of students who may not always be physically present at a school,[1][2] or where the learner and the teacher are separated in both time and distance.[3] Traditionally, this usually involved correspondence courses wherein the student corresponded with the school via mail. Distance education is a technology mediated modality and has evolved with the evolution of technologies such as video conferencing, TV, and internet.[4] Today, it usually involves online education and the learning is usually mediated by some form of technology. A distance learning program can be completely distance learning, or a combination of distance learning and traditional classroom instruction (called hybrid[5] or blended).[6] Other modalities include distance learning with complementary virtual environment or teaching in virtual environment (e-learning).[3]

Student in Kerala, India participating in distance education during the COVID-19 pandemic

Massive open online courses (MOOCs), offering large-scale interactive participation and open access through the World Wide Web or other network technologies, are recent educational modes in distance education.[1] A number of other terms (distributed learning, e-learning, m-learning, online learning, virtual classroom etc.) are used roughly synonymously with distance education. E-learning has shown to be a useful educational tool. E-learning should be an interactive process with multiple learning modes for all learners at various levels of learning. The distance learning environment is an exciting place to learn new things, collaborate with others, and retain self-discipline.


One of the earliest attempts of distance education was advertised in 1728. This was in the Boston Gazette for "Caleb Philipps, Teacher of the new method of Short Hand", who sought students who wanted to learn the skills through weekly mailed lessons.[7]

The first distance education course in the modern sense was provided by Sir Isaac Pitman in the 1840s who taught a system of shorthand by mailing texts transcribed into shorthand on postcards and receiving transcriptions from his students in return for correction. The element of student feedback was a crucial innovation in Pitman's system.[8] This scheme was made possible by the introduction of uniform postage rates across England in 1840.[9]

This early beginning proved extremely successful and the Phonographic Correspondence Society was founded three years later to establish these courses on a more formal basis. The society paved the way for the later formation of Sir Isaac Pitman Colleges across the country.[10]

The first correspondence school in the United States was the Society to Encourage Studies at Home which was founded in 1873.[11]

Founded in 1894, Wolsey Hall, Oxford was the first distance learning college in the UK.[12]

University correspondence courses

The University of London was the first university to offer distance learning degrees, establishing its External Programme in 1858. The background to this innovation lay in the fact that the institution (later known as University College London) was non-denominational and the intense religious rivalries at the time led to an outcry against the "godless" university. The issue soon boiled down to which institutions had degree-granting powers and which institutions did not.[13]

The London University in 1827, drawn by Thomas Hosmer Shepherd

The compromise that emerged in 1836 was that the sole authority to conduct the examinations leading to degrees would be given to a new officially recognized entity, the "University of London", which would act as examining body for the University of London colleges, originally University College London and King's College London, and award their students University of London degrees. As Sheldon Rothblatt states: "Thus arose in nearly archetypal form the famous English distinction between teaching and examining, here embodied in separate institutions."[13]

With the state giving examining powers to a separate entity, the groundwork was laid for the creation of a programme within the new university which would both administer examinations and award qualifications to students taking instruction at another institution or pursuing a course of self-directed study. Referred to as "People's University" by Charles Dickens because it provided access to higher education to students from less affluent backgrounds, the External Programme was chartered by Queen Victoria in 1858, making the University of London the first university to offer distance learning degrees to students.[14][15] Enrollment increased steadily during the late 19th century, and its example was widely copied elsewhere.[16] This programme is now known as the University of London International Programme and includes Postgraduate, Undergraduate and Diploma degrees created by colleges such as the London School of Economics, Royal Holloway and Goldsmiths.[15]

William Rainey Harper encouraged the development of external university courses at the new University of Chicago in the 1890s.

In the United States, William Rainey Harper, founder and first president of the University of Chicago, celebrated the concept of extended education, where a research university had satellite colleges elsewhere in the region.[17]

In 1892, Harper encouraged correspondence courses to further promote education, an idea that was put into practice by Chicago, Wisconsin, Columbia, and several dozen other universities by the 1920s.[18][19] Enrollment in the largest private for-profit school based in Scranton, Pennsylvania, the International Correspondence Schools grew explosively in the 1890s. Founded in 1888 to provide training for immigrant coal miners aiming to become state mine inspectors or foremen, it enrolled 2500 new students in 1894 and matriculated 72,000 new students in 1895. By 1906 total enrollments reached 900,000. The growth was due to sending out complete textbooks instead of single lessons, and the use of 1200 aggressive in-person salesmen.[20][21] There was a stark contrast in pedagogy:

The regular technical school or college aims to educate a man broadly; our aim, on the contrary, is to educate him only along some particular line. The college demands that a student shall have certain educational qualifications to enter it and that all students study for approximately the same length of time; when they have finished their courses they are supposed to be qualified to enter any one of a number of branches in some particular profession. We, on the contrary, are aiming to make our courses fit the particular needs of the student who takes them.[22]

Education was a high priority in the Progressive Era, as American high schools and colleges expanded greatly. For men who were older or were too busy with family responsibilities, night schools were opened, such as the YMCA school in Boston that became Northeastern University. Outside the big cities, private correspondence schools offered a flexible, narrowly focused solution.[23] Large corporations systematized their training programmes for new employees. The National Association of Corporation Schools grew from 37 in 1913 to 146 in 1920. Starting in the 1880s, private schools opened across the country which offered specialized technical training to anyone who enrolled, not just the employees of one company. Starting in Milwaukee in 1907, public schools began opening free vocational programmes.[24]

Only a third of the American population lived in cities of 100,000 or more population in 1920; to reach the rest, correspondence techniques had to be adopted. Australia, with its vast distances, was especially active; the University of Queensland established its Department of Correspondence Studies in 1911.[25] In South Africa, the University of South Africa, formerly an examining and certification body, started to present distance education tuition in 1946. The International Conference for Correspondence Education held its first meeting in 1938.[26] The goal was to provide individualised education for students, at low cost, by using a pedagogy of testing, recording, classification, and differentiation.[27][28] The organization has since been renamed as the International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE), with headquarters in Oslo, Norway.[29]

Open universities

The Open University (OU) the United Kingdom was founded by the-then Labour government led by Harold Wilson. Based on the vision of Michael Young, planning commenced in 1965 under the Minister of State for Education, Jennie Lee, who established a model for the Open University as one of widening access to the highest standards of scholarship in higher education and set up a planning committee consisting of university vice-chancellors, educationalists, and television broadcasters, chaired by Sir Peter Venables. The British Broadcasting Corporation's (BBC) Assistant Director of Engineering at the time, James Redmond, had obtained most of his qualifications at night school, and his natural enthusiasm for the project did much to overcome the technical difficulties of using television to broadcast teaching programmes.[30]

Walton Hall, renovated in 1970 to act as the headquarters of the newly established Open University (artist: Hilary French)

The Open University revolutionised the scope of the correspondence programme and helped to create a respectable learning alternative to the traditional form of education. It has been at the forefront of developing new technologies to improve the distance learning service[31] as well as undertaking research in other disciplines. Walter Perry was appointed the OU's first vice-chancellor in January 1969, and its foundation secretary was Anastasios Christodoulou. The election of the new Conservative government under the leadership of Edward Heath, in 1970; led to budget cuts under Chancellor of the Exchequer Iain Macleod (who had earlier called the idea of an Open University "blithering nonsense").[32] However, the OU accepted its first 25,000 students in 1971, adopting a radical open admissions policy. At the time, the total student population of conventional universities in the United Kingdom was around 130,000.[33]

Athabasca University, Canada's open university, was created in 1970 and followed a similar, though independently developed, pattern.[34] The Open University inspired the creation of Spain's National University of Distance Education (1972)[35] and Germany's FernUniversität in Hagen (1974).[36] There are now many similar institutions around the world, often with the name "Open University" (in English or in the local language).[30]

The University of the Philippines Open University was established in 1995 as the fifth constituent university of the University of the Philippines System and was the first distance education and online university in the Philippines. Its mandate is to provide education opportunities to individuals aspiring for higher education and improved qualifications but were unable to take advantage of traditional modes of education because of personal and professional obligations.

Most open universities use distance education technologies as delivery methods, though some require attendance at local study centres or at regional "summer schools". Some open universities have grown to become mega-universities.[37]

COVID-19 pandemic

Distance lessons over video conferences in the world during the COVID-19 pandemic ...
... in Russia
... in Italy

The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in the closure of the vast majority of schools worldwide for in person learning.[38][39] Many schools moved to online remote learning through platforms including—but not limited to—Zoom, Cisco Webex, Google Classroom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, D2L, and Edgenuity.[40][41] Concerns arose over the impact of this transition on students without access to an internet-enabled device or a stable internet connection.[42] Distanced education during the COVID-19 pandemic has interrupted synchronous learning for many students and teachers; where educators were no longer able to teach in real time and could only switch to asynchronous instruction, this significantly and negatively affected their coping with the transition,[43] and posed various legal issues, especially in terms of copyright.[44] A recent study about the benefits and drawbacks of online learning found that students have had a harder time producing their own work.[45] The study suggests teachers should cut back on the amount of information taught and incorporate more activities during the lesson, in order for students to create their own work.[45]

Though schools are slow to adapt to new technologies, Covid-19 required schools to adapt and learn how to use new digital and online learning tools.[46] Web conferencing has become more popular since 2007.[47] Researchers have found that people in online classes perform just as effectively as participants in conventional learning classes.[46] The use of online learning is becoming a pathway for learners with sparse access to physical courses so they can complete their degrees.[48] Furthermore, digital classroom technologies allow those living remotely to access learning and it enables the student to fit learning into their schedule more easily.


Internet technology has enabled many forms of distance learning through open educational resources and facilities such as e-learning and MOOCs. Although the expansion of the Internet blurs the boundaries, distance education technologies are divided into two modes of delivery: synchronous learning and asynchronous learning.

In synchronous learning, all participants are "present" at the same time in a virtual classroom, as in traditional classroom teaching. It requires a timetable. Web conferencing, videoconferencing, educational television, instructional television are examples of synchronous technology, as are direct-broadcast satellite (DBS), internet radio, live streaming, telephone, and web-based VoIP.[49]

Web conferencing software helps to facilitate class meetings, and usually contains additional interaction tools such as text chat, polls, hand raising, emoticons etc. These tools also support asynchronous participation by students who can listen to recordings of synchronous sessions. Immersive environments (notably SecondLife) have also been used to enhance participant presence in distance education courses. Another form of synchronous learning using the classroom is the use of robot proxies[50] including those that allow sick students to attend classes.[51]

Some universities have been starting to use robot proxies to enable more engaging synchronous hybrid classes where both remote and in-person students can be present and interact using telerobotics devices such as the Kubi Telepresence robot stand that looks around and the Double Robot that roams around. With these telepresence robots, the remote students have a seat at the table or desk instead of being on a screen on the wall.[52][53]

In asynchronous learning, participants access course materials flexibly on their own schedules. Students are not required to be together at the same time. Mail correspondence, which is the oldest form of distance education, is an asynchronous delivery technology, as are message board forums, e-mail, video and audio recordings, print materials, voicemail, and fax.[49]

The two methods can be combined. Many courses offered by both open universities and an increasing number of campus-based institutions use periodic sessions of residential or day teaching to supplement the sessions delivered at a distance.[54] This type of mixed distance and campus-based education has recently come to be called "blended learning" or less often "hybrid learning". Many open universities use a blend of technologies and a blend of learning modalities (face-to-face, distance, and hybrid) all under the rubric of "distance learning".

Distance learning can also use interactive radio instruction (IRI), interactive audio instruction (IAI), online virtual worlds, digital games, webinars, and webcasts, all of which are referred to as e-Learning.[54]

Radio and television

External audio
Air college talk., 2:45, 2 December 1931, WNYC[55]

The rapid spread of film in the 1920s and radio in the 1930s led to proposals to use it for distance education.[56] By 1938, at least 200 city school systems, 25 state boards of education, and many colleges and universities broadcast educational programmes for the public schools.[57] One line of thought was to use radio as a master teacher.

Experts in given fields broadcast lessons for pupils within the many schoolrooms of the public school system, asking questions, suggesting readings, making assignments, and conducting tests. This mechanizes education and leaves the local teacher only the tasks of preparing for the broadcast and keeping order in the classroom.[58]

The first large-scale implementation of radio for distance education took place in 1937 in Chicago. During a three-week school closure implemented in response to a polio outbreak that the city was experiencing, superintendent of Chicago Public Schools William Johnson and assistant superintendent Minnie Fallon implemented a programme of distance learning that provided the city's elementary school students with instruction through radio broadcasts.[59][60][61]

A typical setup came in Kentucky in 1948 when John Wilkinson Taylor, president of the University of Louisville, teamed up with NBC to use radio as a medium for distance education, The chairman of the Federal Communications Commission endorsed the project and predicted that the "college-by-radio" would put "American education 25 years ahead". The university was owned by the city, and local residents would pay the low tuition rates, receive their study materials in the mail, and listen by radio to live classroom discussions that were held on campus.[62] Physicist Daniel Q. Posin also was a pioneer in the field of distance education when he hosted a televised course through DePaul University.[63]

Charles Wedemeyer of the University of Wisconsin–Madison also promoted new methods. From 1964 to 1968, the Carnegie Foundation funded Wedemeyer's Articulated Instructional Media Project (AIM) which brought in a variety of communications technologies aimed at providing learning to an off-campus population. The radio courses faded away in the 1950s.[64] Many efforts to use television along the same lines proved unsuccessful, despite heavy funding by the Ford Foundation.[65][66][67]

From 1970 to 1972 the Coordinating Commission for Higher Education in California funded Project Outreach to study the potential of telecourses. The study included the University of California, California State University, and the community colleges. This study led to coordinated instructional systems legislation allowing the use of public funds for non-classroom instruction and paved the way for the emergence of telecourses as the precursor to the online courses and programmes of today. The Coastline Community Colleges, The Dallas County Community College District, and Miami Dade Community College led the way. The Adult Learning Service of the US Public Broadcasting Service came into being and the "wrapped" series, and individually produced telecourse for credit became a significant part of the history of distance education and online learning.


The widespread use of computers and the Internet has made distance learning easier and faster, and today virtual schools and virtual universities deliver full curricula online.[68] The capacity of Internet to support voice, video, text and immersion teaching methods made earlier distinct forms of telephone, videoconferencing, radio, television, and text based education somewhat redundant. However, many of the techniques developed and lessons learned with earlier media are used in Internet delivery.

The first totally online courses for graduate and undergraduate credit were offered in 1985 by Connected Education through The New School in New York City, with students earning the MA in Media Studies completely online via computer conferencing, with no in-person requirements.[69][70][71] This was followed in 1986 by the University of Toronto[72] through the Graduate School of Education (then called OISE: the Ontario Institute for Studies in Education), offering a course in "Women and Computers in Education", dealing with gender issues and educational computing. The first new and fully online university was founded in 1994 as the Open University of Catalonia, headquartered in Barcelona, Spain. In 1999 Jones International University was launched as the first fully online university accredited by a regional accrediting association in the US.[73]

Between 2000 and 2008, enrollment in distance education courses increased rapidly in almost every country in both developed and developing countries.[74] Many private, public, non-profit and for-profit institutions worldwide now offer distance education courses from the most basic instruction through to the highest levels of degree and doctoral programmes. New York University and the International University Canada, for example, offers online degrees in engineering and management-related fields through NYU Tandon Online. Levels of accreditation vary: widely respected universities such as Stanford University and Harvard now deliver online courses—but other online schools receive little outside oversight, and some are actually fraudulent, i.e., diploma mills. In the US, the Distance Education Accrediting Commission (DEAC) specializes in the accreditation of distance education institutions.[75]

In the United States in 2011, it was found that a third of all the students enrolled in postsecondary education had taken an accredited online course in a postsecondary institution.[76] Growth continued. In 2013 the majority of public and private colleges offered full academic programmes online.[76] Programmes included training in the mental health,[77] occupational therapy,[78][79] family therapy,[80] art therapy,[81] physical therapy,[79] and rehabilitation counseling[82] fields.

By 2008, online learning programmes were available in the United States in 44 states at the K-12 level.[83]

Internet forums, online discussion group and online learning community can contribute to a distance education experience. Research shows that socialization plays an important role in some forms of distance education.[84]

ECourses are available from educational platforms such as Khan Academy and MasterClass on many topics and for students of all levels.

Paced and self-paced models

Most distance education uses a paced format similar to traditional campus-based models in which learners commence and complete a course at the same time. Some institutions offer self-paced programmes that allow for continuous enrollment, and the length of time to complete the course is set by the learner's time, skill, and commitment levels. Self-paced courses are almost always offered asynchronously. Each delivery method offers advantages and disadvantages for students, teachers, and institutions.

Kaplan and Haenlein classify distance education into four groups according to "Time dependency" and "Number of participants":

  1. MOOCs (Massive Open Online Courses): Open-access online course (i.e., without specific participation restrictions) that allows for unlimited (massive) participation;
  2. SPOCs (Small Private Online Courses): Online course that only offers a limited number of places and therefore requires some form of formal enrollment;
  3. SMOCs (Synchronous Massive Online Courses): Open-access online course that allows for unlimited participation but requires students to be "present" at the same time (synchronously);
  4. SSOCs (Synchronous Private Online Courses): Online course that only offers a limited number of places and requires students to be "present" at the same time (synchronously).[1]

Paced models are a familiar mode since they are used almost exclusively in campus-based schools. Institutes that offer both distance and campus programmes usually use paced models so that teacher workload, student semester planning, tuition deadlines, exam schedules, and other administrative details can be synchronized with campus delivery. Student familiarity and the pressure of deadlines encourages students to readily adapt to and usually succeed in paced models. However, student freedom is sacrificed as a common pace is often too fast for some students and too slow for others. In additional life events, professional or family responsibilities can interfere with a student's capability to complete tasks to an external schedule. Finally, paced models allow students to readily form communities of inquiry[85] and to engage in collaborative work.

Self-paced courses maximize student freedom, as not only can students commence studies on any date, but they can complete a course in as little time as a few weeks or up to a year or longer. Students often enroll in self-paced study when they are under pressure to complete programmes, have not been able to complete a scheduled course, need additional courses, or have pressure which precludes regular study for any length of time. The self-paced nature of the programming, though, is an unfamiliar model for many students and can lead to excessive procrastination, resulting in course incompletion. Assessment of learning can also be challenging as exams can be written on any day, making it possible for students to share examination questions with resulting loss of academic integrity. Finally, it is extremely challenging to organize collaborative work activities, though some schools[4] are developing cooperative models based upon networked and connectivist pedagogies[86] for use in self-paced programmes.


Distance learning can expand access to education and training for both general populace and businesses since its flexible scheduling structure lessens the effects of the many time-constraints imposed by personal responsibilities and commitments.[87][88] Devolving some activities off-site alleviates institutional capacity constraints arising from the traditional demand on institutional buildings and infrastructure.[87] As a result, more classes can be offered and enable students to enroll in more of their required classes on time and prevent delayed graduation.[89] Furthermore, there is the potential for increased access to more experts in the field and to other students from diverse geographical, social, cultural, economic, and experiential backgrounds.[80][88] As the population at large becomes more involved in lifelong learning beyond the normal schooling age, institutions can benefit financially, and adult learning business courses may be particularly lucrative.[87][88] Distance education programmes can act as a catalyst for institutional innovation[87] and are at least as effective as face-to-face learning programmes,[77][78][90] especially if the instructor is knowledgeable and skilled.[81][88]

Distance education can also provide a broader method of communication within the realm of education.[88] With the many tools and programmes that technological advancements have to offer, communication appears to increase in distance education amongst students and their professors, as well as students and their classmates. The distance educational increase in communication, particularly communication amongst students and their classmates, is an improvement that has been made to provide distance education students with as many of the opportunities as possible as they would receive in in-person education. The improvement being made in distance education is growing in tandem with the constant technological advancements. Present-day online communication allows students to associate with accredited schools and programmes throughout the world that are out of reach for in-person learning. By having the opportunity to be involved in global institutions via distance education, a diverse array of thought is presented to students through communication with their classmates. This is beneficial because students have the opportunity to "combine new opinions with their own, and develop a solid foundation for learning".[91] It has been shown through research that "as learners become aware of the variations in interpretation and construction of meaning among a range of people [they] construct an individual meaning", which can help students become knowledgeable of a wide array of viewpoints in education.[91] To increase the likelihood that students will build effective ties with one another during the course, instructors should use similar assignments for students across different locations to overcome the influence of co-location on relationship building.[92]

The high cost of education affects students in higher education, to which distance education may be an alternative in order to provide some relief.[90][88] Distance education has been a more cost-effective form of learning, and can sometimes save students a significant amount of money as opposed to traditional education.[88] Distance education may be able to help to save students a considerable amount financially by removing the cost of transportation.[93] In addition, distance education may be able to save students from the economic burden of high-priced course textbooks. Many textbooks are now available as electronic textbooks, known as e-textbooks, which can offer digital textbooks for a reduced price in comparison to traditional textbooks. Also, the increasing improvements in technology have resulted in many school libraries having a partnership with digital publishers that offer course materials for free, which can help students significantly with educational costs.[93]

Within the class, students are able to learn in ways that traditional classrooms would not be able to provide. It is able to promote good learning experiences and therefore, allow students to obtain higher satisfaction with their online learning.[94] For example, students can review their lessons more than once according to their needs. Students can then manipulate the coursework to fit their learning by focusing more on their weaker topics while breezing through concepts that they already have or can easily grasp.[94] When course design and the learning environment are at their optimal conditions, distance education can lead students to higher satisfaction with their learning experiences.[90] Studies have shown that high satisfaction correlates to increased learning. For those in a healthcare or mental health distance learning programme, online-based interactions have the potential to foster deeper reflections and discussions of client issues[79] as well as a quicker response to client issues, since supervision happens on a regular basis and is not limited to a weekly supervision meeting.[82][88] This also may contribute to the students feeling a greater sense of support, since they have ongoing and regular access to their instructors and other students.[79][82]

Distance learning may enable students who are unable to attend a traditional school setting, due to disability or illness such as decreased mobility and immune system suppression, to get a good education.[95] Children who are sick or are unable to attend classes are able to attend them in "person" through the use of robot proxies. This helps the students have experiences of the classroom and social interaction that they are unable to receive at home or the hospital, while still keeping them in a safe learning environment. Over the last few years more students are entering safely back into the classroom thanks to the help of robots. An article from the New York Times, "A Swiveling Proxy Will Even Wear a Tutu", explains the positive impact of virtual learning in the classroom,[96] and another[97] that explains how even a simple, stationary telepresence robot can help.[98] Distance education may provide equal access regardless of socioeconomic status or income, area of residence, gender, race, age, or cost per student.[99] Applying universal design strategies to distance learning courses as they are being developed (rather than instituting accommodations for specific students on an as-needed basis) can increase the accessibility of such courses to students with a range of abilities, disabilities, learning styles, and native languages.[100] Distance education graduates, who would never have been associated with the school under a traditional system, may donate money to the school.[101]

Distance learning may also offer a final opportunity for adolescents that are no longer permitted in the general education population due to behavior disorders. Instead of these students having no other academic opportunities, they may continue their education from their homes and earn their diplomas, offering them another chance to be an integral part of society.

Distance learning offers individuals a unique opportunity to benefit from the expertise and resources of the best universities currently available. Moreover, the online environment facilitates pedagogical innovation such as new programme structures and formats.[102] Students have the ability to collaborate, share, question, infer, and suggest new methods and techniques for continuous improvement of the content. The ability to complete a course at a pace that is appropriate for each individual is the most effective manner to learn given the personal demands on time and schedule.[88] Self-paced distance learning on a mobile device, such as a smartphone, provides maximum flexibility and capability.

Distance learning can also reduce the phenomenon of rural exodus by enabling students from remote regions to remain in their hometowns while pursuing higher education. Eliminating the distance barrier to higher education can also increase the number of alternatives open to students, and foster greater competition between institutions of higher learning regardless of geography.[103]


Barriers to effective distance education include obstacles such as domestic distractions and unreliable technology,[104] as well as students' programme costs, adequate contact with teachers and support services, and a need for more experience.[105]

Some students attempt to participate in distance education without proper training with the tools needed to be successful in the programme. Students must be provided with training opportunities (if needed) on each tool that is used throughout the programme. The lack of advanced technology skills can lead to an unsuccessful experience. Schools have a responsibility to adopt a proactive policy for managing technology barriers.[106] Time management skills and self-discipline in distance education is just as important as complete knowledge of the software and tools being used for learning.

The results of a study of Washington state community college students showed that distance learning students tended to drop out more often than their traditional counterparts due to difficulties in language, time management, and study skills.[107]

According to Dr. Pankaj Singhm, director of Nims University, "distance learning benefits may outweigh the disadvantages for students in such a technology-driven society, however before indulging into the use of educational technology a few more disadvantages should be considered." He describes that over multiple years, "all of the obstacles have been overcome and the world environment for distance education continues to improve." Dr. Pankaj Singhm also claims there is a debate to distance education stating, "due to a lack of direct face-to-face social interaction. However, as more people become used to personal and social interaction online (for example dating, chat rooms, shopping, or blogging), it is becoming easier for learners to both project themselves and socializes with others. This is an obstacle that has dissipated."[108]

Not all courses required to complete a degree may be offered online. Health care profession programmes in particular require some sort of patient interaction through fieldwork before a student may graduate.[109] Studies have also shown that students pursuing a medical professional graduate degree who are participating in distance education courses, favor a face to face communication over professor-mediated chat rooms and/or independent studies. However, this is little correlation between student performance when comparing the previous different distance learning strategies.[78]

There is a theoretical problem about the application of traditional teaching methods to online courses because online courses may have no upper size limit. Daniel Barwick noted that there is no evidence that large class size is always worse or that small class size is always better, although a negative link has been established between certain types of instruction in large classes and learning outcomes; he argued that higher education has not made a sufficient effort to experiment with a variety of instructional methods to determine whether large class size is always negatively correlated with a reduction in learning outcomes.[110] Early proponents of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) saw them as just the type of experiment that Barwick had pointed out was lacking in higher education, although Barwick himself has never advocated for MOOCs.

There may also be institutional challenges. Distance learning is new enough that it may be a challenge to gain support for these programmes in a traditional brick-and-mortar academic learning environment.[79] Furthermore, it may be more difficult for the instructor to organize and plan a distance learning programme,[82] especially since many are new programmes and their organizational needs are different from a traditional learning programme.

Additionally, though distance education offers industrial countries the opportunity to become globally informed, there are still negative sides to it. Hellman states that "These include its cost and capital intensiveness, time constraints and other pressures on instructors, the isolation of students from instructors and their peers, instructors' enormous difficulty in adequately evaluating students they never meet face-to-face, and drop-out rates far higher than in classroom-based courses."[111]

A more complex challenge of distance education relates to cultural differences between students and teachers and among students. Distance programmes tend to be more diverse as they could go beyond the geographical borders of regions, countries, and continents, and cross the cultural borders that may exist with respect to race, gender, and religion. That requires a proper understanding and awareness of the norms, differences, preconceptions, and potential conflicting issues.[112]

Educational technology

The modern use of electronic educational technology (also called e-learning) facilitates distance learning and independent learning by the extensive use of information and communications technology (ICT),[88] replacing traditional content delivery by postal correspondence. Instruction can be synchronous and asynchronous online communication in an interactive learning environment or virtual communities, in lieu of a physical classroom. "The focus is shifted to the education transaction in the form of a virtual community of learners sustainable across time."[113]

One of the most significant issues encountered in the mainstream correspondence model of distance education is the transactional distance, which results from the lack of appropriate communication between learner and teacher. This gap has been observed to become wider if there is no communication between the learner and teacher and has direct implications over the learning process and future endeavors in distance education. Distance education providers began to introduce various strategies, techniques, and procedures to increase the amount of interaction between learners and teachers. These measures e.g. more frequent face-to-face tutorials, increased use of information and communication technologies including teleconferencing and the Internet, were designed to close the gap in transactional distance.[114]


Online credentials for learning are digital credentials that are offered in place of traditional paper credentials for a skill or educational achievement. Directly linked to the accelerated development of internet communication technologies, the development of digital badges, electronic passports and massive open online courses (MOOCs) have a very direct bearing on our understanding of learning, recognition and levels as they pose a direct challenge to the status quo. It is useful to distinguish between three forms of online credentials: Test-based credentials, online badges, and online certificates.[115]

See also


 This article incorporates text from a free content work. Licensed under CC-BY-SA IGO 3.0 (license statement/permission). Text taken from Level-setting and recognition of learning outcomes: The use of level descriptors in the twenty-first century, 129-131, Keevey, James; Chakroun, Borhene, UNESCO. UNESCO. To learn how to add open license text to Wikipedia articles, please see this how-to page. For information on reusing text from Wikipedia, please see the terms of use.


  1. Kaplan, Andreas M.; Haenlein, Michael (2016). "Higher education and the digital revolution: About MOOCs, SPOCs, social media, and the Cookie Monster". Business Horizons. 59 (4): 441–50. doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2016.03.008.
  2. Honeyman, M; Miller, G (December 1993). "Agriculture distance education: A valid alternative for higher education?" (PDF). Proceedings of the 20th Annual National Agricultural Education Research Meeting: 67–73. Archived (PDF) from the original on 30 April 2015.
  3. Anderson, Terry; Rivera Vargas, Pablo (June 2020). "A Critical look at Educational Technology from a Distance Education Perspective". Digital Education Review (37): 208–229. doi:10.1344/der.2020.37.208-229. hdl:2445/172738. ISSN 2013-9144. S2CID 225664918.
  4. Dron, Jon; Anderson, Terry (2014). Teaching Crowds: Learning and Social Media. AU Press.
  5. Tabor, Sharon W (Spring 2007). "Narrowing the Distance: Implementing a Hybrid Learning Model". Quarterly Review of Distance Education. IAP. 8 (1): 48–49. ISBN 9787774570793. ISSN 1528-3518. Retrieved 23 January 2011.
  6. Vaughan, Dr Norman D. (2010). "Blended Learning". In Cleveland-Innes, MF; Garrison, DR (eds.). An Introduction to Distance Education: Understanding Teaching and Learning in a New Era. Taylor & Francis. p. 165. ISBN 978-0-415-99598-6. Retrieved 23 January 2011.
  7. Holmberg, Börje (2005). The evolution, principles and practices of distance education. Studien und Berichte der Arbeitsstelle Fernstudienforschung der Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg [ASF] (in German). Vol. 11. Bibliotheks-und Informationssystem der Universitat Oldenburg. p. 13. ISBN 3-8142-0933-8. Retrieved 23 January 2011.
  8. Alan Tait (April 2003). "Reflections on Student Support in Open and Distance Learning". The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning. 4 (1). doi:10.19173/irrodl.v4i1.134.
  9. IAP. distance learning... a magazine for leaders volume 2 number 6. p. 18. ISBN 9787774554229.
  10. Moore, Michael G.; Greg Kearsley (2005). Distance Education: A Systems View (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth. ISBN 0-534-50688-7.
  11. Robinson, Cole, Elizabeth (2012). "The Invisible Woman and the Silent University". ProQuest LLC. ISBN 9781267371676.
  12. "The Evolution, Principles and Practices of Distance Education, Borj Holmberg, Bibliotheks-und Informationssytem der Universitat Oldenburg 2005 page 15" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 29 August 2017. Retrieved 16 April 2020.
  13. Rothblatt, Sheldon; Muller, Detlef K.; Ringer, Fritz; Simon, Brian; Bryant, Margaret; Roach, John; Harte, Negley; Smith, Barbara; Symonds, Richard (1988). "Supply and Demand: The "Two Histories" of English Education". History of Education Quarterly. 28 (4): 627–44. doi:10.2307/368852. JSTOR 368852. S2CID 248820306.
  14. ""History", University of London External Programme Website". Londonexternal.ac.uk. 15 July 2009. Retrieved 27 April 2010.
  15. ""Key Facts", University of London External Programme Website". Londonexternal.ac.uk. 15 July 2009. Retrieved 27 April 2010.
  16. Tatum Anderson (16 May 2007). "History lessons at the people's university". Guardianabroad.co.uk. Archived from the original on 24 May 2007. Retrieved 20 September 2016.
  17. , James T. Carey, Forms and Forces in University Adult Education (Brookline, MA: Center for the Study of Liberal Education for Adults, 1961), 18-19. https://president.uchicago.edu/directory/william-rainey-harper Archived 7 December 2019 at the Wayback Machine
  18. Levinson, David L (2005). Community colleges: a reference handbook. ABC-CLIO. p. 69. ISBN 1-57607-766-7. Retrieved 23 January 2011.
  19. Von V. Pittman, Correspondence Study in the American University: A Second Historiographical Perspective, in Michael Grahame Moore, William G. Anderson, eds. Handbook of Distance Education pp 21-36
  20. Joseph F. Kett, Pursuit of Knowledge Under Difficulties: From Self-Improvement to Adult Education in America (1996) pp 236-8
  21. J.J. Clark, "The Correspondence School—Its Relation to Technical Education and Some of Its Results," Science (1906) 24#611 pp 327-8, 332, 333. Clark was manager of the school's text-book department.
  22. Clark, "The Correspondence School" (1906) p 329
  23. Kett, Pursuit of Knowledge Under Difficulties, p 240
  24. William Millikan (2003). A Union Against Unions: The Minneapolis Citizens Alliance and Its Fight Against Organized Labor, 1903–1947. Minnesota Historical Society Press. pp. 60–61. ISBN 978-0-87351-499-6.
  25. White, Michael (2009). "Distance education in Australian higher education – a history". Distance Education. 3 (2): 255–78. doi:10.1080/0158791820030207.
  26. Francis Lee (2009). Letters and bytes: Sociotechnical studies of distance education. Francis Lee. p. 48. ISBN 9789173935180.
  27. Lee, Francis (2008). "Technopedagogies of mass‐individualization: Correspondence education in the mid twentieth century". History and Technology. 24 (3): 239–53. doi:10.1080/07341510801900318. S2CID 144728618.
  28. Ellen L. Bunker, "The History of Distance Education through the Eyes of the International Council for Distance Education," in Michael Grahame Moore, William G. Anderson, eds. Handbook of Distance Education pp 49-66
  29. "Who we are". www.icde.org. Archived from the original on 25 March 2019. Retrieved 25 March 2019.
  30. "13.2 HISTORY OF DISTANCE EDUCATION". members.aect.org. Retrieved 25 August 2020.
  31. Bizhan Nasseh. "A Brief History of Distance Education". Archived from the original on 28 July 2013. Retrieved 14 November 2013.
  32. "The OU story". 12 March 2014.
  33. "History". The Open University. Retrieved 25 August 2020.
  34. Byrne, T. C. (1989). Athabasca University The Evolution of Distance Education. Calgary, Alberta: University of Calgary Press. p. 135. ISBN 0-919813-51-8.
  35. "History of UNED (in Spanish)". ES. Retrieved 26 January 2012.
  36. "Three Decades". UK: FernUniversität in Hage. Archived from the original on 23 November 2010. Retrieved 23 January 2011.
  37. Daniel, Sir John S (1998). Mega-Universities and Knowledge Media: Technology Strategies for Higher Education. Routledge. ISBN 0-7494-2634-9. Retrieved 23 January 2011.
  38. "School closures caused by Coronavirus (COVID-19)". UNESCO. Retrieved 12 January 2021.
  39. "290 million students out of school due to COVID-19: UNESCO releases first global numbers and mobilizes response". UNESCO. 4 March 2020. Retrieved 6 March 2020.
  40. Hood, Micaela (1 May 2020). "Virtual learning gets mixed reviews from Pocono parents".
  41. Raymond, Jonathon (28 April 2020). "Georgia awards $21 million in digital learning grants".
  42. Aristovnik A, Keržič D, Ravšelj D, Tomaževič N, Umek L (October 2020). "Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Life of Higher Education Students: A Global Perspective". Sustainability. 12 (20): 8438. doi:10.3390/su12208438.
  43. Jelińska, Magdalena; Paradowski, Michał B. (2021). "Teachers' engagement in and coping with emergency remote instruction during COVID-19-induced school closures: A multi-national contextual perspective". Online Learning Journal. 25 (1): 303–328. doi:10.24059/olj.v25i1.2492.
  44. Deflem, Mathieu (2021). "The Right to Teach in a Hyper-Digital Age: Legal Protections for (Post-)Pandemic Concerns". Society. 58 (3): 204–212. doi:10.1007/s12115-021-00584-w. PMC 8161721. PMID 34075264.
  45. Mukhtar, Khadijah; Javed, Kainat; Arooj, Mahwish; Sethi, Ahsan (May 2020). "Advantages, Limitations and Recommendations for online learning during COVID-19 pandemic era". Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences. 36 (COVID19–S4): S27–S31. doi:10.12669/pjms.36.COVID19-S4.2785. ISSN 1682-024X. PMC 7306967. PMID 32582310.
  46. Hew, Khe Foon; Jia, Chengyuan; Gonda, Donn Emmanuel; Bai, Shurui (21 December 2020). "Transitioning to the "new normal" of learning in unpredictable times: pedagogical practices and learning performance in fully online flipped classrooms". International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. 17 (1): 57. doi:10.1186/s41239-020-00234-x. ISSN 2365-9440. PMC 7750097. PMID 34778516.
  47. Bower, Matt (1 May 2011). "Synchronous collaboration competencies in web‐conferencing environments – their impact on the learning process". Distance Education. 32 (1): 63–83. doi:10.1080/01587919.2011.565502. ISSN 0158-7919. S2CID 17247273.
  48. Veletsianos, George (2020). Learning online : the student experience. Johns Hopkins University. Press. Baltimore, Maryland. ISBN 978-1-4214-3810-8. OCLC 1145122616.
  49. Lever-Duffy, Judy; McDonald, Jean B (March 2007). Teaching and Learning with Technology. Ana A. Ciereszko, Al P. Mizell (3rd ed.). Allyn & Bacon. p. 377. ISBN 978-0-205-51191-4. Retrieved 23 January 2011.
  50. Brown, Robbie. (2013). A Swiveling Proxy That Will Even Wear a Tutu. New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/08/education/for-homebound-students-a-robot-proxy-in-the-classroom.html
  51. Elizabeth Regan. (2015). "Robot brings classroom to sick students Retrieved from http://www.norwichbulletin.com/article/20141109/NEWS/141109566?pagewanted=all&_r=0
  52. "From a Spot on the Wall to a Seat at the Table – CEPSE/COE Design Studio". Archived from the original on 8 November 2018. Retrieved 25 June 2016.
  53. Leila Meyer. (2015). "Michigan State Tests Telepresence Robots for Online Students" Retrieved from https://campustechnology.com/articles/2015/02/24/michigan-state-tests-telepresence-robots-for-online-students.aspx
  54. Burns, Mary. Distance Education for Teacher Training: Modes, Models and Methods. Retrieved 10 September 2012.
  55. "Air college talk". WNYC. 2 December 1931. Retrieved 5 November 2016.
  56. Larry Cuban. (1986). Teachers and Machines: The Classroom Use of Technology Since 1920, pp 11–18 online
  57. Tyson, Levering (1936). "Ten Years of Educational Broadcasting". School and Society. 44: 225–31.
  58. Lloyd Allen Cook. (1938). Community Backgrounds of Education: A Textbook and Educational Sociology, pp 249–250
  59. Strauss, Valerie; Hines, Michael. "Perspective | In Chicago, schools closed during a 1937 polio epidemic and kids learned from home — over the radio". Washington Post. Retrieved 16 August 2021.
  60. White, Theresa Mary (1988). "Coping with Administrative Pressures in the Chicago Schools' Superintendency: An Analysis of William Henry Johnson, 1936-1946". Loyola University Chicago. p. 126. Retrieved 15 August 2021.
  61. Foss, Katherine A. (5 October 2020). "Remote learning isn't new: Radio instruction in the 1937 polio epidemic". The Conversation. Retrieved 16 August 2021.
  62. Dwayne D. Cox and William J. Morison. (1999). The University of Louisville, pp 115–117
  63. Vyse, Stuart. "Before Carl Sagan and Neil deGrasse Tyson, There Was Dan Q. Posin". Committee for Skeptical Inquiry. Archived from the original on 24 April 2018. Retrieved 25 April 2018.
  64. Cuban. (1986). Teachers and Machines: The Classroom Use of Technology Since 1920, pp 19–26
  65. Christopher H. Sterling; Cary O'Dell (2011). The Concise Encyclopedia of American Radio. Routledge. p. 609. ISBN 978-1-135-17684-6.
  66. Robert J. Taggart. (2007). "The Promise and Failure of Educational Television in a Statewide System: Delaware, 1964–1971." American Educational History Journal, 24 (1), 111–122. online
  67. Cuban. (1986).Teachers and Machines: The Classroom Use of Technology Since 1920, pp 27–50
  68. Gold, Larry; Maitland, Christine (1999). Phipps, Ronald A.; Merisotis, Jamie P. (eds.). What's the difference? A review of contemporary research on the effectiveness of distance learning in higher education. Washington, DC: Institute for Higher Education Policy. Retrieved 23 January 2011.
  69. Withrow, Frank (1 June 1997). "Technology in Education and the Next Twenty-Five Years -- THE Journal". T.H.E. Journal.
  70. Ray Percival (28 November 1995). "Carry on learning". New Scientist.
  71. Gail S. Thomas (1 February 1988). "Connected Education, Inc". Netweaver. Electronic Networking Association. Archived from the original on 27 August 2008. Retrieved 25 August 2008.
  72. Bates, Tony (18 January 2016). "Celebrating the 30th anniversary of the first fully online course | Tony Bates". www.tonybates.ca. Retrieved 12 June 2019.
  73. "Accreditation". US: Jones International University. Archived from the original on 21 April 2013. Retrieved 23 January 2011.
  74. Walton Radford, MPR Associates, Alexandria. "Learning at a Distance: Undergraduate Enrollment in Distance Education Courses and Degree Programs" (PDF). National Center for Education Statistics. Archived (PDF) from the original on 16 October 2011. Retrieved 30 November 2011.
  75. "Accreditation". DEAC. Retrieved 20 September 2016.
  76. Lederman, Doug (8 January 2013). "Growth for Online Learning". InsideHigherEd. Retrieved 30 March 2013.
  77. Blackmore, C., van Deurzen, E., & Tantam, D. (2007). Therapy training online: Using the internet to widen access to training in mental health issues. In T. Stickley & T. Basset (Eds.) Teaching Mental Health (pgs. 337-352). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
  78. Jedlicka, J. S., Brown, S. W., Bunch, A. E., & Jaffe, L. E. (2002). A comparison of distance education instructional methods in occupational therapy. Journal of Allied Health, 31(4), 247-251.
  79. Stanton, S. (2001). Going the distance; Developing shared web-based learning programmes. Occupational Therapy International, 8(2), 96-106.
  80. Maggio, L. M., Chenail, R., & Todd, T. (2001). Teaching family therapy in an electronic age. Journal of Systemic Therapies, 20(1), 13-23.
  81. Orr, P. (2010). Distance supervision: Research, findings, and considerations for art therapy. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 37, 106-111.
  82. Stebnicki, M. A. & Glover, N. M. (2001). E-supervision as a complementary approach to traditional face-to-face clinical supervision in rehabilitation counseling: Problems and solutions. Rehabilitation Education, 15(3), 283-293.
  83. Olszewski-Kubilius, Paula; Corwith, Susan. "Distance Education: Where It Started and Where It Stands for Gifted Children and Their Educators." Gifted Child Today, v. 34 issue 3, 2011, pp. 16–24,.
  84. Sazmandasfaranjan, Yasha; Shirzad, Farzad; Baradari, Fatemeh; Salimi, Meysam; Salehi, Mehrdad (2013). "Alleviating the Senses of Isolation and Alienation in the Virtual World: Socialization in Distance Education". Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 93: 332–7. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.09.199.
  85. "Community of Inquiry site". Athabasca University.
  86. Anderson, Terry; Dron, Jon (2011). "Three generations of distance education pedagogy". The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning. 12 (3): 80–97. doi:10.19173/irrodl.v12i3.890.
  87. Oblinger, Diana G. (2000). "The Nature and Purpose of Distance Education". The Technology Source. Michigan: Michigan Virtual University (March/April). Archived from the original on 18 July 2011. Retrieved 23 January 2011.
  88. Masson, M (December 2014). "Benefits of TED Talks". Canadian Family Physician. 60 (12): 1080. PMC 4264800. PMID 25500595.
  89. Fischer, Christian; Baker, Rachel; Li, Qiujie; Orona, Gabe Avakian; Warschauer, Mark (2022). "Increasing success in Higher Education: The relationships of online course taking with college completion and time-to-degree". Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. 44 (3): 355–379. doi:10.3102/01623737211055768. ISSN 0162-3737. S2CID 244498785.
  90. Nguyen, Tuan (June 2015). "The Effectiveness of Online Learning: Beyond No Significant Difference and Future Horizons" (PDF). MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching. 11 (2): 309–319. Archived (PDF) from the original on 6 September 2015.
  91. "Educational Benefits of Online Learning" (PDF). CalPoly.edu. 1998: 1–6. Archived from the original (PDF) on 18 April 2013. Retrieved 29 March 2013. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  92. Yuan, Y. Connie; Gay, Geri (2006). "Homophily of Network Ties and Bonding and Bridging Social Capital in Computer-Mediated Distributed Teams". Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 11 (4): 1062–84. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00308.x.
  93. "Benefits of Online Education". Worldwidelearn.com. Retrieved 1 April 2013.
  94. Kirtman, Lisa (Fall 2009). "Online Versus In-Class Courses: An Examination of Differences in Learning Outcomes" (PDF). Issues in Teacher Education. 18 (2): 103–115. Archived (PDF) from the original on 6 June 2013. Retrieved 30 March 2013.
  95. Woods, Michael L.; Maiden, Jeffrey; Brandes, Joyce A. (15 December 2011). "An Exploration of the Representation of Students with Disabilities in Distance Education". Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration. 14 (4). Retrieved 7 December 2012.
  96. Brown, Robbie. (2013). The New York Times. A Swiveling Proxy That Will Even Wear a Tutu
  97. Reganeregan@norwichbulletin.com(860) 425-4256, Elizabeth. "Robot brings classroom to sick students". The Bulletin.
  98. Elizabeth Regan (2014). "Robot brings classroom to sick students". Norwich Bulletin. Archived from the original on 17 November 2020.
  99. "Cyber-charter Schools: The end of Public Education or a New Beginning". 22 November 2010.
  100. Burgstahler, S.,"Equal Access: Universal Design of Distance Learning". Retrieved 12 February 2013.
  101. Casey, Anne Marie; Lorenzen, Michael (2010). "Untapped Potential: Seeking Library Donors among Alumni of Distance Learning Programs". Journal of Library Administration. 50 (5–6): 515–29. doi:10.1080/01930826.2010.488597. S2CID 62142672.
  102. Andreas Kaplan (2021). "Business Schools: Going Digital Simply Must Make Sense!".
  103. Suburban, Joel Goldenberg The. "Quebec can become a 'leader in distance learning" at universities: MEI". The Suburban Newspaper. Retrieved 13 October 2021.
  104. Östlund, Berit. "Stress, disruption and community — Adult learners' experiences of obstacles and opportunities in distance education". Department of Child and Youth Education, Special Education and Counselling, Umeå University. Archived from the original on 25 April 2012. Retrieved 3 December 2011.
  105. Galusha, Jill M. "Barriers to Learning in Distance Education". Archived from the original on 29 February 2000. Retrieved 10 April 2012.
  106. Stephens, D. (July 2007). "Quality issues in distance learning" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 1 June 2012.
  107. Gabriel (March 2011). "Online and Hybrid Course Enrollment and Performance in Washington State Community and Technical Colleges".
  108. "Unleashing the potential of ODL - "Reaching the unreached"" (PDF). Symbiosis Center for Distance Learning. 24 January 2018. Archived from the original (PDF) on 25 January 2018.
  109. "GoDaddy Corporate Domains - Protected".
  110. Barwick, Daniel W. "Views: Does Class Size Matter?". Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved 3 October 2011.
  111. Hellman, Judith Adler. "The Riddle of Distance Education." Geneva. 1 June 2003.
  112. Nasiri, Fuzhan; Mafakheri, Fereshteh (2014). "Postgraduate research supervision at a distance: A review of challenges and strategies". Studies in Higher Education. 40 (10): 1962–9. doi:10.1080/03075079.2014.914906. S2CID 144996503.
  113. Garrison, D.R. (20 May 2011). E-Learning in the 21st Century: A Framework for Research and Practice. New York: Taylor & Francis. ISBN 0-203-83876-9
  114. Soekartawi, Haryono, A. & Librero, F. 2002. Greater Learning Opportunities Through Distance Education: Experiences in Indonesia and the Philippines. Journal of Southeast Asian Education, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 283–320. Retrieved from
  115. Keevy, James; Chakroun, Borhene (2015). Level-setting and recognition of learning outcomes: The use of level descriptors in the twenty-first century (PDF). Paris, UNESCO. pp. 129–131. ISBN 978-92-3-100138-3.

Further reading

  • Anderson, T. (2008). Theory and Practice of Online Education (2nd ed) ISBN 9781897425084
  • Anderson, T., & Dron, J. (2010). Three generations of distance education pedagogy. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(3), 80–97.
  • Bates, T. (2005). Technology, e-learning and distance education: RoutledgeFalmer.
  • Clark, J. J. (1906). "The Correspondence School--Its Relation to Technical Education and Some of Its Results". Science. 24 (611): 327–34. Bibcode:1906Sci....24..327C. doi:10.1126/science.24.611.327. PMID 17772791.
  • Hampel, Robert L (2010). "The Business of Education: Home Study at Columbia University and the University of Wisconsin in the 1920s and 1930s". Teachers College Record. 112 (9): 2496–2517. doi:10.1177/016146811011200905. S2CID 141830291.
  • Holmberg, Börje. (1995). Theory and Practice of Distance Education (2nd ed) online
  • Jacob, J.U., Ensign M. (2020). Transactional Radio Instruction: Improving Educational Outcomes for Children in Conflict Zones, Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32369-1.
  • Kett, Joseph F. (1994). Pursuit of Knowledge Under Difficulties: From Self-Improvement to Adult Education in America ISBN 978-0804726801
  • Moore, Michael Grahame and William Anderson (2012). Handbook of Distance Education (2nd ed.). Psychology Press. ISBN 978-1-4106-0729-4. online edition
  • Major, C. H. (2015). Teaching online: A guide to theory, research, and practice. (Johns Hopkins University Press).
  • Moore, M. G. (1990). Contemporary issues in American distance education (Ed.)
  • Peters, O. (1994). Distance education and industrial production: A comparative interpretation in outline(1973). Otto Peters on distance education: The industrialization of teaching and learning, 107–127.
  • Saba, F. (2011). Distance Education in the United States: Past, Present, Future. Educational Technology, 51(6), 11.
  • Stubblefield, Harold W., and Patrick Keane. (1994). Adult Education in the American Experience: From the Colonial Period to the Present ISBN 978-0787900250
  • Taylor, J. C. (2001). Fifth-generation distance education. e-Journal of Instructional Science and Technology (e-JIST), 4(1), 1-14.
  • Terry Evans, M. H., David Murphy (Ed.). (2008). International Handbook of Distance Education. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
  • Walsh, T. (2011). Unlocking the Gates: How and Why Leading Universities Are Opening Up Access to Their Courses (Princeton University Press, 2011) online
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.