The subphylum Chelicerata (from New Latin, from French chélicère, from Ancient Greek χηλή (khēlḗ) 'claw, chela', and κέρας (kéras) 'horn')[1] constitutes one of the major subdivisions of the phylum Arthropoda. It contains the sea spiders, horseshoe crabs, and arachnids (including harvestmen, scorpions, spiders, solifuges, ticks, and mites, among many others), as well as a number of extinct lineages, such as the eurypterids (sea scorpions) and chasmataspidids.

Temporal range: Possible Fortunian record
A collection of modern and extinct chelicerates. Clockwise from top left: a sea spider, Pentecopterus (an extinct eurypterid), a spiny orb-weaver and an Atlantic horseshoe crab.
Scientific classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Arthropoda
Clade: Arachnomorpha
Subphylum: Chelicerata
Heymons, 1901
  • Habeliida
    • Habelia
    • Sanctacarididae
  • Mollisoniida
    • Mollisonia
    • Corcorania
    • Urokodia
    • Thelxiope
  • †Megacheira?
  • Pycnogonida
  • Euchelicerata
    • Dibasterium
    • †Offacolidae
    • Prosomapoda
  • Cheliceriformes Schram and Hedgpeth, 1978

The Chelicerata originated as marine animals in the Middle Cambrian period; the first confirmed chelicerate fossils, belonging to Sanctacaris, date from 508 million years ago.[2] The surviving marine species include the four species of xiphosurans (horseshoe crabs), and possibly the 1,300 species of pycnogonids (sea spiders), if the latter are indeed chelicerates. On the other hand, there are over 77,000 well-identified species of air-breathing chelicerates, and there may be about 500,000 unidentified species.

Like all arthropods, chelicerates have segmented bodies with jointed limbs, all covered in a cuticle made of chitin and proteins. The chelicerate body plan consists of two tagmata, the prosoma and the opisthosoma, except that mites have lost a visible division between these sections. The chelicerae, which give the group its name, are the only appendages that appear before the mouth. In most sub-groups, they are modest pincers used to feed. However, spiders' chelicerae form fangs that most species use to inject venom into prey. The group has the open circulatory system typical of arthropods, in which a tube-like heart pumps blood through the hemocoel, which is the major body cavity. Marine chelicerates have gills, while the air-breathing forms generally have both book lungs and tracheae. In general, the ganglia of living chelicerates' central nervous systems fuse into large masses in the cephalothorax, but there are wide variations and this fusion is very limited in the Mesothelae, which are regarded as the oldest and most basal group of spiders. Most chelicerates rely on modified bristles for touch and for information about vibrations, air currents, and chemical changes in their environment. The most active hunting spiders also have very acute eyesight.

Chelicerates were originally predators, but the group has diversified to use all the major feeding strategies: predation, parasitism, herbivory, scavenging and eating decaying organic matter. Although harvestmen can digest solid food, the guts of most modern chelicerates are too narrow for this, and they generally liquidize their food by grinding it with their chelicerae and pedipalps and flooding it with digestive enzymes. To conserve water, air-breathing chelicerates excrete waste as solids that are removed from their blood by Malpighian tubules, structures that also evolved independently in insects.[3]

While the marine horseshoe crabs rely on external fertilization, air-breathing chelicerates use internal but usually indirect fertilization. Many species use elaborate courtship rituals to attract mates. Most lay eggs that hatch as what look like miniature adults, but all scorpions and a few species of mites keep the eggs inside their bodies until the young emerge. In most chelicerate species the young have to fend for themselves, but in scorpions and some species of spider the females protect and feed their young.

The evolutionary origins of chelicerates from the early arthropods have been debated for decades. Although there is considerable agreement about the relationships between most chelicerate sub-groups, the inclusion of the Pycnogonida in this taxon has recently been questioned (see below), and the exact position of scorpions is still controversial, though they were long considered the most basal of the arachnids.[4]

Venom has evolved three times in the chelicerates; spiders, scorpions and pseudoscorpions, or four times if the hematophagous secretions produced by ticks are included. In addition there have been undocumented descriptions of venom glands in Solifugae.[5] Chemical defense has been found in whip scorpions, shorttailed whipscorpions, harvestmen, beetle mites and sea spiders.[6][7][8]

Although the venom of a few spider and scorpion species can be very dangerous to humans, medical researchers are investigating the use of these venoms for the treatment of disorders ranging from cancer to erectile dysfunction. The medical industry also uses the blood of horseshoe crabs as a test for the presence of contaminant bacteria. Mites can cause allergies in humans, transmit several diseases to humans and their livestock, and are serious agricultural pests.


    = acron
    = segments contributing to the head
    = body segments
x = lost during development
    = eyes
    = nephridia
O = nephridia lost during development
L = Leg
Mnd = Mandible
Mx = Maxilla
Formation of anterior segments across arthropod taxa based on previous hypothesis.[9] Note the antenna-bearing somite 1 was thought to be lost in Chelicerata.
Formation of anterior segments across arthropod taxa based on gene expression and neuroanatomical observations,[10][11] Note the chelicera(Ch) and chelifore(Chf) arose from somite 1 and thus correspond to the first antenna(An/An1) of other arthropods.

Segmentation and cuticle

The Chelicerata are arthropods as they have: segmented bodies with jointed limbs, all covered in a cuticle made of chitin and proteins; heads that are composed of several segments that fuse during the development of the embryo; a much reduced coelom; a hemocoel through which the blood circulates, driven by a tube-like heart.[9] Chelicerates' bodies consist of two tagmata, sets of segments that serve similar functions: the foremost one, called the prosoma or cephalothorax, and the rear tagma is called the opisthosoma or abdomen.[12] However, in the Acari (mites and ticks) there is no visible division between these sections.[13]

The prosoma is formed in the embryo by fusion of the ocular somite (referred as "acron" in previous literatures), which carries the eyes and labrum,[11] with six post-ocular segments (somite 1 to 6),[10] which all have paired appendages. It was previously thought that chelicerates had lost the antennae-bearing somite 1,[14] but later investigations reveal that it is retained and corresponds to a pair of chelicerae or chelifores,[15] small appendages that often form pincers. somite 2 has a pair of pedipalps that in most sub-groups perform sensory functions, while the remaining four cephalothorax segments (somite 4 to 6) have pairs of legs.[10] In basal forms the ocular somite has a pair of compound eyes on the sides and four pigment-cup ocelli ("little eyes") in the middle.[12] The mouth is between somite 1 and 2 (chelicerae and pedipalps).

The opisthosoma consists of thirteen or fewer segments, may or may not end with a telson.[10] In some taxa such as scorpion and eurypterid the opisthosoma divided into two groups, mesosoma and metasoma.[10] The abdominal appendages of modern chelicerates are missing or heavily modified[12] – for example in spiders the remaining appendages form spinnerets that extrude silk,[16] while those of horseshoe crabs (Xiphosura) form gills.[17][10]

Like all arthropods, chelicerates' bodies and appendages are covered with a tough cuticle made mainly of chitin and chemically hardened proteins. Since this cannot stretch, the animals must molt to grow. In other words, they grow new but still soft cuticles, then cast off the old one and wait for the new one to harden. Until the new cuticle hardens the animals are defenseless and almost immobilized.[18]

Phidippus johnsoni chelicera (green) and pedipalps (bottom)

Chelicerae and pedipalps

Chelicerae and pedipalps are the two pairs of appendages closest to the mouth; they vary widely in form and function and the consistent difference between them is their position in the embryo and corresponding neurons: chelicerae are deutocerebral and arise from somite 1, ahead of the mouth, while pedipalps are tritocerebral and arise from somite 2, behind the mouth.[12][10][11]

The chelicerae ("claw horns") that give the sub-phylum its name normally consist of three sections, and the claw is formed by the third section and a rigid extension of the second.[12][19] However, spiders' have only two sections, and the second forms a fang that folds away behind the first when not in use.[16] The relative sizes of chelicerae vary widely: those of some fossil eurypterids and modern harvestmen form large claws that extended ahead of the body,[19] while scorpions' are tiny pincers that are used in feeding and project only slightly in front of the head.[20]

In basal chelicerates, the pedipalps are unspecialized and subequal to the posterior pairs of walking legs.[10] However, in sea spider and arachnids, the pedipalps are more or less specialized for sensory[12] or prey-catching function[10] – for example scorpions have pincers[20] and male spiders have bulbous tips that act as syringes to inject sperm into the females' reproductive openings when mating.[16]

    Nervous system
    Digestive & excretory
    Circulatory system
    Respiratory system
    Reproductive system
  1 Chelicera
  2 Venom gland
  3 Brain
  4 Pumping stomach
  5 Forward aorta branch
  6 Digestive cecum
  7 Heart
  8 Midgut
10 Stercoral pocket
11 Rear aorta
15 Ovary (female)
18 Legs
Spider's main organs[21]

Body cavities and circulatory systems

As in all arthropods, the chelicerate body has a very small coelom restricted to small areas round the reproductive and excretory systems. The main body cavity is a hemocoel that runs most of the length of the body and through which blood flows, driven by a tubular heart that collects blood from the rear and pumps it forward. Although arteries direct the blood to specific parts of the body, they have open ends rather than joining directly to veins, and chelicerates therefore have open circulatory systems as is typical for arthropods.[22]

Respiratory systems

These depend on individual sub-groups' environments. Modern terrestrial chelicerates generally have both book lungs, which deliver oxygen and remove waste gases via the blood, and tracheae, which do the same without using the blood as a transport system.[23] The living horseshoe crabs are aquatic and have book gills that lie in a horizontal plane. For a long time it was assumed that the extinct eurypterids had gills, but the fossil evidence was ambiguous. However, a fossil of the 45 millimetres (1.8 in) long eurypterid Onychopterella, from the Late Ordovician period, has what appear to be four pairs of vertically oriented book gills whose internal structure is very similar to that of scorpions' book lungs.[24]

Feeding and digestion

The guts of most modern chelicerates are too narrow to take solid food.[23] All scorpions and almost all spiders are predators that "pre-process" food in preoral cavities formed by the chelicerae and the bases of the pedipalps.[16][20] However, one predominantly herbivore spider species is known,[25] and many supplement their diets with nectar and pollen.[26] Many of the Acari (ticks and mites) are blood-sucking parasites, but there are many predatory, herbivore and scavenger sub-groups. All the Acari have a retractable feeding assembly that consists of the chelicerae, pedipalps and parts of the exoskeleton, and which forms a preoral cavity for pre-processing food.[13]

Harvestmen are among the minority of living chelicerates that can take solid food, and the group includes predators, herbivores and scavengers.[27] Horseshoe crabs are also capable of processing solid food, and use a distinctive feeding system. Claws at the tips of their legs grab small invertebrates and pass them to a food groove that runs from between the rearmost legs to the mouth, which is on the underside of the head and faces slightly backwards. The bases of the legs form toothed gnathobases that both grind the food and push it towards the mouth.[17] This is how the earliest arthropods are thought to have fed.[28]


Horseshoe crabs convert nitrogenous wastes to ammonia and dump it via their gills, and excrete other wastes as feces via the anus. They also have nephridia ("little kidneys"), which extract other wastes for excretion as urine.[17] Ammonia is so toxic that it must be diluted rapidly with large quantities of water.[29] Most terrestrial chelicerates cannot afford to use so much water and therefore convert nitrogenous wastes to other chemicals, which they excrete as dry matter. Extraction is by various combinations of nephridia and Malpighian tubules. The tubules filter wastes out of the blood and dump them into the hindgut as solids, a system that has evolved independently in insects and several groups of arachnids.[23]

Nervous system

 Cephalothorax ganglia fused into brainAbdominal ganglia fused into brain
Horseshoe crabs AllFirst two segments only
Scorpions AllNone
Mesothelae First two pairs onlyNone
Other arachnids AllAll

Chelicerate nervous systems are based on the standard arthropod model of a pair of nerve cords, each with a ganglion per segment, and a brain formed by fusion of the ganglia just behind the mouth with those ahead of it.[30] If one assume that chelicerates lose the first segment, which bears antennae in other arthropods, chelicerate brains include only one pair of pre-oral ganglia instead of two.[12] However, there is evidence that the first segment is indeed available and bears the cheliceres.[31][15]

There is a notable but variable trend towards fusion of other ganglia into the brain. The brains of horseshoe crabs include all the ganglia of the prosoma plus those of the first two opisthosomal segments, while the other opisthosomal segments retain separate pairs of ganglia.[17] In most living arachnids, except scorpions if they are true arachnids, all the ganglia, including those that would normally be in the opisthosoma, are fused into a single mass in the prosoma and there are no ganglia in the opisthosoma.[23] However, in the Mesothelae, which are regarded as the most basal living spiders, the ganglia of the opisthosoma and the rear part of the prosoma remain unfused,[32] and in scorpions the ganglia of the cephalothorax are fused but the abdomen retains separate pairs of ganglia.[23]


As with other arthropods, chelicerates' cuticles would block out information about the outside world, except that they are penetrated by many sensors or connections from sensors to the nervous system. In fact, spiders and other arthropods have modified their cuticles into elaborate arrays of sensors. Various touch and vibration sensors, mostly bristles called setae, respond to different levels of force, from strong contact to very weak air currents. Chemical sensors provide equivalents of taste and smell, often by means of setae.[33]

Living chelicerates have both compound eyes (only in horseshoe crabs, as the compound eye in the other clades has been reduced to a cluster of no more than five pairs of ocelli), mounted on the sides of the head, plus pigment-cup ocelli ("little eyes"), mounted in the middle. These median ocelli-type eyes in chelicerates are assumed to be homologous with the crustacean nauplius eyes and the insect ocelli.[34] The eyes of horseshoe crabs can detect movement but not form images.[17] At the other extreme, jumping spiders have a very wide field of vision,[16] and their main eyes are ten times as acute as those of dragonflies,[35] able to see in both colors and UV-light.[36]


Female scorpion Compsobuthus werneri carrying its young (white)

Horseshoe crabs, which are aquatic, use external fertilization, in other words the sperm and ova meet outside the parents' bodies. Their trilobite-like larvae look rather like miniature adults as they have full sets of appendages and eyes, but initially they have only two pairs of book-gills and gain three more pairs as they molt.[17]

Being air-breathing animals, the living arachnids (excluding horseshoe crabs) use internal fertilization, which is direct in some species, in other words the males' genitalia make contact with the females'. However, in most species fertilization is indirect. Male spiders use their pedipalps as syringes to "inject" sperm into the females' reproductive openings,[16] but most arachnids produce spermatophores (packages of sperm) which the females take into their bodies.[23] Courtship rituals are common, especially in the most powerful predators, where males risk being eaten before mating. Most arachnids lay eggs, but all scorpions and a few mites keep the eggs inside their bodies until they hatch and offspring rather like miniature adults emerge.[23]

Levels of parental care for the young range from zero to prolonged. Scorpions carry their young on their backs until the first molt, and in a few semi-social species the young remain with their mother.[37] Some spiders care for their young, for example a wolf spider's brood cling to rough bristles on the mother's back,[16] and females of some species respond to the "begging" behavior of their young by giving them their prey, provided it is no longer struggling, or even regurgitate food.[38]

Evolutionary history

Fossil record

There are large gaps in the chelicerates' fossil record because, like all arthropods, their exoskeletons are organic and hence their fossils are rare except in a few lagerstätten where conditions were exceptionally suited to preserving fairly soft tissues. The Burgess shale animals like Sidneyia from about 505 million years ago have been classified as chelicerates, the latter because its appendages resemble those of the Xiphosura (horseshoe crabs). However, cladistic analyses that consider wider ranges of characteristics place neither as chelicerates. There is debate about whether Fuxianhuia from earlier in the Cambrian period, about 525 million years ago, was a chelicerate. Another Cambrian fossil, Kodymirus, was originally classified as an aglaspid but may have been a eurypterid and therefore a chelicerate. If any of these was closely related to chelicerates, there is a gap of at least 43 million years in the record between true chelicerates and their nearest not-quite chelicerate relatives.[39]

Sanctacaris, member of the family Sanctacarididae from the Burgess Shale of Canada, represents the oldest occurrence of a confirmed chelicerate, Middle Cambrian in age.[2] Although its chelicerate nature has been doubted for its pattern of tagmosis (how the segments are grouped, especially in the head),[39] a restudy in 2014 confirmed its phylogenetic position as the oldest chelicerate.[2]

The eurypterids have left few good fossils and one of the earliest confirmed eurypterid, Pentecopterus decorahensis, appears in the Middle Ordovician period 467.3 million years ago, making it the oldest eurypterid.[40] Until recently the earliest known xiphosuran fossil dated from the Late Llandovery stage of the Silurian 436 to 428 million years ago,[41] but in 2008 an older specimen described as Lunataspis aurora was reported from about 445 million years ago in the Late Ordovician.[42]

The oldest known arachnid is the trigonotarbid Palaeotarbus jerami, from about 420 million years ago in the Silurian period, and had a triangular cephalothorax and segmented abdomen, as well as eight legs and a pair of pedipalps.[43]

Attercopus fimbriunguis, from 386 million years ago in the Devonian period, bears the earliest known silk-producing spigots, and was therefore hailed as a spider,[44] but it lacked spinnerets and hence was not a true spider.[45] Rather, it was likely sister group to the spiders, a clade which has been named Serikodiastida.[46] Close relatives of the group survived through to the Cretaceous Period.[47] Several Carboniferous spiders were members of the Mesothelae, a basal group now represented only by the Liphistiidae,[44] and fossils suggest taxa closely related to the spiders, but which were not true members of the group were also present during this Period.[48]

The Late Silurian Proscorpius has been classified as a scorpion, but differed significantly from modern scorpions: it appears wholly aquatic since it had gills rather than book lungs or tracheae; its mouth was completely under its head and almost between the first pair of legs, as in the extinct eurypterids and living horseshoe crabs.[49] Fossils of terrestrial scorpions with book lungs have been found in Early Devonian rocks from about 402 million years ago.[50] The oldest species of scorpion found as of 2021 is Dolichophonus loudonensis, which lived during the Silurian, in present-day Scotland.[51]

Relationships with other arthropods







 A recent view of chelicerate phylogeny[52]
 A "traditional" view of chelicerate phylogeny[53][54]

The "traditional" view of the arthropod "family tree" shows chelicerates as less closely related to the other major living groups (crustaceans; hexapods, which includes insects; and myriapods, which includes centipedes and millipedes) than these other groups are to each other. Recent research since 2001, using both molecular phylogenetics (the application of cladistic analysis to biochemistry, especially to organisms' DNA and RNA) and detailed examination of how various arthropods' nervous systems develop in the embryos, suggests that chelicerates are most closely related to myriapods, while hexapods and crustaceans are each other's closest relatives. However, these results are derived from analyzing only living arthropods, and including extinct ones such as trilobites causes a swing back to the "traditional" view, placing trilobites as the sister-group of the Tracheata (hexapods plus myriapods) and chelicerates as least closely related to the other groups.[55]

Major sub-groups


Xiphosura (horseshoe crabs)





Opiliones (harvestmen)


Solifugae (sun spiders)

Palpigradi (microwhip scorpions)


Araneae (spiders)


Amblypygi (whip spiders)

Thelyphonida (whip scorpions)


Ricinulei (hooded tickspiders)


Acariformes (mites)

Shultz (2007)'s evolutionary family tree of arachnids[56] marks extinct groups.

It is generally agreed that the Chelicerata contain the classes Arachnida (spiders, scorpions, mites, etc.), Xiphosura (horseshoe crabs) and Eurypterida (sea scorpions, extinct).[56] The extinct Chasmataspidida may be a sub-group within Eurypterida.[56][57] The Pycnogonida (sea spiders) were traditionally classified as chelicerates, but some features suggest they may be representatives of the earliest arthropods from which the well-known groups such as chelicerates evolved.[58]

However, the structure of "family tree" relationships within the Chelicerata has been controversial ever since the late 19th century. An attempt in 2002 to combine analysis of RNA features of modern chelicerates and anatomical features of modern and fossil ones produced credible results for many lower-level groups, but its results for the high-level relationships between major sub-groups of chelicerates were unstable, in other words minor changes in the inputs caused significant changes in the outputs of the computer program used (POY).[59] An analysis in 2007 using only anatomical features produced the cladogram on the right, but also noted that many uncertainties remain.[60] In recent analyses the clade Tetrapulmonata is reliably recovered, but other ordinal relationships remain in flux.[47][61][48][62][63][64][65]

The position of scorpions is particularly controversial. Some early fossils such as the Late Silurian Proscorpius have been classified by paleontologists as scorpions, but described as wholly aquatic as they had gills rather than book lungs or tracheae. Their mouths are also completely under their heads and almost between the first pair of legs, as in the extinct eurypterids and living horseshoe crabs.[49] This presents a difficult choice: classify Proscorpius and other aquatic fossils as something other than scorpions, despite the similarities; accept that "scorpions" are not monophyletic but consist of separate aquatic and terrestrial groups;[49] or treat scorpions as more closely related to eurypterids and possibly horseshoe crabs than to spiders and other arachnids,[24] so that either scorpions are not arachnids or "arachnids" are not monophyletic.[49] Cladistic analyses have recovered Proscorpius within the scorpions,[46] based on reinterpretation of the species' breathing apparatus.[66] This is reflected also in the reinterpretation of Palaeoscorpius as a terrestrial animal.[67]

A 2013 phylogenetic analysis[68] (the results presented in a cladogram below) on the relationships within the Xiphosura and the relations to other closely related groups (including the eurypterids, which were represented in the analysis by genera Eurypterus, Parastylonurus, Rhenopterus and Stoermeropterus) concluded that the Xiphosura, as presently understood, was paraphyletic (a group sharing a last common ancestor but not including all descendants of this ancestor) and thus not a valid phylogenetic group. Eurypterids were recovered as closely related to arachnids instead of xiphosurans, forming the group Sclerophorata within the clade Dekatriata (composed of sclerophorates and chasmataspidids). This work suggested it is possible that Dekatriata is synonymous with Sclerophorata as the reproductive system, the primary defining feature of sclerophorates, has not been thoroughly studied in chasmataspidids. Dekatriata is in turn part of the Prosomapoda, a group including the Xiphosurida (the only monophyletic xiphosuran group) and other stem-genera. A recent phylogenetic analysis of the chelicerates places the Xiphosura within the Arachnida as the sister group of Ricinulei.,[65] but others still retrieve a monophyletic arachnida.[69]










































Although well behind the insects, chelicerates are one of the most diverse groups of animals, with over 77,000 living species that have been described in scientific publications.[70] Some estimates suggest that there may be 130,000 undescribed species of spider and nearly 500,000 undescribed species of mites and ticks.[71] While the earliest chelicerates and the living Pycnogonida (if they are chelicerates[58]) and Xiphosura are marine animals that breathe dissolved oxygen, the vast majority of living species are air-breathers,[70] although a few spider species build "diving bell" webs that enable them to live under water.[72] Like their ancestors, most living chelicerates are carnivores, mainly on small invertebrates. However, many species feed as parasites, herbivores, scavengers and detritivores.[13][27][70]

Diversity of living chelicerates
GroupDescribed species[70][73][74]Diet
Pycnogonida (sea-spiders) 500Carnivorous[70]
Araneae (spiders) 50,300Carnivorous;[70] 1 herbivore[25]
Acari (mites and ticks) 32,000Carnivorous, parasitic, herbivore, detritivore[13][70]
Opiliones (harvestmen) 6,500Carnivorous, herbivore, detritivore[27]
Pseudoscorpiones (false scorpions) 3,200Carnivorous[75]
Scorpiones (scorpions) 1,400Carnivorous[20]
Solifugae (sunspiders) 900Carnivorous, omnivorous[76]
Schizomida (small whipscorpions) 180 
Amblypygi (whipspiders) 100 
Uropygi (Thelyphonida – whipscorpions) 90Carnivorous[77]
Palpigradi (micro whipscorpions) 60 
Xiphosura (horseshoe crabs) 4Carnivorous[70]
Ricinulei 60 

Interaction with humans

A microscopic mite Lorryia formosa.

In the past, Native Americans ate the flesh of horseshoe crabs, and used the tail spines as spear tips and the shells to bail water out of their canoes. More recent attempts to use horseshoe crabs as food for livestock were abandoned when it was found that this gave the meat a bad taste. Horseshoe crab blood contains a clotting agent, limulus amebocyte lysate, which is used to test antibiotics and kidney machines to ensure that they are free of dangerous bacteria, and to detect spinal meningitis and some cancers.[78]

Cooked tarantula spiders are considered a delicacy in Cambodia,[79] and by the Piaroa Indians of southern Venezuela.[80] Spider venoms may be a less polluting alternative to conventional pesticides as they are deadly to insects but the great majority are harmless to vertebrates.[81] Possible medical uses for spider venoms are being investigated, for the treatment of cardiac arrhythmia,[82] Alzheimer's disease,[83] strokes,[84] and erectile dysfunction.[85]

Because spider silk is both light and very strong, but large-scale harvesting from spiders is impractical, work is being done to produce it in other organisms by means of genetic engineering.[86] Spider silk proteins have been successfully produced in transgenic goats' milk,[87] tobacco leaves,[88] silkworms,[89][90][91] and bacteria,[86][92][93] and recombinant spider silk is now available as a commercial product from some biotechnology companies.[91]

In the 20th century, there were about 100 reliably reported deaths from spider bites,[94] compared with 1,500 from jellyfish stings.[95] Scorpion stings are thought to be a significant danger in less-developed countries; for example, they cause about 1,000 deaths per year in Mexico, but only one every few years in the USA. Most of these incidents are caused by accidental human "invasions" of scorpions' nests.[96] On the other hand, medical uses of scorpion venom are being investigated for treatment of brain cancers and bone diseases.[97][98]

Ticks are parasitic, and some transmit micro-organisms and parasites that can cause diseases in humans, while the saliva of a few species can directly cause tick paralysis if they are not removed within a day or two.[99]

A few of the closely related mites also infest humans, some causing intense itching by their bites, and others by burrowing into the skin. Species that normally infest other animals such as rodents may infest humans if their normal hosts are eliminated.[100] Three species of mite are a threat to honey bees and one of these, Varroa destructor, has become the largest single problem faced by beekeepers worldwide.[101] Mites cause several forms of allergic diseases, including hay fever, asthma and eczema, and they aggravate atopic dermatitis.[102] Mites are also significant crop pests, although predatory mites may be useful in controlling some of these.[70][103]

See also

  • Arthropods portal


  1. Barnes, R. S. K.; Calow, P. P.; Olive, P. J. W. (2009). The Invertebrates: A Synthesis (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons. p. 174. ISBN 978-1-4443-1233-1.
  2. Legg, David A. (2014). "Sanctacaris uncata: the oldest chelicerate (Arthropoda)". Naturwissenschaften. 101 (12): 1065–1073. Bibcode:2014NW....101.1065L. doi:10.1007/s00114-014-1245-4. PMID 25296691. S2CID 15290784.
  3. Garwood, Russell J.; Edgecombe, Gregory D. (2011). "Early Terrestrial Animals, Evolution, and Uncertainty". Evolution: Education and Outreach. 4 (3): 489–501. doi:10.1007/s12052-011-0357-y. ISSN 1936-6426.
  4. Margulis, Lynn; Schwartz, Karlene (1998), Five Kingdoms, An Illustrated Guide to the Phyla of Life on Earth (third ed.), W.H. Freeman and Company, ISBN 978-0-7167-3027-9
  5. von Reumont BM, Campbell LI, Jenner RA (2014). "Quo vadis venomics? A roadmap to neglected venomous invertebrates". Toxins (Basel). 6 (12): 3488–551. doi:10.3390/toxins6123488. PMC 4280546. PMID 25533518.
  6. Ecdysteroids from Pycnogonum litorale (Arthropoda, Pantopoda) act as chemical defense against Carcinus maenas (Crustacea, Decapoda)
  7. Gnaspini, Pedro; Hara, Marcos R. (2007). "Defense Mechanisms". In Pinto-da-Rocha, Ricardo; Machado, Glauco; Giribet, Gonzalo (eds.). Harvestmen: The Biology of Opiliones. Harvard University Press. p. 382. ISBN 9780674023437.
  8. Heethoff M, Koerner L, Norton RA, Raspotnig G (2011). "Tasty but protected--first evidence of chemical defense in oribatid mites". J Chem Ecol. 37 (9): 1037–43. doi:10.1007/s10886-011-0009-2. PMID 21898169. S2CID 23628645.
  9. Ruppert, Fox & Barnes 2004, pp. 518–522
  10. Dunlop, Jason A.; Lamsdell, James C. (2017). "Segmentation and tagmosis in Chelicerata". Arthropod Structure & Development. 46 (3): 395–418. doi:10.1016/j.asd.2016.05.002. ISSN 1467-8039. PMID 27240897.
  11. Ortega-Hernández, Javier; Janssen, Ralf; Budd, Graham E. (2017-05-01). "Origin and evolution of the panarthropod head – A palaeobiological and developmental perspective". Arthropod Structure & Development. Evolution of Segmentation. 46 (3): 354–379. doi:10.1016/j.asd.2016.10.011. ISSN 1467-8039. PMID 27989966.
  12. Ruppert, Fox & Barnes 2004, pp. 554–555
  13. Ruppert, Fox & Barnes 2004, pp. 591–595
  14. Willmer, P.; Willmer, P.G. (1990). Invertebrate Relationships: Patterns in animal evolution. Cambridge University Press. p. 275. ISBN 978-0-521-33712-0. Retrieved 14 October 2008 via Google Books.
  15. Telford, Maximilian J.; Thomas, Richard H. (1998-09-01). "Expression of homeobox genes shows chelicerate arthropods retain their deutocerebral segment". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 95 (18): 10671–10675. Bibcode:1998PNAS...9510671T. doi:10.1073/pnas.95.18.10671. ISSN 0027-8424. PMC 27953. PMID 9724762.
  16. Ruppert, Fox & Barnes 2004, pp. 571–584
  17. Ruppert, Fox & Barnes 2004, pp. 555–559
  18. Ruppert, Fox & Barnes 2004, pp. 521–525
  19. Braddy, S.J.; Poschmann, M. Markus & Tetlie, O.E. (2008). "Giant claw reveals the largest ever arthropod". Biology Letters. 4 (1): 106–109. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2007.0491. PMC 2412931. PMID 18029297.
  20. Ruppert, Fox & Barnes 2004, pp. 565–569
  21. Ruppert, E. E.; Fox, R. S. & Barnes, R. D. (2004). Invertebrate Zoology (7th ed.). Brooks / Cole. pp. 571–584. ISBN 0030259827.
  22. Ruppert, Fox & Barnes 2004, pp. 527–528
  23. Ruppert, Fox & Barnes 2004, pp. 559–564
  24. Braddy, S.J.; Aldridge, R.J.; Gabbott, S.E. & Theron, J.N. (1999), "Lamellate book-gills in a late Ordovician eurypterid from the Soom Shale, South Africa: Support for a eurypterid-scorpion clade", Lethaia, 32 (1): 72–74, doi:10.1111/j.1502-3931.1999.tb00582.x
  25. Meehan, C.J.; Olson, E.J.; Curry, R.L. (21 August 2008). Exploitation of the Pseudomyrmex–Acacia mutualism by a predominantly vegetarian jumping spider (Bagheera kiplingi). 93rd ESA Annual Meeting. Archived from the original on 1 December 2019. Retrieved 10 October 2008.
  26. Jackson, R.R.; et al. (2001), "Jumping spiders (Araneae: Salticidae) that feed on nectar" (PDF), Journal of Zoology, 255: 25–29, doi:10.1017/S095283690100108X
  27. Ruppert, Fox & Barnes 2004, pp. 588–590
  28. Gould, S.J. (1990). Wonderful Life: The Burgess Shale and the Nature of History. New York, NY: W.W. Norton; Hutchinson Radius. p. 105. ISBN 978-0-09-174271-3.
  29. Ruppert, Fox & Barnes 2004, pp. 529–530
  30. Ruppert, Fox & Barnes 2004, pp. 531–532
  31. Mittmann, B.; Scholtz, G. (2003). "Development of the nervous system in the "head" of Limulus polyphemus (Chelicerata: Xiphosura): Morphological evidence for a correspondence between the segments of the chelicerae and of the (first) antennae of Mandibulata". Dev Genes Evol. 213 (1): 9–17. doi:10.1007/s00427-002-0285-5. PMID 12590348. S2CID 13101102.
  32. Coddington, J.A.; Levi, H.W. (1991). "Systematics and Evolution of Spiders (Araneae)". Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 22: 565–592. doi:10.1146/ S2CID 55647804.
  33. Ruppert, Fox & Barnes 2004, pp. 532–537
  34. Samadi L, Schmid A, Eriksson BJ (2015). "Differential expression of retinal determination genes in the principal and secondary eyes of Cupiennius salei Keyserling (1877)". Evodevo. 6: 16. doi:10.1186/s13227-015-0010-x. PMC 4450993. PMID 26034575.
  35. Harland, D.P.; Jackson, R.R. (2000). ""Eight-legged cats" and how they see - a review of recent research on jumping spiders (Araneae: Salticidae)" (PDF). Cimbebasia. 16: 231–240. Archived from the original (PDF) on 28 September 2006. Retrieved 11 October 2008.
  36. "With their eight eyes, jumping spiders are true visionaries". NBC News. 2012-10-17.
  37. Lourenço, W.R. (2002). "Reproduction in scorpions, with special reference to parthenogenesis". In Toft, S.; Scharff, N. (eds.). European Arachnology 2000 (PDF). Aarhus University Press. pp. 71–85. ISBN 978-87-7934-001-5. Retrieved 28 September 2008.
  38. Foelix, R.F. (1996). "Reproduction". Biology of Spiders. Oxford University Press US. pp. 176–212. ISBN 978-0-19-509594-4. Retrieved 8 October 2008 via Google Books.
  39. Wills, M.A. (2001), "How good is the fossil record of arthropods? An assessment using the stratigraphic congruence of cladograms", Geological Journal, 36 (3–4): 187–210, doi:10.1002/gj.882, S2CID 86279530
  40. Lamsdell, James C.; Briggs, Derek E. G.; Liu, Huaibao; Witzke, Brian J.; McKay, Robert M. (2015), "The oldest described eurypterid: a giant Middle Ordovician (Darriwilian) megalograptid from the Winneshiek Lagerstätte of Iowa", BMC Evolutionary Biology, 15: 169, doi:10.1186/s12862-015-0443-9, PMC 4556007, PMID 26324341
  41. Moore, R.A.; Briggs, D.E.G.; Braddy, S.J.; Anderson, L.I.; Mikulic, D.G. & Kluessendorf, J. (March 2005), "A new synziphosurine (Chelicerata, Xiphosura) from the late Llandovery (Silurian) Waukesha Lagerstaette, Wisconsin, USA", Journal of Paleontology, 79 (2): 242–250, doi:10.1666/0022-3360(2005)079<0242:ANSCXF>2.0.CO;2, ISSN 0022-3360, S2CID 56570105
  42. Rudkin, D.M.; Young, G.A. & Nowlan, G.S. (January 2008), "The Oldest Horseshoe Crab: a New Xiphosurid from Late Ordovician Konservat-Lagerstätten Deposits, Manitoba, Canada", Palaeontology, 51 (1): 1–9, doi:10.1111/j.1475-4983.2007.00746.x, S2CID 62891048
  43. Dunlop, J.A. (September 1996), "A trigonotarbid arachnid from the Upper Silurian of Shropshire" (PDF), Palaeontology, 39 (3): 605–614, archived from the original (PDF) on 2008-12-16, retrieved 2008-10-12 The fossil was originally named Eotarbus but was renamed when it was realized that a Carboniferous arachnid had already been named Eotarbus: Dunlop, J.A. (1999), "A replacement name for the trigonotarbid arachnid Eotarbus Dunlop", Palaeontology, 42 (1): 191, doi:10.1111/1475-4983.00068, S2CID 83825904
  44. Vollrath, F.; Selden, P.A. (December 2007), "The Role of Behavior in the Evolution of Spiders, Silks, and Webs" (PDF), Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 38: 819–846, doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.37.091305.110221, archived from the original (PDF) on 2008-12-09, retrieved 2008-10-12
  45. Selden, P.A.; Shear, W.A. (July 2008), "Fossil evidence for the origin of spider spinnerets", PNAS, 105 (52): 20781–5, Bibcode:2008PNAS..10520781S, doi:10.1073/pnas.0809174106, PMC 2634869, PMID 19104044
  46. Garwood, Russell J.; Dunlop, Jason A. (2014). "Three-dimensional reconstruction and the phylogeny of extinct chelicerate orders". PeerJ. 2: e641. doi:10.7717/peerj.641. PMC 4232842. PMID 25405073.
  47. Wang, Bo; Dunlop, Jason A.; Selden, Paul A.; Garwood, Russell J.; Shear, William A.; Müller, Patrick; Lei, Xiaojie (2018). "Cretaceous arachnid Chimerarachne yingi gen. et sp. nov. illuminates spider origins". Nature Ecology & Evolution. 2 (4): 614–622. doi:10.1038/s41559-017-0449-3. ISSN 2397-334X. PMID 29403075. S2CID 4239867.
  48. Garwood, Russell J.; Dunlop, Jason A.; Selden, Paul A.; Spencer, Alan R. T.; Atwood, Robert C.; Vo, Nghia T.; Drakopoulos, Michael (2016). "Almost a spider: a 305-million-year-old fossil arachnid and spider origins". Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 283 (1827): 20160125. doi:10.1098/rspb.2016.0125. ISSN 0962-8452. PMC 4822468. PMID 27030415.
  49. Weygoldt, P. (February 1998), "Evolution and systematics of the Chelicerata", Experimental and Applied Acarology, 22 (2): 63–79, doi:10.1023/A:1006037525704, S2CID 35595726
  50. Shear, W.A., Gensel, P.G. and Jeram, A.J. (December 1996), "Fossils of large terrestrial arthropods from the Lower Devonian of Canada", Nature, 384 (6609): 555–557, Bibcode:1996Natur.384..555S, doi:10.1038/384555a0, S2CID 4367636{{citation}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  51. Anderson, Evan P.; Schiffbauer, James D.; Jacquet, Sarah M.; Lamsdell, James C.; Kluessendorf, Joanne; Mikulic, Donald G. (2021). "Stranger than a scorpion: a reassessment of Parioscorpio venator, a problematic arthropod from the Llandoverian Waukesha Lagerstätte". Palaeontology. 64 (3): 429–474. doi:10.1111/pala.12534. ISSN 1475-4983. S2CID 234812878.
  52. Giribet G, Edgecombe G (April 2013). "The Arthropoda: A Phylogenetic Framework". Arthropod Biology and Evolution: 17–40. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-36160-9_2. ISBN 978-3-642-36159-3.
  53. Turbeville J, Pfeifer D, Field K, Raff R (September 1991). "The phylogenetic status of arthropods, as inferred from 18S rRNA sequences". Molecular Biology and Evolution. 8 (5): 669–686. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040677. PMID 1766363.
  54. Giribet G, Ribera C (2000). "A Review of Arthropod Phylogeny: New Data Based on Ribosomal DNA Sequences and Direct Character Optimization". Cladistics. 16 (2): 204–231. doi:10.1111/j.1096-0031.2000.tb00353.x. PMID 34902954. S2CID 84370269.
  55. Jenner, R.A. (2006), "Challenging received wisdoms: Some contributions of the new microscopy to the new animal phylogeny", Integrative and Comparative Biology, 46 (2): 93–103, doi:10.1093/icb/icj014, PMID 21672726
  56. Schultz, J.W. (2007), "A phylogenetic analysis of the arachnid orders based on morphological characters", Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 150 (2): 221–265, doi:10.1111/j.1096-3642.2007.00284.x
  57. O. Tetlie, E.; Braddy, S.J. (2003), "The first Silurian chasmataspid, Loganamaraspis dunlopi gen. et sp. nov. (Chelicerata: Chasmataspidida) from Lesmahagow, Scotland, and its implications for eurypterid phylogeny", Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh: Earth Sciences, 94 (3): 227–234, doi:10.1017/S0263593300000638, S2CID 73596575
  58. Poschmann, M.; Dunlop, J.A. (2006), "A New Sea Spider (Arthropoda: Pycnogonida) with a Flagelliform Telson from the Lower Devonian Hunsrück Slate, Germany", Palaeontology, 49 (5): 983–989, doi:10.1111/j.1475-4983.2006.00583.x
  59. Gonzalo Giribet G., Edgecombe, G.D., Wheeler, W.C., and Babbitt, C. (2002), "Phylogeny and Systematic Position of Opiliones: A Combined Analysis of Chelicerate Relationships Using Morphological and Molecular Data", Cladistics, 18 (1): 5–70, doi:10.1111/j.1096-0031.2002.tb00140.x, PMID 14552352, S2CID 16833833{{citation}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  60. Shultz, J.W. (2007), "A phylogenetic analysis of the arachnid orders based on morphological characters", Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 150 (2): 221–265, doi:10.1111/j.1096-3642.2007.00284.x
  61. Garwood, Russell J.; Dunlop, Jason A.; Knecht, Brian J.; Hegna, Thomas A. (2017). "The phylogeny of fossil whip spiders". BMC Evolutionary Biology. 17 (1): 105. doi:10.1186/s12862-017-0931-1. ISSN 1471-2148. PMC 5399839. PMID 28431496.
  62. Garwood, Russell J.; Dunlop, Jason (2014). "Three-dimensional reconstruction and the phylogeny of extinct chelicerate orders". PeerJ. 2: e641. doi:10.7717/peerj.641. ISSN 2167-8359. PMC 4232842. PMID 25405073.
  63. Giribet, Gonzalo (2018). "Current views on chelicerate phylogeny—A tribute to Peter Weygoldt". Zoologischer Anzeiger. 273: 7–13. doi:10.1016/j.jcz.2018.01.004. ISSN 0044-5231. S2CID 90344977.
  64. Sharma, Prashant P.; Kaluziak, Stefan T.; Pérez-Porro, Alicia R.; González, Vanessa L.; Hormiga, Gustavo; Wheeler, Ward C.; Giribet, Gonzalo (2014). "Phylogenomic Interrogation of Arachnida Reveals Systemic Conflicts in Phylogenetic Signal". Molecular Biology and Evolution. 31 (11): 2963–2984. doi:10.1093/molbev/msu235. ISSN 1537-1719. PMID 25107551.
  65. Ballesteros, Jesús A; Sharma, Prashant P; Halanych, Ken (2019). "A Critical Appraisal of the Placement of Xiphosura (Chelicerata) with Account of Known Sources of Phylogenetic Error". Systematic Biology. 68 (6): 896–917. doi:10.1093/sysbio/syz011. ISSN 1063-5157. PMID 30917194.
  66. Jason A. Dunlop; O. Erik Tetlie; Lorenzo Prendini (2008). "Reinterpretation of the Silurian scorpion Proscorpius osborni (Whitfield): integrating data from Palaeozoic and recent scorpions". Palaeontology. 51 (2): 303–320. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4983.2007.00749.x. S2CID 53521811.
  67. G. Kühl; A. Bergmann; J. Dunlop; R. J. Garwood; J. Rust (2012). "Redescription and palaeobiology of Palaeoscorpius devonicus Lehmann, 1944 from the Lower Devonian Hunsrück Slate of Germany". Palaeontology. 55 (4): 775–787. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4983.2012.01152.x.
  68. Lamsdell, James C. (2013-01-01). "Revised systematics of Palaeozoic 'horseshoe crabs' and the myth of monophyletic Xiphosura". Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society. 167 (1): 1–27. doi:10.1111/j.1096-3642.2012.00874.x. ISSN 0024-4082.
  69. Lozano-Fernandez, Jesus; Tanner, Alastair R.; Giacomelli, Mattia; Carton, Robert; Vinther, Jakob; Edgecombe, Gregory D.; Pisani, Davide (2019). "Increasing species sampling in chelicerate genomic-scale datasets provides support for monophyly of Acari and Arachnida". Nature Communications. 10 (1): 2295. Bibcode:2019NatCo..10.2295L. doi:10.1038/s41467-019-10244-7. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 6534568. PMID 31127117.
  70. Shultz, J.W. (2001), "Chelicerata (Arachnids, Including Spiders, Mites and Scorpions)", Encyclopedia of Life Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., doi:10.1038/npg.els.0001605, ISBN 978-0470016176, S2CID 85601266
  71. Numbers of Living Species in Australia and the World (PDF), Department of the Environment and Heritage, Australian Government, September 2005, retrieved 2010-03-29
  72. Schütz, D.; Taborsky, M. (2003), "Adaptations to an aquatic life may be responsible for the reversed sexual size dimorphism in the water spider, Argyroneta aquatica" (PDF), Evolutionary Ecology Research, 5 (1): 105–117, archived from the original (PDF) on 2008-12-16, retrieved 2008-10-11
  73. Pinto-da-Rocha, R., G. Machado, G. Giribet. 2007. Harvestmen: The Biology of Opiliones. Harvard University Press. Cambridge, MA.
  74. World Spider Catalog (2022). World Spider Catalog. Version 23.5. Natural History Museum Bern, online at, accessed on {date of access}. doi: 10.24436/2
  75. Pseudoscorpion - Penn State Entomology Department Fact Sheet, Pennsylvania State University, retrieved 2008-10-26
  76. Ruppert, Fox & Barnes 2004, pp. 586–588
  77. Harvey, M.S. (2002), "The Neglected Cousins: What do we Know about the Smaller Arachnid Orders?" (PDF), Journal of Arachnology, 30 (2): 357–372, doi:10.1636/0161-8202(2002)030[0357:TNCWDW]2.0.CO;2, ISSN 0161-8202, S2CID 59047074, archived from the original (PDF) on 2010-12-13, retrieved 2008-10-26
  78. Heard, W. (2008), Coast (PDF), University of South Florida, ISBN 978-1-59874-147-6, archived from the original (PDF) on 2017-02-19, retrieved 2008-08-25
  79. Ray, N. (2002), Lonely Planet Cambodia, Lonely Planet Publications, p. 308, ISBN 978-1-74059-111-9
  80. Weil, C. (2006), Fierce Food, Plume, ISBN 978-0-452-28700-6, archived from the original on 2011-05-11, retrieved 2008-10-03
  81. Spider Venom Could Yield Eco-Friendly Insecticides, National Science Foundation (USA), retrieved 2008-10-11
  82. Novak, K. (2001), "Spider venom helps hearts keep their rhythm", Nature Medicine, 7 (155): 155, doi:10.1038/84588, PMID 11175840, S2CID 12556102
  83. Lewis, R.J.; Garcia, M.L. (October 2003), "Therapeutic potential of venom peptides", Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 2 (10): 790–802, doi:10.1038/nrd1197, PMID 14526382, S2CID 1348177
  84. Bogin, O. (Spring 2005), "Venom Peptides and their Mimetics as Potential Drugs" (PDF), Modulator (19), archived from the original (PDF) on 2008-12-09, retrieved 2008-10-11
  85. Andrade, E.; Villanova, F.; Borra, P.; et al. (June 2008), "Penile erection induced in vivo by a purified toxin from the Brazilian spider Phoneutria nigriventer", British Journal of Urology International, 102 (7): 835–837, doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.07762.x, PMID 18537953, S2CID 24771127
  86. Robitzski, Dan (2019-04-02). "Scientists gene-hacked bacteria to make bullet-proof spider silk". Retrieved 2019-06-08.
  87. Hinman, M.B., Jones J.A., and Lewis, R.W. (September 2000), "Synthetic spider silk: a modular fiber" (PDF), Trends in Biotechnology, 18 (9): 374–379, CiteSeerX, doi:10.1016/S0167-7799(00)01481-5, PMID 10942961, archived from the original (PDF) on 2008-12-16, retrieved 2008-10-19{{citation}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  88. Menassa, R.; Zhu, H.; Karatzas, C.N.; Lazaris, A.; Richman, A. & Brandle, J. (June 2004), "Spider dragline silk proteins in transgenic tobacco leaves: accumulation and field production", Plant Biotechnology Journal, 2 (5): 431–438, doi:10.1111/j.1467-7652.2004.00087.x, PMID 17168889
  89. Kojima, Katsura; Tamada, Yasushi; Nakajima, Ken-ichi; Sezutsu, Hideki; Kuwana, Yoshihiko (2014-08-27). "High-Toughness Silk Produced by a Transgenic Silkworm Expressing Spider (Araneus ventricosus) Dragline Silk Protein". PLOS ONE. 9 (8): e105325. Bibcode:2014PLoSO...9j5325K. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0105325. ISSN 1932-6203. PMC 4146547. PMID 25162624.
  90. Yirka, Bob (2018-08-07). "Gene editing technique allows silkworms to produce spider silk". Retrieved 2019-06-08.
  91. "Spider Silk | Kraig Biocraft Laboratories". Kraig Biocraft Laboratories. 13 October 2014. Retrieved 2019-06-08.
  92. Jefferson, Brandie (2018-08-21). "Engineering scientists use bacteria to create biosynthetic silk threads stronger and more tensile than before". Retrieved 2019-06-08.
  93. Rehm, Jeremy (2019-05-01). "Bacteria can be coaxed into making the toughest kind of spider silk". Science News. Retrieved 2019-06-08.
  94. Diaz, J.H. (August 1, 2004), "The Global Epidemiology, Syndromic Classification, Management, and Prevention of Spider Bites", American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 71 (2): 239–250, doi:10.4269/ajtmh.2004.71.2.0700239, PMID 15306718, retrieved 2008-10-11
  95. Williamson, J.A.; Fenner, P.J.; Burnett, J.W. & Rifkin, J. (1996), Venomous and Poisonous Marine Animals: A Medical and Biological Handbook, UNSW Press, pp. 65–68, ISBN 978-0-86840-279-6, retrieved 2008-10-03
  96. Cheng, D.; Dattaro, J.A. & Yakobi, R., Scorpion Sting, WebMD, retrieved 2008-10-25
  97. "'Scorpion venom' attacks tumours", BBC News, 2006-07-30, retrieved 2008-10-25
  98. Scorpion venom blocks bone loss, Harvard University, retrieved 2008-10-25
  99. Goodman, Jesse L.; Dennis, David Tappen; Sonenshine, Daniel E. (2005), Tick-borne diseases of humans, ASM Press, p. 114, ISBN 978-1-55581-238-6, retrieved 29 March 2010
  100. Potter, M.F., Parasitic Mites of Humans, University of Kentucky College of Agriculture, retrieved 2008-10-25
  101. Jong, D.D.; Morse, R.A. & Eickwort, G.C. (January 1982), "Mite Pests of Honey Bees", Annual Review of Entomology, 27: 229–252, doi:10.1146/annurev.en.27.010182.001305
  102. Klenerman, Paul; Lipworth, Brian; authors, House dust mite allergy, NetDoctor, retrieved 2008-02-20
  103. Osakabe, M. (2002), "Which predatory mite can control both a dominant mite pest, Tetranychus urticae, and a latent mite pest, Eotetranychus asiaticus, on strawberry?", Experimental & Applied Acarology, 26 (3–4): 219–230, doi:10.1023/A:1021116121604, PMID 12542009, S2CID 10823576


This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.