Possible Duplicate:
How come 32.5 = 31.5?

1fairly sure there was a duplicate of this question... – InterestedGuest Mar 02 '11 at 00:18

There might be. That's what I thought and tried to find it (put very little effort) but couldn't. – 0x0 Mar 02 '11 at 00:20

@InterestedQuest, @Sunil This was the dupe: http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/287/howcome325315 – Uticensis Mar 07 '11 at 11:24
4 Answers
If you count carefully, you'll see that the base is meant to be $13$ units long, while the height is $5$ units long. That means that the triangle on the top on the top figure, which has a height of $2$, should have a base of length $b$, where $$\frac{b}{2} = \frac{13}{5}$$ or $b = \frac{26}{5}$, longer than the $5$ units depicted.
Likewise, the bottom red triangle, with a base of size $8$ should have a height of length $h$, with $$\frac{h}{8} = \frac{5}{13}$$ or $h = \frac{40}{13}$, which is a little longer than the $3$ depicted.
So in fact, the "missing square" comes from misdrawing the pictures (or from having the individual figures drawn correctly, but the composed figures not being real triangles; the two inner triangles are not similar, though they "should" be).
 362,355
 27
 241
 432
 356,881
 50
 750
 1,081
Eye trick! Look at the angles formed where the red and green triangle meet.
 3,929
 2
 28
 37

1Looking at angles may not be enough given the thick lines. But the slope of the hypotenuse of the red triangle is $3/8 = 0.375$ while the slope for the green triangle is $2/5 = 0.4$. If the whole thing was a triangle (which it is not) then the slope would be $5/13 =0.3846\ldots$ – Henry Mar 01 '11 at 23:41

Indeed the thick lines are what make the "angles different"  and which is what makes it sloppy. – milcak Mar 01 '11 at 23:47
Take your credit card, driver's license, or some other readily available straightedge and put it against the hypotenuse. You'll find the composite shape is not a triangle, but a cleverly disguised irregular quadrilateral. The better, more mathy answers made sense once I got my brain away from the idea that there were triangles involved.
Nothing but a cheap trick designed to confound.
 191
 1
 6